← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-23

仁淀川町町民バス

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

77.1 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Catalogued in Kochi, Japan.

Covers 157 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

仁淀川町町民バス is the public schedule named by the repository. This registry item represents one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

210 of 210 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

59 of 59 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 157 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness81.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 4 kinds of issue across 1108 instances (0 error, 1105 warning, 3 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 157 days.

Rider experience52.5 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 町民バス 折尾線 (green)
  • 町民バス 安居渓谷線 (green)
  • 町民バス 楮原線 (green)
  • 町民バス 坂本線 (green)
  • 町民バス 北川線 (green)
  • 町民バス 上名野川線 (green)
  • 町民バス 織合橋大崎線 (green)
  • 町民バス 東部バス線 (green)
  • 町民バス 芋生野線 (green)
  • 町民バス 森山線 (green)
Routes in 仁淀川町町民バス's feed
RouteTypeLine color
町民バス 折尾線Busgreen
町民バス 安居渓谷線Busgreen
町民バス 楮原線Busgreen
町民バス 坂本線Busgreen
町民バス 北川線Busgreen
町民バス 上名野川線Busgreen
町民バス 織合橋大崎線Busgreen
町民バス 東部バス線Busgreen
町民バス 芋生野線Busgreen
町民バス 森山線Busgreen

This feed has 210 stops.

List every stop
  • 大崎
  • 相能
  • 相能
  • 引地
  • 引地
  • 二子野
  • 二子野
  • 崎ノ山
  • 崎ノ山
  • 正ノ石
  • 正ノ石
  • 名野川
  • 名野川
  • 名野川
  • 上仁淀
  • 上仁淀
  • 森口橋
  • 森口橋
  • 森口橋
  • 五味
  • 五味
  • 川渡
  • 川渡
  • 池川総合支所前
  • 池川総合支所前
  • 三叉
  • 三叉
  • 上町
  • 上町
  • 堀切
  • 堀切
  • 有実
  • 有実
  • 赤薮
  • 赤薮
  • 明戸岩
  • 明戸岩
  • 大西
  • 大西
  • 永代
  • 永代
  • 猪ノ谷
  • 猪ノ谷
  • 用居
  • 用居
  • 宮向
  • 宮向
  • 出丸
  • 出丸
  • 舟形
  • 舟形
  • 奥下田
  • 奥下田
  • 桧谷
  • 桧谷
  • 折尾
  • 池川
  • 池川
  • 家古屋
  • 家古屋
  • 狩山口
  • 狩山口
  • 景成
  • 景成
  • 和等地橋
  • 和等地橋
  • 入江谷
  • 入江谷
  • 成川
  • 成川
  • 宮ノ下
  • 宮ノ下
  • 宮ヶ平
  • 宮ヶ平
  • 大屋
  • 大屋
  • 栂ノ瀬
  • 栂ノ瀬
  • 安居渓谷
  • 見ノ越
  • 見ノ越
  • ガイザコ
  • ガイザコ
  • 集会所前
  • 集会所前
  • 日浦
  • 日浦
  • 中川原
  • 中川原
  • 坂本橋
  • 坂本橋
  • 楮原
  • 小郷口
  • 小郷口
  • 西谷口
  • 西谷口
  • 相ノ谷
  • 相ノ谷
  • 堂ヶ内
  • 堂ヶ内
  • 坂本
  • 竹屋敷
  • 竹屋敷
  • 昇雲橋
  • 昇雲橋
  • 昇雲橋
  • 下北川下
  • 下北川下
  • 北川
  • 二ノ滝
  • 二ノ滝
  • 土居
  • 土居
  • 下名野川橋
  • 下名野川橋
  • 斧ノ谷
  • 斧ノ谷
  • 上屋敷
  • 上屋敷
  • しもなの郷前
  • しもなの郷前
  • 長坂橋
  • 長坂橋
  • 槙の谷
  • 槙の谷
  • 下条
  • 下条
  • 上名野川
  • 下実間
  • 下実間
  • 上実間
  • 上実間
  • 中ノ瀬
  • 中ノ瀬
  • 長者
  • 五味谷
  • 五味谷
  • 石井野口
  • 石井野口
  • 桧ヶ畝
  • 桧ヶ畝
  • 形部
  • 形部
  • 六地蔵
  • 六地蔵
  • 泉川
  • 泉川
  • 織合橋
  • 織合橋
  • 五所神社
  • 五所神社
  • 椎尾
  • 椎尾
  • 中宮第2
  • 中宮第2
  • 中宮第1
  • 中宮第1
  • 谷山
  • 谷山
  • 松尾
  • 松尾
  • 柚ノ木谷
  • 柚ノ木谷
  • 大蕨
  • 大蕨
  • 西谷(仁淀)
  • 西谷(仁淀)
  • 大渡ダム公園
  • 大渡ダム公園
  • 高瀬本村
  • 高瀬本村
  • 高瀬口
  • 高瀬口
  • 高瀬口
  • 高瀬口
  • 大尾
  • 大尾
  • 長渕
  • 長渕
  • 鷲ノ巣
  • 鷲ノ巣
  • 秋葉口団地
  • 秋葉口団地
  • 秋葉口
  • 秋葉口
  • 別枝大橋
  • 岩屋
  • サガノ橋
  • サガノ橋
  • 芋生野
  • 芋生野
  • 岩川
  • 別枝口
  • 大渡
  • 大渡
  • 手引
  • 手引
  • 潰溜
  • 潰溜
  • 森山団地
  • 森山団地
  • 森山
  • 森山
  • 下北川上
  • 下北川上
  • 中津渓谷
  • 中津渓谷

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

7 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning1092 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning210 instances

    210 of 210 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning59 instances

    59 of 59 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning12 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info3 instances

    The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.

    A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.

    Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)

    Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 157 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 157 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 82 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

仁淀川町町民バス GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/niyodogawatown-gtfs-niyodogawatown-townsbus/2026-07-23.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-23. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.