← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-10-20

Matsumoto Station and Bus Terminal Services (松本市 松本駅・バスターミナル発着バス)

Based on the official feed source on file

Service mode Bus

70.2 / 100

unchanged since 2026-10-19

Cataloged in Nagano, Japan.

Covers 528 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Source feed: https://api.gtfs-data.jp/v2/organizations/matsumotocity/feeds/guruttomatsumotobus1/files/feed.zip?rid=current

The services Matsumoto City publishes for routes starting or ending at Matsumoto Station and its bus terminal.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 7 hours ago; last changed 44 days ago.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

About this feed

Matsumoto Station and Bus Terminal Services (松本市 松本駅・バスターミナル発着バス)’s published feed lists 17 bus routes, 588 scheduled trips and 462 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-08-01 through 2028-03-31. The published file has not changed since our first check on 2026-09-05.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

462 of 462 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

Fixing this covers all 462 stops in the feed.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

588 of 588 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

Fixing this covers all 588 trips in the feed.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

Riders and need behind these fixes

  • Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
  • The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.

These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.

Finding handoff

Move one finding to a recheck

Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.

Finding
Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
Recheck
Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Fix 03

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 528 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness65.8 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 8 kinds of issue across 17079 instances (0 error, 16949 warning, 130 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 528 days.

Rider experience52.5 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

1 accessibility depth signal

  • 7 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (信大横田循環線, 横田信大循環線, 浅間線, 美ヶ原温泉線, 北市内線, and more).

    Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.

Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.

This feed has 462 stops.

Skip to route and stop data

The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

Routes in Matsumoto Station and Bus Terminal Services (松本市 松本駅・バスターミナル発着バス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
信大横田循環線Busorange (no shape in feed)
横田信大循環線Busorange (no shape in feed)
浅間線Busred (no shape in feed)
新浅間線Busblack (no shape in feed)
美ヶ原温泉線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
北市内線Busteal (no shape in feed)
岡田線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
アルプス公園線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
鹿教湯温泉線Busgray (no shape in feed)
空港今井線Busteal (no shape in feed)
大久保工場団地・神林線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
山形線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
寿台線Buspink (no shape in feed)
松原線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
内田線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
並柳団地線Buspurple (no shape in feed)
四賀線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
List every stop
  • 松本バスターミナル
  • 松本バスターミナル
  • 松本バスターミナル
  • 松本バスターミナル
  • 松本バスターミナル
  • 本町
  • 本町
  • 大名町
  • 大名町
  • 蟻ヶ崎高校前
  • 蟻ヶ崎高校前
  • 正麟寺口
  • 宮渕東
  • 丸の内中学校前
  • 開松
  • 放光寺
  • 種畜場口
  • 種畜場口
  • 城山老健施設前
  • アルプス公園
  • 蟻ヶ崎台
  • 蟻ヶ崎五丁目
  • 北蟻ヶ崎
  • 北蟻ヶ崎
  • 深志ヶ丘
  • 深志ヶ丘
  • 城山公園口
  • 城山公園口
  • 鷹匠町
  • 国府町
  • 国府町
  • 松本駅お城口
  • 松本駅お城口
  • 松本駅お城口
  • 松本駅お城口
  • バスターミナル北
  • バスターミナル北
  • 秀峰学校前
  • 秀峰学校前
  • 秀峰学校前
  • 秀峰学校前
  • 秀峰学校前
  • 秀峰学校前
  • 松本市美術館
  • 松本市美術館
  • 市民芸術館
  • 市民芸術館
  • 筑摩小学校口
  • 筑摩小学校口
  • 西筑摩
  • 西筑摩
  • 本町五丁目
  • 上土町
  • 大手大通り
  • 大手大通り
  • 飯田町
  • 清水
  • 清水
  • 清水
  • 桜橋
  • 桜橋
  • 桜橋
  • 桜橋
  • 元町
  • 元町
  • 元町
  • 横田
  • 横田
  • 横田
  • 北元町
  • 北元町
  • 自動車学校前
  • 自動車学校前
  • 南浅間
  • 南浅間
  • 南浅間公民館前
  • 南浅間公民館前
  • 松本第一高校
  • 松本第一高校
  • 浅間温泉入口
  • 浅間温泉入口
  • 浅間温泉入口
  • 水汲
  • 水汲
  • 追分
  • 追分
  • 追分
  • 追分
  • 追分
  • 大学西門
  • 大学西門
  • 信州大学前
  • 信州大学前
  • 元原町
  • 元原町
  • 萩町
  • 萩町
  • 安原町
  • 安原町
  • 新町
  • 新町
  • 片端
  • 白金町
  • 白金町
  • 中原町
  • 中原町
  • 松岡口
  • 松岡口
  • 松岡
  • 松岡
  • 岡田東区
  • 岡田出張所前
  • 岡田出張所前
  • 仲町
  • 仲町
  • 岡田町
  • 岡田町
  • 山城口
  • 山城口
  • 中条
  • 中条
  • 鎌田
  • 鎌田
  • 鎌田
  • 鎌田
  • 征矢野口
  • 征矢野口
  • 高宮
  • 高宮
  • 高宮南
  • 高宮南
  • 石芝町
  • 石芝町
  • 野溝口
  • 野溝口
  • 二子橋
  • 二子橋
  • 下二子
  • 下二子
  • 神林高速バス停前
  • 神林高速バス停前
  • 町神東
  • 町神東
  • 神林
  • 神林
  • 上二子口
  • 上二子口
  • 菅野中学校前
  • 菅野中学校前
  • 松本短大口
  • 松本短大口
  • やまびこドーム前
  • やまびこドーム前
  • 小俣
  • 小俣
  • 空港東区
  • 空港東区
  • 信州まつもと空港
  • 松本空港入口
  • 松本空港入口
  • 信州スカイパーク体育センター
  • 信州スカイパーク体育センター
  • 北耕地口
  • 北耕地口
  • 下今井
  • 下今井
  • 洞
  • 洞
  • 山城
  • 山城
  • 伊深
  • 伊深
  • 組合下
  • 組合下
  • 峠口
  • 峠口
  • 稲倉
  • 稲倉
  • 小日向
  • 小日向
  • 小日向橋
  • 小日向橋
  • 両島口
  • 両島口
  • 両島
  • 両島
  • 笹部
  • 笹部
  • 五月町
  • 五月町
  • 月見町
  • 月見町
  • 笹部団地
  • 北栗東
  • 北栗東
  • 北栗南
  • 北栗南
  • 南栗口
  • 南栗口
  • 擬宝珠
  • 擬宝珠
  • 下和田
  • 下和田
  • 和田町郵便局
  • 和田町郵便局
  • 和田
  • 和田
  • 観音寺口
  • 観音寺口
  • 殿
  • 殿
  • 和田橋場
  • 和田橋場
  • 臨空工業団地
  • 臨空工業団地
  • アイシティ21前
  • アイシティ21前
  • 竹田原
  • 竹田原
  • 下竹田
  • 下竹田
  • 竹田
  • 竹田
  • 記念碑前
  • 記念碑前
  • 山形村役場
  • 山形村役場
  • 山形学校前
  • 山形学校前
  • 小坂口組合前
  • 小坂口組合前
  • 山形診療所前
  • 山形診療所前
  • 中大池
  • 中大池
  • 上大池
  • 上大池
  • 車庫前
  • 車庫前
  • 大橋通り南
  • 大橋通り南
  • 東町
  • 塩屋小路入口
  • 塩屋小路入口
  • 上馬出し
  • 上馬出し
  • 和泉町
  • 和泉町
  • 西岡田
  • 西岡田
  • and 212 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)

