Feed status · checked 2026-07-23
Mie Kotsu Kuwana (三重交通 桑名営業所)
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Bus
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Mie, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 73 minutes ago; last changed 73 minutes ago.
Measured 4 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: high.
- All four score categories were measured this run.
- Realtime was sampled in one bounded window of 9 snapshots.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Ask your AVL vendor why the feed stopped advancing; the GTFS-Realtime header timestamp should move forward on every publish.
The realtime feed's last update was about 2 hours old when sampled. A realtime feed this far behind has effectively stopped. Riders see buses that already left, or apps quietly fall back to the schedule while still showing a live label.
⏱ A vendor support ticket; treat it as a feed outage.worth about +50 points in its category
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
437 of 437 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
1429 of 1429 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Ask your AVL vendor why the feed stopped advancing; the GTFS-Realtime header timestamp should move forward on every publish.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 92 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- One or more realtime feeds were reachable; live-arrival coverage is not known.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 8 kinds of issue across 1771 instances (0 error, 1764 warning, 7 informational).
Service data covers the next 92 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Sampled 9 times outside service hours: 3 of 3 configured feeds healthy; vehicle position plausibility was not measurable.
Routes and stops
Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.
Skip to route and stop dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
- 桑名長島温泉線 (green)
- 城南線 (green)
- 桑名大山田団地線 (green)
- 名古屋桑名高速線 (green)
- 栄桑名高速線 (green)
- 名古屋南陽線 (green)
- 桑名阿下喜線 (green)
- 桑名ネオポリス線 (green)
- 名古屋長島温泉高速 (green)
- 栄長島温泉高速線 (green)
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 名古屋桑名線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 名四長島温泉線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 桑名長島温泉線 | Bus | green |
| 城南線 | Bus | green |
| 市内循環 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 桑名大山田団地線 | Bus | green |
| 名古屋桑名高速線 | Bus | green |
| 栄桑名高速線 | Bus | green |
| 陽だまりの丘線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 名古屋南陽線 | Bus | green |
| 桑名阿下喜線 | Bus | green |
| 桑名ネオポリス線 | Bus | green |
| 名古屋長島温泉高速 | Bus | green |
| 栄長島温泉高速線 | Bus | green |
This feed has 437 stops.
List every stop
- 陽だまりの丘中央
- 陽だまりの丘中央
- 陽だまりの丘中央
- 陽だまりの丘中央
- 陽だまりの丘北
- 陽だまりの丘北
- 陽だまりの丘北
- 陽だまりの丘北
- 陽だまりの丘(郵政研修所前)
- 陽だまりの丘(郵政研修所前)
- 陽だまりの丘(郵政研修所前)
- 陽だまりの丘(郵政研修所前)
- 国道安永
- 国道安永
- 若宮町
- 若宮町
- 矢田
- 矢田
- 国道市役所前
- 国道市役所前
- 桑名シティホテル前 (桑名)
- 桑名シティホテル前 (桑名)
- 桑名駅前 (桑名)
- 桑名駅前 (桑名)
- 桑名駅前 (桑名)
- 桑名駅前 (桑名)
- 有楽町 (桑名)
- 有楽町 (桑名)
- 福島
- 伊勢大橋南詰
- 伊勢大橋
- 尾張大橋南詰
- 尾張大橋
- 弥富
- 十四山
- 佐古木
- 富吉
- 日光橋
- 蟹江
- 蟹江八反田
- 富永(名古屋)
- 一色大橋 (桑名)
- 一色大橋 (桑名)
- 東中島
- 東中島
- 中野新町
- 中野新町
- 中野新町
- 昭和橋
- 昭和橋
- 六番町
- 六番町
- 尾頭橋
- 尾頭橋
- 日置橋
- 日置橋
- 名古屋(名鉄バスセンター)
- 名古屋(名鉄バスセンター)
- 名古屋(名鉄バスセンター)
- 川西通三丁目
- 川西通三丁目
- 名四寛政町
- 名四寛政町
- 宝神町
- 宝神町
- 南陽町藤前
- 南陽町藤前
- 飛島新田
- 名四飛島
- 鍋田
- 名四木曽岬
- 長島スポーツランド
- 長島スポーツランド
- 長島スポーツランド
- 長島温泉
- 長島温泉
- 長島温泉
- 江松
- 江松
- 南長島
- 南桑名
- 三交桑名
- 三交桑名
- 伊曽島
- 横満蔵
- 横満蔵
- 松中
- 松中
- 長島海岸
- 長島海岸
- 太夫
- 太夫
- ナガシマファーム前
- ナガシマファーム前
- 陽だまりの丘東
- 陽だまりの丘東
- しおがま公園
- しおがま公園
- 陽だまりの丘一丁目
- 陽だまりの丘一丁目
- 陽だまりの丘二丁目
- 陽だまりの丘二丁目
- 播磨中央公園南
- 播磨中央公園南
- 城南口
- 城南口
- 安永七丁目
- 城南小学校前
- 城南小学校前
- 和泉
- 記念碑前
- 大貝須
- 日の出橋
- 桑名高校前
- 桑名高校前
- 桑名高校口
- 桑名高校口
- 市役所前 (桑名)
- 市役所前 (桑名)
- 中央通
- 中央通
- 法盛寺前
- 法盛寺前
- 萱町 (桑名)
- 萱町 (桑名)
- 末広町 (桑名)
