Feed status · checked 2026-10-20
Ikasa Bus Company (井笠バスカンパニー)
Based on the official feed source on file
Service mode Bus
down 5.2 since 2026-10-19
Cataloged in Okayama, Japan.
Source feed: https://bus-vision.jp/gtfs_v2/ikasabus/gtfsFeed
Heads-up: Days until the service window ends dropped by 22 between 2026-10-19 and 2026-10-20, but only 1 day(s) passed. The feed's calendar appears to have moved backward, which can happen when an older export is republished. Worth confirming the latest export is the one being served. (checked 2026-10-20). This can be a brief vendor export glitch; watch the next update before acting.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 4 hours ago; last changed 4 hours ago.
Measured 4 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: high.
- All four score categories were measured this run.
- Realtime was sampled in one bounded window of 9 snapshots.
- The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
About this feed
Ikasa Bus Company (井笠バスカンパニー)’s published feed lists 22 bus routes, 380 scheduled trips and 699 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-10-01 through 2026-12-31. It publishes realtime trip updates, vehicle positions and service alerts; when we checked, all of them answered. The published file last changed on 2026-10-20.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
699 of 699 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fixing this covers all 699 stops in the feed.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
380 of 380 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fixing this covers all 380 trips in the feed.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Ask your AVL vendor to check that every vehicle assignment reaches TripUpdates. School-day and tripper runs are the ones most often left out.
1 of 4 trips scheduled during the sampling window had no live predictions. Riders on those trips get schedule times labeled as live. Caltrans asks that every trip you run shows up in TripUpdates.
This was measured over a realtime sampling window, so it has no feed-wide share.
⏱ A vendor data-mapping question.worth about +10 points in its category
Riders and need behind these fixes
- Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
- The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.
These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.
Finding handoff
Move one finding to a recheck
Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.
- Finding
- Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 02 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 03 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_rt_trip_coverage
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 72 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Live-arrival data covered 75% of scheduled trips in the sampled window.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 11 kinds of issue across 671 instances (0 error, 661 warning, 10 informational).
Service data covers the next 72 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Sampled 9 times: 3 of 3 configured feeds healthy; 75.0% of scheduled trips had live predictions; vehicle position plausibility was not measurable; predictions ran a median of 84s behind schedule.
Routes and stops
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.
This feed has 699 stops.
