← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-10-20

Kure City Life Bus (呉市生活バス)

Based on the official feed source on file

Service mode Bus

61.6 / 100

unchanged since 2026-10-19

Cataloged in Hiroshima, Japan.

Covers 180 daysAccessibility gaps

Source feed: https://ajt-mobusta-gtfs.mcapps.jp/static/18/current_data.zip

Kure City's contracted life-line bus network, published by the city. The portal notes that a few of these routes have no realtime coverage.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 34 minutes ago; last changed 3 days ago.

Measured 4 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: high.

  • All four score categories were measured this run.
  • Realtime was sampled in one bounded window of 9 snapshots.
  • The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

About this feed

Kure City Life Bus (呉市生活バス)’s published feed lists 58 bus routes, 943 scheduled trips and 758 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-10-18 through 2027-04-18. It publishes realtime trip updates, vehicle positions and service alerts; when we checked, all of them answered. The published file last changed on 2026-10-17.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.Likely your export tool

A file is missing a column that GTFS requires. Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.

⏱ Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.worth about +12 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

758 of 758 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

Fixing this covers all 758 stops in the feed.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 03

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

943 of 943 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

Fixing this covers all 943 trips in the feed.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Riders and need behind these fixes

  • Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
  • The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.

These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.

Finding handoff

Move one finding to a recheck

Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.

Finding
Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
Recheck
Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

  2. Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

  3. Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 180 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
One or more realtime feeds were reachable; live-arrival coverage is not known.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness26.0 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 14 kinds of issue across 25132 instances (3 error, 25109 warning, 20 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 180 days.

Rider experience49.9 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime quality100.0 / 100

Sampled 9 times outside service hours: 3 of 3 configured feeds healthy; vehicle position plausibility was not measurable.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

This feed has 758 stops.

