← Home

Equity overlay.

High-need states (by ACS poverty, zero-vehicle, and disability shares), ordered by the share of their feeds on a D or F grade. This is where weak data lands on riders with the fewest alternatives.

Skip to the state tables
Transit need by stateEach state is shaded and hatched by its ACS transit-need tier; the same figures are in the state table below.Alabama: Moderate need, 9 feed records covered, 25.0% on D or F across 4 comparable feed recordsArizona: Lower need, 23 feed records covered, 61.5% on D or F across 13 comparable feed recordsArkansas: Moderate need, 3 feed records covered, 100.0% on D or F across 1 comparable feed recordCalifornia: Lower need, 183 feed records covered, 47.6% on D or F across 84 comparable feed recordsColorado: Lower need, 95 feed records covered, 20.3% on D or F across 74 comparable feed recordsConnecticut: Lower need, 11 feed records covered, 20.0% on D or F across 5 comparable feed recordsDelaware: Lower need, 1 feed record covered, 100.0% on D or F across 1 comparable feed recordDistrict of Columbia: Moderate need, 5 feed records covered, 100.0% on D or F across 2 comparable feed recordsFlorida: Lower need, 43 feed records covered, 50.0% on D or F across 20 comparable feed recordsGeorgia: Lower need, 16 feed records covered, 0.0% on D or F across 1 comparable feed recordIdaho: Lower need, 3 feed records covered, 0.0% on D or F across 1 comparable feed recordIllinois: Lower need, 15 feed records covered, 72.7% on D or F across 11 comparable feed recordsIndiana: Lower need, 11 feed records covered, 20.0% on D or F across 5 comparable feed recordsIowa: Lower need, 21 feed records covered, 23.5% on D or F across 17 comparable feed recordsKansas: Lower need, 6 feed records covered, 100.0% on D or F across 2 comparable feed recordsKentucky: Moderate need, 7 feed records covered, 33.3% on D or F across 3 comparable feed recordsLouisiana: High need, 3 feed records covered, 100.0% on D or F across 2 comparable feed recordsMaine: Moderate need, 7 feed records covered, 50.0% on D or F across 2 comparable feed recordsMaryland: Lower need, 33 feed records covered, 46.2% on D or F across 13 comparable feed recordsMassachusetts: Lower need, 41 feed records covered, 33.3% on D or F across 27 comparable feed recordsMichigan: Lower need, 18 feed records covered, 66.7% on D or F across 9 comparable feed recordsMinnesota: Lower need, 9 feed records covered, 20.0% on D or F across 5 comparable feed recordsMississippi: High need, 3 feed records covered, 50.0% on D or F across 2 comparable feed recordsMissouri: Lower need, 5 feed records covered, 50.0% on D or F across 2 comparable feed recordsMontana: Lower need, 6 feed records covered, 33.3% on D or F across 3 comparable feed recordsNebraska: Lower need, 5 feed records covered, 66.7% on D or F across 3 comparable feed recordsNevada: Lower need, 6 feed records covered, 50.0% on D or F across 4 comparable feed recordsNew Hampshire: Lower need, 3 feed records covered, 100.0% on D or F across 2 comparable feed recordsNew Jersey: Lower need, 6 feed records covered, 50.0% on D or F across 6 comparable feed recordsNew Mexico: High need, 14 feed records covered, 62.5% on D or F across 8 comparable feed recordsNew York: Moderate need, 84 feed records covered, 80.4% on D or F across 51 comparable feed recordsNorth Carolina: Lower need, 24 feed records covered, 50.0% on D or F across 12 comparable feed recordsNorth Dakota: Lower need, 3 feed records covered, 0.0% on D or F across 1 comparable feed recordOhio: Lower need, 19 feed records covered, 62.5% on D or F across 8 comparable feed recordsOklahoma: Moderate need, 4 feed records covered, 50.0% on D or F across 2 comparable feed recordsOregon: Lower need, 78 feed records covered, 28.6% on D or F across 49 comparable feed recordsPennsylvania: Lower need, 15 feed records covered, 25.0% on D or F across 4 comparable feed recordsRhode Island: Lower need, 3 feed records covered, 0.0% on D or F across 2 comparable feed recordsSouth Carolina: Lower need, 4 feed records covered, 0.0% on D or F across 1 comparable feed recordSouth Dakota: Lower need, 1 feed record coveredTennessee: Moderate need, 10 feed records covered, 60.0% on D or F across 5 comparable feed recordsTexas: Lower need, 15 feed records covered, 75.0% on D or F across 8 comparable feed recordsUtah: Lower need, 5 feed records covered, 100.0% on D or F across 1 comparable feed recordVermont: Lower need, 16 feed records covered, 25.0% on D or F across 12 comparable feed recordsVirginia: Lower need, 58 feed records covered, 46.7% on D or F across 45 comparable feed recordsWashington: Lower need, 78 feed records covered, 19.2% on D or F across 52 comparable feed recordsWest Virginia: Moderate need, 1 feed record covered, 0.0% on D or F across 1 comparable feed recordWisconsin: Lower need, 15 feed records covered, 37.5% on D or F across 8 comparable feed recordsAlaska: Lower need, 6 feed records covered, 0.0% on D or F across 3 comparable feed recordsHawaii: Lower need, 3 feed records covered, 100.0% on D or F across 1 comparable feed record
Need tier: High needModerate needLower needNo tracked feeds

