← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-19

Chikuma City Loop Bus (千曲市循環バス)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

75.2 / 100

unchanged since 2026-07-18

Catalogued in Nagano, Japan.

Covers 255 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Chikuma City's circulating community bus; counted as one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

269 of 269 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

130 of 130 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 255 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness77.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 7845 instances (0 error, 7843 warning, 2 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 255 days.

Rider experience52.2 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

1 accessibility depth signal

  • 3 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (大循環線(西回り), 大循環線(東回り), 大田原線).

    Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.

Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 大循環線(西回り) (red)
  • おばすて棚田・温泉便 (teal)
  • 大循環線(東回り) (red)
  • 東部線 (yellow)
  • 姨捨線 (pink)
  • 大田原線 (green)
  • 更級戸倉線 (gray)
  • 五加戸倉線 (teal)
  • 上山田線 (pink)
Routes in Chikuma City Loop Bus (千曲市循環バス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
大循環線(西回り)Busred
おばすて棚田・温泉便Busteal
大循環線(東回り)Busred
東部線Busyellow
姨捨線Buspink
大田原線Busgreen
更級戸倉線Busgray
五加戸倉線Busteal
上山田線Buspink

This feed has 269 stops.

List every stop
  • 高河原
  • 高河原
  • 寂蒔公民館
  • 寂蒔上町集会所
  • 寂蒔仲町
  • 新田ふれあい広場
  • 新田ふれあい広場
  • 新田入口
  • 新田入口
  • 森林組合
  • 森林組合
  • 消防署入口
  • 消防署入口
  • 千曲中央病院
  • 千曲中央病院
  • 岡地入口
  • 中公民館
  • 鋳物師屋南
  • 鋳物師屋南
  • 鋳物師屋西
  • 鋳物師屋西
  • 五加郵便局前
  • 五加郵便局前
  • あいにー前
  • あいにー前
  • ツルヤ稲荷山店前
  • ひまわり前
  • ひまわり前
  • 稲荷山温泉前
  • 稲荷山温泉前
  • 稲荷山荒町
  • 稲荷山郵便局
  • 稲荷山郵便局
  • 健康プラザ
  • 稲荷山支援学校前
  • 桑原
  • 桑原
  • 桑原中区北
  • 桑原鳥居前
  • 桑原鳥居前
  • 桑原保育園前
  • 桑原保育園前
  • 穴守稲荷神社
  • 穴守稲荷神社
  • 元町公民館
  • 元町公民館
  • 更埴西中学校
  • 古大穴神社前
  • 佐野入口
  • 治田公園
  • 治田公園
  • 小坂公民館入口
  • 小坂公民館入口
  • 上中区
  • 上中区
  • 上八日町
  • 上八日町
  • 菅谷医院前
  • 大田原
  • 大田原マレットパーク
  • 大田原西
  • 妻女台団地中央
  • 竹林の湯
  • 中原
  • 治田町
  • 治田町
  • 長雲寺入口
  • 長雲寺入口
  • 天満宮前
  • 天満宮前
  • 本八日町
  • 本八日町
  • JR姨捨駅
  • 金毘羅前
  • 妻女台団地入口
  • 御言橋
  • 御言橋
  • 公民館下
  • 志川
  • 志川
  • 上町
  • 上町
  • 上町
  • 上町
  • 斉の森
  • 斉の森
  • 代入口
  • 代入口
  • 大池
  • 森南
  • 大池掲示
  • 長尾根
  • 鳥居前
  • 鳥居前
  • 八幡(武水別神社神官松田邸前)
  • 八幡(武水別神社神官松田邸前)
  • 森北
  • 北堀
  • 北堀
  • 姨捨SA入口
  • 日本遺産センター
  • 日本遺産センター
  • 姨捨公園入口
  • 姨捨上
  • 旧JA更級店前
  • 海野鉄筋前
  • 五区公民館
  • 生萱
  • 更級小学校入口
  • 更級小学校入口
  • 更級郵便局前
  • 黒彦公民館
  • 黒彦団地入口
  • 黒彦団地入口
  • 三島
  • 四区公民館
  • 四区消防詰所
  • 芝原水野青果前
