← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-19

Ichinoseki City Bus (一関市市営バス)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

73.9 / 100

unchanged since 2026-07-18

Catalogued in Iwate, Japan.

Covers 255 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Ichinoseki City's municipal bus network; counted as one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

563 of 563 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

235 of 235 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 255 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness74.2 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 7 kinds of issue across 8364 instances (0 error, 8354 warning, 10 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 255 days.

Rider experience52.4 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

Routes in Ichinoseki City Bus (一関市市営バス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
外山・宮沢線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
京津畑線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
興田猿沢線/大東環状線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
興田線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
永井1線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
小猪岡・山谷線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
新山線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
千厩花泉線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
千厩線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
千厩磐清水線Busteal (no shape in feed)
曽慶線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
曽慶栃折沢線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
大原・上内野線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
永井2線Busgray (no shape in feed)
大原中川線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
大籠線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
長倉・霜後線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
天狗田線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
藤・牧沢線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
藤沢一関線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
栃倉・川台線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
萩荘線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
永井3線Buspink (no shape in feed)
弥栄・藤ノ沢線Buswhite (no shape in feed)
摺沢・新山線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
一関花泉線Buspink (no shape in feed)
永井4線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
猿沢線1Busyellow (no shape in feed)
猿沢線2Busyellow (no shape in feed)

This feed has 563 stops.

