← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-23

南伊勢町営バス

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

74.7 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Catalogued in Mie, Japan.

Covers 69 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

南伊勢町営バス is the public schedule named by the repository. This registry item represents one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

163 of 163 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

139 of 139 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 69 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness76.2 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 7 kinds of issue across 2949 instances (0 error, 2934 warning, 15 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 69 days.

Rider experience52.4 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

1 accessibility depth signal

  • 4 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (南海線, 神前柏崎線, 大方竈線, 吉津線).

    Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.

Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

Routes in 南伊勢町営バス's feed
RouteTypeLine color
宿浦線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
南海線Buspink (no shape in feed)
切原線Busorange (no shape in feed)
神前柏崎線Busorange (no shape in feed)
大方竈線/南島地区線Busteal (no shape in feed)
南島地区線(三重交通 31 伊勢方面と直通)Busteal (no shape in feed)
南島地区線Busteal (no shape in feed)
南島南勢連絡線Busteal (no shape in feed)
大方竈線Buspurple (no shape in feed)
吉津線Busbrown (no shape in feed)

This feed has 163 stops.

List every stop
  • 中津浜浦
  • ワンバ
  • 高校前
  • 南勢野添
  • 南勢野添
  • 五ヶ所
  • 楓江橋
  • 楓江橋
  • 薬局前
  • 薬局前
  • 南勢小学校前
  • 南勢小学校前
  • 佐田
  • 佐田
  • 神津佐大橋
  • 神津佐大橋
  • 神津佐農協前
  • 神津佐農協前
  • 神津佐
  • 下津浦口
  • 下津浦
  • 下津浦海水浴場
  • 下津浦海水浴場
  • 木谷
  • 天理教前
  • 田曽口
  • 田曽浦
  • 診療所前
  • 宿浦漁協前
  • 船着場
  • 宿浦
  • 船越
  • 高浜
  • 松崎
  • 内瀬
  • 伊勢路
  • 伊勢路
  • 小切間出
  • 寺前堂
  • 七軒屋
  • 斎田口
  • 斎田口
  • 沖田
  • 始神口
  • 始神口
  • 押渕口
  • 押渕口
  • 国道迫間口
  • 国道迫間口
  • 迫間口
  • 南勢迫間
  • 南勢迫間
  • 三胡地
  • 迫間浦
  • 里谷
  • 神縄
  • 三浦
  • 南海体育館前
  • 大三浦
  • 礫口
  • 礫浦
  • 礫浦漁協
  • 相賀旧道口
  • 相賀口
  • 相賀
  • JR伊勢柏崎駅前
  • 南島棚橋
  • 白石
  • 楠江
  • 楠江
  • こすえ
  • こすえ
  • 古和
  • 古和
  • 栃木
  • 大谷
  • 大谷
  • 小方口
  • 小方口
  • 方座
  • 村山
  • 村山
  • 村山口
  • 村山口
  • 浜田橋
  • 浜田橋
  • 浜田橋
  • 奈津観音前
  • 河内
  • 河内
  • 河内隧道口
  • 河内隧道口
  • 東宮
  • 東宮
  • 奈屋
  • 奈屋
  • 豆方
  • 豆方
  • 鵜倉西
  • 鵜倉農協前
  • 慥柄
  • 慥柄
  • 南島メディカルセンター
  • 阿曽浦口
  • 阿曽浦口
  • 阿曽浦口
  • 阿曽浦
  • 南島道方
  • 浮島パーク口
  • 浮島パーク口
  • 道行竈口
  • 道行竈口
  • 国道大江
  • 国道大江
  • 国道相賀
  • 国道相賀
  • 相賀漁協前
  • 切原口
  • 切原
  • 神前
  • 神前
  • 漁連前
  • 漁連前
  • アリカタ
  • 切原(回転場)
  • 町立南伊勢病院
  • 小方竈
  • 小方竈
  • 合同ビル前
  • 阿曽浦コミセン
  • 阿曽浦コミセン
  • 阿曽浦旧中学校前
  • 阿曽浦弁天
  • 赤崎
  • 大方竈
  • コメリ・ぎゅーとら
  • コメリ・ぎゅーとら
  • 阿曽浦お墓前
  • 新桑竈口
  • 棚橋憩いの家
  • ふるさと公園
  • 大納生活改善センター
  • 島津郵便局前
  • 古和浦漁港
  • 小方竈多目的集会施設
  • 村山山の神
  • わかば園跡地
  • 村山消防団庫前
  • 小島医院
  • ふれあいセンターなんとう
  • コトブキ吉津店
  • 南島庁舎
  • マリンバンク神前浦
  • カスケヤ前
  • おふじや前
  • 伊勢地多目的集会施設
  • 河内農協
  • 河内多目的集会施設
  • 浜地整骨院
  • とらいちや前
  • 日の出グラウンド

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

10 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning2921 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning163 instances

    163 of 163 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning139 instances

    139 of 139 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning7 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning5 instances

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info11 instances

    Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Validator rule: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some trip headsigns name a stop along the way, not the final destination.

    The sign should tell riders where the bus ends up, so a midpoint name can send them the wrong way.

    Fix: Set trip_headsign to the trip's last stop or its overall destination. (Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: trip_headsign_matches_intermediate_stop · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 69 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 69 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 76 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

南伊勢町営バス GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/minamiisetown-choeibus/2026-07-23.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-23. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.