Feed status · checked 2026-07-19
Ogaki City Bus (Meihan Kintetsu) (大垣市 名阪近鉄バス)
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Bus
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Gifu, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
459 of 459 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
1017 of 1017 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 255 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 11 kinds of issue across 22603 instances (0 error, 22517 warning, 86 informational).
Service data covers the next 255 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
1 accessibility depth signal
6 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (大垣市民病院線, 岐垣線, 若森車庫線, キャンパス線, 大垣大野線, and more).
Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.
Skip to route and stop dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
- 羽島線 (blue)
- 市民プール線 (yellow)
- 大垣市民病院線 (teal)
- 岐垣線 (red)
- 若森車庫線 (red)
- キャンパス線 (blue)
- キャンパス線 (pink)
- 大商スクール線 (yellow)
- 海津線 (teal)
- 大垣競輪場線 (black)
- 大垣伊吹山線 (black)
- 大垣宮代線 (black)
- 大垣野口線 (black)
- 輪之内線 (teal)
- 青柳線 (pink)
- 荒尾線 (yellow)
- 赤坂線 (yellow)
- 川並線 (red)
- 稲葉線 (pink)
- 荒崎線 (pink)
- 開発住宅線 (yellow)
- 綾里養北線 (pink)
- 大垣大野線 (orange)
- 関ケ原時線 (green)
- ソフトピア線 (blue)
- 上石津地域コミュニティバス 時コース (white)
- 上石津地域コミュニティバス 多良コース (gray)
- 上石津地域コミュニティバス 牧田コース (blue)
- 上石津地域コミュニティバス 養老コース (gray)
- 青墓地域コミュニティバス (teal)
- 大垣市役所線 (yellow)
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 羽島線 | Bus | blue |
| 市民プール線 | Bus | yellow |
| 大垣市民病院線 | Bus | teal |
| 岐垣線 | Bus | red |
| 若森車庫線 | Bus | red |
| キャンパス線 | Bus | blue |
| キャンパス線 | Bus | pink |
| 大商スクール線 | Bus | yellow |
| 海津線 | Bus | teal |
| 大垣競輪場線 | Bus | black |
| 大垣伊吹山線 | Bus | black |
| 大垣宮代線 | Bus | black |
| 大垣野口線 | Bus | black |
| 輪之内線 | Bus | teal |
| 青柳線 | Bus | pink |
| 荒尾線 | Bus | yellow |
| 赤坂線 | Bus | yellow |
| 川並線 | Bus | red |
| 稲葉線 | Bus | pink |
| 荒崎線 | Bus | pink |
| 開発住宅線 | Bus | yellow |
| 綾里養北線 | Bus | pink |
| 大垣大野線 | Bus | orange |
| 関ケ原時線 | Bus | green |
| ソフトピア線 | Bus | blue |
| 上石津地域コミュニティバス 時コース | Bus | white |
| 上石津地域コミュニティバス 多良コース | Bus | gray |
| 上石津地域コミュニティバス 牧田コース | Bus | blue |
| 上石津地域コミュニティバス 養老コース | Bus | gray |
| 青墓地域コミュニティバス | Bus | teal |
| 大垣市役所線 | Bus | yellow |
This feed has 459 stops.
List every stop
- 麻生
- 小衣斐
- 南方
- 五の里
- 南小前
- 南小前
- 南こども園前
- 井田
- 井田
- 神戸小前
- 神戸小前
- 下宮
- 下宮
- 瀬古
- 瀬古
- 曽根
- 曽根
- 北方
- 三津屋(岐阜協立大学口)
- 岐阜協立大学
- 室本町
- 室本町
- 室本町
- 池尻
- 池尻
- 河間
- 河間
- 中野口
- 中野口
- 宿地
- 宿地
- 宿地
- 宿地
- 市営球場西
- 市営球場西
- 大垣女子短大前
- 大垣女子短大前
- 西之川
- 西之川
- 中川
- 中川
- 領家
- 領家
- 領家
- 領家
- 林町十丁目
- 林町十丁目
- 日大高前
- 日大高前
- 林町五丁目
- 林町五丁目
- 大垣駅北口
- 大垣駅北口
- 大垣駅北口
- 林町
- 林町
- 林町
- 林町
- 室村町
- 室村町
- 歩行町
- 歩行町
- 林東口
- 林東口
- 貝曽根口
- 貝曽根口
- 楽田
- 楽田
- 北高東口
- 北高東口
- 坂下
- 大島
- 開発住宅前
- 赤坂港跡
- 赤坂丸本前
- 虚空蔵口
- 赤坂西町
- 昼飯
- 昼飯南
- 消防赤坂分署
- 大垣市役所
- 北大垣
- 北大垣
- 笠木町
- 笠木町
- 福田町
- 熊野町
- 熊野町
- 御首神社前
- 御首神社前
- 善楽寺前
- 善楽寺前
- 荒尾ひだまりの街
- 東牧野
- 東牧野
- 荒尾
- 荒尾
- 荒尾五丁目
- 荒尾五丁目
- 荒尾六丁目
- 荒尾六丁目
- 西高前
- 稲葉団地
- 宮町
- 宮町
- 大垣駅前
- 大垣駅前
- 大垣駅前
- 大垣駅前
- 大垣駅前
- 大垣駅前
- OKBストリート新大橋
- OKBストリート新大橋
- OKBストリート郭町
- OKBストリート郭町
- 俵町
- OKB大垣共立銀行前
- 寺内町
- 寺内町
- 奥の細道むすびの地記念館前
- 奥の細道むすびの地記念館前
- 船町
- 船町
- 工業高口
- 工業高口
- 久瀬川
