← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-18

Hachinohe City Bus (八戸市営バス)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

71.8 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Catalogued in Aomori, Japan.

Covers 256 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

The Hachinohe City Transportation Bureau's municipal bus network in northeastern Aomori; counted as one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

680 of 680 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

2148 of 2148 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 256 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness69.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 9 kinds of issue across 130510 instances (0 error, 130491 warning, 19 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 256 days.

Rider experience52.5 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

Routes in Hachinohe City Bus (八戸市営バス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
ハイテクパーク線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
光星高校線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
八戸ニュータウン・高専線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
八戸ニュータウン・高専線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
八戸ニュータウン・高専線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
八戸ニュータウン・高専線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
八戸駅(西高校)線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
多賀台団地線(八太郎→河原木まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
多賀台団地線(八太郎→河原木まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
多賀台団地線(八太郎まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
多賀台団地線(河原木→八太郎まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
多賀台団地線(河原木→八太郎まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
多賀台団地線(河原木団地まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
岬台団地線(上柳町まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
岬台団地線(東霊園まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
工業大学線(市民病院まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
工業大学線(東霊園まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
工業大学線(館花下まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
市内循環線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
平庭線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
日曜朝市循環バス いさば号Busgreen (no shape in feed)
日計線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
旧シーガルビューホテル線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
旭ヶ丘・中心街線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
旭ヶ丘線(上柳町まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
旭ヶ丘線(吹上まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
旭ヶ丘線(四本松まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
旭ヶ丘線(東運動公園まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
旭ヶ丘線(類家南団地まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
是川団地線(中居林まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
是川団地線(大館中学校まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
是川団地線(市民病院まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
是川団地線(東霊園まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
柳橋線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
町畑線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
町畑線(吹上まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
種差海岸遊覧バス うみねこ号Busgreen (no shape in feed)
種差線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
美保野線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
鮫・市民病院線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
鮫中学校線(光星高校前まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
鮫中学校線(東霊園まわり)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
鮫(上柳町まわり)・長者中学校線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
鮫(白銀まわり)線Busgreen (no shape in feed)

This feed has 680 stops.

