Across 1577 feeds, 16.8% publish flexible (demand-responsive) service, 48.8% publish fare data (1.9% using the newer Fares v2), and 0.4% model stations with accessible paths. These are optional parts of GTFS; adoption shows where the spec is spreading. Among 1577 feeds measured for translations, 24.3% publish rider-facing translations.
What this measures: adoption of optional
parts of the spec, never quality. None of these counts changes a grade, and a
feed without them is early, not failing.
↳ Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole, United Kingdom
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
↳ Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Brighton and Hove, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Blackpool, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Cornwall, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Cardiff [Caerdydd GB-CRD], United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Dundee City, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ East Riding of Yorkshire, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Essex, United Kingdom
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
↳ Falkirk, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Gateshead, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Hampshire, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Isle of Wight, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Inverclyde, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Norfolk, United Kingdom
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
↳ Nottingham, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Newport [Casnewydd GB-CNW], United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Plymouth, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Reading, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Scottish Borders, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Southampton, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Swindon, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ West Berkshire, United Kingdom
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
↳ Wiltshire, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Windsor and Maidenhead, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Warrington, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ West Sussex, United Kingdom
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Greece
Covered subdivisions in Greece
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Attikí, Greece
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
Show 1 covered subdivision in Hong Kong SAR China
Covered subdivisions in Hong Kong SAR China
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Unlocated, Hong Kong SAR China
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Croatia
Covered subdivisions in Croatia
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Grad Zagreb, Croatia
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 3 covered subdivisions in Hungary
Covered subdivisions in Hungary
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Pécs, Hungary
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Szombathely, Hungary
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Unlocated, Hungary
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 2 covered subdivisions in Ireland
Covered subdivisions in Ireland
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Dublin, Ireland
6
0
0
0
0
6
6
↳ Unlocated, Ireland
14
0
0
0
0
13
14
Show 1 covered subdivision in Israel
Covered subdivisions in Israel
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Unlocated, Israel
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in India
Covered subdivisions in India
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Telangāna, India
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 12 covered subdivisions in Italy
Covered subdivisions in Italy
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Lombardia, Italy
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
↳ Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Veneto, Italy
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
↳ Liguria, Italy
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Emilia-Romagna, Italy
3
0
1
1
0
0
3
↳ Toscana, Italy
5
0
0
0
0
0
5
↳ Lazio, Italy
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Campania, Italy
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Puglia, Italy
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Calabria, Italy
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Sicilia, Italy
2
0
1
0
0
0
2
↳ Sardegna, Italy
7
0
0
0
0
0
7
Show 40 covered subdivisions in Japan
Covered subdivisions in Japan
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Hokkaido, Japan
5
0
5
0
0
5
5
↳ Aomori, Japan
23
0
22
0
0
23
23
↳ Iwate, Japan
3
0
3
0
0
3
3
↳ Miyagi, Japan
2
0
2
0
0
2
2
↳ Akita, Japan
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
↳ Yamagata, Japan
31
0
31
0
0
30
31
↳ Fukushima, Japan
4
0
4
0
0
4
4
↳ Ibaraki, Japan
6
0
6
0
0
5
6
↳ Tochigi, Japan
7
0
7
0
0
7
7
↳ Gunma, Japan
4
0
4
0
0
4
4
↳ Saitama, Japan
2
0
2
0
0
1
2
↳ Chiba, Japan
7
0
7
0
0
7
7
↳ Tokyo, Japan
8
1
7
0
0
8
8
↳ Kanagawa, Japan
3
0
3
0
0
3
3
↳ Niigata, Japan
4
0
4
0
0
4
4
↳ Toyama, Japan
10
0
9
0
0
9
10
↳ Ishikawa, Japan
3
0
3
0
0
3