Skip to route and stop data

The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 904-07-03 (green)
  • 904-22-01 (green)
  • 904-12-01 (green)
  • 904-04-03 (green)
  • 904-18-02 (green)
  • 904-08-02 (green)
  • 904-03-03 (green)
  • 904-03-01 (green)
  • 904-14-01 (green)
  • 904-05-03 (green)
  • 904-03-02 (green)
  • 904-05-01 (green)
  • 904-11-01 (green)
  • 904-04-02 (green)
  • 904-15-02 (green)
  • 904-03-09 (green)
  • 904-04-04 (green)
  • 904-03-10 (green)
  • 904-05-04 (green)
  • 904-06-01 (green)
  • 904-14-02 (green)
  • 904-18-01 (green)
  • 904-05-02 (green)
  • 904-08-05 (green)
  • 904-06-04 (green)
  • 904-03-05 (green)
  • 904-03-11 (green)
  • 904-03-08 (green)
  • 904-04-05 (green)
  • 904-03-15 (green)
  • 904-10-02 (green)
  • 904-19-02 (green)
  • 904-13-01 (green)
  • 904-07-02 (green)
  • 904-10-01 (green)
  • 904-19-01 (green)
  • 904-17-02 (green)
  • 904-04-06 (green)
  • 904-03-12 (green)
  • 904-06-03 (green)
  • 904-22-02 (green)
  • 904-08-01 (green)
  • 904-07-01 (green)
  • 904-04-01 (green)
  • 904-09-01 (green)
  • 904-08-04 (green)
  • 904-06-02 (green)
  • 904-04-07 (green)
  • 904-17-01 (green)
  • 904-03-14 (green)
  • 904-16-01 (green)
  • 904-15-01 (green)
  • 904-08-03 (green)
Routes in Kure City Life Bus (呉市生活バス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
904-07-03 呉市生活バス 白石白岳交叉点循環線Busgreen
904-22-01 呉市生活バス 三条二河宝町線Busgreen
904-12-01 呉市生活バス 北原神山峠線Busgreen
904-04-03 呉市生活バス 安浦地区生活バスBusgreen
904-18-02 呉市生活バス 広川尻線Busgreen
904-08-02 呉市生活バス 昭和循環線北コースBusgreen
904-03-03 呉市生活バス 倉橋地区生活バスBusgreen
904-03-01 呉市生活バス 倉橋地区生活バスBusgreen
904-01-01 呉市生活バス 下蒲刈地区生活バスBusgreen (no shape in feed)
904-14-01 呉市生活バス 阿賀音戸の瀬戸線Busgreen
904-05-03 呉市生活バス 音戸さざなみ線Busgreen
904-03-02 呉市生活バス 倉橋地区生活バスBusgreen
904-05-01 呉市生活バス 音戸さざなみ線Busgreen
904-11-01 呉市生活バス 呉苗代下条線Busgreen
904-01-04 呉市生活バス 下蒲刈地区生活バスBusgreen (no shape in feed)
904-04-02 呉市生活バス 安浦地区生活バスBusgreen
904-15-02 呉市生活バス 田原藤の脇線Busgreen
904-03-09 呉市生活バス 倉橋地区生活バスBusgreen
904-04-04 呉市生活バス 安浦地区生活バスBusgreen
904-03-10 呉市生活バス 倉橋地区生活バスBusgreen
904-05-04 呉市生活バス 音戸さざなみ線Busgreen
904-06-01 呉市生活バス 横路交叉点循環線Busgreen
904-14-02 呉市生活バス 阿賀音戸の瀬戸線Busgreen
904-18-01 呉市生活バス 広川尻線Busgreen
904-05-02 呉市生活バス 音戸さざなみ線Busgreen
904-08-05 呉市生活バス 昭和循環線北コースBusgreen
904-06-04 呉市生活バス 横路交叉点循環線Busgreen
904-03-05 呉市生活バス 倉橋地区生活バスBusgreen
904-03-11 呉市生活バス 倉橋地区生活バスBusgreen
904-03-08 呉市生活バス 倉橋地区生活バスBusgreen
904-04-05 呉市生活バス 安浦地区生活バスBusgreen
904-03-15 呉市生活バス 倉橋地区生活バスBusgreen
904-10-02 呉市生活バス 昭和循環線南コースBusgreen
904-19-02 呉市生活バス 川尻地区生活バスBusgreen
904-13-01 呉市生活バス 見晴町線Busgreen
904-01-03 呉市生活バス 下蒲刈地区生活バスBusgreen (no shape in feed)
904-07-02 呉市生活バス 白石白岳交叉点循環線Busgreen
呉市生活バス 三条二河宝町線Busgreen (no shape in feed)
904-10-01 呉市生活バス 昭和循環線南コースBusgreen
904-19-01 呉市生活バス 川尻地区生活バスBusgreen
904-17-02 呉市生活バス 広長浜線Busgreen
904-04-06 呉市生活バス 安浦地区生活バスBusgreen
904-01-02 呉市生活バス 下蒲刈地区生活バスBusgreen (no shape in feed)
