Feed status · checked 2026-10-20
Kofu Town Bus (江府町営バス)
Based on the official feed source on file
Service mode Bus
unchanged since 2026-10-19
Cataloged in Tottori, Japan.
Source feed: https://odp-pref-tottori.tori-info.co.jp/bus_data/14.zip
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 3 hours ago; last changed 39 days ago.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
About this feed
Kofu Town Bus (江府町営バス)’s published feed lists 7 bus routes, 59 scheduled trips and 137 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-09-01 through 2027-02-26. The published file last changed on 2026-09-11.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
137 of 137 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fixing this covers all 137 stops in the feed.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
59 of 59 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fixing this covers all 59 trips in the feed.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Set timepoint=1 on stops that are real time checks and 0 on the rest. If every published time is a scheduled one, mark them all 1.Likely your export tool
Some rows in stop_times.txt leave the timepoint column blank. That column says whether a time is a real checkpoint or an estimate. Blank leaves apps guessing, and they may show your estimates as promises.
This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.
⏱ Usually one export setting.worth about +8 points in its category
Riders and need behind these fixes
- Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
- The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.
These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.
Finding handoff
Move one finding to a recheck
Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.
- Finding
- Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 02 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 03 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for missing_timepoint_value
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 129 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 930 instances (0 error, 923 warning, 7 informational).
Service data covers the next 129 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.
This feed has 137 stops.
The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.
Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 下安井線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 下蚊屋線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 柿原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 御机線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 大河原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 俣野線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 江尾佐川ループ線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
List every stop
- 江尾下町
- 江尾下町
- 江尾下町
- 江尾駅
- 江尾駅
- 江尾上町
- 江尾上町
- 江府町役場
- 江府町役場
- 一旦
- 一旦
- 武庫
- 武庫
- 防災情報センター
- 防災情報センター
- 宮の前
- 半の上
- 荒田
- 江尾駐在前
- 江尾駐在前
- 宮市下
- 宮市下
- 宮市
- 宮市
- 宮市上
- 宮市上
- 宮市原下
- 宮市原下
- 宮市原中
- 宮市原中
- 宮市原上
- 宮市原上
- 助沢
- 助沢
- 下蚊屋
- 下蚊屋
- 下蚊屋上
- エミーズカフェ
- 久連集落
- 美女石集落
- 美女石入口
- 江府インター
- 江府インター
- 佐川集落
- 佐川上
- 佐川上
- 佐川
- 佐川
- 柿原尻
- 柿原尻
- 柿原下
- 柿原下
- 柿原中
- 柿原中
- 柿原上
- 小江尾
- 小江尾
- 小江尾下
- 小江尾下
- 杉谷
- 杉谷
- 仲屋
- 仲屋
- 杉谷入口
- 杉谷入口
- 小原集落
- 小原
- 小原
- 小原上
- 小原上
- 美用集落
- 美用
- 美用
- 栗尾集落
- 御机集落
- 御机下
- 御机下
- 御机中
- 御机中
- 御机
- 小江尾上
- 小江尾上
- 大満
- 大満
- 貝田下
- 貝田下
- 貝田
- 貝田
- 袋原
- 袋原
- 上袋原
- 上袋原
- 西成
- 西成
- 吉原別れ
- 吉原別れ
- 吉原下
- 吉原
- 下大河原入口
- 下大河原
- 中大河原入口
- 中大河原入口
- 中大河原
- 中大河原
- 上大河原
- 一旦集落
- 新道集落
- 老健施設あやめ前
- 老健施設あやめ前
- 武庫集落
- 武庫上
- 武庫上
- 池の内集落
- 俣野ふれ愛学舎
- 尾之上原下
- 尾之上原下
- 尾之上原
- 尾之上原
- 日の詰
- 日の詰
- 日の詰上
- 日の詰上
- 畑ヶ田
- 畑ヶ田
- 古屋敷
- 古屋敷
- 深山口
- 江尾
- 池の内下
- 池の内下
- 池の内
- 池の内
- 佐川第二団地
- 佐川第二団地
- ブナの森校舎入口
- ブナの森校舎入口
- 下安井
Over time
Overall score across the last 19 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-19.
Show the numbers
| Check | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 76.8 | first check |
| 2026-10-03 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-04 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-05 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-06 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-07 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-08 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-09 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-10 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-11 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-12 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-13 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-14 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-15 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-16 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-17 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-18 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-19 | 76.8 | no change |
| 2026-10-20 | 76.8 | no change |
What changed since your last check
- Correctness no change
- Freshness no change
- Rider experience no change
Feed history
Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.
| Checked | Published file | Service dates through | Grade at the time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-20 (19 checks) | 5fa77db3478e | 2027-02-26 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-09-11 to 2026-10-01 (17 checks) | 5fa77db3478e | 2027-02-26 | C, 76.8 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
| 2026-09-05 to 2026-09-10 (6 checks) | 561e2992f94b | 2027-01-29 | C, 76.8 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
What changed in this feed
Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-10-19.
Same feed file as 2026-10-19; the published zip did not change.
Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops and export changes in a reader, with no sign-up.
Everything we checked
8 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning914 instances
Some rows in stop_times.txt leave the timepoint column blank.
That column says whether a time is a real checkpoint or an estimate. Blank leaves apps guessing, and they may show your estimates as promises.
Fix: Set timepoint=1 on stops that are real time checks and 0 on the rest. If every published time is a scheduled one, mark them all 1. (Usually one export setting.)
Finding code: missing_timepoint_value · Read the fix guide for missing_timepoint_value · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning137 instances
137 of 137 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning59 instances
59 of 59 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning8 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Finding code: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for missing_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info4 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info3 instances
The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.
Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.
Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)
Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide for unknown_file · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
One requirement remains for this feed to earn the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 129 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 129 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 81 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.
Similar feeds in Tottori
Other scorecards in Tottori, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/kofu-town-bus/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.