The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.
Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| まわローズ(青ルート) | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| まわローズ(青ルート) | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~城見台団地~総合スポーツ公園~笠岡線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~市民会館~外浦~寺間~笠岡線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~大井ハイランド~尾坂線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~矢掛線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~竹田~乗時線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 今井循環線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~広東線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~山王口~井原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 新倉敷~玉島協同病院~寄島線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~千間土手東~東福山駅口~旭ヶ丘団地線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 大門線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~福山線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 東部循環線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 北部循環線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~福山市民病院~伊勢ヶ丘三丁目線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~篠坂線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 美の浜線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~国道~福山市民病院~中国中央病院線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~井原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~東深津~伊勢丘~坪生線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
List every stop
- 福山駅前
- 福山駅前
- 福山駅前
- 福山駅前
- 福山駅前
- 福山市民病院前
- 福山東インター入口
- 福山東インター入口
- 福山東インター入口
- 伏越
- 伏越
- 伏見町
- 井原バスセンター
- 井原バスセンター
- フジグラン前
- フジグラン前
- 二ツ川
- 二ツ川
- 井原郵便局前
- 井原郵便局前
- 平成大学西
- 本通り
- 本通り
- 幕山口
- 幕山口
- 幕山口
- 幕山小学校下
- 幕山小学校下
- 幕山台六丁目
- 幕山台六丁目
- 松原
- 松原
- 青葉台一丁目
- 青葉台一丁目
- 緑ヶ丘小学校前
- 緑ヶ丘小学校前
- 入船町
- 入船町
- 入船町
- 南小学校前
- 南本通り
- 南本通り
- 南町
- 御野学校前
- 御野学校前
- 御船町
- 御船町
- 御船町
- 御船町
- 明神前
- 明神前
- 明泉寺大橋
- 三吉町
- 三吉町
- 三吉町
- 三吉町北
- 三吉町北
- 三吉町南
- 三吉町南
- 巌山
- 巌山
- 茂平
- 茂平
- 茂平橋
- 茂平橋
- 木綿橋
- 薬師
- 薬師
- 八尋口
- 八尋口
- 藪路
- 藪路
- 藪路住宅前
- 藪路住宅前
- 湯野入口
- 湯野入口
- 西浜
- 西浜
- 横尾
- 横尾
- 横尾駅前
- 横尾駅前
- 吉田
- 吉田
- 吉田西
- 吉田西
- 吉田東
- 吉田東
- 吉野
- 吉野
- 吉浜
- リーデンローズ入口
- 緑陽団地口
- 緑陽団地口
- ローズタウン入口
- ローズタウン入口
- ローズタウン上
- ローズタウン上
- ローズタウン中
- ローズタウン中
- リム・ふくやま前
- 湾頭
- 一丁目
- JA営農センター前
- 外浜
- 外浜
- 稲荷町
- 稲荷町
- 浦上
- 井原駅
- 井原線矢掛駅
- 今井入口
- 今井小学校前
- 今井小学校前
- 今井農協前
- 浦上団地口
- 浦上団地口
- 岩倉上
- 岩倉上
- 岩谷
- 岩谷
- 浦上西
- 浦上東
- 追分
- 追分
- 大河
- 大井小学校前
- 大井小学校前
- 大井ハイランド西口
- 大井南一丁目
- 大井南一丁目
- 大井南二丁目
- 大井南二丁目
- 大井南三丁目
- 大久保
- 大久保
- 大島小学校前
- 大谷
- 大谷
- 鳳団地
- 鳳団地
- 大戸上
- 大戸上
- 大戸口
- 大戸口
- 大戸中
- 大戸中
- 尾坂
- 尾坂上
- 小田中
- 小田中
- 小田東
- 小田東
- 小平井
- 小平井
- 駅前通り
- 駅前通り
- 笠岡駅前
- 笠岡駅前
- 笠岡駅前
- 笠岡駅前
- 笠岡温泉前
- 笠岡総合スポーツ公園前
- 笠岡郵便局前
- 笠岡郵便局前
- 笠高入口
- 笠高入口
- 春日台団地口
- 春日台団地口
- 片島口
- 片島口
- カブトガニ博物館前
- 上篠坂
- 唐井
- 川手
- 川手
- 川中
- 川面
- 川面
- 北川
- 旧道富岡
- 駅家町
- くじば
- くじば
- 楠
- 国頭
- 黒崎
- 黒崎
- 黒崎西
- 黒崎西
- 敬愛学園口
- 敬愛学園口
- 県井笠支局前
- 県井笠支局前
- 高
- 公会堂前
- 工業高校前
- 工業高校前
- コウノシマ化成前
- 神島荘前
- 神島変電所前
- 甲弩
- 小黒崎
- 小黒崎
- 小原(倉敷市)
- 小原(倉敷市)
- 小原水門
- 小原水門
- 才の神
- 才の神
- 境橋
- 境橋
- 沙美
- 沙美
- 沙美白浜
- 沙美中
- 沙美中
- 沙美野路
- 山王口
- 山王口
- 支所前
- 島の天神
- 下追分
- 下追分
- 集会所前
- 集会所前
- 正砂
- 昭和橋
- 昭和橋
- 王子
- 王子
- 汁方
- 城見台団地
- 新川(笠岡市)
- 新賀郵便局前
- 新賀郵便局前
- 新倉敷駅
- 十字
- 住宅上
- 生江浜
- 生江浜
- 生江浜西
- 生江浜西
- 関戸
- 関戸口
- 関戸橋
- 千田(笠岡市)
- 千田(笠岡市)
- 外浦
- 園井
- and 449 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
Overall score across the last 19 checks — down 5.2 since 2026-10-19.