3
↳ Yamanashi, Japan
4
0
4
0
0
4
4
↳ Nagano, Japan
22
0
21
0
0
22
22
↳ Gifu, Japan
26
0
26
0
0
26
26
↳ Shizuoka, Japan
3
0
3
0
0
3
3
↳ Aichi, Japan
23
0
23
0
0
21
23
↳ Mie, Japan
23
0
23
0
0
21
23
↳ Shiga, Japan
10
0
10
0
0
10
10
↳ Osaka, Japan
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
↳ Hyogo, Japan
17
0
15
0
0
17
17
↳ Nara, Japan
2
0
2
0
0
2
2
↳ Wakayama, Japan
9
0
9
0
0
8
9
↳ Shimane, Japan
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
↳ Okayama, Japan
7
0
7
0
0
7
7
↳ Tokushima, Japan
13
0
13
0
0
13
13
↳ Kagawa, Japan
4
0
4
0
0
4
4
↳ Kochi, Japan
29
4
29
0
0
29
29
↳ Fukuoka, Japan
25
0
25
0
0
25
25
↳ Saga, Japan
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
↳ Nagasaki, Japan
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
↳ Kumamoto, Japan
5
0
5
0
0
2
5
↳ Oita, Japan
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
↳ Kagoshima, Japan
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
↳ Okinawa, Japan
2
0
1
0
0
2
2
Show 51 covered subdivisions in Lithuania
Covered subdivisions in Lithuania
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Akmenė, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Alytaus miestas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Alytus, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Anykščiai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Birštonas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Biržai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Druskininkai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Elektrėnai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Jonava, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Joniškis, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Jurbarkas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Kalvarija, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Kauno miestas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Kaunas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Kėdainiai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Kelmė, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Klaipėdos miestas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Kretinga, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Kupiškis, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Lazdijai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Marijampolė, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Mažeikiai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Molėtai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Neringa, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Pakruojis, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Palangos miestas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Panevėžio miestas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Panevėžys, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Plungė, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Prienai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Radviliškis, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Raseiniai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Rietavas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Rokiškis, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Šalčininkai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Šiaulių miestas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Šiauliai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Šilutė, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Širvintos, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Skuodas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Švenčionys, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Tauragė, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Telšiai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Trakai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Ukmergė, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Utena, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Varėna, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Vilniaus miestas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Vilnius, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Visaginas, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Zarasai, Lithuania
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 2 covered subdivisions in Latvia
Covered subdivisions in Latvia
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Rīga, Latvia
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Unlocated, Latvia
2
0
2
0
0
0
2
Show 1 covered subdivision in Moldova
Covered subdivisions in Moldova
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Ungheni, Moldova
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
Show 9 covered subdivisions in Malaysia
Covered subdivisions in Malaysia
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Johor, Malaysia
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
↳ Kedah, Malaysia
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Kelantan, Malaysia
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Melaka, Malaysia
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
↳ Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Terengganu, Malaysia
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Sarawak, Malaysia
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
