← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-23

すざか市民バス (須坂市)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

74.4 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Catalogued in Nagano, Japan.

Covers 281 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

すざか市民バス is the public schedule named by the repository. This registry item represents one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

171 of 171 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

71 of 71 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 281 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness75.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 2121 instances (0 error, 2119 warning, 2 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 281 days.

Rider experience52.5 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

1 accessibility depth signal

  • 6 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (北相之島線K10(土曜), 北相之島線K10, 北相之島線K11, 北相之島線K20(下り), 北相之島線K20(上り), and more).

    Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.

Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

Routes in すざか市民バス (須坂市)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
仙仁線S10(土日祝)Buspurple (no shape in feed)
仙仁線S10Buspurple (no shape in feed)
仙仁線S20(下り)Buspurple (no shape in feed)
仙仁線S20(上り)Buspurple (no shape in feed)
仙仁線S30(下り)Buspurple (no shape in feed)
仙仁線S30(上り)Buspurple (no shape in feed)
仙仁線S31Buspurple (no shape in feed)
仙仁線S40Buspurple (no shape in feed)
仙仁線S41Buspurple (no shape in feed)
米子線Y20(土曜)Busyellow (no shape in feed)
米子線Y20Busyellow (no shape in feed)
米子線Y21(下り)Busyellow (no shape in feed)
米子線Y21(上り)Busyellow (no shape in feed)
米子線Y40(下り)Busyellow (no shape in feed)
米子線Y40(上り)Busyellow (no shape in feed)
米子線Y41Busyellow (no shape in feed)
北相之島線K10(土曜)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
北相之島線K10Busgreen (no shape in feed)
北相之島線K11Busgreen (no shape in feed)
北相之島線K20(下り)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
北相之島線K20(上り)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
明徳団地線M10(土曜)Busgray (no shape in feed)
明徳団地線M10Busgray (no shape in feed)
明徳団地線M20(下り)Busgray (no shape in feed)
明徳団地線M20(上り)Busgray (no shape in feed)
明徳団地線M21Busgray (no shape in feed)
おかえりライナーBuswhite (no shape in feed)
おはようライナー仙仁豊丘Buswhite (no shape in feed)
おはようライナー米子明徳Buswhite (no shape in feed)

This feed has 171 stops.

List every stop
  • アートパーク入口
  • アートパーク入口
  • 小池医院前
  • 小池医院前
  • 旭ヶ丘団地西(クスリのアオキ旭ヶ丘店前)
  • 旭ヶ丘団地西(クスリのアオキ旭ヶ丘店前)
  • 東中学校
  • 東中学校
  • 相森北
  • 相森北
  • 相森宮前
  • 相森宮前
  • 大谷不動入口
  • 大谷不動入口
  • 大日向
  • 大日向
  • 笠鉾会館
  • 笠鉾会館
  • 霧原大元神社前
  • 霧原大元神社前
  • 上八町公会堂北
  • 上八町公会堂北
  • 亀倉
  • 亀倉
  • 亀倉新田
  • 亀倉新田
  • 亀倉西
  • 亀倉西
  • 臥竜公園
  • 臥竜公園
  • 臥竜公園入口
  • 臥竜公園入口
  • 臥竜東(コメリ須坂店前)
  • 臥竜東(コメリ須坂店前)
  • 看護専門学校
  • 看護専門学校
  • 北相之島町
  • 北相之島町
  • 北相之島町西
  • 北相之島町西
  • 北相之島町南
  • 北相之島町南
  • 北須坂駅
  • 北須坂駅
  • 北原口
  • 北原口
  • 湯っ蔵んど入口
  • グリーンアルム
  • グリーンアルム
  • 県民グラウンド入口
  • 県民グラウンド入口
  • 塩野
  • 塩野
  • 大日向神社前
  • 大日向神社前
  • 芝宮
  • 芝宮
  • 下八町
  • 下八町
  • ラウンドアバウト南
  • ラウンドアバウト南
  • 下米子
  • 下米子
  • 須坂市役所西
  • 須坂市役所西
  • 旭ヶ丘ふれあいプラザ南
  • 旭ヶ丘ふれあいプラザ南
  • 新田町公会堂
  • 新田町公会堂
  • 新田南
  • 新田南
  • 末広町
  • 末広町
  • 須坂駅
  • 須坂駅
  • 須坂創成高校前
  • 須坂創成高校前
  • 長野県立信州医療センター
  • 長野県立信州医療センター
  • 関谷
  • 関谷
  • 仙仁
  • 仙仁
  • 仙仁入口
  • 仙仁入口
  • 仙仁公会堂
  • 仙仁公会堂
  • 相森中学校南
  • 相森中学校南
  • タカツバ
  • タカツバ
  • 高畑
  • 高畑
  • 高甫小学校入口
  • 高甫小学校入口
  • 栃倉入口
  • 栃倉入口
  • 豊丘
  • 豊丘
  • 豊丘小学校
  • 豊丘小学校
  • 豊里
  • 豊里
  • 豊島町
  • 豊島町
  • 中田
  • 中田
  • 中田南
  • 中田南
  • 中原団地
  • 中原団地
  • 中村
  • 中村
  • 仁礼小学校
  • 仁礼小学校
  • 仁礼小学校西
  • 仁礼小学校西
  • 野辺
  • 野辺
  • 八幡東(デリシア須坂西店前)
  • 八幡東(デリシア須坂西店前)
  • 須坂市社会福祉協議会
  • 須坂市社会福祉協議会
  • 望岳台団地
  • 望岳台団地
  • 松川林間工業団地
  • 松川林間工業団地
  • 南原町
  • 南原町
  • 田中本家博物館西
  • 田中本家博物館西
  • 南原町東
  • 南原町東
  • みのどう山
  • みのどう山
  • 明光寺
  • 明光寺
  • 明徳町公会堂
  • 明徳町公会堂
  • 明徳団地入口
  • 明徳団地入口
  • おいしい広場
  • おいしい広場
  • 村石
  • 村石
  • 湯河原
  • 湯河原
  • 湯っ蔵んど
  • 湯っ蔵んど
  • 米子
  • 米子
  • 米子不動尊
  • 米子不動尊
  • 和合団地
  • 和合団地
  • 米子町公会堂
  • 米子町公会堂
  • 臥竜公園入口(明徳団地線)
  • 臥竜公園入口(明徳団地線)
  • 蔵のまち入口
  • 蔵のまち入口
  • 信州医療センター東
  • 信州医療センター東
  • 須坂高校北
  • 須坂高校北
  • たけまえ医院前
  • たけまえ医院前
  • そのさとホール
  • そのさとホール

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

8 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning2087 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning171 instances

    171 of 171 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning71 instances

    71 of 71 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning24 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning7 instances

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 281 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 281 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 76 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

すざか市民バス (須坂市) GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/suzakicity-suzakashiminbus/2026-07-23.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-23. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.