High-need states

StateD/F shareComparable feedsMedian score
Louisiana100.0%256.4
New Mexico62.5%862.5
Mississippi50.0%283.6

Every state

The ACS need tier for every state we track, with guarded score summaries only where a comparable feed cohort exists.

StateNeed tierD/F shareFeed recordsComparable feedsMedian score
LouisianaHigh need100.0%3256.4
New MexicoHigh need62.5%14862.5
MississippiHigh need50.0%3283.6
ArkansasModerate need100.0%3136.9
District of ColumbiaModerate need100.0%5254.9
New YorkModerate need80.4%845158.5
TennesseeModerate need60.0%10559.5
MaineModerate need50.0%7270.8
OklahomaModerate need50.0%4277.3
KentuckyModerate need33.3%7370.9
AlabamaModerate need25.0%9475.4
West VirginiaModerate need0.0%1185.6
DelawareLower need100.0%1146.2
HawaiiLower need100.0%3128.4
KansasLower need100.0%6265.4
New HampshireLower need100.0%3251.3
UtahLower need100.0%5158.6
TexasLower need75.0%15847.2
IllinoisLower need72.7%151162.0
MichiganLower need66.7%18965.5
NebraskaLower need66.7%5368.2
OhioLower need62.5%19867.0
ArizonaLower need61.5%231369.3
FloridaLower need50.0%432070.8
MissouriLower need50.0%5265.8
NevadaLower need50.0%6469.5
New JerseyLower need50.0%6663.0
North CarolinaLower need50.0%241270.1
CaliforniaLower need47.6%1838474.4
VirginiaLower need46.7%584574.1
MarylandLower need46.2%331370.8
WisconsinLower need37.5%15878.1
MassachusettsLower need33.3%412773.5
MontanaLower need33.3%6378.7
OregonLower need28.6%784975.2
PennsylvaniaLower need25.0%15473.0
VermontLower need25.0%161278.4
IowaLower need23.5%211779.1
ColoradoLower need20.3%957477.0
ConnecticutLower need20.0%11577.7
IndianaLower need20.0%11583.0
MinnesotaLower need20.0%9578.4
WashingtonLower need19.2%785275.5
AlaskaLower need0.0%6374.7
GeorgiaLower need0.0%16171.7
IdahoLower need0.0%3194.8
North DakotaLower need0.0%3173.9
Rhode IslandLower need0.0%3276.8
South CarolinaLower need0.0%4181.1
South DakotaLower needNot compared10Not compared

In plain words: this highlights high-need states where a guarded score cohort also shows weak feeds, so help can go where it matters most. It never changes any feed's grade.

Need tiers come from Census ACS (poverty, zero-vehicle households, disability share), joined to agencies by state. They prioritize data-quality help; they never change a grade. Score summaries use 1634 canonical, non-duplicate feed scorecards under rubric 1.3, scoring profile gtfs-scorecard-1.3, MobilityData gtfs-validator 8.0.1, reader archive profile raw-v1, and measured categories Correctness, Freshness, Rider experience. The same data is at the equity API (equity.json). State outlines: public-domain simplified geometry (docs/decisions/0022-equity-choropleth.md). State-level is a first cut; a tract-level refinement is in progress.