Feed status · checked 2026-07-23
Mie Kotsu Iga (三重交通 伊賀営業所)
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Bus
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Mie, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 73 minutes ago; last changed 73 minutes ago.
Measured 4 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: high.
- All four score categories were measured this run.
- Realtime was sampled in one bounded window of 9 snapshots.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Ask your AVL vendor why the feed stopped advancing; the GTFS-Realtime header timestamp should move forward on every publish.
The realtime feed's last update was about 2 hours old when sampled. A realtime feed this far behind has effectively stopped. Riders see buses that already left, or apps quietly fall back to the schedule while still showing a live label.
⏱ A vendor support ticket; treat it as a feed outage.worth about +50 points in its category
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
580 of 580 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
820 of 820 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Ask your AVL vendor why the feed stopped advancing; the GTFS-Realtime header timestamp should move forward on every publish.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 92 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- One or more realtime feeds were reachable; live-arrival coverage is not known.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 6 kinds of issue across 1504 instances (0 error, 1497 warning, 7 informational).
Service data covers the next 92 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Sampled 9 times outside service hours: 3 of 3 configured feeds healthy; vehicle position plausibility was not measurable.
Routes and stops
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.
Skip to route and stop dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 阿波線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 玉滝線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 柘植線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 諏訪・予野線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 月瀬線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 上野名張線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 西山・島ヶ原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 名古屋上野高速線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 友生線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 桐が丘線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 曽爾香落渓線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 赤目線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 奥津線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 梅が丘線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 名張つつじが丘線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 名張百合が丘線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 桔梗が丘循環線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 桔梗が丘市立病院線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| すずらん台線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
This feed has 580 stops.
List every stop
- 名古屋(名鉄バスセンター)
- 関バスセンター
- 上野市駅
- 上野市駅
- 上野市駅
- 広小路
- 農人町
- 御代インター森精機前
- 荒木(伊賀)
- 荒木(伊賀)
- 岡山口
- 岡山口
- 中之瀬
- 千戸
- 千戸
- 真泥橋
- 炊口
- 畑
- 畑
- 大山田小学校
- 大山田小学校
- 山田(伊賀)
- 山田(伊賀)
- 宮の前(伊賀)
- 大山田支所前
- 大山田支所前
- 持中
- 持中
- 中村(伊賀)
- 出後橋
- 川北
- 川北
- 三谷
- 三谷
- 正覚寺前
- 寺坂橋
- 大橋
- 富永(伊賀)
- 成田山前
- 阿波
- 平松口
- 元町(伊賀)
- 元町(伊賀)
- 汁付
- 木の館前
- 子延口
- 赤坂
- 東丸之内
- 川東
- 春日口
- あけぼの学園前
- あけぼの学園前
- 御代
- 西新堂
- 小田口
- 小田口
- 服部口
- 印代
- 印代
- 百町
- 松原(伊賀)
- 松原(伊賀)
- 松原東
- 松原東
- 西方寺
- 佐那具
- 佐那具
- 佐那具
- 佐那具病院前
- 佐那具病院前
- 西之沢
- 川西
- 居附
- 佐那具駅前
- 岩瀬
- 円徳院
- 下川合
- 上川合
- 八丁口
- 馬場
- 河合
- 阿山支所前
- 北平野
- 服部
- 市営球場前
- 市営球場前
- 水源地前
- 水源地前
- 伊賀上野駅前
