← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-10-20

JR Bus Chugoku (JRバス中国)

Based on the official feed source on file

Service mode Bus

69.6 / 100

unchanged since 2026-10-19

Cataloged in Hiroshima, Japan.

Covers 177 daysAccessibility gaps

Source feed: https://ajt-mobusta-gtfs.mcapps.jp/static/15/current_data.zip

JR Bus Chugoku, headquartered in Hiroshima. The published archive covers its local and regional routes; some lines run into neighbouring prefectures.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 4 hours ago; last changed 6 days ago.

Measured 4 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: high.

  • All four score categories were measured this run.
  • Realtime was sampled in one bounded window of 9 snapshots.
  • The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

About this feed

JR Bus Chugoku (JRバス中国)’s published feed lists 18 bus routes, 1,175 scheduled trips and 891 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-10-15 through 2027-04-15. It publishes realtime trip updates, vehicle positions and service alerts; when we checked, all of them answered. The published file last changed on 2026-10-14.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.Likely your export tool

A file is missing a column that GTFS requires. Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.

⏱ Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.worth about +12 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

891 of 891 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

Fixing this covers all 891 stops in the feed.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 03

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

1175 of 1175 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

Fixing this covers all 1,175 trips in the feed.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Riders and need behind these fixes

  • Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
  • The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.

These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.

Finding handoff

Move one finding to a recheck

Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.

Finding
Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
Recheck
Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

  2. Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

  3. Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 177 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Live-arrival data covered 100% of scheduled trips in the sampled window.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness49.8 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 10 kinds of issue across 38058 instances (3 error, 37966 warning, 89 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 177 days.

Rider experience48.9 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

1 accessibility depth signal

  • This feed models stations or entrances but has no pathways.txt and levels.txt.

    Consider: Add pathways.txt connecting entrances, platforms, and elevators, and levels.txt for each floor, so the step-free route is described.

Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime quality100.0 / 100

Sampled 9 times: 3 of 3 configured feeds healthy; 100.0% of scheduled trips had live predictions; 100.0% of vehicles on their route; predictions ran a median of 180s behind schedule.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

This feed has 891 stops.