904-03-12 呉市生活バス 倉橋地区生活バスBusgreen
904-06-03 呉市生活バス 横路交叉点循環線Busgreen
904-22-02 呉市生活バス 三条二河宝町線Busgreen
904-08-01 呉市生活バス 昭和循環線北コースBusgreen
904-07-01 呉市生活バス 白石白岳交叉点循環線Busgreen
904-04-01 呉市生活バス 安浦地区生活バスBusgreen
904-09-01 呉市生活バス 昭和循環線中央コースBusgreen
904-08-04 呉市生活バス 昭和循環線北コースBusgreen
904-06-02 呉市生活バス 横路交叉点循環線Busgreen
904-04-07 呉市生活バス 安浦地区生活バスBusgreen
904-17-01 呉市生活バス 広長浜線Busgreen
904-03-14 呉市生活バス 倉橋地区生活バスBusgreen
904-16-01 呉市生活バス 仁方小須磨線Busgreen
904-15-01 呉市生活バス 田原藤の脇線Busgreen
904-08-03 呉市生活バス 昭和循環線北コースBusgreen
List every stop
  • 夢ヶ丘入口
  • 夢ヶ丘中
  • 夢ヶ丘東
  • 東明ハイツ入口
  • 東明ハイツ入口
  • 東明ハイツ
  • 東明ハイツ
  • 本庄
  • 本庄
  • 泉ヶ丘団地
  • 泉ヶ丘団地
  • 水源池前
  • 水源池前
  • 北原
  • 北原
  • 昭和市民センター前
  • 昭和市民センター前
  • 昭和市民センター
  • 昭和市民センター西
  • 上條橋東
  • 勤住橋
  • 勤住橋
  • 仲間ヶ原
  • 仲間ヶ原
  • 仲間ヶ原
  • 仲間ヶ原
  • 西畑
  • 西畑
  • 阿賀駅前
  • 阿賀駅前
  • 阿賀駅前
  • 先小倉
  • 広市民センター
  • 広市民センター
  • 広市民センター
  • 広市民センター
  • 広交叉点
  • 広交叉点
  • 広交叉点
  • 広交叉点
  • 広交叉点
  • 広駅前
  • 広駅前
  • 東のりば
  • 東のりば
  • 東のりば
  • 呉駅前
  • 呉駅前
  • 呉駅前
  • 眼鏡橋
  • 眼鏡橋
  • 教育隊前
  • 鍋桟橋
  • 鍋桟橋
  • 呉信警固屋支店前
  • 呉信警固屋支店前
  • 警固屋5丁目
  • 警固屋5丁目
  • 警固屋ドック前
  • 警固屋ドック前
  • 警固屋市民センター
  • 警固屋市民センター
  • 警固屋中学校
  • 警固屋中学校
  • 音戸渡船口
  • 音戸渡船口
  • 清盛塚
  • 清盛塚
  • 音戸桟橋
  • 音戸桟橋
  • 音戸市民センター
  • 音戸市民センター
  • 音戸市民センター
  • 高須
  • 高須
  • 御所の浦
  • 御所の浦
  • 双見
  • 双見
  • 外双見
  • 外双見
  • 竹田浜
  • 竹田浜
  • 水産海洋技術センター入口
  • 水産海洋技術センター入口
  • 波多見
  • 波多見
  • 田之浦
  • 田之浦
  • 請石
  • 請石
  • 赤崎
  • 赤崎
  • あかさき東
  • あかさき東
  • 有清東
  • 有清東
  • 奥の内
  • 奥の内
  • 先奥
  • 先奥
  • 明徳中学校
  • 明徳中学校
  • 藤の脇
  • 藤の脇
  • 釣士田郵便局前
  • 釣士田郵便局前
  • 釣士田造船所前
  • 釣士田造船所前
  • 釣士田南
  • 釣士田南
  • 宇和木新開
  • 宇和木新開
  • 大白明橋
  • 大白明橋
  • 宇和木
  • 宇和木
  • 倉橋本浦
  • 倉橋本浦
  • 本浦
  • 本浦
  • 才の木
  • 才の木
  • 桂浜・温泉館
  • 桂浜・温泉館
  • 音戸
  • 音戸
  • 三軒鼻
  • 三軒鼻
  • 坪井東
  • 坪井
  • 坪井
  • 日付
  • 日付
  • 美化センター
  • 美化センター
  • 下光友
  • 下光友
  • 渡子
  • 渡子
  • 前の浜
  • 前の浜
  • 雇用促進住宅渡子前
  • 雇用促進住宅渡子前
  • 後口
  • 後口
  • 田原桟橋
  • 田原桟橋
  • 五反田
  • 五反田
  • 田原
  • 田原
  • コドウラ
  • コドウラ
  • 流田
  • 流田
  • 早瀬大橋北
  • 早瀬大橋北
  • 早瀬大橋
  • 早瀬大橋
  • 早瀬大橋
  • 早瀬桟橋前
  • 早瀬桟橋前
  • 南浜
  • 南浜
  • 鳥ヶ首
  • 鳥ヶ首
  • 鯉の浦
  • 鯉の浦
  • 藤の脇桟橋
  • 藤の脇桟橋
  • 藤の脇
  • 音戸の瀬戸
  • 音戸の瀬戸
  • 県営警固屋アパート前
  • 県営警固屋アパート前
  • 警固屋9丁目西
  • 警固屋9丁目西
  • 警固屋9丁目
  • 警固屋9丁目
  • 見晴口
  • 見晴口
  • 長郷
  • 長郷
  • 火山峠
  • 火山峠
  • 冠崎西
  • 冠崎西
  • 冠崎
  • 冠崎
  • 大冠中学校前
  • 大冠中学校前
  • 大入
  • 大入
  • 浜田
  • 浜田
  • 大崎
  • 大崎
  • 灘
  • 灘
  • 東灘
  • 東灘
  • 塩谷
  • 塩谷
  • 塩谷住宅
  • 塩谷住宅
  • 阿賀港
  • 阿賀港
  • 延崎
  • 延崎
  • 阿賀小学校
  • 西町
  • 西町
  • 東町
  • 東町
  • 音戸大橋上
  • 音戸大橋上
  • みはらし荘
  • みはらし荘
  • 見晴町
  • 中通1丁目
  • 中通1丁目
  • 四道路
  • 四道路
  • 本通3丁目
  • 本通3丁目
  • 本通4丁目
  • 本通4丁目
  • 本通5丁目
  • 本通5丁目
  • 本通6丁目
  • 本通6丁目
  • 本通7丁目
  • 本通7丁目
  • 本通8丁目
  • 本通8丁目
  • 阿賀海岸通
  • 阿賀海岸通
  • 広大橋
  • 新広駅
  • 新広駅
  • 二級橋
  • 二級橋
  • オークアリーナ入口
  • オークアリーナ入口
  • 白岳入口
  • 白岳入口
  • 白石
  • 白石
  • 白石
  • and 508 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)