↳ Unlocated, Malaysia
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in New Caledonia
Covered subdivisions in New Caledonia
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Unlocated, New Caledonia
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Netherlands
Covered subdivisions in Netherlands
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Unlocated, Netherlands
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 12 covered subdivisions in Norway
Covered subdivisions in Norway
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Oslo, Norway
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Rogaland, Norway
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Møre og Romsdal, Norway
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Nordland, Norway
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Viken, Norway
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
↳ Innlandet, Norway
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Vestfold og Telemark, Norway
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
↳ Agder, Norway
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Vestland, Norway
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Trøndelag, Norway
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Troms og Finnmark, Norway
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
↳ Unlocated, Norway
6
0
0
0
0
0
6
Show 3 covered subdivisions in New Zealand
Covered subdivisions in New Zealand
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Auckland, New Zealand
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Otago, New Zealand
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Oman
Covered subdivisions in Oman
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Unlocated, Oman
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
Show 3 covered subdivisions in Poland
Covered subdivisions in Poland
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Dolnośląskie, Poland
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Pomorskie, Poland
3
0
0
0
0
0
3
↳ Wielkopolskie, Poland
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Puerto Rico
Covered subdivisions in Puerto Rico
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Unlocated, Puerto Rico
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
Show 4 covered subdivisions in Portugal
Covered subdivisions in Portugal
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Braga, Portugal
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
↳ Lisboa, Portugal
4
0
3
0
0
0
4
↳ Porto, Portugal
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Setúbal, Portugal
2
0
1
0
0
0
2
Show 1 covered subdivision in Serbia
Covered subdivisions in Serbia
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Beograd, Serbia
2
0
1
0
0
0
2
Show 1 covered subdivision in Slovenia
Covered subdivisions in Slovenia
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Ljubljana, Slovenia
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Slovakia
Covered subdivisions in Slovakia
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Bratislavský kraj, Slovakia
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Thailand
Covered subdivisions in Thailand
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Krung Thep Maha Nakhon, Thailand
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Türkiye
Covered subdivisions in Türkiye
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ İzmir, Türkiye
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
Show 1 covered subdivision in Ukraine
Covered subdivisions in Ukraine
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Kyiv, Ukraine
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Show 50 covered subdivisions in United States
Covered subdivisions in United States
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Alaska, United States
4
2
3
0
0
0
4
↳ Alabama, United States
4
1
2
0
0
0
4
↳ Arkansas, United States
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Arizona, United States
12
2
9
0
0
0
12
↳ California, United States
86
35
70
12
0
0
86
↳ Colorado, United States
71
59
42
2
0
0
71
↳ Connecticut, United States
5
2
3
0
0
0
5
↳ District of Columbia, United States
2
0
0
0
1
0
2
↳ Delaware, United States
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
↳ Florida, United States
21
3
9
0
0
0
21
↳ Georgia, United States
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Hawaii, United States
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Iowa, United States
17
2
8
0
0
0
17
↳ Idaho, United States
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
↳ Illinois, United States
11
2
4
1
0
0
11
↳ Indiana, United States
5
0
4
0
0
0
5
↳ Kansas, United States
2
1
0
0
0
0
2
↳ Kentucky, United States
3
0
3
0
0
0
3
↳ Louisiana, United States
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Massachusetts, United States
27
11
18
0
0
0
27
↳ Maryland, United States
13
2
6
3
1
0
13
↳ Maine, United States
3
0
1
0
0
0
3
↳ Michigan, United States
9
1
3
0
0
0
9
↳ Minnesota, United States
5
4
4
0
0
4
5
↳ Missouri, United States
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
↳ Mississippi, United States
2
0
1
0
0
0
2
↳ Montana, United States
4
1
2
0
0
0
4
↳ North Carolina, United States
11
2
4
0
0
0
11
↳ North Dakota, United States
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
