Feed status · checked 2026-10-15
美濃加茂市コミュニティバス「あい愛バス」
Based on the official feed source on file
Service mode Bus
unchanged since 2026-10-14
Cataloged in Gifu, Japan.
Source feed: https://api.gtfs-data.jp/v2/organizations/minokamocity/feeds/communitybus/files/feed.zip?rid=current
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 3 hours ago; last changed 15 days ago.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
About this feed
美濃加茂市コミュニティバス「あい愛バス」’s published feed lists 8 bus routes, 93 scheduled trips and 241 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-10-01 through 2027-09-30. The published file last changed on 2026-09-30.
Top things to fix
Review the rule documentation for 'invalid_phone_number' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Invalid phone number (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.
This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.
⏱ Varies.worth about +12 points in its category
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
241 of 241 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fixing this covers all 241 stops in the feed.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
93 of 93 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fixing this covers all 93 trips in the feed.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Riders and need behind these fixes
- Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
- The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.
These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.
Finding handoff
Move one finding to a recheck
Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.
- Finding
- Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 02 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 03 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 350 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 3669 instances (1 error, 3666 warning, 2 informational).
Service data covers the next 350 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
1 accessibility depth signal
1 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (あい愛バス まちなかぐるっと線).
Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.
This feed has 241 stops.
The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.
Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| あい愛バス まちなかぐるっと線 | Bus | red (no shape in feed) |
| あい愛バスあまちの森・しょうよう線 | Bus | yellow (no shape in feed) |
| あい愛バスむくの木・そうきち線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あい愛バスフルーツ山之上線 | Bus | pink (no shape in feed) |
| あい愛バスフルーツ蜂屋線 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あい愛バスさとやま線 | Bus | purple (no shape in feed) |
| あい愛バスほたる線 | Bus | yellow (no shape in feed) |
| あい愛バス古井-可児線 | Bus | gray (no shape in feed) |
List every stop
- 美濃太田駅北口
- 美濃太田駅南口
- 野尻整形外科
- 美濃加茂市役所
- 八坂
- 八坂
- 弥生
- 弥生
- 中部脳リハビリテーション病院
- 中部脳リハビリテーション病院
- 可茂総合庁舎
- かも~る(文化会館)
- 島町2丁目
- 島町2丁目
- リバーポートパーク美濃加茂
- MEGA ドン・キホーテUNY 美濃加茂店
- 美濃川合駅
- 京町
- 京町
- 東図書館南
- 東図書館南
- 本郷町6丁目
- 本郷町6丁目
- ひまわりの家
- 総合福祉会館
- 駅北商業団地
- 駅北商業団地
- 文化の森
- 中部台公民館
- 中部台公民館
- スイーツの丘
- ぎふ清流里山公園
- 食品スーパー アルビス
- 中部国際医療センター
- 黒岩内科クリニック
- 中山道会館
- 太田本町4丁目
- 太田小学校
- 深田神社
- 深田町
- 深田町
- 加茂川町
- 加茂川町
- 西体育館
- 西町中
- 縣主神社
- 西町北2
- きらら美濃加茂
- 木野池北
- 木野池北
- 木野公民館
- 加茂野駅
- 今泉東
- 今泉公民館
- 加茂野交流センター
- 今泉西
- 鷹之巣公民館
- あじさいエコパーク
- 富加駅南
- わらべ村
- 市橋
- 市橋グラウンド
- 稲辺公民館
- ナビタウン稲辺
- オークワ坂祝店
- ナビタウン稲辺北
- ひょうたん池
- 加茂野中
- 瑞雲寺
- 加茂野南
- 加茂野コミュニティセンター東
- 市橋北公民館
- 下古井
- 下古井
- 清井
- 清水
- 加茂高校
- 加茂高校
- 古井小学校
- 川合西4
- 川合西公民館
- 川合東公民館
- 川合東
- 上古井交流センター
- 古井本郷
- 古井駅
- 魚周商店
- 深渡
- 中屋敷公民館
- 桜貝戸公民館
- 橋上公民館
- 東栃井公民館
- 為岡
- 山本
- 山本上池
- 信友公民館
- 信友下池
- 信友
- 則光公民館
- 下米田交流センター
- Msmile(今)
- 今公民館
- 今公民館
- 馬串山
- 牧野北
- 牧野交流センター
- 牧野中公民館
- 下牧野クラブ
- 牧野東
- 新興東
- 新興西
- 共進公民館
- 小山中
- 秋葉神社
- 小山長福
- 深渡公民館
- 上野西
- 美濃加茂高校グラウンド
- サン・スポーツランド西
- 上野
- フルーピア山之上
- 上野北
- 天王交差点
- 天王交差点
- 中之番
- 中之番公民館東
- 金谷公民館
- 金谷
- 西洞南
- 西洞公民館
- 山之上交流センター
- 山之上交流センター
- 佐口公民館
- 本地
- 本地公民館