Over time

Overall score across the last 19 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-19.

2026-10-02: 63.02026-10-03: 63.02026-10-04: 63.02026-10-05: 63.02026-10-06: 63.02026-10-07: 63.02026-10-08: 63.02026-10-09: 63.02026-10-10: 63.02026-10-11: 63.02026-10-12: 63.02026-10-13: 63.02026-10-14: 63.02026-10-15: 63.02026-10-16: 63.02026-10-17: 61.22026-10-18: 61.62026-10-19: 61.62026-10-20: 61.6
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-10-0263.0 first check
2026-10-0363.0 no change
2026-10-0463.0 no change
2026-10-0563.0 no change
2026-10-0663.0 no change
2026-10-0763.0 no change
2026-10-0863.0 no change
2026-10-0963.0 no change
2026-10-1063.0 no change
2026-10-1163.0 no change
2026-10-1263.0 no change
2026-10-1363.0 no change
2026-10-1463.0 no change
2026-10-1563.0 no change
2026-10-1663.0 no change
2026-10-1761.2 down 1.8
2026-10-1861.6 up 0.4
2026-10-1961.6 no change
2026-10-2061.6 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change
  • Realtime quality no change

Feed history

Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.

Feed history by published file
CheckedPublished fileService dates throughGrade at the time
2026-10-17 to 2026-10-20 (4 checks)9024ffde5f372027-04-18Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-02 to 2026-10-16 (15 checks)2c56104ea3282027-04-01Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-09-30 to 2026-10-01 (2 checks)2c56104ea3282027-04-01F, 59.9 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade
2026-09-05 to 2026-09-29 (21 checks)d52392361b842027-02-16F, 59.9 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade

What changed in this feed

Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-10-19.

Same feed file as 2026-10-19; the published zip did not change.

Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops and export changes in a reader, with no sign-up.

Everything we checked

18 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Error3 instances

    A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.

    Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

    Fix: Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. (Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.)

    Finding code: missing_required_column · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning24255 instances

    Some rows in stop_times.txt leave the timepoint column blank.

    That column says whether a time is a real checkpoint or an estimate. Blank leaves apps guessing, and they may show your estimates as promises.

    Fix: Set timepoint=1 on stops that are real time checks and 0 on the rest. If every published time is a scheduled one, mark them all 1. (Usually one export setting.)

