Feed status · checked 2026-07-19
Tanabe City Residents Bus (田辺市住民バス)
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Bus
unchanged since 2026-07-18
Catalogued in Wakayama, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Review the rule documentation for 'foreign_key_violation' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Foreign key violation (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.
⏱ Varies.worth about +12 points in its category
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
248 of 248 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
34 of 34 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Review the rule documentation for 'foreign_key_violation' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 316 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 7 kinds of issue across 1591 instances (1 error, 1584 warning, 6 informational).
Service data covers the next 316 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
1 accessibility depth signal
3 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (田辺市住民バス 龍神日高川線, 田辺市住民バス 上切原・切畑・大居線, 田辺市住民バス 栗垣内・曲川・小津荷・高山線).
Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.
Skip to route and stop dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
- 田辺市住民バス 龍神日高川線 (green)
- 田辺市住民バス 丹生ノ川線 (blue)
- 田辺市住民バス 上番・中下番・発心門線 (pink)
- 田辺市住民バス 上切原・切畑・大居線 (green)
- 田辺市住民バス 栗垣内・曲川・小津荷・高山線 (red)
- 田辺市住民バス 小森・一本松・福寿・菊水線 (white)
- 田辺市住民バス 武住・野竹・大瀬線 (blue)
- 田辺市住民バス 静川・上大野線 (yellow)
- 田辺市住民バス 土河屋・本宮線 (brown)
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 田辺市住民バス 龍神日高川線 | Bus | green |
| 田辺市住民バス 丹生ノ川線 | Bus | blue |
| 田辺市住民バス 栗栖川・近露線 | Bus | brown (no shape in feed) |
| 田辺市住民バス 上番・中下番・発心門線 | Bus | pink |
| 田辺市住民バス 上切原・切畑・大居線 | Bus | green |
| 田辺市住民バス 栗垣内・曲川・小津荷・高山線 | Bus | red |
| 田辺市住民バス 小森・一本松・福寿・菊水線 | Bus | white |
| 田辺市住民バス 武住・野竹・大瀬線 | Bus | blue |
| 田辺市住民バス 静川・上大野線 | Bus | yellow |
| 田辺市住民バス 土河屋・本宮線 | Bus | brown |
This feed has 248 stops.
List every stop
- 栗栖川駅
- 井戸坂
- 井戸坂
- 築根
- 築根
- 柳瀬
- 柳瀬
- 保の平
- 保の平
- 近露王子
- なかへち美術館
- 古道歩きの里ちかつゆ
- 北野
- 北野
- 北野
- 北野
- 朝来平口
- 紀伊中川
- 古道の里
- 野々尻
- 皆ノ川口
- 紀伊大川
- 三善橋
- 福定
- 柿平
- 小柳瀬
- 小柳瀬
- 東方
- 東方
- 応地
- 応地
- 原
- 原
- 上原
- 西
- 芝
- 芝
- 芝の下
- 芝の下
- 宮の瀬橋
- 宮の瀬橋
- 上福井
- 上福井
- 中福井
- 中福井
- 福井橋
- 福井橋
- 福井
- 福井
- 手谷橋
- 手谷橋
- 菅の川
- 下山路郵便局前
- 下山路郵便局前
- 龍神行政局前
- 龍神行政局前
- 上番
- 中下番
- 発心門
- 伏拝
- 竹の本
- 本宮大社前
- うらら館
- 請川
- 上切原
- 小菅
- 小菅
- 上切原山振センター前
- 寺臺
- 下モ山
- 草合
- 切畑
- 萩
- 大居上地
- 大居集会所前
- 不動さん前
- 栗垣内回転場
- 下福井
- 下福井
- 久保野集会所前
- 久保野平
- 横尾
- 曲川
- 串峠
- 将監の峰
- 小津荷
- 高山
- 三軒茶屋
- 沖の平
- 方栗
- 方栗
- 一本松下地
- 一本松上地
- 小森下地
- 小森上地
- 菊水
- 伏拝札場
- 福寿集会所前
- 向栗須
- 武住公民館前
- 三区集会所前
- 甲斐の川支所前
- 甲斐の川支所前
- 大瀬(本宮)
- 野竹
- 旧皆地小
- 蓑尾谷