List every stop
  • 旭ヶ丘西口
  • 旭ヶ丘西口
  • 高館小学校前
  • 高館小学校前
  • 高館小学校前
  • 高館小学校前
  • 海浜荘前
  • 海浜荘前
  • 柏崎二丁目
  • 柏崎新町
  • 春日町
  • 春日町
  • 旭ヶ丘東口
  • 旭ヶ丘東口
  • 旭ヶ丘東口
  • 花水河原
  • 花水河原
  • 金浜
  • 金浜駅前
  • 金浜口
  • 金浜小学校前
  • 蕪島町
  • 蟇平
  • 蟇平
  • 蟇平
  • 蟇平
  • 上明戸
  • 上明戸
  • 上明戸
  • 上明戸
  • 上大久保
  • 上大久保
  • 上大杉平
  • 上大杉平
  • 旭ヶ丘四丁目
  • 旭ヶ丘四丁目
  • 上金浜
  • 上左比代
  • 上左比代
  • 上鮫
  • 上鮫
  • 上中道
  • 上中道
  • 上浜名谷地
  • 上浜名谷地
  • 上二ツ家
  • 上柳町
  • 上柳町
  • 上柳町
  • 上柳町
  • 荒町
  • 河原木団地
  • 河原木団地
  • 河原木団地南口
  • 河原木団地南口
  • 願成寺前
  • 願成寺前
  • 桔梗野
  • 桔梗野
  • 桔梗野工業団地
  • 桔梗野工業団地
  • 桔梗野小学校通
  • 桔梗野小学校通
  • 北高校通
  • 北高校通
  • 北高校前
  • 北高校前
  • 石手洗団地前
  • 石手洗団地前
  • 石手洗団地前
  • 漁港通
  • 漁港通
  • 北青葉
  • 北青葉
  • コープるいけ店前
  • コープるいけ店前
  • 工業高校前
  • 工業高校前
  • 工業大学前
  • 光星高校前
  • 光星高校前
  • 石堂
  • 石堂
  • 高専前
  • 高専前
  • 工大一高前
  • 工大一高前
  • 東白山台
  • 東白山台
  • 合同庁舎前
  • 合同庁舎前
  • 間ノ田
  • 間ノ田
  • 小久保
  • 小久保平
  • 小久保平
  • 小田
  • 小田
  • 小田上
  • 小田上
  • 小田前
  • 小田前
  • 石堂二丁目
  • 石堂二丁目
  • 八戸公園こどもの国入口
  • 小長根
  • 小長根
  • 小中野
  • 小中野
  • 小中野二丁目
  • 小舟渡
  • 小松平
  • 小松平
  • 是川団地
  • 是川団地一丁目
  • 是川団地一丁目
  • 是川団地二丁目
  • 是川団地二丁目
  • 工業大学正門前
  • 工業大学正門前
  • グランドサンピア八戸
  • 鉄工団地前
  • 鉄工団地前
  • 向陵高校前
  • 向陵高校前
  • 官舎集会所前
  • 市川
  • 市川
  • 斎場前
  • 斎場前
  • 妻ノ神
  • 栄町
  • 栄町
  • 栄町
  • 栄町
  • 桜ヶ丘
  • 桜ヶ丘
  • 桜ヶ丘
  • 桜ヶ丘
  • 桜木町
  • 桜木町
  • さくら幼稚園前
  • さくら幼稚園前
  • 市川後
  • 市川後
  • 鮫小学校通
  • 鮫消防分署前
  • 鮫消防分署前
  • 鮫中学校前
  • 鮫中学校前
  • さめ保育園前
  • 塩入
  • 塩入
  • 重地
  • 重地
  • 重地
  • 重地
  • 志民
  • 志民
  • 市庁前
  • 市庁前
  • 市川中学校前
  • 市川中学校前
  • 忍町
  • 忍町
  • 忍町
  • 忍町
  • 忍町
  • 司法センター前
  • 司法センター前
  • 四本松
  • 四本松
  • 四本松
  • 四本松
  • 清水川
  • 清水川
  • 市民センター前
  • 市民センター前
  • 市民センター前
  • 市民センター前
  • 鍛冶町
  • 鍛冶町
  • 鍛冶町
  • 鍛冶町
  • 下大久喜
  • 下大谷地
  • 下大谷地
  • 下組町
  • 下組町
  • 下大工町
  • 市川変電所
  • 市川変電所
  • 市川変電所
  • 下長
  • 下長
  • 車検登録事務所
  • 車検登録事務所
  • 社宅前
  • 社宅前
  • 十三日町
  • 十六日町
  • 商業高校前
  • 商業高校前
  • 常泉下
  • 常泉下
  • 一番町
  • 一番町
  • 八戸公園こどもの国通
  • 八戸公園こどもの国通
  • 八戸公園こどもの国通
  • 八戸公園こどもの国通
  • 白浜
  • 白浜
  • 尻引
  • 尻引
  • シルバークリニック
  • 白銀
  • 白銀
  • 白銀小学校前
  • 白銀小学校前
  • 白銀台団地
  • 白銀台団地
  • 白銀台西口
  • 白銀台西口
  • 一中前
  • 一中前
  • 白銀台郵便局前
  • 白銀台郵便局前
  • 城下一丁目
  • 城下一丁目
  • 城下一丁目
  • 城下一丁目
  • 城下四丁目
  • 城下四丁目
  • 新荒町
  • 新荒町
  • 新荒町
  • 新丁
  • 新丁
  • 岩ノ沢
  • 岩ノ沢
  • 新長横町
  • ユニバース白銀店前
  • ユニバース白銀店前
  • 新湊二丁目
  • 新湊二丁目
  • 水産高校前
  • 恵比須浜
  • and 430 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

12 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning130440 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning2148 instances

    2148 of 2148 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning680 instances

    680 of 680 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning39 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning6 instances

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning5 instances

    Two or more routes share the same name.

    Riders can't tell the routes apart in apps.

    Fix: Give each route a distinct short or long name. (One field per route.)

    Validator rule: duplicate_route_name · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info8 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info7 instances

    Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Validator rule: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info3 instances

    The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.

    Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.

    Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)

    Validator rule: unknown_file · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.

    A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.

    Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)

    Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 256 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 256 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 70 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Hachinohe City Bus (八戸市営バス) GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/hachinohe-city-bus/2026-07-18.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-18. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.