    Finding code: missing_timepoint_value · Read the fix guide for missing_timepoint_value · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning943 instances

    943 of 943 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning758 instances

    758 of 758 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning689 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning165 instances

    165 of 943 trips have no headsign, the text that tells riders where the bus is going. A trip counts when it has trip_headsign or a stop_headsign at every stop.

    When a route has multiple directions or patterns, the route name alone may not tell riders which service is coming.

    Fix: Add the destination, direction, or 'via' label riders actually see to trip_headsign. Do not copy the route name. If the label changes during the trip, use stop_headsign. (Usually one value per route pattern in your scheduling source.)

    Finding code: scorecard_missing_headsigns · Read the fix guide for scorecard_missing_headsigns · See GTFS Best Practices (opens GTFS Best Practices on an external site)

  • Warning98 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning36 instances

    Some stops exist in the feed but no trip ever stops at them.

    Riders may walk to a stop where no bus is scheduled to arrive.

    Fix: Remove retired stops from the export, or add them back to the trips that should serve them. (A review pass in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: stop_without_stop_time · Read the fix guide for stop_without_stop_time · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning9 instances

    On some trips the stops fall along the route line in a different order than the schedule lists.

    Trip planners can draw the bus doubling back or skipping ahead, which confuses riders reading the map.

    Fix: Check the stop order and the shape direction in your scheduling software; the shape is often drawn backwards. (A few minutes per flagged trip.)

    Finding code: stops_match_shape_out_of_order · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning9 instances

    The feed contains route shapes no trip uses.

    Harmless to riders, but it bloats the feed and suggests stale export data.

    Fix: Turn on 'remove unused shapes' (or the like) in your export tool. (One setting.)

    Finding code: unused_shape · Read the fix guide for unused_shape · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning6 instances

    Stop has too many matches for shape (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'stop_has_too_many_matches_for_shape' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Finding code: stop_has_too_many_matches_for_shape · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning5 instances

    Some stops sit far from the route line they belong to.

    Trip planners may draw the bus route through the wrong streets or point riders to the wrong corner.

    Fix: Check the flagged stops' coordinates and the route shape in your scheduling software; re-snap whichever is misplaced. (A few minutes per flagged stop.)

    Finding code: stop_too_far_from_shape · Read the fix guide for stop_too_far_from_shape · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    Many of the feed's trips don't run at all in the next 7 days.

    It usually means old service periods are still in the export, making the feed bigger and harder to check.

    Fix: Trim past service periods the next time you export. (One setting in most export tools.)

    Finding code: trip_coverage_not_active_for_next7_days · Read the fix guide for trip_coverage_not_active_for_next7_days · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info11 instances

    The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.

    Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.

    Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)

    Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide for unknown_file · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info7 instances

    Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Finding code: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

Two requirements remain for this feed to earn the conformance mark. 1 validator error to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Not yet
1 validator error to resolve.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 180 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Can riders use it?

Checks beyond structural validation: places where the feed is valid but a rider still could not travel.

  • 36 of 758 boardable stops are never served by any trip. Riders see these stops in apps and on the map but can never catch anything there, which erodes trust in the data. Remove stops no route serves, or add the trips that should call at them.

These do not change the grade. They catch trips with no rideable leg and stops no trip serves, the kind of gap a trip planner trips over.

Realtime reliability

The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 200 checks in the 25 days to 2026-10-20, with 21s median lag.

Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment. The window ends at the newest observation, which is not always today: if the monitor stops, this window stops with it.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 180 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 3 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 26 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 50 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality 100 / 100
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.

Similar feeds in Hiroshima

Other scorecards in Hiroshima, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.

Show your grade

Put this badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check, shows the date of that check, and links back to this scorecard. When there is no current score it says so instead of showing an old one.

Kure City Life Bus (呉市生活バス): GTFS feed quality grade D, 61.6 of 100, checked 2026-10-20. GTFS Scorecard.

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/kure-city-life-bus/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.