Feed status · checked 2026-10-20
Kimitsu City Through Bus Routes (君津市経由路線バス)
Based on the official feed source on file
Service mode Bus
unchanged since 2026-10-19
Cataloged in Chiba, Japan.
Source feed: https://api.gtfs-data.jp/v2/organizations/kimitsucity/feeds/Local_buses_via_Kimitsu_City/files/feed.zip?rid=current
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 36 minutes ago; last changed 20 days ago.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
About this feed
Kimitsu City Through Bus Routes (君津市経由路線バス)’s published feed lists 15 bus routes, 373 scheduled trips and 489 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-10-01 through 2027-03-31. The published file last changed on 2026-09-30.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
489 of 489 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fixing this covers all 489 stops in the feed.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
373 of 373 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fixing this covers all 373 trips in the feed.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE').Likely your export tool
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase. ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.
⏱ Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.worth about +6 points in its category
Riders and need behind these fixes
- Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
- The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.
These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.
Finding handoff
Move one finding to a recheck
Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.
- Finding
- Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 02 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 03 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 162 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 6 kinds of issue across 152 instances (0 error, 45 warning, 107 informational).
Service data covers the next 162 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
1 accessibility depth signal
3 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (周西線, 三島線, 富津線).
Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.
This feed has 489 stops.
The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.
Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
- 君津市内循環線 (purple)
- 君津・マザー牧場線 (gray)
- 鹿野山線 (blue)
- イオンモール富津線(富津営業所系統) (teal)
- イオンモール富津線 (teal)
- 富津線 (pink)
- 富津市役所・君津駅線 (red)
- 木更津鴨川線 (green)
- 高倉アカデミア線 (white)
- 高倉アカデミア線(草敷ルート) (white)
- 君津市内循環線(水道山下系統) (purple)
- 周西線 (pink)
- 三島線 (green)
- 畑沢線 (teal)
- イオンモール木更津線 (gray)
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 君津市内循環線 | Bus | purple |
| 君津・マザー牧場線 | Bus | gray |
| 鹿野山線 | Bus | blue |
| イオンモール富津線(富津営業所系統) | Bus | teal |
| イオンモール富津線 | Bus | teal |
| 富津線 | Bus | pink |
| 富津市役所・君津駅線 | Bus | red |
| 木更津鴨川線 | Bus | green |
| 高倉アカデミア線 | Bus | white |
| 高倉アカデミア線(草敷ルート) | Bus | white |
| 君津市内循環線(水道山下系統) | Bus | purple |
| 周西線 | Bus | pink |
| 三島線 | Bus | green |
| 畑沢線 | Bus | teal |
| イオンモール木更津線 | Bus | gray |
List every stop
- 君津中
- 君津中
- 君津中央病院
- 君津中学校
- 君津中学校
- 県営住宅前
- 県営住宅前
- 県営住宅入口
- 県営住宅入口
- イオンモール木更津(従業員口)
- 公園前
- 公園前
- 公民館前
- 公民館前
- 港南台一丁目
- 港南台一丁目
- 糠田
- 糠田
- 高坂
- 高坂
- 高倉観音下
- 高倉観音下
- かじや本店前
- かじや本店前
- 国道請西
- 国道請西
- 佐貫町駅
- 佐貫郵便局前
- 佐貫郵便局前
- 裁判所前
- 裁判所前
- 坂田
- 坂田
- 坂田浜ノ作
- 坂田浜ノ作
- 堺田公園
- 堺田公園
- 桜井
- 桜井
- 桜井西
- 桜井西
- 桜井谷
- かずさDNA研究所
- かずさDNA研究所
- 桜井東町
- 桜井東町
- 桜井南公園
- 桜井南公園
- 桜井南町
- 桜井南町
- 桜井北町
- 桜井北町
- 三ツ池
- 三ツ池
- 三枝病院前
- 三枝病院前
- 三直
- 三直
- 山王下
- 山王下
- かずさアーク
- 山麓
- 山麓
- 子安
- 子安
- 市宿
- 市宿
- 市宿中
- 市宿中
- 市場
- 市場
- 市民文化ホール
- 市民文化ホール
- かずさ鎌足1丁目南
- かずさ鎌足1丁目南
- 自動車学校入口
- 自動車学校入口
- 鹿野山口
- 鹿野山口
- 鹿野山山頂
- 鹿野山山頂
- 芝原
- 芝原
- 主基駅
- 主基駅
- 周南入口
- 周南入口
- かずさ鎌足1丁目北
- かずさ鎌足1丁目北
- 宿原
- 宿原
- 春日山
- 春日山
- 小原町
- 小原町
- 小糸地域市民センター
- 小糸地域市民センター
- 小糸小入口
- 小糸小入口
- 小糸中農協
- 小糸中農協
- 小糸中農協前
- 小糸中農協前
- かずさ鎌足3丁目東
- かずさ鎌足3丁目東
- 小浜
- 小浜
- 小浜第二橋
- 小浜第二橋
- 上根本自治会館
- 上根本自治会館
- 上総農園
- 上総農園
- かずさ高倉
- かずさ高倉
- 信金前
- 信金前
- 新井
- 新井
- 新町
- 新町
- 新田1丁目
- 新田1丁目
- 新田郵便局前
- 新田郵便局前
- かずさ小糸南
- かずさ小糸南
- 神門
- 神門
- 神門
- 神野寺
- 神野寺
- 人見
- 人見
- 人見大橋
- 人見大橋
- 水道山下
- 水道山下
- 清和公民館
- 清和中
- 清和中
- かずさ小糸北
- かずさ小糸北
- DNA研究所
- DNA研究所
- 精米所前
- 精米所前
- 西坂田
- 西坂田
- 西川
- 西川
- 請西小学校
- 請西小学校
- 請西小関
- 請西小関
- 請西平川
- 請西平川
- 青堀駅
- 青堀駅
- クルックフィールズ入口
- クルックフィールズ入口
- 青堀局前
- 青堀局前
- 青堀鉱泉
- 青堀鉱泉
- 青堀小前
- 青堀小前
- 青堀中央
- 青堀中央
- 青木
- 青木
- 泉
- 泉
- 草敷
- 草敷
- 太田
- 太田
- 大貫駅東口
- 大佐和教習所前
- 大佐和教習所前
- 大乗寺前
- 大乗寺前
- 大堀
- 大堀
- 大堀1丁目
- 大堀1丁目
- 大堀二丁目
- 大堀二丁目
- 大野台
- 大野台
- サン・ラポール
- サン・ラポール
- 大和田
- 大和田
- 大和田
- 大和田
- 大和田D1棟前
- 大和田陸橋下
- 大和田陸橋下
- 大和田寮前
- 大和田寮前
- 中央門前
- 中央門前
- 中央門入口
- 中央門入口
- サンライフ鹿野山
- サンライフ鹿野山
- 中島