Skip to route and stop data

The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 30-5 (green)
  • 西条線 (green)
  • 西条エアポートリムジン (green)
  • 32-9 (green)
  • 高速:クレアライン (green)
  • 秋吉線 (green)
  • 防長線 (green)
  • 30-4 (green)
  • 33-4 (green)
  • めいぷる~ぷ (green)
  • めいぷる~ぷ (green)
  • 雲芸南線 (green)
  • 秋芳洞循環バス (green)
  • 30-15 (green)
  • 30-9 (green)
  • 新山口駅~東萩駅線(スーパーはぎ号) (green)
  • のんバス 赤ルート(外回り) (green)
  • のんバス 青ルート(内回り) (green)
Routes in JR Bus Chugoku (JRバス中国)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
30-5 雲芸南線Busgreen
西条線Busgreen
西条エアポートリムジンBusgreen
32-9 雲芸南線Busgreen
高速:クレアラインBusgreen
秋吉線Busgreen
防長線Busgreen
30-4 雲芸南線Busgreen
33-4 雲芸南線Busgreen
めいぷる~ぷ めいぷる~ぷ(現美経由)Busgreen
めいぷる~ぷ めいぷる~ぷ(新天地経由)Busgreen
雲芸南線Busgreen
秋芳洞循環バスBusgreen
30-15 雲芸南線Busgreen
30-9 雲芸南線Busgreen
新山口駅~東萩駅線(スーパーはぎ号)Busgreen
のんバス 赤ルート(外回り)Busgreen
のんバス 青ルート(内回り)Busgreen
List every stop
  • 広島バスセンター
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅
  • 中央公園前
  • 中央公園前
  • 中央公園前
  • 中央公園前
  • 中央公園前
  • 中央公園前
  • 中央公園前
  • 中央公園前
  • 中央公園前
  • 西条昭和町
  • 西条昭和町
  • 西条昭和町
  • 西条昭和町
  • 西条昭和町
  • 西条昭和町
  • 西条昭和町
  • 西条昭和町
  • 石ヶ瀬橋
  • 石ヶ瀬橋
  • 石ヶ瀬橋
  • 石ヶ瀬橋
  • 石ヶ瀬橋
  • 石ヶ瀬橋
  • 西条小学校前
  • 西条小学校前
  • 西条小学校前
  • 西条小学校前
  • 西条小学校前
  • 西条小学校前
  • 江熊
  • 江熊
  • 江熊
  • 江熊
  • 中央図書館前
  • 中央図書館前
  • 中央図書館前
  • 中央図書館前
  • 鏡山公園入口
  • 鏡山公園入口
  • 池ノ上学生宿舎前
  • 池ノ上学生宿舎前
  • 広大中央口
  • 広大中央口
  • 広大中央口
  • 広大北口
  • 広大北口
  • 広大北口
  • 広大二神口
  • 広大二神口
  • 広大二神口
  • 広大二神口
  • 広大西口
  • 広大西口
  • 広大西口
  • 広大西口
  • 広大西口
  • 大学会館前
  • 大学会館前
  • 大学会館前
  • ががら口
  • ががら口
  • ががら口
  • 広大東口
  • 広大東口
  • 広大東口
  • 山中池
  • 山中池
  • 山中池
  • 山中池
  • 八本松駅
  • 八本松駅
  • 上曽場
  • 上曽場
  • 中学校前
  • 中学校前
  • 日興団地入口
  • 日興団地入口
  • 記念橋
  • 記念橋
  • 宮西
  • 宮西
  • 宮の前
  • 宮の前
  • 農業技術センター前
  • 農業技術センター前
  • 下原
  • 下原
  • 千野丸
  • 千野丸
  • 西側
  • 西側
  • 下見大池
  • 下見大池
  • 下見大池
  • 下見大池
  • 東広島駅
  • 東広島駅
  • 東広島駅
  • 末釜
  • 末釜
  • 末釜
  • 末釜
  • 千年池
  • 千年池
  • 千年池
  • 千年池
  • 松原池
  • 松原池
  • 松原池
  • 松原池
  • 扇ノ池
  • 扇ノ池
  • 扇ノ池
  • 扇ノ池
  • 三升原
  • 三升原
  • 三升原
  • 三升原
  • 東広島運動公園
  • 東広島運動公園
  • 栄町
  • 栄町
  • 栄町
  • 栄町
  • 西条朝日町
  • 西条朝日町
  • 大坪通
  • 大坪通
  • 助実
  • 助実
  • 和泉
  • 和泉
  • 卯之留
  • 卯之留
  • 御薗宇
  • 御薗宇
  • 御薗宇
  • 御薗宇
  • 産総研前
  • 中国電力前
  • サイエンス北
  • 酒類総合研究所前
  • 水源地前
  • 水源地前
  • 西条農高前
  • 西条農高前
  • 東子
  • 東子
  • 小滝原
  • 小滝原
  • 早稲木地蔵前
  • 早稲木地蔵前
  • 下三永広島ガス前
  • 下三永広島ガス前
  • ゴルフ場入口
  • ゴルフ場入口
  • ゴルフ場下
  • ゴルフ場下
  • 高岡
  • 高岡
  • 大沢
  • 大沢
  • 板城
  • 板城
  • 馬木
  • 馬木
  • 樋ノ詰橋
  • 樋ノ詰橋
  • 樋ノ詰橋
  • 小多田
  • 小多田
  • 上黒瀬
  • 上黒瀬
  • 南方
  • 南方
  • 賀茂医療センター前
  • 黒瀬高校前
  • 賀茂医療センター口
  • 賀茂医療センター口
  • 乃美尾
  • 乃美尾
  • 乃美尾
  • 乃美尾
  • 西門前
  • 西門前
  • 黒瀬中学校前
  • 黒瀬中学校前
  • 丸山
  • 丸山
  • 黒瀬支所前
  • 黒瀬支所前
  • 中黒瀬
  • 中黒瀬
  • 楢原
  • 楢原
  • 中黒瀬小学校前
  • 中黒瀬小学校前
  • くろせハイライフ前
  • くろせハイライフ前
  • 黒瀬中央団地前
  • 黒瀬中央団地前
  • 鷹原
  • 鷹原
  • 鷹原
  • 鷹原
  • 庚ハイツ
  • 庚ハイツ
  • 狐ヶ城
  • 狐ヶ城
  • 松ヶ丘団地
  • 松ヶ丘団地
  • 春日野二丁目
  • 春日野二丁目
  • 春日野西
  • 春日野西
  • 春日野一丁目
  • 春日野一丁目
  • 康成病院前
  • 康成病院前
  • 楢原中央
  • 楢原中央
  • 北上保田
  • 北上保田
  • 上保田
  • 上保田
  • 広島国際大学
  • 広島国際大学
  • 広島国際大学
  • 明治橋
  • 明治橋
  • 市飯田
  • 市飯田
  • 八幡橋
  • 八幡橋
  • 呉記念病院前
  • 呉記念病院前
  • 郷原畑
  • 郷原畑
  • 郷原
  • 郷原
  • and 641 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)

Over time

Overall score across the last 19 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-19.

