← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-06-16

Roseville Transit

Based on the feed this agency publishes

67.5 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Covers 198 daysAccessibility gapsNo realtime feed

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its feed. Not the official Caltrans or Cal-ITP compliance determination. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view. Rubric v1.1, validator 8.0.1.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.

193 of 193 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip (most small-agency fleets are 100% accessible, so this is often a single default).

490 of 490 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ Often one default setting in your export.

Fix 03

Add fare_attributes.txt (or Fares v2 files) with your fare structure.

The feed contains no fare information. Riders see 'fare unknown' in trip planners and can't budget their trip; visitors are most affected.

⏱ A small file for most flat-fare systems.

Score by category

Correctness82.8 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issues: 0 error, 280 warning, and 11 informational instances in total.

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 198 days.

Rider experience20.0 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible). Fare data is not published.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked