← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-10

Springfield Mass Transit District (SMTD)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

55.2 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Ahead of 45% of all tracked agencies and 55% of large agencies.

All agencies45%
large peers55%
Feed expiredAccessibility gaps

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.1, validator 8.0.1.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Re-export the feed with a calendar that reaches further out, and set feed_info feed_end_date past your next service change.Likely your export tool

Service data ended 34 day(s) ago. When the calendar runs out, trip planners stop showing this agency even though the buses are still running. Riders are told the service does not exist.

⏱ Usually one export setting; export on a schedule so it never lapses again.worth about +100 points

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip (most small-agency fleets are 100% accessible, so this is often a single default).Likely your export tool

3505 of 3505 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ Often one default setting in your export.worth about +15 points

Fix 03

Ask your AVL vendor to check vehicle-to-trip assignments for the flagged trips.

10 of 10 sampled vehicle positions were far from their assigned route (worst: 7435 m). A bus shown off its route usually means a wrong trip assignment; riders watch their bus drive the wrong streets.

⏱ A vendor support ticket with the trip ids attached.worth about +15 points

Close the loop on each fix. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and let the next run verify it — the scorecard shows the fix; the agency publishes it.

  1. Re-export the feed with a calendar that reaches further out, and set feed_info feed_end_date past your next service change. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Prove it cleared. The next scorecard run re-checks this automatically and, once it is gone, mints a dated receipt. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip (most small-agency fleets are 100% accessible, so this is often a single default). · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Prove it cleared. The next scorecard run re-checks this automatically and, once it is gone, mints a dated receipt. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Ask your AVL vendor to check vehicle-to-trip assignments for the flagged trips.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Prove it cleared. The next scorecard run re-checks this automatically and, once it is gone, mints a dated receipt. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Send the agency a note

Supporting this agency? Copy this and email it to them. It names what lapsed, why it matters to riders, and the one setting to change.

Score by category

Correctness63.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 8 kinds of issue across 61224 instances (0 error, 61223 warning, 1 informational).

Freshness0.0 / 100

Service data ended 34 day(s) ago. Trip planners have likely already dropped this feed.

Rider experience70.2 / 100

71% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (71% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility44.3 / 100

71% of stops state accessibility (71% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime quality76.9 / 100

Sampled 9 times outside service hours: 3 of 3 feeds healthy; 0.0% of vehicles on their route.

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

Beyond the grade

Opportunities that do not change your grade today: fare detail, on-demand service, and deeper accessibility data.

Some fixes we can make for you

These are the safe mechanical fixes, applied to a copy of your feed. They change only what is certain and leave everything else untouched. Review the diff before you publish.

Download corrected feed

NTD GTFS readiness Not ready

Resolve this before you certify on the D-10. Service data expired 34 days ago, so FTA would find the link out of date.

Published Ready
Published at a public URL.
Valid Ready
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Not ready
Service data expired 34 days ago, so FTA would find the link out of date.
agency_id matches your NTD ID Not checked yet
Setting your GTFS agency_id to your five-digit NTD ID is an optional way to line a feed up with its National Transit Database record. FTA links the two on your P-50 form, so it is not a required feed change. We don't have your NTD ID on file, so this is not checked yet.

In plain words: if you report to the federal transit database, you have to publish a working, up-to-date feed and confirm it once a year. This box is a heads-up on whether yours looks ready; it is not the official sign-off.

A readiness signal mapping this feed to the FTA National Transit Database GTFS requirement (Report Year 2023 onward: a public, valid, current feed, certified annually on the D-10). Aligning agency_id with your NTD ID lets the feed line up with your NTD record; the July 2025 final rule links the two on the P-50 form rather than requiring that feed change, and requires shapes.txt in the published GTFS: Full Reporters from Report Year 2025, and Reduced, Rural, and Tribal Reporters from Report Year 2026. Not an official determination; your certification is the official check.

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. Service data expired 34 days ago. States wheelchair access on 71% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Not yet
Service data expired 34 days ago.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 71% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Realtime reliability

The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 1 checks, with 6s median lag.

Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment.

Live predictions vs schedule

0.0% of reported vehicle positions sat on or near the published route shape.

From the last full realtime sample: how far live arrival predictions sat from the schedule, and whether vehicle positions fell on the route. These feed the realtime score; they change no other category.

Below the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed's last day of service has passed, so Google and Apple Maps will stop showing your agency. Re-export with a calendar that covers at least the next four weeks.

How this agency maps to the standards

A data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Each category shows this feed's score and the standards it relates to: the FTA National Transit Database GTFS requirement, the MobilityData grading scheme, and the Google Transit gate. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 64 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading: stop locations, route names and colors. Google Transit: a feed must pass validation to stay in Maps.
Freshness 0 / 100
The FTA National Transit Database expectation of a valid, current feed. Google Transit: an expired calendar drops the agency from Maps.
Rider experience 70 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading: stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality 77 / 100
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a live badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates daily and links back to this scorecard.

Springfield Mass Transit District (SMTD) GTFS data quality grade: F

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/springfield-mass-transit-district-smtd-385/2026-07-10.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-10. Use it in a board packet, an NTD narrative, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.