- 西三田
- 大谷
- 諏訪口
- 諏訪(伊賀)
- 諏訪下出
- 希央台
- 希央台
- 後出
- 案山子畑
- 木根
- 岩倉
- 出城
- 西高倉
- 木田原
- 鳥居出
- 寺辻
- 中出
- 西山
- 公園口
- 崇広堂前
- 西大手
- 鍵屋辻
- 鍵屋辻
- 市場(伊賀)
- 長田
- 新居市民センター前
- 銀座二丁目
- 銀座二丁目
- 銀座四丁目
- 銀座四丁目
- 恵美須町
- 恵美須町
- 恵美須町
- 恵美須町
- 勧進辻
- 八幡町(伊賀)
- 八幡町(伊賀)
- 八幡町(伊賀)
- 清水
- 大野木
- 大内口
- 成和西小学校前
- 成和西小学校前
- 七本木
- 七本木
- 永谷辻
- 白樫
- 石打保育所前
- 石打
- 石打
- 尾山診療所前
- 尾山診療所前
- 尾山
- 月瀬橋
- 嵩口
- 月ノ瀬
- 月ノ瀬
- 太郎谷
- 桃香野
- 口法花
- 中法花
- 奥法花
- ぎゅーとら蔵持店
- ぎゅーとら蔵持店
- さつき団地
- さつき団地
- 守田町
- 守田町
- 桑町
- 桑町
- 桑町南口
- 桑町南口
- 名阪東インター
- 名阪東インター
- 国道並松
- 国道並松
- 市民病院下
- 市民病院下
- 本郷口
- 本郷口
- 猪田道
- 依那具
- 西出口(伊賀)
- 田中(伊賀)
- 山出(伊賀)
- 山出団地前
- 金坪
- 金坪
- 金坪
- 上野インター
- 上野インター
- 大内
- 大内
- 笠部口
- 笠部口
- 上之庄
- 菖蒲池
- 菖蒲池
- 古山局前
- 古山局前
- 蔵縄手
- 蔵縄手
- 安場
- 安場
- 南口
- 南口
- 水越
- 水越
- 田原
- 田原
- 東田原
- 東田原
- 野中(名張)
- 野中(名張)
- 西原
- 西原
- 桔梗が丘
- 蔵持
- 蔵持
- 東町(名張)
- 東町(名張)
- 東町(名張)
- 東町(名張)
- 上八町
- 上八町
- 松崎町
- 松崎町
- 名張駅前
- 名張駅前
- 向島
- 向島
- 木興団地前
- 木興団地前
- 青山町駅前
- 労働基準監督署前
- 市営住宅前
- 東小学校前
- 東小学校前
- 下友生
- 中友生
- 中友生
- 友生局前
- 上友生
- 稲葉
- 蓮池
- 喰代
- 広
- 青ノ代
- 高山
- 茅町駅前
- 茅町駅前
- 茅町東
- 茅町東
- 緑ケ丘東町
- 緑ケ丘東町
- 緑ケ丘
- 緑ケ丘
- 文化会館口
- 伊賀広域防災拠点前
- 伊賀広域防災拠点前
- 荒木団地
- and 330 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
10 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Error1 instance
The realtime feed's last update was about 2 hours old when sampled.
A realtime feed this far behind has effectively stopped. Riders see buses that already left, or apps quietly fall back to the schedule while still showing a live label.
Fix: Ask your AVL vendor why the feed stopped advancing; the GTFS-Realtime header timestamp should move forward on every publish. (A vendor support ticket; treat it as a feed outage.)
Validator rule: scorecard_rt_feed_lapsed
- Warning866 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning820 instances
820 of 820 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning629 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning580 instances
580 of 580 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Some stops exist in the feed but no trip ever stops at them.
Riders may walk to a stop where no bus is scheduled to arrive.
Fix: Remove retired stops from the export, or add them back to the trips that should serve them. (A review pass in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: stop_without_stop_time · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info4 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info3 instances
The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.
Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.
Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)
Validator rule: unknown_file · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 92 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Can riders use it?
Checks beyond structural validation: places where the feed is valid but a rider still could not travel.
- 1 of 580 boardable stops are never served by any trip. Riders see these stops in apps and on the map but can never catch anything there, which erodes trust in the data. Remove stops no route serves, or add the trips that should call at them.
These do not change the grade. They catch trips with no rideable leg and stops no trip serves, the kind of gap a trip planner trips over.
Realtime reliability
The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 1 checks, with 9224s median lag.
Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 92 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 75 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality 50 / 100
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/mie-kotsu-iga/2026-07-23.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-23. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.