Feed status · checked 2026-07-23
瑞浪市コミュニティバス
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Bus
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Gifu, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
202 of 202 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
33 of 33 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 251 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 7 kinds of issue across 1123 instances (0 error, 1120 warning, 3 informational).
Service data covers the next 251 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
1 accessibility depth signal
1 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (瑞浪市コミュニティバス 日吉線).
Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.
Skip to route and stop dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 瑞浪市コミュニティバス 瑞浪中央線 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| 瑞浪市コミュニティバス 山田線 | Bus | gray (no shape in feed) |
| 瑞浪市コミュニティバス 学校線 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| 瑞浪市コミュニティバス 土岐線 | Bus | yellow (no shape in feed) |
| 瑞浪市コミュニティバス 土岐線 | Bus | yellow (no shape in feed) |
| 瑞浪市コミュニティバス 萩原線 | Bus | gray (no shape in feed) |
| 瑞浪市コミュニティバス 釜戸=平山線 | Bus | gray (no shape in feed) |
| 瑞浪市コミュニティバス 釜戸=大湫線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 瑞浪市コミュニティバス 日吉線 | Bus | red (no shape in feed) |
This feed has 202 stops.
List every stop
- 滝上
- 滝下
- 苅上
- 神徳
- 石拾
- 神徳口
- 釜戸郵便局前
- 仲ヶ平
- 萩原大草
- 大牧
- 十六銀行北
- 十六銀行北
- 麗澤瑞浪高校前
- 大牧口
- 萩原上平
- 公会堂前
- 学園口
- 河原
- 水洗口
- 小井戸
- 小井戸坂
- 稲津コミュニティセンター
- 竹尾
- 竹尾
- 神戸
- 釜糠
- 羽広
- 学園台
- 台
- 台
- ピアゴ瑞浪店前
- ピアゴ瑞浪店前
- 半原野菜売場前
- 高屋
- 小旗
- 薬師町三丁目
- 薬師町三丁目
- 半原
- 新田口
- 郷倉
- 宿洞
- 社別当口
- 宿
- 宿口
- 南垣外
- 日吉コミュニティセンター
- 常柄
- 薬師町五丁目
- 日吉口
- 日吉口
- 本郷口
- 本郷
- 大山
- 白倉口
- 日吉小学校前
- 日吉小学校前
- 瑞浪衛生センター
- 深沢
- 深沢口
- 細久手
- 和合公園
- 和合公園
- 広見口
- 仲町
- 細久手口
- 平岩辻
- 白倉
- 羽根口
- 月吉
- 旧白寿荘
- 旧明世観月荘前
- 山野内
- 山野内
- 中央公園
- 中央公園
- 明白寺前
- 明白寺前
- 戸狩
- 薬師前
- 瑞浪郵便局前
- 弁天
- 北野神社前
- 北野中町
- 北野
- 三和の郷
- 鳥屋洞
- 高松公園
- 高松公園
- 田高戸口
- 西大久手
- 三本松
- 箕打
- 箕打口
- 田高戸
- 高松
- 開元院前
- 平岩公民館
- 市民公園
- 紺屋原
- 紺屋原
- 瑞浪駅前
- 瑞浪インター口
- 野外学習地
- 松ヶ瀬町
- 大西(釜戸町)
- 長場
- 飯塚橋
- 飯塚橋
- 大法原団地
- 大法原団地
- バロー瑞浪店前
- 五色
- 五色
- ちゃわん屋みずなみ前
- 樽上町
- 益見バロー前
- 益見バロー前
- 市役所北
- 東濃信用金庫瑞浪支店西
- 東濃信用金庫瑞浪支店西
- 龍門橋西
- 龍門橋西
- メイト前
- メイト前
- 元町
- 一色
- 小田北
- 小田北
- 中原東
- 中原東
- 下山田公民館
- 竹ノ下
- 明賀台口
- 明賀台わらべ公園
- 明賀台ふれあい公園
- 下山田団地
- JA瑞浪支店前
- JA瑞浪支店前
- 下山田地区集会所
- クリエイションパーク口
- 瑞浪クリエイションパーク
- 入ヶ洞
- 常盤
- 中京高校前
- 松坂町
- 一日市場
- 大西(土岐町)
- 豆沢
- 診療所バスターミナル
- 木の暮
- 鶴城
- みずなみ陶生苑前
- 白狐温泉前
- 名滝橋
- 下沢公民館
- 桜寿荘
- 根竹
- 桜堂
- 大通
- 市役所
- 日焼田橋南
- 市原
- 市原
- 瑞浪高校前
- 下沢
- 公文垣内
- 釜戸中切
- 町屋
- JA釜戸支店前
- ハートピア南
- 釜戸温泉前
- 釜戸駅前
- 八瀬沢
- 足又公民館
- 足又
- 神田
- 神田公民館
- 神田公民館南
- 大湫コミュニティセンター
- 大湫
- 旧JA上野町支店前
- 記念碑前
- 竜吟湖口
- 竜吟団地前
- 釜戸小学校前
- エスポラン
- 上荻之島公民館
- 笠ヶ平
- 下荻之島公民館
- 荻之島口
- 東区集会所
- 上野町
- 釜戸コミュニティセンター
- 平山口
- ゴルフ場口
- 平山
- 上論栃
- 下論栃
- 上川戸
- 川戸
- 下川戸
- 高月町
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
10 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning1103 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning202 instances
202 of 202 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning33 instances
33 of 33 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning11 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning4 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Two or more routes share the same name.
Riders can't tell the routes apart in apps.
Fix: Give each route a distinct short or long name. (One field per route.)
Validator rule: duplicate_route_name · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 251 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 251 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 73 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/mizunamicity-communitybus/2026-07-23.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-23. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.