2026-10-02: 66.32026-10-03: 66.32026-10-04: 66.32026-10-05: 66.32026-10-06: 66.32026-10-07: 66.32026-10-08: 66.32026-10-09: 66.32026-10-10: 66.32026-10-11: 66.32026-10-12: 66.32026-10-13: 66.32026-10-14: 67.92026-10-15: 69.62026-10-16: 69.62026-10-17: 69.62026-10-18: 69.62026-10-19: 69.62026-10-20: 69.6
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-10-0266.3 first check
2026-10-0366.3 no change
2026-10-0466.3 no change
2026-10-0566.3 no change
2026-10-0666.3 no change
2026-10-0766.3 no change
2026-10-0866.3 no change
2026-10-0966.3 no change
2026-10-1066.3 no change
2026-10-1166.3 no change
2026-10-1266.3 no change
2026-10-1366.3 no change
2026-10-1467.9 up 1.6
2026-10-1569.6 up 1.7
2026-10-1669.6 no change
2026-10-1769.6 no change
2026-10-1869.6 no change
2026-10-1969.6 no change
2026-10-2069.6 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change
  • Realtime quality no change

Feed history

Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.

Feed history by published file
CheckedPublished fileService dates throughGrade at the time
2026-10-14 to 2026-10-20 (7 checks)f5781720a5bd2027-04-15Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-02 to 2026-10-13 (12 checks)7cbd08bf00c92027-02-15Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-09-05 to 2026-10-01 (23 checks)7cbd08bf00c92027-02-15D, 65.8 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade

Everything we checked

15 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Error3 instances

    A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.

    Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

    Fix: Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. (Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.)

    Finding code: missing_required_column · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning36506 instances

    Some rows in stop_times.txt leave the timepoint column blank.

    That column says whether a time is a real checkpoint or an estimate. Blank leaves apps guessing, and they may show your estimates as promises.

    Fix: Set timepoint=1 on stops that are real time checks and 0 on the rest. If every published time is a scheduled one, mark them all 1. (Usually one export setting.)

    Finding code: missing_timepoint_value · Read the fix guide for missing_timepoint_value · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1175 instances

    1175 of 1175 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning992 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning891 instances

    891 of 891 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning463 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning283 instances

    283 of 1175 trips have no headsign, the text that tells riders where the bus is going. A trip counts when it has trip_headsign or a stop_headsign at every stop.

    When a route has multiple directions or patterns, the route name alone may not tell riders which service is coming.

    Fix: Add the destination, direction, or 'via' label riders actually see to trip_headsign. Do not copy the route name. If the label changes during the trip, use stop_headsign. (Usually one value per route pattern in your scheduling source.)

    Finding code: scorecard_missing_headsigns · Read the fix guide for scorecard_missing_headsigns · See GTFS Best Practices (opens GTFS Best Practices on an external site)

  • Warning2 instances

    Some stops sit far from the route line they belong to.

    Trip planners may draw the bus route through the wrong streets or point riders to the wrong corner.

    Fix: Check the flagged stops' coordinates and the route shape in your scheduling software; re-snap whichever is misplaced. (A few minutes per flagged stop.)

    Finding code: stop_too_far_from_shape · Read the fix guide for stop_too_far_from_shape · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning2 instances

    On some trips the stops fall along the route line in a different order than the schedule lists.

    Trip planners can draw the bus doubling back or skipping ahead, which confuses riders reading the map.

    Fix: Check the stop order and the shape direction in your scheduling software; the shape is often drawn backwards. (A few minutes per flagged trip.)

    Finding code: stops_match_shape_out_of_order · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    This feed models stations or entrances but has no pathways.txt.

    Trip planners can't guide riders through the station, and there is no step-free route information for wheelchair users.

    Fix: Add pathways.txt to link entrances, platforms, and elevators. Give each one a level. (Worth it for multi-level or large stations; flat stops don't need it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_station_no_pathways · Read the fix guide for scorecard_station_no_pathways · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Info76 instances

    Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Finding code: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info11 instances

    The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.

    Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.

    Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)

    Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide for unknown_file · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

Two requirements remain for this feed to earn the conformance mark. 1 validator error to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Not yet
1 validator error to resolve.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 177 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Realtime reliability

The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 200 checks in the 25 days to 2026-10-20, with 21s median lag.

Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment. The window ends at the newest observation, which is not always today: if the monitor stops, this window stops with it.

Live predictions vs schedule

Arrival predictions ran a median 180s late versus the schedule, and stayed within 300s nine times in ten. They were on time (about a minute early to five late) 100.0% of the time. 100.0% of reported vehicle positions sat on or near the published route shape.

From the last full realtime sample: how far live arrival predictions sat from the schedule, and whether vehicle positions fell on the route. These feed the realtime score; they change no other category.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 176 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 3 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 50 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 49 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality 100 / 100
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.

Similar feeds in Hiroshima

Other scorecards in Hiroshima, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.

Show your grade

Put this badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check, shows the date of that check, and links back to this scorecard. When there is no current score it says so instead of showing an old one.

JR Bus Chugoku (JRバス中国): GTFS feed quality grade D, 69.6 of 100, checked 2026-10-20. GTFS Scorecard.

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/jr-bus-chugoku/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.