- 瀬井
- 白河
- 平
- 静川小学校
- 白根
- 東和田
- 甲斐の川
- 甲斐の川
- 上大野
- 田代橋
- 旧本宮小学校
- 本宮中学校
- 土河屋
- 八木尾
- 熊野萩
- 三里橋
- 道の駅奥熊野
- 平岩口
- 甲斐の川口
- 甲斐の川口
- 大居口
- 下向橋
- 祓戸団地前
- 甲斐の川小学校前
- 甲斐の川小学校前
- 大瀬(龍神日高川線)
- 大瀬(龍神日高川線)
- 古宮橋
- 古宮橋
- 小家谷
- 小家谷
- 丸井旅館
- 丸井旅館
- 崎
- 崎
- 菅
- 菅
- 丸滝
- 丸滝
- 五味
- 五味
- 猿橋
- 猿橋
- 奥小森
- 奥小森
- ぬかごえ
- ぬかごえ
- 猪谷橋
- 猪谷橋
- 初湯川大橋
- 初湯川大橋
- 平橋
- 平橋
- 五領
- 五領
- 椿山ダム
- 椿山ダム
- 笠松(龍神日高川線)
- 笠松(龍神日高川線)
- 愛口
- 愛口
- 滝頭郵便局前
- 滝頭郵便局前
- 滝頭
- 滝頭
- 野々古口
- 野々古口
- 上の段(集落内)
- 上の段(集落内)
- 上の段(国道沿い)
- 上の段(国道沿い)
- 熊野川
- 熊野川
- 竿本橋
- 竿本橋
- 上安井
- 上安井
- 浅間峠
- 浅間峠
- 明神橋詰
- 明神橋詰
- 浅間集会所前
- 浅間集会所前
- 打尾
- 打尾
- 打尾下
- 打尾下
- 皆瀬奥
- 皆瀬奥
- 川原河
- 森林組合
- 森林組合
- 東
- 東
- 中の谷
- 中の谷
- 中安井
- 中安井
- 栃谷
- 栃谷
- 朝瀬橋
- 朝瀬橋
- 亀畑
- 亀畑
- 中南谷口
- 中南谷口
- 上平
- 上平
- 富士ヶ瀬
- 富士ヶ瀬
- 富登野
- 富登野
- 殿原
- 殿原
- 中央橋
- 中央橋
- 宮の谷口
- 宮の谷口
- 龍神中学校
- 龍神中学校
- 丹生ノ川谷口
- 丹生ノ川谷口
- 三ツ又口
- 三ツ又口
- 森
- 森
- 串
- 串
- 峯
- 峯
- 加財
- 加財
- 五味(丹生ノ川線)
- 五味(丹生ノ川線)
- 高畑
- 高畑
- ヤマセミ温泉
- 龍神市民センター
- 龍神市民センター
- 丸島橋
- 丸島橋
Over time
Overall score across the last 2 checks — unchanged since 2026-07-18.
Show the numbers
| Check | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-18 | 69.8 | first check |
| 2026-07-19 | 69.8 | no change |
What changed since your last check
- Correctness no change
- Freshness no change
- Rider experience no change
What changed in this feed
Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-07-18.
Same feed file as 2026-07-18; the published zip did not change.
Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops in a reader, with no sign-up.
Everything we checked
10 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Error1 instance
Foreign key violation (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'foreign_key_violation' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: foreign_key_violation · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1561 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning248 instances
248 of 248 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning34 instances
34 of 34 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning21 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info4 instances
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. 1 validator error to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Not yet
- 1 validator error to resolve.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 316 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 316 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 1 validator error, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 65 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/tanabe-city-jumin-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.