← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-18

Kimitsu City Community Bus (君津市コミュニティバス)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

82.9 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Catalogued in Chiba, Japan.

Covers 256 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Kimitsu City's community bus network on the Bōsō Peninsula in Chiba; counted as one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 43 minutes ago; last changed 43 minutes ago.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

166 of 166 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

100 of 100 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE').Likely your export tool

Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase. ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

⏱ Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.worth about +6 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 256 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness89.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 3 kinds of issue across 13 instances (0 error, 12 warning, 1 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 256 days.

Rider experience60.0 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

1 accessibility depth signal

  • 1 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (小糸川循環線).

    Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.

Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 小糸川循環線 (pink)
  • 人見・大和田・神門線 (yellow)
  • 中島・豊英線 (yellow)
Routes in Kimitsu City Community Bus (君津市コミュニティバス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
小糸川循環線Buspink
人見・大和田・神門線Busyellow
中島・豊英線Busyellow

This feed has 166 stops.

List every stop
  • 君津中前
  • 君津中前
  • 君津保育園
  • 君津保育園
  • 郡の杜
  • 郡の杜
  • 郡入口
  • 郡入口
  • 穴原口
  • 穴原口
  • 県民の森
  • 県民の森
  • 玄々堂君津病院
  • 玄々堂君津病院
  • 公会堂前
  • 公会堂前
  • 溝添社宅
  • 溝添社宅
  • 三島湖
  • 三島湖
  • 山王下
  • 山王下
  • 山高原
  • 山高原
  • 市民体育館
  • 市民体育館
  • 市民文化ホール
  • 市民文化ホール
  • 自動車学校前
  • 自動車学校前
  • 周南公民館入口
  • 周南公民館入口
  • 周南口
  • 周南口
  • 周南小前
  • 周南小前
  • 周南中前
  • 周南中前
  • 宿原
  • 宿原
  • 小原町
  • 小原町
  • 小糸郵便局前
  • 上の台
  • 上の台
  • 上宿
  • 上宿
  • 常代
  • 常代
  • 常代1丁目
  • 常代1丁目
  • 常代5丁目
  • 常代5丁目
  • 植畑根形
  • 植畑根形
  • 植畑上郷
  • 植畑上郷
  • 植畑本郷
  • 植畑本郷
  • 新御堂入口
  • 新御堂入口
  • 新道台
  • 新道台
  • 神門
  • 人見
  • 人見神社
  • 清和公民館
  • 清和小
  • 清和小
  • 西日笠
  • 西日笠
  • 川代
  • 川代
  • 泉南
  • 泉南
  • サン・ラポール
  • サン・ラポール
  • 大岩
  • 大岩
  • 大山野
  • 大山野
  • 大和田
  • 大和田橋
  • 大和田橋
  • 大和田郵便局
  • 中野
  • 中野
  • ジョイフル本田前
  • ジョイフル本田前
  • 追込台
  • 追込台
  • 辻森
  • 辻森
  • 辻前公園
  • 辻前公園
  • 貞元社宅前
  • 貞元小前
  • 貞元小前
  • 東粟倉
  • 東粟倉
  • 東日笠
  • 東日笠
  • 南子安4丁目
  • 南子安4丁目
  • 南子安小
  • 南子安小
  • 二入
  • 二入
  • 日の出橋
  • 日の出橋
  • 日笠
  • 日笠
  • 富士食品前
  • 富士食品前
  • 平田
  • 平田
  • ロマンの森共和国
  • ロマンの森共和国
  • 法木作
  • 法木作
  • 味楽囲さだもと店
  • 味楽囲さだもと店
  • 旅名
  • 旅名
  • 六手公民館前
  • 六手公民館前
  • 粟倉橋
  • 粟倉橋
  • 周西の丘小
  • 周西の丘小
  • 奥畑
  • 奥畑
  • 下の台
  • 下の台
  • 外箕輪
  • 外箕輪
  • アピタ前
  • アピタ前
  • 釜神
  • 釜神
  • 久保
  • 久保
  • 宮下
  • 宮下
  • 宮下公園前
  • 宮下公園前
  • 旧周西幼稚園
  • 旧偕楽園下
  • 旧偕楽園下
  • 君津グラウンドゴルフ場
  • 君津バスターミナル
  • 君津駅南口
  • 君津駅北口
  • 君津高校
  • 君津高校
  • 君津市役所
  • 君津市役所
  • 君津市役所
  • 君津台西
  • 君津台西
  • 君津台中央
  • 君津台中央
  • 君津台東
  • 君津台東

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

5 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning166 instances

    166 of 166 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning100 instances

    100 of 100 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning10 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning2 instances

    Some service calendars in the feed have already ended.

    Expired calendars are dead weight and can hide real schedule problems from your staff and vendors.

    Fix: Remove past service periods the next time you export the feed. (One setting in most export tools.)

    Validator rule: expired_calendar · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 256 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 256 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 90 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 60 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Kimitsu City Community Bus (君津市コミュニティバス) GTFS data quality grade: B

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/kimitsu-community-bus/2026-07-18.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-18. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.