Feed status · checked 2026-07-19
Gujo City Bus (郡上市自主運行バス)
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Bus
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Gifu, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 64 minutes ago; last changed 64 minutes ago.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
500 of 500 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
115 of 115 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 255 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 7 kinds of issue across 4977 instances (0 error, 4954 warning, 23 informational).
Service data covers the next 255 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
1 accessibility depth signal
2 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (郡上八幡コミュニティバス(まめバス赤ルート), やまとふれあいバス栗巣・古道線).
Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.
Skip to route and stop dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 郡上八幡コミュニティバス(まめバス青ルート) | Bus | blue (no shape in feed) |
| 郡上八幡コミュニティバス(まめバス赤ルート) | Bus | red (no shape in feed) |
| 相生線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 小駄良線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| やまとふれあいバス栗巣・古道線 | Bus | gray (no shape in feed) |
| やまとふれあいバス落部・場皿線 | Bus | yellow (no shape in feed) |
| やまとふれあいバス神路線 | Bus | yellow (no shape in feed) |
| やまとふれあいバス大間見・小間見線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 美並巡回バス 北ルート | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 美並巡回バス 南ルート | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 美並美濃線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 気良線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 寒水線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 小川線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 奥住線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 和良巡回バス 鹿倉線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 和良巡回バス 土京線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 和良巡回バス 田平・美山線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
This feed has 500 stops.
List every stop
- 日吉駐車場前
- 日吉駐車場前
- 住吉町
- 住吉町
- 腰細
- 腰細
- 天満神社前
- 天満神社前
- 中山城跡下
- 中山城跡下
- 中山
- 中山
- 八幡西中前
- 蓮心寺前
- 寺本
- 寺本
- 城南交差点
- 亀尾島口
- 亀尾島口
- 久造
- 久造
- 大洞
- 大洞
- 下森
- 下森
- 上森
- 上森
- 大平
- 大平
- 二間手
- 二間手
- 旧相生第二小
- 旧相生第二小
- 阿瀬尾
- 阿瀬尾
- 小谷通
- 小谷通
- 郡上八幡駅
- 高畑
- 高畑
- 宇留良
- ラドンセンター前
- ラドンセンター前
- 相生農協前
- 相生農協前
- 郡上高校前
- 郡上高校前
- 中坪住宅前
- 中坪住宅前
- 初音住宅前
- 初音住宅前
- 川合小学校前
- 川合小学校前
- 中桐
- 中桐
- 南宮神社前
- 南宮神社前
- 城南町一丁目
- 印雀
- 印雀
- 下原橋
- 下原橋
- 原
- 原
- 上原
- 上原
- 焼山
- 焼山
- 深皿
- 深皿
- 集落センター前
- 集落センター前
- 為安
- 為安
- 河鹿神社前
- 河鹿神社前
- 坪谷
- 坪谷
- 城南町二丁目
- 戒仏口
- 戒仏口
- 戒仏
- 戒仏
- 郡上市民病院
- 新栄町
- 新栄町
- 栄町
- 栄町
- 今町
- 今町
- 新町
- 新町
- 楽藝館前
- 楽藝館前
- 城下町プラザ
- 城下町プラザ
- 大和生涯学習センター
- 大和庁舎前
- Pio(ピオ)前
- JA大和支店前
- JA大和支店前
- やまと温泉
- JA大和南支店前
- JA大和南支店前
- 徳永辻
- 徳永辻
- 元兼橋
- 元兼橋
- フィールドミュージアム
- 旧庁舎記念館前
- 旧庁舎記念館前
- 三田
- 三田
- ぎんじ前
- ぎんじ前
- 兼頼橋
- 兼頼橋
- 下古道集会所
- 下古道集会所
- 熊谷坂
- 熊谷坂
- 古道宮前
- 落添
- 落添
- 下栗巣集会所
- 下栗巣集会所
- 寄定
- 寄定
- 薬師堂
- 薬師堂
- 新橋
- 新橋
- 上栗巣体育館
- 上栗巣体育館
- 北切
- 北切
- 野口公民館
- 野口公民館
- 旧大和西小学校前
- 旧大和西小学校前
- 福田シタ田
- 福田シタ田
- 福田周戸
- 福田周戸
- 大和工業団地前
- 大和工業団地前
- 場皿公民館
- 福田ポンプ倉庫前
- 福田ポンプ倉庫前
- 洞口公民館
- 洞口公民館
- 本町
- 本町
- 下島橋
- 下島橋
- 新向橋
- 新向橋
- 落部公民館
- 落部公民館
- 中坪
- 中坪
- 空切
- 空切
- 野座口
- 野座口
- 野座
- 白山神社
- 白山神社
- 法円寺
- 法円寺
- 田ノ畑
- 田ノ畑
- 橋本町
- 橋本町
- 上神路
- 青木商店前
- 青木商店前
- 心宗寺
- 心宗寺
- 小間見集会所
- 小間見集会所
- 西洞林道口
- 西洞林道口
- 道谷口
- 区民センター
- 区民センター
- 為氏
- 為氏
- 周戸口
- 周戸口
- 大間見詰所前
- 大間見詰所前
- 立町
- 立町
- 雑座
- 雑座
- 清浄寺
- 清浄寺
- 川原町
- 川原町
- 下愛宕町
- 下愛宕町
- 郡上市役所
- 愛宕公園前
- 愛宕公園前
- 総合スポーツセンター
- 博覧館前
- 博覧館前
- 郡上高校前上
- 小野二丁目
- 小野二丁目
- 小野六丁目
- 小野六丁目
- 青少年センター前
- 青少年センター前
- はちまん児童館前
- はちまん児童館前
- 上小野バス停
- 上小野バス停
- 八幡中学校前バス停
- 八幡中学校前バス停
- 中小野バス停
- 中小野バス停
- 郡上高校前下
- 小野八幡神社前
- 小野八幡神社前
- 中坪四区
- 中坪四区
- 下桜町
- 下桜町
- 新中坪住宅前
- 新中坪住宅前
- 新中坪住宅前
- 新中坪住宅前
- 美並庁舎
- 美並総合案内所
- 美並総合案内所
- 相戸公民館
- 相戸公民館
- 梅原
- 深戸公民館
- 深戸公民館
- 深戸駅
- 門福手
- 門福手
- くじ本公民館
- 三日市
- 三日市
- 赤池公民館
- 赤池公民館
- and 250 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
10 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning4938 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning500 instances
500 of 500 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning115 instances
115 of 115 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning10 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning5 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info20 instances
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 255 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 255 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 76 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/gujo-city-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.