↳ Nebraska, United States
3
1
1
0
0
0
3
↳ New Hampshire, United States
2
2
1
0
0
0
2
↳ New Jersey, United States
5
1
2
0
0
0
5
↳ New Mexico, United States
9
0
7
0
0
0
9
↳ Nevada, United States
4
1
2
0
0
0
4
↳ New York, United States
48
0
4
0
0
0
48
↳ Ohio, United States
8
0
5
0
0
0
8
↳ Oklahoma, United States
2
0
1
1
0
0
2
↳ Oregon, United States
46
20
29
1
0
0
46
↳ Pennsylvania, United States
4
0
1
0
0
0
4
↳ Rhode Island, United States
2
1
1
0
0
0
2
↳ South Carolina, United States
3
0
1
0
0
0
3
↳ Tennessee, United States
5
1
3
0
0
0
5
↳ Texas, United States
8
3
6
0
0
0
8
↳ Utah, United States
5
0
0
0
0
0
5
↳ Virginia, United States
43
31
34
0
0
0
43
↳ Vermont, United States
12
12
11
0
0
0
12
↳ Washington, United States
52
36
30
3
0
2
52
↳ Wisconsin, United States
8
4
5
0
0
0
8
↳ West Virginia, United States
2
0
2
0
0
0
2
↳ Unlocated, United States
14
5
5
0
0
0
14
Show 1 covered subdivision in Uruguay
Covered subdivisions in Uruguay
Subdivision
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations
Translation measured
↳ Montevideo, Uruguay
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
United States by state
State
Feed records
Flex
Fares
Fares v2
Pathways
Translations (of measured)
Colorado
72
60
43
2
0
0 of 72
California
62
32
50
7
0
0 of 62
Washington
52
36
30
3
0
2 of 52
New York
49
0
5
0
0
0 of 49
Unlocated
49
7
29
5
0
0 of 49
Oregon
46
20
29
1
0
0 of 46
Virginia
43
31
34
0
0
0 of 43
Massachusetts
26
11
17
0
0
0 of 26
Florida
19
3
8
0
0
0 of 19
Iowa
17
2
8
0
0
0 of 17
Maryland
13
2
6
3
1
0 of 13
Arizona
12
2
9
0
0
0 of 12
Vermont
12
12
11
0
0
0 of 12
Illinois
11
2
4
1
0
0 of 11
North Carolina
11
2
4
0
0
0 of 11
Michigan
9
1
3
0
0
0 of 9
New Mexico
8
0
7
0
0
0 of 8
Ohio
8
0
5
0
0
0 of 8
Texas
8
3
6
0
0
0 of 8
Wisconsin
8
4
5
0
0
0 of 8
Connecticut
5
2
3
0
0
0 of 5
Indiana
5
0
4
0
0
0 of 5
Minnesota
5
4
4
0
0
4 of 5
New Jersey
5
1
2
0
0
0 of 5
Tennessee
5
1
3
0
0
0 of 5
Alabama
4
1
2
0
0
0 of 4
Nevada
4
1
2
0
0
0 of 4
Pennsylvania
4
0
1
0
0
0 of 4
Alaska
3
2
2
0
0
0 of 3
Kentucky
3
0
3
0
0
0 of 3
Montana
3
1
1
0
0
0 of 3
Nebraska
3
1
1
0
0
0 of 3
District of Columbia
2
0
0
0
1
0 of 2
Kansas
2
1
0
0
0
0 of 2
Maine
2
0
1
0
0
0 of 2
Mississippi
2
0
1
0
0
0 of 2
Missouri
2
0
0
0
0
0 of 2
New Hampshire
2
2
1
0
0
0 of 2
Oklahoma
2
0
1
1
0
0 of 2
Rhode Island
2
1
1
0
0
0 of 2
Utah
2
0
0
0
0
0 of 2
Arkansas
1
0
0
0
0
0 of 1
Delaware
1
0
1
0
0
0 of 1
Georgia
1
0
0
0
0
0 of 1
Hawaii
1
0
0
0
0
0 of 1
Idaho
1
0
1
0
0
0 of 1
Louisiana
1
0
0
0
0
0 of 1
North Dakota
1
1
0
0
0
0 of 1
South Carolina
1
0
0
0
0
0 of 1
West Virginia
1
0
1
0
0
0 of 1
Accessibility data coverage
Across 1572 feeds, an average of 12.6% of stops carry wheelchair-access information. When a stop is unmarked, a rider who uses a wheelchair cannot tell from a trip planner whether they can board there.
What this measures: whether feeds publish the data, never
whether a stop is physically usable.
Where feeds stand
Stop-level accessibility coverageShare of feeds in each coverage band.
Nearly every stop marked7.8%123 of 1572 feeds
Some stops marked16.2%255 of 1572 feeds
No accessibility data yet76%1194 of 1572 feeds
0%100%
Show the table
Stop-level coverage
Feeds
Nearly every stop marked
123
Some stops marked
255
No accessibility data yet
1194
Most complete
Feed records whose stops are the most fully marked for wheelchair access. A target to aim for.
↳ Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole, United Kingdom
2
0.0%
0
2
↳ Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Brighton and Hove, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Blackpool, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Cornwall, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Cardiff [Caerdydd GB-CRD], United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Dundee City, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ East Riding of Yorkshire, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Essex, United Kingdom
2
0.1%
0
1
↳ Falkirk, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Gateshead, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Hampshire, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Isle of Wight, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Inverclyde, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Norfolk, United Kingdom
3
0.0%
0
3
↳ Nottingham, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Newport [Casnewydd GB-CNW], United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ North Yorkshire, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Plymouth, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Reading, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Scottish Borders, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Southampton, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Swindon, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ West Berkshire, United Kingdom
2
0.0%
0
2
↳ Wiltshire, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Windsor and Maidenhead, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Warrington, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ West Sussex, United Kingdom
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Greece
Covered subdivisions in Greece
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Attikí, Greece
2
24.4%