- 久瀬川四丁目
- 久瀬川四丁目
- 静里
- 静里
- 太平洋前
- 太平洋前
- 中曽根
- 中曽根
- 荒川
- 荒川
- 長松
- 長松
- 長松住宅前
- 長松住宅前
- 綾戸口
- 綾戸口
- 垂井口
- 関ケ原駅
- 関ケ原駅
- 中町
- 中町
- 東高口
- 東高口
- 市民病院前
- 市民病院前
- 大垣市民病院
- 禾ノ森
- 禾ノ森
- 禾ノ森
- 禾ノ森
- 総合庁舎口
- 総合庁舎口
- 犬ケ渕
- 犬ケ渕
- 小泉
- 小泉
- すぐ江
- すぐ江
- 青刈
- 青刈
- 大明神
- 大明神
- 安八町役場
- 安八町役場
- 南大森
- 南大森
- 平方
- 平方
- 総合庁舎
- 伝馬町
- 伝馬町
- 藤江町三丁目
- 藤江町三丁目
- 東小前
- 東小前
- 三塚町
- 三塚町
- 小野
- 海津市役所
- 総合体育館
- ソフトピアジャパン
- 別院前
- 別院前
- 羽島駅口
- 羽島駅口
- 岐阜羽島駅
- 藤江町
- 藤江町
- 旭町(大信前)
- 旭町(大信前)
- 南高橋町
- 南高橋町
- 南頬町
- 南頬町
- 伊吹山
- 西濃運輸前
- 西濃運輸前
- 築捨
- 築捨
- 米野口
- 米野口
- 問屋町
- 問屋町
- 江並中前
- 江並中前
- 島里
- 島里
- 名神大垣
- 名神大垣
- 北浅草
- 北浅草
- 南浅草
- 南浅草
- 横曽根工業団地口
- 横曽根工業団地口
- 横曽根
- 横曽根
- 船附
- 船附
- 笠郷
- 笠郷
- 大垣城ホール
- 大野宮前
- 大野
- 根古地
- 池辺
- 大巻
- 大巻
- 牧田(上野)
- 主水橋
- 今尾
- 土倉
- 脇野
- 野口
- 徳光
- 徳光
- 南徳光
- 南徳光
- 綾野
- 綾野
- 綾里小前
- 綾里小前
- 岐阜流通センター南口
- 栄町
- and 209 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
14 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning22395 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1017 instances
1017 of 1017 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning459 instances
459 of 459 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning80 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning31 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning8 instances
Some values have extra spaces at the start or end.
A stray space can break a match, so a stop or route may fail to link across files.
Fix: Trim leading and trailing spaces on export. The scorecard's auto-fixed copy already does this. (Usually one export setting.)
Validator rule: leading_or_trailing_whitespaces · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Two or more routes share the same name.
Riders can't tell the routes apart in apps.
Fix: Give each route a distinct short or long name. (One field per route.)
Validator rule: duplicate_route_name · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
On some trips the stops fall along the route line in a different order than the schedule lists.
Trip planners can draw the bus doubling back or skipping ahead, which confuses riders reading the map.
Fix: Check the stop order and the shape direction in your scheduling software; the shape is often drawn backwards. (A few minutes per flagged trip.)
Validator rule: stops_match_shape_out_of_order · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info39 instances
Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info38 instances
Some trip headsigns name a stop along the way, not the final destination.
The sign should tell riders where the bus ends up, so a midpoint name can send them the wrong way.
Fix: Set trip_headsign to the trip's last stop or its overall destination. (Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: trip_headsign_matches_intermediate_stop · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info7 instances
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 255 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 255 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 57 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/ogaki-meihan-kintetsu-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.