  • 芝原水野青果前
  • 若宮
  • 若宮
  • 若宮東
  • 若宮東
  • 生萱入口
  • 須坂
  • 須坂
  • 須坂冠着橋入口
  • 明治新道入口
  • 歴史資料館入口
  • 綿半千曲店前
  • 綿半千曲店前
  • 石杭
  • JAあんず店西
  • セブンイレブン戸倉店前
  • セブンイレブン戸倉店前
  • セブンイレブン戸倉内川店東
  • セブンイレブン戸倉内川店東
  • 五加児童館
  • 五加小学校西
  • 十夜河原入口
  • 十夜河原入口
  • 小船山花き集荷所
  • 小船山公民館
  • 上徳間公民館
  • 上徳間公民館
  • 上徳館前
  • 上徳館前
  • 赤柴
  • 千曲駅
  • 千本柳公民館
  • 千本柳南
  • 千本柳北
  • 五差路
  • 五差路
  • とよき内科南
  • 磯部ミニ公園
  • 倉科
  • 磯部畑野商店横
  • 戸上中学校入口
  • 戸上中学校入口
  • 戸倉駅
  • 戸倉体育館
  • 今井町
  • 酒造コレクション前
  • 新戸倉温泉信金前
  • 新戸倉温泉信金前
  • 千曲市ふれあい福祉センター
  • 千曲市ふれあい福祉センター
  • 創造館
  • 地域福祉センター
  • 倉科入口
  • 茶売原踏切前
  • 中学校前
  • 中学校前
  • 二階堂医院前
  • 柏王公民館入口
  • 柏王南
  • 柏王北
  • 白鳥園
  • 福井
  • 福井公民館
  • 中之宮公会堂
  • 旧JA上山田支所前
  • つるの湯
  • 温泉資料館前
  • 温泉資料館前
  • 羽場貯水槽前
  • 原の前
  • 戸倉温泉入口
  • 戸倉温泉入口
  • 三本木花の駅
  • 漆原集落センター
  • 上山田温泉公園
  • 上山田温泉公園
  • 上山田温泉入口
  • 上山田温泉入口
  • 田端
  • 上山田小学校入口
  • 上山田戸倉出張所前
  • 上山田戸倉出張所前
  • 城山入口
  • 城山入口
  • 新屋
  • 新屋
  • 新山ニュータウン
  • 新山ニュータウン入口
  • 新山公民館
  • 西友上山田店
  • 西友上山田店
  • 総合観光会館
  • 総合観光会館
  • 土口中
  • 智識寺前
  • 長野寿光会上山田病院
  • 南部公園入口
  • 八坂火の見前
  • 力石4組集会所
  • 力石公民館
  • 力石北
  • 薬師堂団地前
  • 下久保
  • 唐木製菓前
  • 土口南
  • 土口北
  • 日吉神社前
  • JAあんず店前
  • 謡坂
  • 駐在所前
  • 雨宮会館前
  • 雨宮上
  • ふれあい通り
  • ふれあい通り
  • 屋代駅
  • 屋代駅入口
  • 屋代駅入口
  • 雨宮中
  • 屋代横町
  • 屋代横町
  • 屋代公民館
  • 屋代高校前
  • 屋代高校前駅
  • 屋代中学校
  • 屋代中学校入口
  • 屋代南高校
  • 屋代本町
  • 科野の里歴史公園
  • and 19 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)

Over time

Overall score across the last 2 checks — unchanged since 2026-07-18.

2026-07-18: 75.22026-07-19: 75.2
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-07-1875.2 first check
2026-07-1975.2 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change

What changed in this feed

Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-07-18.

Same feed file as 2026-07-18; the published zip did not change.

Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops in a reader, with no sign-up.

Everything we checked

8 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning7830 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning269 instances

    269 of 269 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning130 instances

    130 of 130 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning11 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 255 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 255 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 78 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Chikuma City Loop Bus (千曲市循環バス) GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/chikuma-city-loop-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.