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Hong Kong SAR China
Covered subdivisions in Hong Kong SAR China
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Unlocated, Hong Kong SAR China
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Croatia
Covered subdivisions in Croatia
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Grad Zagreb, Croatia
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 3 covered subdivisions in Hungary
Covered subdivisions in Hungary
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Pécs, Hungary
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Szombathely, Hungary
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Unlocated, Hungary
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 2 covered subdivisions in Ireland
Covered subdivisions in Ireland
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Dublin, Ireland
6
0.0%
0
6
↳ Unlocated, Ireland
14
0.0%
0
14
Show 1 covered subdivision in Israel
Covered subdivisions in Israel
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Unlocated, Israel
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in India
Covered subdivisions in India
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Telangāna, India
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 12 covered subdivisions in Italy
Covered subdivisions in Italy
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Lombardia, Italy
2
29.4%
0
1
↳ Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy
1
83.0%
0
0
↳ Veneto, Italy
2
0.0%
0
2
↳ Liguria, Italy
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Emilia-Romagna, Italy
3
33.3%
1
2
↳ Toscana, Italy
5
0.0%
0
5
↳ Lazio, Italy
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Campania, Italy
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Puglia, Italy
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Calabria, Italy
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Sicilia, Italy
2
0.1%
0
1
↳ Sardegna, Italy
7
5.1%
0
5
Show 40 covered subdivisions in Japan
Covered subdivisions in Japan
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Hokkaido, Japan
5
0.0%
0
5
↳ Aomori, Japan
23
0.0%
0
23
↳ Iwate, Japan
3
0.0%
0
3
↳ Miyagi, Japan
2
0.0%
0
2
↳ Akita, Japan
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Yamagata, Japan
31
0.0%
0
31
↳ Fukushima, Japan
4
0.0%
0
4
↳ Ibaraki, Japan
6
0.0%
0
6
↳ Tochigi, Japan
7
0.0%
0
7
↳ Gunma, Japan
4
0.0%
0
4
↳ Saitama, Japan
2
0.0%
0
2
↳ Chiba, Japan
7
0.0%
0
7
↳ Tokyo, Japan
8
0.0%
0
8
↳ Kanagawa, Japan
3
0.0%
0
3
↳ Niigata, Japan
4
0.0%
0
4
↳ Toyama, Japan
10
0.0%
0
10
↳ Ishikawa, Japan
3
0.0%
0
3
↳ Yamanashi, Japan
4
0.0%
0
4
↳ Nagano, Japan
22
0.0%
0
22
↳ Gifu, Japan
26
3.8%
1
25
↳ Shizuoka, Japan
3
0.0%
0
3
↳ Aichi, Japan
23
0.0%
0
23
↳ Mie, Japan
23
0.0%
0
23
↳ Shiga, Japan
10
0.0%
0
10
↳ Osaka, Japan
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Hyogo, Japan
17
0.0%
0
17
↳ Nara, Japan
2
0.0%
0
2
↳ Wakayama, Japan
9
0.0%
0
9
↳ Shimane, Japan
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Okayama, Japan
7
0.0%
0
7
↳ Tokushima, Japan
13
0.0%
0
13
↳ Kagawa, Japan
4
0.0%
0
4
↳ Kochi, Japan
29
3.7%
1
27
↳ Fukuoka, Japan
25
0.0%
0
25
↳ Saga, Japan
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Nagasaki, Japan
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Kumamoto, Japan
5
0.0%
0
5
↳ Oita, Japan
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Kagoshima, Japan
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Okinawa, Japan
2
0.0%
0
2
Show 51 covered subdivisions in Lithuania
Covered subdivisions in Lithuania
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Akmenė, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Alytaus miestas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Alytus, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Anykščiai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Birštonas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Biržai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Druskininkai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Elektrėnai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Jonava, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Joniškis, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Jurbarkas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Kalvarija, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Kauno miestas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Kaunas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Kėdainiai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Kelmė, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Klaipėdos miestas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Kretinga, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Kupiškis, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Lazdijai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Marijampolė, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Mažeikiai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Molėtai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Neringa, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Pakruojis, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Palangos miestas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Panevėžio