Feed status · checked 2026-10-17
Towada Kanko Dentetsu (十和田観光電鉄)
Based on the feed source on file; publisher ownership is not verified
Service mode Bus
unchanged since 2026-10-16
Cataloged in Aomori, Japan.
Source feed: https://api.gtfs-data.jp/v2/organizations/towadakankodentetsu/feeds/toutetsu/files/feed.zip?rid=current
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 66 minutes ago; last changed 16 days ago.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the feed URL on file (publisher not verified).
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the configured feed URL. Publisher ownership of that URL is not verified.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
About this feed
Towada Kanko Dentetsu (十和田観光電鉄)’s published feed lists 19 bus routes, 183 scheduled trips and 935 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-10-01 through 2027-03-31. The published file last changed on 2026-09-30.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
935 of 935 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fixing this covers all 935 stops in the feed.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
183 of 183 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fixing this covers all 183 trips in the feed.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.
⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category
Riders and need behind these fixes
- Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
- The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.
These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.
Finding handoff
Move one finding to a recheck
Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.
- Finding
- Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 02 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 03 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 165 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 7 kinds of issue across 9929 instances (0 error, 9898 warning, 31 informational).
Service data covers the next 165 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.
This feed has 935 stops.
The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.
Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
- みちのく経由青森線 (green)
- 万内森ノ越線 (green)
- 三沢百石線 (green)
- 上北線 (green)
- 七戸乙供線 (green)
- 野辺地尾駮線 (green)
- 野辺地市内 (green)
- 十和田三沢線 (green)
- 十和田八戸線 (green)
- イオンスーパーセンター十和田線 (green)
- 三沢市~イオンモール下田線 (green)
- 青森市内線 (green)
- 十和田線 (green)
- 野辺地線 (green)
- 野辺地線(乙供三高スクール) (green)
- 野辺地線(芋久保経由) (green)
- 野辺地線(もみのき学園経由) (green)
- 立崎線 (green)
- 水喰十和田市線 (green)
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| みちのく経由青森線 | Bus | green |
| 万内森ノ越線 | Bus | green |
| 三沢百石線 | Bus | green |
| 上北線 | Bus | green |
| 七戸乙供線 | Bus | green |
| 野辺地尾駮線 | Bus | green |
| 野辺地市内 | Bus | green |
| 十和田三沢線 | Bus | green |
| 十和田八戸線 | Bus | green |
| イオンスーパーセンター十和田線 | Bus | green |
| 三沢市~イオンモール下田線 | Bus | green |
| 青森市内線 | Bus | green |
| 十和田線 | Bus | green |
| 野辺地線 | Bus | green |
| 野辺地線(乙供三高スクール) | Bus | green |
| 野辺地線(芋久保経由) | Bus | green |
| 野辺地線(もみのき学園経由) | Bus | green |
| 立崎線 | Bus | green |
| 水喰十和田市線 | Bus | green |
List every stop
- 三本木営業所
- 三本木営業所
- 観音寺前
- 観音寺前
- 稲吉
- 稲吉
- 中央モータースクール
- 中央モータースクール
- 中央モータースクール
- 日の出町
- 日の出町
- 東十五番町
- 東十五番町
- 東五番町
- 東五番町
- 三高前
- 三高前
- 南小学校通
- 南小学校通
- 並木
- 並木
- 一丁目
- 一丁目
- 三丁目
- 三丁目
- 十和田市中央
- 十和田市中央
- 十和田市現代美術館前
- 十和田市現代美術館前
- 市役所前(十和田市)
- 市役所前(十和田市)
- 中央病院
- 官庁街通
- 官庁街通
- 八丁目
- 八丁目
- 十丁目
- 十丁目
- 元町東
- 元町東
- 元町
- 元町
- 七郷入口
- 七郷入口
- 土手山
- 土手山
- 井戸頭
- 井戸頭
- 北井戸頭
- 北井戸頭
- 真登地
- 真登地
- 南洞内
- 南洞内
- 洞内
- 洞内
- 洞内
- 洞内
- 法身塚通
- 法身塚通
- 洞内本村
- 洞内本村
- 大沢田入口
- 大沢田入口
- 大沢田入口
- 大沢田本村
- 大沢田本村
- 芋久保
- 芋久保
- 西芋久保
- 西芋久保
- 東池ノ平
- 東池ノ平
- 池ノ平
- 池ノ平
- 北野(野辺地線)
- 北野(野辺地線)
- 川去
- 川去
- 七高前
- 七高前
- 七高入口
- 七高入口
- 川向
- 川向
- 下川向
- 下川向
- 小川町
- 小川町
- 七戸中央
- 七戸中央
- 七戸公民館
- 七戸公民館
- 七戸病院前
- 七戸病院前
- 笊田川久保
- 笊田川久保
- 七戸案内所
- 七戸案内所
- 変電所前(七戸町)
- 変電所前(七戸町)
- 変電所前(七戸町)
- 変電所前(七戸町)
- 福祉センター入口
- 福祉センター入口
- 膝森
- 膝森
- 美土里荘前
- 美土里荘前
- 長沢
- 長沢
- 野崎
- 野崎
- 花松
- 花松
- 西榎林
- 西榎林
- 榎林
- 榎林
- 東榎林
- 東榎林
- 七戸東栄前
- 七戸東栄前
- 蛇坂入口
- もみのき学園
- 蛇坂
- 七戸小学校
- 七戸町文化村前
- 七戸町文化村前
- 七戸十和田駅
- 七戸十和田駅
- 道の駅しちのへ
- 営農大学前
- 営農大学前
- 中野
- 中野
- 長下
- 長下
- 七戸町役場前
- 七戸町役場前
- 七戸町役場前
- 七戸町役場前
- 天間林小学校前
- 天間林小学校前
- 団地前
- 団地前
- 桜木
- 桜木
- 十字路
- 十字路
- 西天間
- 西天間
- 天間
- 天間
- 東天間
- 東天間
- 一本木
- 一本木
- 北一本木
- 北一本木
- 舟場向川久保