- 中野3丁目
- 中野3丁目
- 中野5丁目
- 中野5丁目
- 仲村口
- 仲村口
- 仲町
- 仲町
- 猪原
- 猪原
- 猪台
- 猪台
- 長狭中前
- 長狭中前
- 長石大橋
- 長石大橋
- 鳥居崎海浜公園前
- 鳥居崎海浜公園前
- 追分
- 追分
- 塚原
- 塚原
- 辻森
- 辻森
- ソニー前
- ソニー前
- 田中台
- 田中台
- 電通富津クラブ
- 電通富津クラブ
- 東粟倉
- 東粟倉
- 東佐貫
- 東佐貫
- 東坂田
- 東坂田
- 東坂田四丁目
- 東坂田四丁目
- 東日笠
- 東日笠
- 東畑沢
- 東畑沢
- and 239 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
Overall score across the last 19 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-19.
Show the numbers
| Check | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 83.2 | first check |
| 2026-10-03 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-04 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-05 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-06 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-07 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-08 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-09 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-10 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-11 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-12 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-13 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-14 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-15 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-16 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-17 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-18 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-19 | 83.2 | no change |
| 2026-10-20 | 83.2 | no change |
What changed since your last check
- Correctness no change
- Freshness no change
- Rider experience no change
Feed history
Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.
| Checked | Published file | Service dates through | Grade at the time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-20 (19 checks) | 339fef5e6d6b | 2027-03-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-09-30 to 2026-10-01 (2 checks) | 339fef5e6d6b | 2027-03-31 | B, 83.2 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
| 2026-09-05 to 2026-09-29 (21 checks) | f6ec6d734e41 | 2027-03-31 | C, 79.7 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
What changed in this feed
Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-10-19.
Same feed file as 2026-10-19; the published zip did not change.
Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops and export changes in a reader, with no sign-up.
Everything we checked
8 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning489 instances
489 of 489 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning373 instances
373 of 373 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning45 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info76 instances
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Finding code: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide for big_gap_in_service · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info15 instances
Some trip headsigns name a stop along the way, not the final destination.
The sign should tell riders where the bus ends up, so a midpoint name can send them the wrong way.
Fix: Set trip_headsign to the trip's last stop or its overall destination. (Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: trip_headsign_matches_intermediate_stop · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info14 instances
Some service dates fall outside the date window set in feed_info.txt.
feed_info.txt should span every day your service runs, so apps know when the data applies.
Fix: Widen feed_start_date and feed_end_date to cover all service dates, or fix the dates that fall outside. (Two fields in feed_info.txt, or one export setting.)
Finding code: service_window_outside_feed_period · Read the fix guide for service_window_outside_feed_period · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.
Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.
Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)
Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide for unknown_file · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
One requirement remains for this feed to earn the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 162 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 162 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 90 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 60 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.
Similar feeds in Chiba
Other scorecards in Chiba, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/kimitsu-city-through-routes/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.