miestas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Panevėžys, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Plungė, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Prienai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Radviliškis, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Raseiniai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Rietavas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Rokiškis, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Šalčininkai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Šiaulių miestas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Šiauliai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Šilutė, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Širvintos, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Skuodas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Švenčionys, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Tauragė, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Telšiai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Trakai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Ukmergė, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Utena, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Varėna, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Vilniaus miestas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Vilnius, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Visaginas, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Zarasai, Lithuania
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 2 covered subdivisions in Latvia
Covered subdivisions in Latvia
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Rīga, Latvia
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Unlocated, Latvia
2
0.0%
0
2
Show 1 covered subdivision in Moldova
Covered subdivisions in Moldova
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Ungheni, Moldova
1
98.4%
1
0
Show 5 covered subdivisions in Malaysia
Covered subdivisions in Malaysia
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Johor, Malaysia
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Melaka, Malaysia
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
3
0.0%
0
3
↳ Unlocated, Malaysia
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in New Caledonia
Covered subdivisions in New Caledonia
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Unlocated, New Caledonia
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Netherlands
Covered subdivisions in Netherlands
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Unlocated, Netherlands
1
36.8%
0
0
Show 12 covered subdivisions in Norway
Covered subdivisions in Norway
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Oslo, Norway
1
2.1%
0
0
↳ Rogaland, Norway
1
0.1%
0
0
↳ Møre og Romsdal, Norway
1
0.3%
0
0
↳ Nordland, Norway
1
0.1%
0
0
↳ Viken, Norway
2
17.4%
0
0
↳ Innlandet, Norway
1
0.1%
0
0
↳ Vestfold og Telemark, Norway
2
0.4%
0
0
↳ Agder, Norway
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Vestland, Norway
1
0.6%
0
0
↳ Trøndelag, Norway
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Troms og Finnmark, Norway
2
5.5%
0
0
↳ Unlocated, Norway
6
43.4%
0
0
Show 3 covered subdivisions in New Zealand
Covered subdivisions in New Zealand
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Auckland, New Zealand
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Bay of Plenty, New Zealand
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Otago, New Zealand
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Oman
Covered subdivisions in Oman
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Unlocated, Oman
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 3 covered subdivisions in Poland
Covered subdivisions in Poland
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Dolnośląskie, Poland
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Pomorskie, Poland
3
8.6%
0
2
↳ Wielkopolskie, Poland
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Puerto Rico
Covered subdivisions in Puerto Rico
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Unlocated, Puerto Rico
1
2.4%
0
0
Show 4 covered subdivisions in Portugal
Covered subdivisions in Portugal
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Braga, Portugal
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Lisboa, Portugal
4
25.0%
1
3
↳ Porto, Portugal
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Setúbal, Portugal
2
100.0%
2
0
Show 1 covered subdivision in Serbia
Covered subdivisions in Serbia
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Beograd, Serbia
2
0.0%
0
2
Show 1 covered subdivision in Slovenia
Covered subdivisions in Slovenia
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Ljubljana, Slovenia
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Slovakia
Covered subdivisions in Slovakia
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Bratislavský kraj, Slovakia
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 1 covered subdivision in Thailand
Covered subdivisions in Thailand
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Krung Thep Maha Nakhon, Thailand
1
100.0%
1
0
Show 1 covered subdivision in Türkiye
Covered subdivisions in Türkiye
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ İzmir, Türkiye
2
0.0%
0
2
Show 1 covered subdivision in Ukraine
Covered subdivisions in Ukraine