Show the numbers
| Check | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 76.6 | first check |
| 2026-10-03 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-04 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-05 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-06 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-07 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-08 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-09 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-10 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-11 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-12 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-13 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-14 | 75.2 | down 1.4 |
| 2026-10-15 | 76.6 | up 1.4 |
| 2026-10-16 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-17 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-18 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-19 | 76.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-20 | 71.4 | down 5.2 |
What changed since your last check
- Correctness down 9.0
- Freshness no change
- Rider experience no change
- Realtime quality down 10.3
Feed history
Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.
| Checked | Published file | Service dates through | Grade at the time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-20 | 94db38cf381b | 2026-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-19 | 4a2ba6288574 | 2027-01-21 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-18 | 55dce3c4db36 | 2027-01-20 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-17 | f8d14cb9818c | 2027-01-19 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-16 | 7e10876ec26e | 2027-01-18 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-15 | 31f27853b030 | 2027-01-17 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-14 | 42ec6209f2cb | 2027-01-16 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-13 | d87d5deb0036 | 2027-01-15 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-12 | 1e6f83f40576 | 2027-01-14 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-11 | 7ec4f73870c2 | 2027-01-13 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-10 | a8c18b36e846 | 2027-01-12 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-09 | a6bc28d8ea15 | 2027-01-11 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 periods.
What changed over time
On 2026-10-02 this feed started at grade C. On 2026-10-20 the grade held, though the score fell from 77 to 71. As of 2026-10-20 it holds grade C.
A plain-language history of this feed, newest first.
- 2026-10-20 Score fell 5 points, realtime fell 10 points.
Everything we checked
15 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning699 instances
699 of 699 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning547 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Finding code: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for missing_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning380 instances
380 of 380 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning53 instances
Same name and description for stop (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'same_name_and_description_for_stop' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: same_name_and_description_for_stop · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning32 instances
Some stops exist in the feed but no trip ever stops at them.
Riders may walk to a stop where no bus is scheduled to arrive.
Fix: Remove retired stops from the export, or add them back to the trips that should serve them. (A review pass in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: stop_without_stop_time · Read the fix guide for stop_without_stop_time · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning26 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Two or more routes share the same name.
Riders can't tell the routes apart in apps.
Fix: Give each route a distinct short or long name. (One field per route.)
Finding code: duplicate_route_name · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Many of the feed's trips don't run at all in the next 7 days.
It usually means old service periods are still in the export, making the feed bigger and harder to check.
Fix: Trim past service periods the next time you export. (One setting in most export tools.)
Finding code: trip_coverage_not_active_for_next7_days · Read the fix guide for trip_coverage_not_active_for_next7_days · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
1 of 4 trips scheduled during the sampling window had no live predictions.
Riders on those trips get schedule times labeled as live. Caltrans asks that every trip you run shows up in TripUpdates.
Fix: Ask your AVL vendor to check that every vehicle assignment reaches TripUpdates. School-day and tripper runs are the ones most often left out. (A vendor data-mapping question.)
Finding code: scorecard_rt_trip_coverage · Read the fix guide for scorecard_rt_trip_coverage · See GTFS-Realtime reference (opens the GTFS-Realtime reference on an external site)
- Info4 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info3 instances
The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.
Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.
Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)
Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide for unknown_file · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Finding code: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide for big_gap_in_service · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
Feed valid beyond total service window (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'feed_valid_beyond_total_service_window' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: feed_valid_beyond_total_service_window · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
One requirement remains for this feed to earn the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 72 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Can riders use it?
Checks beyond structural validation: places where the feed is valid but a rider still could not travel.
- 32 of 699 boardable stops are never served by any trip. Riders see these stops in apps and on the map but can never catch anything there, which erodes trust in the data. Remove stops no route serves, or add the trips that should call at them.
These do not change the grade. They catch trips with no rideable leg and stops no trip serves, the kind of gap a trip planner trips over.
Realtime reliability
The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 200 checks in the 25 days to 2026-10-20, with 48s median lag.
Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment. The window ends at the newest observation, which is not always today: if the monitor stops, this window stops with it.
Live predictions vs schedule
Arrival predictions ran a median 84s late versus the schedule, and stayed within 89s nine times in ten. They were on time (about a minute early to five late) 100.0% of the time.
From the last full realtime sample: how far live arrival predictions sat from the schedule, and whether vehicle positions fell on the route. These feed the realtime score; they change no other category.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 71 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 58 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality 90 / 100
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.
Similar feeds in Okayama
Other scorecards in Okayama, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/ikasa-bus/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.