Feed status · checked 2026-09-05
Ikasa Bus Company (井笠バスカンパニー)
Based on the official feed source on file
Service mode Bus
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Okayama, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.3, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 2 hours ago; last changed 2 hours ago.
Measured 4 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: high.
- All four score categories were measured this run.
- Realtime was sampled in one bounded window of 9 snapshots.
- The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Ask your AVL vendor why the feed stopped advancing; the GTFS-Realtime header timestamp should move forward on every publish.
The realtime feed's last update was about 1 hours old when sampled. A realtime feed this far behind has effectively stopped. Riders see buses that already left, or apps quietly fall back to the schedule while still showing a live label.
⏱ A vendor support ticket; treat it as a feed outage.worth about +50 points in its category
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
680 of 680 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
1371 of 1371 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Finding handoff
Move one finding to a recheck
Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.
- Feed evidence
- The realtime feed's last update was about 1 hours old when sampled.
- Next action
- Ask your AVL vendor why the feed stopped advancing; the GTFS-Realtime header timestamp should move forward on every publish.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Feed evidence
- 680 of 680 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
- Next action
- Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Feed evidence
- 1371 of 1371 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
- Next action
- Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Ask your AVL vendor why the feed stopped advancing; the GTFS-Realtime header timestamp should move forward on every publish.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 94 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- One or more realtime feeds were reachable; live-arrival coverage is not known.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 12 kinds of issue across 1987 instances (0 error, 643 warning, 1344 informational).
Service data covers the next 94 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Sampled 9 times outside service hours: 3 of 3 configured feeds healthy; vehicle position plausibility was not measurable.
Routes and stops
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.
This feed has 680 stops.
The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.
Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| まわローズ(青ルート) | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| まわローズ(青ルート) | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~城見台団地~総合スポーツ公園~笠岡線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~市民会館~外浦~寺間~笠岡線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~大井ハイランド~尾坂線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~矢掛線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~竹田~乗時線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 今井循環線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~広東線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~山王口~井原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 新倉敷~玉島協同病院~寄島線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~千間土手東~東福山駅口~旭ヶ丘団地線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 大門線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 笠岡~福山線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 東部循環線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~福山市民病院~伊勢ヶ丘三丁目線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~篠坂線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 美の浜線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~国道~福山市民病院~中国中央病院線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~井原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 福山~東深津~伊勢丘~坪生線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
List every stop
- 福山駅前
- 福山駅前
- 福山駅前
- 福山駅前
- 福山駅前
- 福山市民病院前
- 福山東インター入口
- 福山東インター入口
- 福山東インター入口
- 伏越
- 伏越
- 伏見町
- 井原バスセンター
- 井原バスセンター
- フジグラン前
- 二ツ川
- 二ツ川
- 井原郵便局前
- 井原郵便局前
- 平成大学
- 本通り
- 本通り
- 幕山口
- 幕山口
- 幕山口
- 幕山小学校下
- 幕山小学校下
- 幕山台六丁目
- 幕山台六丁目
- 松原
- 松原
- 青葉台一丁目
- 青葉台一丁目
- 緑ヶ丘小学校前
- 緑ヶ丘小学校前
- 入船町
- 入船町
- 入船町
- 南小学校前
- 南本通り
- 南本通り
- 南町
- 御野学校前
- 御野学校前
- 御船町
- 御船町
- 御船町
- 明神前
- 明神前
- 三吉町
- 三吉町
- 三吉町
- 三吉町北
- 三吉町北
- 三吉町南
- 三吉町南
- 巌山
- 巌山
- 茂平
- 茂平
- 茂平橋
- 茂平橋
- 木綿橋
- 薬師
- 薬師
- 八尋口
- 八尋口
- 藪路
- 藪路
- 藪路住宅前
- 藪路住宅前
- 湯野入口
- 湯野入口
- 西浜
- 西浜
- 横尾
- 横尾
- 横尾駅前
- 横尾駅前
- 吉田
- 吉田
- 吉田西
- 吉田西
- 吉田東
- 吉田東
- 吉野
- 吉野
- 吉浜
- リーデンローズ入口
- 緑陽団地口
- 緑陽団地口
- ローズタウン入口
- ローズタウン入口
- ローズタウン上
- ローズタウン上
- ローズタウン中
- ローズタウン中
- リム・ふくやま前
- 湾頭
- 一丁目
- JA営農センター前
- 外浜
- 外浜
- 稲荷町
- 稲荷町
- 浦上
- 井原駅
- 井原線矢掛駅
- 今井入口
- 今井小学校前
- 今井小学校前
- 今井農協前
- 浦上団地口
- 浦上団地口
- 岩倉上
- 岩倉上
- 岩谷
- 岩谷
- 浦上西
- 浦上東
- 追分
- 追分
- 大河
- 大井小学校前
- 大井小学校前
- 大井ハイランド西口
- 大井南一丁目
- 大井南一丁目
- 大井南二丁目
- 大井南二丁目
- 大井南三丁目
- 大久保
- 大久保
- 大島小学校前
- 大谷
- 大谷
- 鳳団地
- 鳳団地
- 大戸上
- 大戸上
- 大戸口
- 大戸口
- 大戸中
- 大戸中
- 尾坂
- 尾坂上
- 小田中
- 小田中