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Kyiv, Ukraine
1
0.0%
0
1
Show 50 covered subdivisions in United States
Covered subdivisions in United States
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Alaska, United States
4
52.1%
2
1
↳ Alabama, United States
4
25.0%
1
3
↳ Arkansas, United States
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Arizona, United States
12
41.6%
5
6
↳ California, United States
86
27.2%
13
46
↳ Colorado, United States
71
9.2%
5
61
↳ Connecticut, United States
5
20.5%
1
2
↳ District of Columbia, United States
2
48.0%
1
1
↳ Delaware, United States
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Florida, United States
21
36.7%
7
13
↳ Georgia, United States
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Hawaii, United States
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Iowa, United States
17
5.4%
0
14
↳ Idaho, United States
1
95.8%
1
0
↳ Illinois, United States
11
18.2%
2
8
↳ Indiana, United States
5
1.2%
0
3
↳ Kansas, United States
2
28.2%
0
1
↳ Kentucky, United States
3
0.0%
0
3
↳ Louisiana, United States
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Massachusetts, United States
27
13.0%
1
22
↳ Maryland, United States
13
23.0%
2
8
↳ Maine, United States
3
0.6%
0
2
↳ Michigan, United States
9
39.4%
3
4
↳ Minnesota, United States
5
20.0%
1
4
↳ Missouri, United States
2
50.0%
1
1
↳ Mississippi, United States
2
50.0%
1
1
↳ Montana, United States
4
25.0%
1
3
↳ North Carolina, United States
11
7.1%
0
8
↳ North Dakota, United States
1
0.0%
0
1
↳ Nebraska, United States
3
33.0%
1
2
↳ New Hampshire, United States
2
0.0%
0
2
↳ New Jersey, United States
4
25.0%
1
3
↳ New Mexico, United States
9
11.3%
1
6
↳ Nevada, United States
4
0.0%
0
4
↳ New York, United States
48
2.2%
1
45
↳ Ohio, United States
8
43.2%
3
3
↳ Oklahoma, United States
2
44.8%
0
1
↳ Oregon, United States
46
2.9%
1
44
↳ Pennsylvania, United States
4
25.0%
1
3
↳ Rhode Island, United States
2
0.0%
0
2
↳ South Carolina, United States
3
66.7%
2
1
↳ Tennessee, United States
5
36.1%
1
3
↳ Texas, United States
8
13.2%
0
4
↳ Utah, United States
5
29.4%
1
3
↳ Virginia, United States
43
0.4%
0
36
↳ Vermont, United States
12
0.0%
0
12
↳ Washington, United States
52
18.0%
8
41
↳ Wisconsin, United States
8
0.2%
0
5
↳ West Virginia, United States
2
99.0%
2
0
↳ Unlocated, United States
14
11.7%
0
10
Show 1 covered subdivision in Uruguay
Covered subdivisions in Uruguay
Subdivision
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
↳ Montevideo, Uruguay
1
0.0%
0
1
United States by state
State
Feed records
Avg stops marked
Nearly all
None yet
Colorado
72
9.3%
5
61
California
62
28.6%
10
30
Washington
52
18.0%
8
41
New York
49
4.2%
2
45
Unlocated
49
26.8%
9
32
Oregon
46
2.9%
1
44
Virginia
43
0.4%
0
36
Massachusetts
26
9.7%
0
22
Florida
19
35.3%
6
12
Iowa
17
5.4%
0
14
Maryland
13
23.0%
2
8
Arizona
12
41.6%
5
6
Vermont
12
0.0%
0
12
Illinois
11
18.2%
2
8
North Carolina
11
7.1%
0
8
Michigan
9
39.4%
3
4
New Mexico
8
12.7%
1
5
Ohio
8
43.2%
3
3
Texas
8
13.2%
0
4
Wisconsin
8
0.2%
0
5
Connecticut
5
20.5%
1
2
Indiana
5
1.2%
0
3
Minnesota
5
20.0%
1
4
Tennessee
5
36.1%
1
3
Alabama
4
25.0%
1
3
Nevada
4
0.0%
0
4
New Jersey
4
25.0%
1
3
Pennsylvania
4
25.0%
1
3
Alaska
3
36.1%
1
1
Kentucky
3
0.0%
0
3
Montana
3
0.0%
0
3
Nebraska
3
33.0%
1
2
District of Columbia
2
48.0%
1
1
Kansas
2
28.2%
0
1
Maine
2
0.9%
0
1
Mississippi
2
50.0%
1
1
Missouri
2
50.0%
1
1
New Hampshire
2
0.0%
0
2
Oklahoma
2
44.8%
0
1
Rhode Island
2
0.0%
0
2
Utah
2
23.4%
0
1
Arkansas
1
0.0%
0
1
Delaware
1
0.0%
0
1
Georgia
1
0.0%
0
1
Hawaii
1
0.0%
0
1
Idaho
1
95.8%
1
0
Louisiana
1
0.0%
0
1
North Dakota
1
0.0%
0
1
South Carolina
1
100.0%
1
0
West Virginia
1
97.9%
1
0
Coverage is the share of a feed's stops carrying
wheelchair_boarding and trips carrying wheelchair_accessible,
the portable GTFS accessibility fields used by trip planners. California's
Transit Data Guidelines are one regional source for this published scoring profile,
not its worldwide authority. It never changes a grade. The
same data is at the accessibility API
(accessibility.json). This page is about data completeness; for how this site itself
meets WCAG, see
Accessibility. The directory contains 2009 published feed records; 1577 meet rubric 1.3, scoring profile gtfs-scorecard-1.3, MobilityData gtfs-validator 8.0.1, reader archive profile raw-v1, and measured categories Correctness, Freshness, Rider experience, and 1572 supply the accessibility detail used here.
In plain words: a feed does not need any of these to
earn a good grade. This tracks where optional parts of GTFS are catching on, so an
agency can see what peers publish and a program can see where to help next.
Adoption is read from each feed's own files: GTFS-Flex
(locations.geojson, booking_rules.txt), fare data
(fare_attributes.txt for the legacy model, fare_products.txt and
fare_leg_rules.txt for Fares v2), and GTFS-Pathways (pathways.txt,
levels.txt), plus rider-facing translations (translations.txt).
It never changes a grade. The same data is at
the adoption API (adoption.json).
The directory contains 2009 published feed records; 1577 meet rubric 1.3, scoring profile gtfs-scorecard-1.3, MobilityData gtfs-validator 8.0.1, reader archive profile raw-v1, and measured categories Correctness, Freshness, Rider experience, and 1577 supply the capability detail used here.