← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-19

Nakatsugawa City Community Bus (中津川市コミュニティバス)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

75.2 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Catalogued in Gifu, Japan.

Covers 438 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Nakatsugawa City's community bus.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 5 hours ago; last changed 11 hours ago.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

193 of 193 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

27 of 27 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 438 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness77.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 977 instances (0 error, 975 warning, 2 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 438 days.

Rider experience52.2 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

Routes in Nakatsugawa City Community Bus (中津川市コミュニティバス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
落合巡回線Busgray (no shape in feed)
山の田・三五沢線Busgray (no shape in feed)
阿木巡回線Busgray (no shape in feed)
上野線(きりら坂下経由)Busgray (no shape in feed)
上野線Busgray (no shape in feed)
外洞線(きりら坂下経由)Busgray (no shape in feed)
外洞線Busgray (no shape in feed)
合郷線Busgray (no shape in feed)
西方寺・握・高部線Busgray (no shape in feed)
上鐘・松源地線Busgray (no shape in feed)
上野・合郷線Busgray (no shape in feed)
上野・外洞線Busgray (no shape in feed)
加子母巡回線Busgray (no shape in feed)

This feed has 193 stops.

List every stop
  • 落合事務所
  • JA落合支店
  • 落合診療所
  • 中川医院
  • 木曽路口バス停
  • 向山(落合)
  • 石畳入口
  • 石畳下
  • 用水改修記念碑
  • 弘法様
  • ひょうたん山前
  • 農園前
  • 清水平上
  • 民宿下
  • 落合川駅上
  • 落合川駅
  • 恵乃裾橋
  • 5号区クラブ
  • 下落合
  • JR陸橋南
  • 6号区公会堂
  • 落合小学校
  • 落合小上
  • 中央道ガード下
  • 御殿山
  • 山の田大橋
  • 上ノ山浄水場下
  • 銭亀倶楽部
  • 銭亀
  • 三五沢上
  • ふれあい広場
  • 丸山バス停
  • 三五沢下
  • 上与坂大橋
  • 上与坂
  • 与坂バス停
  • 与坂交差点南
  • 沖田交差点北
  • 落合下町
  • ふれあい広場中
  • 阿木駅
  • JA阿木支店
  • 阿木郵便局
  • 阿木交流センター
  • ライスセンター
  • 藤上組集会所
  • 広岡公民館
  • 牧野クラブ
  • 中組
  • 清水クラブ
  • 六地蔵
  • 下広岡燈籠場
  • 大根木
  • 長楽寺
  • 真原燈籠場
  • 真原クラブ
  • 下山野田
  • 山野田クラブ
  • 宮田整田碑
  • 野内クラブ
  • 藪下
  • 梨坪
  • 方外戸
  • 大野ゴウロ
  • 大野八幡神社
  • 新田クラブ
  • 山ノ田
  • 矢筈
  • 外戸尻
  • 飯沼駅
  • 山の神
  • 野田クラブ
  • 野田口
  • 上真原
  • 阿佐木前
  • 下野口
  • 下小野沢
  • 熊野口
  • 洞口
  • 宮の洞
  • 中尾
  • 辻屋口
  • 寺尾洞
  • 本郷(坂下)
  • 本郷(坂下)
  • 薬師口
  • 薬師口
  • 椛の湖
  • 樺の木
  • 熊久保
  • 赤田
  • 矢渕
  • 島平西
  • 島平東
  • 島平東
  • 坂下診療所
  • 坂下駅前
  • 中原
  • 黒沢
  • 上外
  • 外洞
  • 二股
  • 中島
  • 井汲
  • 八幡神社
  • 成栗
  • 中外公会堂
  • 堀懸橋
  • 下外公会堂
  • 向山橋
  • 横吹
  • 下握
  • 上握
  • 握坂
  • 小田垣外
  • 上砂護地谷
  • 高部公会堂
  • 高部
  • 坂下新橋
  • 坂下総合体育館前
  • 大岩
  • 坂下小学校横
  • 4-1詰所
  • 小田
  • 徳野
  • 赤田公会堂
  • 坂下橋
  • 阿弥陀様前
  • 西方寺公会堂
  • 坂下処理場前
  • 握公会堂下
  • 下島(坂下)
  • 元庄屋前
  • 中之垣外
  • 東町
  • 東町住宅
  • 上鐘入口
  • 上鐘出口
  • 坂下浄水場前
  • 松源地
  • 樋ヶ沢住宅
  • 時鐘公会堂上
  • 坂下中学校横
  • 時鐘南
  • やさかこども園前
  • 坂下公民館
  • 坂下郵便局前
  • 門田橋
  • 時鐘北
  • 小野沢
  • 上野口
  • 弥栄橋
  • きりら坂下
  • 加子母総合事務所
  • 加子母歯科診療所
  • 向畑住宅
  • 二渡橋西
  • 鎌井野
  • 三屋前
  • 濃飛小和知バス停
  • 濃飛小和知バス停
  • 河村分院
  • 小郷農道記念碑
  • 日枯谷
  • 大杉スクールバス停
  • 小郷西スクールバス停
  • 高屋
  • 炭焼渡
  • 番田消防詰所
  • 番田
  • 学園前
  • JA加子母支店
  • 田口屋前
  • 道の駅加子母
  • 加子母郵便局
  • 旧加子母郵便局前
  • 栄屋
  • 十一屋
  • 明治座前
  • 河村医院
  • 旧アトラ
  • 万賀の辻
  • 寺地前
  • 角領公民館
  • 旧消防詰所
  • 下島(加子母)
  • 吉金橋
  • ます池
  • かねいま
  • ゲンキー
  • ファミリーマート横
  • ますだ農園下

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

8 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning958 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning193 instances

    193 of 193 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning27 instances

    27 of 27 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning15 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 438 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 438 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 78 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Nakatsugawa City Community Bus (中津川市コミュニティバス) GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/nakatsugawa-city-community-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.