- 小田東
- 小田東
- 小平井
- 小平井
- 駅前通り
- 駅前通り
- 笠岡駅前
- 笠岡駅前
- 笠岡駅前
- 笠岡駅前
- 笠岡温泉前
- 笠岡総合スポーツ公園前
- 笠岡郵便局前
- 笠岡郵便局前
- 笠高入口
- 笠高入口
- 春日台団地口
- 春日台団地口
- 片島口
- 片島口
- カブトガニ博物館前
- 上篠坂
- 唐井
- 川手
- 川手
- 川中
- 川面
- 川面
- 北川
- 旧道富岡
- くじば
- くじば
- 楠
- 国頭
- 黒崎
- 黒崎
- 黒崎西
- 黒崎西
- 敬愛学園口
- 敬愛学園口
- 県井笠支局前
- 県井笠支局前
- 高
- 公会堂前
- 工業高校前
- 工業高校前
- コウノシマ化成前
- 神島荘前
- 神島変電所前
- 甲弩
- 小黒崎
- 小黒崎
- 小原(倉敷市)
- 小原(倉敷市)
- 小原水門
- 小原水門
- 才の神
- 才の神
- 境橋
- 境橋
- 沙美
- 沙美
- 沙美白浜
- 沙美中
- 沙美中
- 沙美野路
- 山王口
- 山王口
- 支所前
- 島の天神
- 下追分
- 下追分
- 集会所前
- 集会所前
- 正砂
- 昭和橋
- 昭和橋
- 王子
- 王子
- 汁方
- 城見台団地
- 新川(笠岡市)
- 新賀郵便局前
- 新賀郵便局前
- 新倉敷駅
- 十字
- 住宅上
- 生江浜
- 生江浜
- 生江浜西
- 生江浜西
- 関戸
- 関戸口
- 関戸橋
- 千田(笠岡市)
- 千田(笠岡市)
- 外浦
- 園井
- 園井
- 園井住宅前
- 市民体育センター前
- 市民体育センター前
- and 430 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
16 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Error1 instance
The realtime feed's last update was about 1 hours old when sampled.
A realtime feed this far behind has effectively stopped. Riders see buses that already left, or apps quietly fall back to the schedule while still showing a live label.
Fix: Ask your AVL vendor why the feed stopped advancing; the GTFS-Realtime header timestamp should move forward on every publish. (A vendor support ticket; treat it as a feed outage.)
Finding code: scorecard_rt_feed_lapsed
- Warning1371 instances
1371 of 1371 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning680 instances
680 of 680 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning546 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Finding code: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning36 instances
Same name and description for stop (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'same_name_and_description_for_stop' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: same_name_and_description_for_stop · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning27 instances
Some stops exist in the feed but no trip ever stops at them.
Riders may walk to a stop where no bus is scheduled to arrive.
Fix: Remove retired stops from the export, or add them back to the trips that should serve them. (A review pass in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: stop_without_stop_time · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning26 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning6 instances
Some service calendars in the feed have already ended.
Expired calendars are dead weight and can hide real schedule problems from your staff and vendors.
Fix: Remove past service periods the next time you export the feed. (One setting in most export tools.)
Finding code: expired_calendar · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Two or more routes share the same name.
Riders can't tell the routes apart in apps.
Fix: Give each route a distinct short or long name. (One field per route.)
Finding code: duplicate_route_name · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1331 instances
Unsorted stop times (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'unsorted_stop_times' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: unsorted_stop_times · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info5 instances
Some service dates fall outside the date window set in feed_info.txt.
feed_info.txt should span every day your service runs, so apps know when the data applies.
Fix: Widen feed_start_date and feed_end_date to cover all service dates, or fix the dates that fall outside. (Two fields in feed_info.txt, or one export setting.)
Finding code: service_window_outside_feed_period · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info4 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info3 instances
The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.
Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.
Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)
Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Finding code: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
One requirement remains for this feed to earn the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 94 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Can riders use it?
Checks beyond structural validation: places where the feed is valid but a rider still could not travel.
- 27 of 680 boardable stops are never served by any trip. Riders see these stops in apps and on the map but can never catch anything there, which erodes trust in the data. Remove stops no route serves, or add the trips that should call at them.
These do not change the grade. They catch trips with no rideable leg and stops no trip serves, the kind of gap a trip planner trips over.
Realtime reliability
The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 8 checks over the last 1 day, with 41s median lag.
Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 94 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 57 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality 50 / 100
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/ikasa-bus/2026-09-05.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-09-05. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.