List every stop
  • 鍋倉
  • 新山団地前
  • 丸福団地前
  • 長昌寺前
  • 馬渕沢
  • 願成寺前
  • 新大町
  • 一ノ関駅前
  • 大町通り
  • 大町通り
  • 大町角
  • 大町角
  • 大槻町
  • 一関小学校前
  • 桜町中学校前
  • 桜町中学校前
  • 三ノ関
  • 県立高等看護学院前
  • 県立高等看護学院前
  • 磐井・南光病院前
  • 一関一高前
  • 一関一高前
  • 磐井橋
  • 一関市役所前
  • 一関市役所前
  • 一関市役所西
  • 一関市役所西
  • 一関市役所西
  • 一関市役所西
  • 一関警察署前
  • 中野
  • 山目
  • イオン一関店前
  • 大槻
  • 沢内住宅
  • 粒乱田公民館前
  • 館ヶ丘入口
  • 館ヶ丘
  • 館ニュータウン入口
  • 桃の湯・果実の森
  • きつね塚前
  • 泉沢橋
  • 笹谷分館前
  • 外山[一関市赤荻]
  • 白崖
  • 薄衣
  • 薄衣
  • 21P
  • 久伝
  • 道の駅かわさき
  • 一本木
  • 上大原
  • 畑中
  • 西の前
  • 金華山[一関市大東町]
  • 長泉寺
  • 金華山[一関市花泉町]
  • 中島
  • 一六
  • 立町
  • 立町角
  • 西山
  • 跡ノ沢
  • 市道峠
  • 市道入口
  • 前田野
  • 奈良崎
  • 道下
  • 本宿[一関市大東町]
  • 興田局前
  • 興田局前
  • 八日町
  • 大塚
  • 興田
  • 下中川
  • 柳ノ平
  • 菅ノ沢
  • 伊勢張
  • 砂渕
  • JA花泉支店前
  • 大中斉
  • 下京津畑
  • 京津畑
  • 上ノ山
  • 二十前
  • 越路
  • 大原小学校前
  • 七切
  • 上ノ洞
  • 野々下
  • 花泉郵便局前
  • 惣ヶ屋敷
  • 水山参道口
  • 大森[一関市大東町]
  • 暮坪
  • 老人ホーム前
  • 前ノ沢
  • 白山
  • 宮田前
  • 後沢
  • 花泉支所
  • 神蔭
  • 田中[一関市大東町]
  • 界田[一関市大東町]
  • 木工団地入口
  • 上摺沢
  • 八幡前
  • 但馬崎
  • 四ツ角
  • 大東高校前
  • 花泉駅前
  • 環境改善センター前
  • 長洞
  • 本木入口
  • 石奈坂[一関市大東町]
  • 狩集
  • 旧天狗田小学校前
  • ライスセンター
  • 旧興田中学校前
  • 旧中川小学校前
  • 小向[一関市大東町中川]
  • 東永井公民館前
  • 野田
  • 新城
  • 清水
  • 中山[一関市大東町]
  • 野々沢
  • 和田戸
  • 中田
  • 5区会館前
  • 袖振
  • 峠[一関市大東町]
  • 大森公民館前
  • 中屋敷[一関市大東町]
  • 赤菅
  • 向山
  • 堀合
  • 小森
  • 前畑
  • 上野[一関市大東町]
  • 丑石
  • 西丑石
  • 小黒滝
  • 杉山
  • 滝ノ上
  • 市ノ通[一関市大東町鳥海]
  • 郷ノ目
  • 郷ノ目
  • 飯倉
  • 堺田[一関市花泉町]
  • 九千沢
  • 稗田
  • 長岫
  • JA高倉倉庫前
  • 神平
  • 磐井中学校入口
  • 磐井中学校入口
  • 円満寺前
  • 円満寺前
  • 若宮八幡前
  • 若宮八幡前
  • 一関変電所前
  • 山根公民館前
  • 山口
  • 上野[一関市厳美町]
  • 上野[一関市厳美町]
  • 亀の井ホテル一関入口
  • 亀の井ホテル一関入口
  • 巻ヶ渕
  • 高倉公民館前
  • 沖野々
  • 水神木
  • 4区公民館前
  • 樋ノ口
  • 夏梨
  • 13区集落センター前
  • 駒形根神社前
  • 大森橋
  • 深立目公民館前
  • 山谷
  • 合方沢
  • 二ノ町
  • 真打堰土地改良区前
  • 7区公民館前
  • 上菅生沢東
  • 上菅生沢西
  • 骨寺村荘園遺跡
  • 本寺小学校前
  • 小猪岡ミーティングハウス前
  • 下小猪岡集会所前
  • 柧木立
  • 上原集会所前
  • 杉則入口
  • 落合[一関市厳美町]
  • 青笹
  • 小河原
  • 入道
  • 入道坂の上
  • 山谷分館前
  • 鴻ノ巣
  • 大久保[一関市大東町]
  • 外大久保
  • 払川
  • 新田[一関市大東町]
  • 藤ヶ崎
  • 山口会館前
  • 一の通[一関市大東町大原上]
  • 八幡神社入口
  • 永井市民センター入口
  • 農村女性の家前
  • 大久保[一関市川崎町]
  • 泉沢
  • 旧永井小学校前
  • 千厩病院前
  • 萩の森
  • 千厩駅前
  • 千厩駅前
  • 千厩高校前
  • 千厩体育館入口
  • 舘山
  • 舘山公園下
  • 東小田
  • 西小田橋
  • 下田
  • 九千沢サンコスモスセンター前
  • 日当
  • 藤沢営農経済センター前
  • 関田橋
  • 高田
  • 宮ノ脇
  • 野々田橋
  • ハネト
  • 藤沢小学校前
  • 藤沢
  • 藤沢郵便局前
  • 高倉コミュニティセンター前
  • 藤沢病院
  • 仲町[一関市藤沢町]
  • 下町[一関市藤沢町]
  • 柳平
  • 新地
  • 天神橋[一関市藤沢町]
  • 白沢
  • 割山
  • 黄海上町
  • 二日町
  • 塔婆崎公民館前
  • and 313 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)

Over time

Overall score across the last 2 checks — unchanged since 2026-07-18.

2026-07-18: 73.92026-07-19: 73.9
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-07-1873.9 first check
2026-07-1973.9 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change

What changed in this feed

Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-07-18.

Same feed file as 2026-07-18; the published zip did not change.

Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops in a reader, with no sign-up.

Everything we checked

10 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning8227 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning563 instances

    563 of 563 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning235 instances

    235 of 235 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning125 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info8 instances

    Some trip headsigns name a stop along the way, not the final destination.

    The sign should tell riders where the bus ends up, so a midpoint name can send them the wrong way.

    Fix: Set trip_headsign to the trip's last stop or its overall destination. (Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: trip_headsign_matches_intermediate_stop · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.

    A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.

    Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)

    Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.

    Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.

    Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)

    Validator rule: unknown_file · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 255 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 255 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 74 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Ichinoseki City Bus (一関市市営バス) GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/ichinoseki-city-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.