- 末広町 (桑名)
- 寺町
- 寺町
- 田町
- 田町
- 桑名市博物館
- 桑名市博物館
- 外堀
- 柳原橋
- 赤須賀
- 桜通り(桑名)
- 桜通り(桑名)
- 本町 (桑名)
- 宮通
- 三之丸
- 立教小学校前
- 神明社前
- なばなの里
- なばなの里
- なばなの里
- サンシティ前
- サンシティ前
- 七和住宅口
- 七和住宅口
- 星見ケ丘南
- 星見ケ丘南
- 星見ケ丘南
- 星見ケ丘南
- 星見ケ丘
- 星見ケ丘
- 星見ケ丘
- 星見ケ丘
- 星見ケ丘三丁目
- 星見ケ丘三丁目
- 星見ケ丘三丁目
- 星見ケ丘三丁目
- 星見ケ丘六丁目
- 星見ケ丘六丁目
- 星見ケ丘六丁目
- 星見ケ丘六丁目
- 桑名工業高校前
- 桑名工業高校前
- 大仲新田
- 大仲新田
- 東員中学前
- 東員中学前
- 六把野
- 六把野
- 鳥取
- 鳥取
- 大木
- 大木
- 東員郵便局前
- 東員郵便局前
- 長宮
- 長宮
- 新楚原
- 新楚原
- 笠田新田
- 笠田新田
- 上笠田
- 上笠田
- 新麻生田
- 新麻生田
- 六石
- 六石
- 阿下喜東町
- 阿下喜東町
- 阿下喜北町
- 阿下喜本町
- 阿下喜本町
- 阿下喜
- 三交北勢
- 希望ヶ丘
- 希望ヶ丘
- 希望ヶ丘
- 希望ヶ丘
- 名阪桑名インター口
- 名阪桑名インター口
- 名阪桑名インター口
- 名阪桑名インター口
- 笹尾東一丁目
- 笹尾東一丁目
- 笹尾東一丁目
- 笹尾東一丁目
- 笹尾西一丁目
- 笹尾西一丁目
- 笹尾西一丁目
- 笹尾西一丁目
- 笹尾西二丁目
- 笹尾西二丁目
- 笹尾西二丁目
- 笹尾西二丁目
- 笹尾西三丁目
- 笹尾西三丁目
- 笹尾西三丁目
- 笹尾西三丁目
- 笹尾東三丁目
- 笹尾東三丁目
- 笹尾東三丁目
- 笹尾東三丁目
- 西桑名ネオポリス
- 西桑名ネオポリス
- 西桑名ネオポリス
- イオンモール桑名口
- イオンモール桑名口
- イオンモール桑名口
- イオンモール桑名口
- イオンモール桑名口
- 公園南
- 公園南
- 公園南
- 公園南
- 公園南
- センター前(桑名)
- センター前(桑名)
- センター前(桑名)
- センター前(桑名)
- センター前(桑名)
- 公団住宅西
- 公団住宅西
- 公団住宅西
- 公団住宅西
- 光陵中学校前
- and 187 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
12 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Error1 instance
The realtime feed's last update was about 2 hours old when sampled.
A realtime feed this far behind has effectively stopped. Riders see buses that already left, or apps quietly fall back to the schedule while still showing a live label.
Fix: Ask your AVL vendor why the feed stopped advancing; the GTFS-Realtime header timestamp should move forward on every publish. (A vendor support ticket; treat it as a feed outage.)
Validator rule: scorecard_rt_feed_lapsed
- Warning1429 instances
1429 of 1429 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning1349 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning437 instances
437 of 437 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning375 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning37 instances
The feed contains route shapes no trip uses.
Harmless to riders, but it bloats the feed and suggests stale export data.
Fix: Turn on 'remove unused shapes' (or the like) in your export tool. (One setting.)
Validator rule: unused_shape · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Same name and description for stop (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'same_name_and_description_for_stop' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: same_name_and_description_for_stop · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
On some trips the stops fall along the route line in a different order than the schedule lists.
Trip planners can draw the bus doubling back or skipping ahead, which confuses riders reading the map.
Fix: Check the stop order and the shape direction in your scheduling software; the shape is often drawn backwards. (A few minutes per flagged trip.)
Validator rule: stops_match_shape_out_of_order · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info4 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info3 instances
The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.
Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.
Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)
Validator rule: unknown_file · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 92 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Realtime reliability
The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 1 checks, with 9292s median lag.
Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 92 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 65 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality 50 / 100
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/mie-kotsu-kuwana/2026-07-23.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-23. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.