← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-19

Gero City Gero Bus (下呂市げろバス)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

73.8 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Catalogued in Gifu, Japan.

Covers 255 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Gero City's Gero Bus community network.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

188 of 188 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

70 of 70 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 255 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness74.2 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 7 kinds of issue across 2955 instances (0 error, 2939 warning, 16 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 255 days.

Rider experience52.3 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • げろバス 上原線 (green)
  • げろバス 中原線 (green)
  • げろバス 循環線 (green)
  • げろバス 川西北線 (green)
  • げろバス 川西南線 (green)
  • げろバス 川西北・川西南線 (green)
  • げろバス 川西南・川西北線 (green)
Routes in Gero City Gero Bus (下呂市げろバス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
げろバス 上原線Busgreen
げろバス 中原線Busgreen
げろバス 循環線Busgreen
げろバス 川西北線Busgreen
げろバス 川西南線Busgreen
げろバス 川西北・川西南線Busgreen
げろバス 川西南・川西北線Busgreen

This feed has 188 stops.

List every stop
  • 少ヶ野
  • 少ヶ野
  • 住吉
  • 住吉
  • 船渡
  • 船渡
  • 下呂駅前
  • 下呂駅前
  • 旧下呂温泉病院口
  • 白鷺橋
  • 白鷺橋
  • 松原通り
  • 松原通り
  • 桜通り
  • 桜通り
  • 下桜通り
  • 下呂小学校前
  • 下呂小学校前
  • 下呂中学校前
  • 下呂中学校前
  • 小川橋
  • 小川橋
  • 河鹿橋
  • 河鹿橋
  • 帯雲橋
  • 帯雲橋
  • 上原口
  • 上原口
  • 夏焼
  • 夏焼
  • 鳥屋ヶ野口
  • 鳥屋ヶ野口
  • 西洞口
  • 西洞口
  • 中切(夏焼)
  • 中切(夏焼)
  • JP上原局前
  • JP上原局前
  • 上原会館前
  • 上原会館前
  • 田口
  • 田口
  • 門和佐
  • 門和佐
  • 中村(門和佐)
  • 中村(門和佐)
  • 芋沢上上
  • 芋沢上上
  • 芋沢上
  • 芋沢上
  • 新田
  • 新田
  • 川渡
  • 川渡
  • 二の樽
  • 二の樽
  • 井之口
  • 井之口
  • 火打
  • 火打
  • 一ノ瀬
  • 一ノ瀬
  • 大和橋
  • 大和橋
  • 和佐公民館前
  • 和佐公民館前
  • 和佐グランド前
  • 和佐グランド前
  • 焼石駅前
  • 焼石駅前
  • 中原会館前
  • 中原会館前
  • 旧中原小学校前
  • 旧中原小学校前
  • 瀬戸
  • 瀬戸
  • 久野川口
  • 久野川口
  • 保井戸
  • 保井戸
  • 西ヶ洞口
  • 西ヶ洞口
  • 坂下口
  • 坂下口
  • 門原
  • 門原
  • 深谷
  • 深谷
  • 釣鐘
  • 釣鐘
  • 茂谷
  • 茂谷
  • 帯雲橋(三原)
  • 帯雲橋(三原)
  • いで湯朝市
  • いで湯朝市
  • 合掌村
  • 合掌村
  • 下呂温泉病院
  • 下呂交流会館
  • 旧下呂温泉病院前
  • 旧下呂温泉病院前
  • 南ひだせせらぎ病院前
  • 南ひだせせらぎ病院前
  • 釜ヶ野下
  • 釜ヶ野下
  • 釜ヶ野
  • 釜ヶ野
  • 定清
  • 定清
  • 南部体育館前
  • 南部体育館前
  • 石浦
  • 石浦
  • 円通橋
  • 円通橋
  • 下跡津
  • 下跡津
  • 跡津公民館下
  • 跡津公民館下
  • 上跡津
  • 上跡津
  • 古関
  • 古関
  • 古関
  • 飛騨萩原駅下
  • 飛騨萩原駅下
  • 旧萩原庁舎前
  • 萩原駅前
  • 星雲会館前
  • 星雲会館前
  • あさぎりサニーランド前
  • あさぎりサニーランド前
  • 下羽根
  • 下羽根
  • 神通堂前
  • 神通堂前
  • 牧家前
  • 牧家前
  • 中羽根
  • 中羽根
  • 白山
  • 白山
  • 萩原北醫院前
  • 萩原北醫院前
  • 下野上
  • 下野上
  • 北中前
  • 北中前
  • 橋場
  • 橋場
  • 四美辻
  • 四美辻
  • 尾崎小前
  • 尾崎小前
  • 宮下
  • 宮下
  • 中村(萩原)
  • 中村(萩原)
  • 曲坂
  • 曲坂
  • 黍生
  • 黍生
  • 和田
  • 和田
  • 平沢
  • 平沢
  • 大向
  • 大向
  • 森下口
  • 森下口
  • 中切(萩原)
  • 中切(萩原)
  • 山之口公民館前
  • 山之口公民館前
  • 旧青木屋前
  • 旧青木屋前
  • 上之田
  • 上之田
  • 下四美
  • しみずの湯
  • 南飛騨健康増進センター
  • 中四美
  • 上四美
  • 嫁谷橋
  • ジークフリーダ前
  • ジークフリーダ前
  • 上古関

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

10 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning2915 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning188 instances

    188 of 188 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning70 instances

    70 of 70 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning17 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning6 instances

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info11 instances

    Some trip headsigns name a stop along the way, not the final destination.

    The sign should tell riders where the bus ends up, so a midpoint name can send them the wrong way.

    Fix: Set trip_headsign to the trip's last stop or its overall destination. (Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: trip_headsign_matches_intermediate_stop · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info3 instances

    The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.

    A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.

    Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)

    Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 255 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 255 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 74 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Gero City Gero Bus (下呂市げろバス) GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/gero-city-gero-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.