- 本地南
- 八坂神社
- 前平町1丁目
- 前平町1丁目
- 前平町3丁目
- 前平公園
- たんどーる
- たんどーる
- 黒金化成
- 引田
- 引田
- 引田公民館
- 諏訪神社
- 蜂屋交流センター西
- 大仲寺
- 諸田
- 作り洞
- 下東
- 下東公民館
- 下西
- 堀部医院
- 富加羽生
- コメリ富加店
- 東今泉
- 伊瀬公民館
- 上伊瀬
- ナビ蜂屋集会所
- 五徳
- 諸田児童公園
- 石塚
- のぞみの丘ホスピタル
- 国際たくみアカデミー
- 七福神
- 七福神
- 矢田公民館
- 矢田公民館
- 島之洞公民館
- 広橋公民館
- 広橋
- 糠洞公民館
- 伊深市営住宅
- 野地原口
- 高倉神社
- 伊深本郷
- 正眼寺前
- 旧伊深村役場庁舎
- 正眼短期大学
- 中切公民館
- 大洞下
- 大洞公民館
- 一文坂
- 中廿屋
- 福昌寺
- 弘法堂
- 御殿山キャンプ場
- 上廿屋
- 関也公民館
- 加瀬田
- 加瀬田公民館
- 中部台5丁目
- 中部台5丁目
- 下則友公民館
- 上開公民館
- 上則友公民館
- 南坂公民館
- 田畑公民館
- みのかも健康の森
- みのかも健康の森園内
- 廿屋口
- 一反田
- 長塚
- 下廿屋公民館
- 三和交流センター
- 平古市公民館
- 中川浦公民館西
- 中川浦
- 水市
- 上川浦公民館
- 田島町1丁目
- 田島町1丁目
- 田島町3丁目
- 田島町3丁目
- 加茂農林高校
- 加茂農林高校
- 加茂高校北
- 下中
- 田畑西
- 本郷町7丁目
- 法務局北
- 法務局北
- 美濃加茂高校
- 美濃加茂高校
- 森山団地北
- 森山団地
- 天狗山下
- プラザちゅうたい
- プラザちゅうたい
- 花木センター
- 可児とうのう病院
- 前平公園駅北
- 前平公園駅北
- 前平公園園内
- ヤマザキマザック工作機械博物館
- 西町公民館南
- 西町公民館南
- 岐阜健康管理センター
Over time
Overall score across the last 14 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-14.
Show the numbers
| Check | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 71.8 | first check |
| 2026-10-03 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-04 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-05 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-06 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-07 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-08 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-09 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-10 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-11 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-12 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-13 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-14 | 71.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-15 | 71.8 | no change |
What changed since your last check
- Correctness no change
- Freshness no change
- Rider experience no change
Feed history
Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.
| Checked | Published file | Service dates through | Grade at the time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-15 (14 checks) | 6e063f95976f | 2027-09-30 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-09-30 to 2026-10-01 (2 checks) | 6e063f95976f | 2027-09-30 | C, 71.8 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
| 2026-07-25 to 2026-09-29 (63 checks) | 64e4034dc955 | 2026-09-30 | F, 47.2 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
| 2026-07-23 to 2026-07-24 (2 checks) | 64e4034dc955 | 2026-09-30 | C, 71.8 under rubric 1.2, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
Everything we checked
8 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Error1 instance
Invalid phone number (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'invalid_phone_number' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: invalid_phone_number · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning3642 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning241 instances
241 of 241 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning93 instances
93 of 93 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning23 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
Two requirements remain for this feed to earn the conformance mark. 1 validator error to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Not yet
- 1 validator error to resolve.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 350 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 349 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 1 validator error, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 70 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.
Similar feeds in Gifu
Other scorecards in Gifu, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/minokamocity-communitybus/2026-10-15.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-15. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.