Over time

Overall score across the last 19 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-19.

2026-10-02: 70.22026-10-03: 70.22026-10-04: 70.22026-10-05: 70.22026-10-06: 70.22026-10-07: 70.22026-10-08: 70.22026-10-09: 70.22026-10-10: 70.22026-10-11: 70.22026-10-12: 70.22026-10-13: 70.22026-10-14: 70.22026-10-15: 70.22026-10-16: 70.22026-10-17: 70.22026-10-18: 70.22026-10-19: 70.22026-10-20: 70.2
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-10-0270.2 first check
2026-10-0370.2 no change
2026-10-0470.2 no change
2026-10-0570.2 no change
2026-10-0670.2 no change
2026-10-0770.2 no change
2026-10-0870.2 no change
2026-10-0970.2 no change
2026-10-1070.2 no change
2026-10-1170.2 no change
2026-10-1270.2 no change
2026-10-1370.2 no change
2026-10-1470.2 no change
2026-10-1570.2 no change
2026-10-1670.2 no change
2026-10-1770.2 no change
2026-10-1870.2 no change
2026-10-1970.2 no change
2026-10-2070.2 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change

Feed history

Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.

Feed history by published file
CheckedPublished fileService dates throughGrade at the time
2026-10-02 to 2026-10-20 (19 checks)99f883aa7e1c2028-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-09-05 to 2026-10-01 (23 checks)99f883aa7e1c2028-03-31C, 70.2 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade

Everything we checked

11 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning16821 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning588 instances

    588 of 588 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning462 instances

    462 of 462 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning73 instances

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Finding code: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for missing_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning47 instances

    The feed contains route shapes no trip uses.

    Harmless to riders, but it bloats the feed and suggests stale export data.

    Fix: Turn on 'remove unused shapes' (or the like) in your export tool. (One setting.)

    Finding code: unused_shape · Read the fix guide for unused_shape · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning7 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info114 instances

    Some trip headsigns name a stop along the way, not the final destination.

    The sign should tell riders where the bus ends up, so a midpoint name can send them the wrong way.

    Fix: Set trip_headsign to the trip's last stop or its overall destination. (Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: trip_headsign_matches_intermediate_stop · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info14 instances

    Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Finding code: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

One requirement remains for this feed to earn the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 528 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 527 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 66 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.

Similar feeds in Nagano

Other scorecards in Nagano, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.

Show your grade

Put this badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check, shows the date of that check, and links back to this scorecard. When there is no current score it says so instead of showing an old one.

Matsumoto Station and Bus Terminal Services (松本市 松本駅・バスターミナル発着バス): GTFS feed quality grade C, 70.2 of 100, checked 2026-10-20. GTFS Scorecard.

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/matsumoto-station-bus/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.