- 舟場向川久保
- 石沢
- 石沢
- 朝日団地
- 朝日団地
- 馬込
- 馬込
- 乙供元町
- 乙供元町
- 乙供
- 道ノ上
- 道ノ上
- 小又入口
- 小又入口
- 黄金
- 黄金
- 坪
- 坪
- 上坪
- 上坪
- 後平
- 後平
- 南平入口
- 南平入口
- 尾山入口
- 尾山入口
- 千曳
- 千曳
- 石坂
- 石坂
- 清水目
- 清水目
- 中屋敷入口
- 中屋敷入口
- 松ノ木平
- 松ノ木平
- 野辺地駅前
- 野辺地病院前
- 野辺地病院前
- 下町
- 下町
- 野辺地中央
- 野辺地中央
- 新町通
- 新町通
- 新町(野辺地町)
- 新町(野辺地町)
- 裁判所前
- 裁判所前
- 馬門道
- 馬門道
- 野辺地案内所
- 野辺地案内所
- 港湾前
- 港湾前
- 馬門
- 馬門
- 野辺地家ノ上
- 野辺地家ノ上
- 馬門児童公園
- 馬門児童公園
- 馬門温泉口
- 馬門温泉口
- 柴崎
- 柴崎
- 馬門温泉入口
- 馬門温泉入口
- 馬門温泉通
- 馬門温泉通
- スキー場前
- スキー場前
- 馬門温泉
- 滝沢入口
- 滝沢入口
- 諏訪沢入口
- 諏訪沢入口
- 農協通り
- 農協通り
- 後萢通
- 後萢通
- 東跨線橋
- 東跨線橋
- 八重田通り
- 八重田通り
- 県病通
- 県病通
- 南造道
- 南造道
- 岡造道一丁目
- and 685 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
Overall score across the last 16 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-16.
Show the numbers
| Check | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 72.0 | first check |
| 2026-10-03 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-04 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-05 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-06 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-07 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-08 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-09 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-10 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-11 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-12 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-13 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-14 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-15 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-16 | 72.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-17 | 72.0 | no change |
What changed since your last check
- Correctness no change
- Freshness no change
- Rider experience no change
Feed history
Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.
| Checked | Published file | Service dates through | Grade at the time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-17 (16 checks) | 2e7e98e7fba0 | 2027-03-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-09-30 to 2026-10-01 (2 checks) | 2e7e98e7fba0 | 2027-03-31 | C, 72 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
| 2026-07-25 to 2026-09-29 (63 checks) | 4107b0423928 | 2027-03-31 | C, 71.8 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
| 2026-07-18 to 2026-07-24 (4 checks) | 4107b0423928 | 2027-03-31 | C, 71.8 under rubric 1.2, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
What changed in this feed
Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-10-16.
Same feed file as 2026-10-16; the published zip did not change.
Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops and export changes in a reader, with no sign-up.
Everything we checked
10 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning9648 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning935 instances
935 of 935 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning183 instances
183 of 183 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning152 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Finding code: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for missing_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning97 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info20 instances
Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info9 instances
Some trip headsigns name a stop along the way, not the final destination.
The sign should tell riders where the bus ends up, so a midpoint name can send them the wrong way.
Fix: Set trip_headsign to the trip's last stop or its overall destination. (Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: trip_headsign_matches_intermediate_stop · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
One requirement remains for this feed to earn the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 165 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 165 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 70 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.
Similar feeds in Aomori
Other scorecards in Aomori, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/towada-kanko-dentetsu/2026-10-17.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-17. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.