← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-10-20

Bonbus (ボンバス / エイチ・ディー西広島)

Based on the official feed source on file

Service mode Bus

73.8 / 100

unchanged since 2026-10-19

Cataloged in Hiroshima, Japan.

Covers 175 daysAccessibility gaps

Source feed: https://ajt-mobusta-gtfs.mcapps.jp/static/13/current_data.zip

Bonbus, operated by HD Nishi-Hiroshima in the western hill suburbs of Hiroshima City.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 4 hours ago; last changed 8 days ago.

Measured 4 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: high.

  • All four score categories were measured this run.
  • Realtime was sampled in one bounded window of 9 snapshots.
  • The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

About this feed

Bonbus (ボンバス / エイチ・ディー西広島)’s published feed lists 37 bus routes, 769 scheduled trips and 132 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-10-13 through 2027-04-13. It publishes realtime trip updates, vehicle positions and service alerts; when we checked, all of them answered. The published file last changed on 2026-10-12.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.Likely your export tool

A file is missing a column that GTFS requires. Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.

⏱ Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.worth about +12 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

132 of 132 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

Fixing this covers all 132 stops in the feed.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 03

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

769 of 769 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

Fixing this covers all 769 trips in the feed.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Riders and need behind these fixes

  • Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
  • The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.

These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.

Finding handoff

Move one finding to a recheck

Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.

Finding
Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
Recheck
Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

  2. Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

  3. Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 175 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
One or more realtime feeds were reachable; live-arrival coverage is not known.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness60.0 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 8 kinds of issue across 14771 instances (3 error, 14722 warning, 46 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 175 days.

Rider experience51.2 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime quality100.0 / 100

Sampled 9 times outside service hours: 3 of 3 configured feeds healthy; vehicle position plausibility was not measurable.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

This feed has 132 stops.

Skip to route and stop data

The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 11-51 大迫団地線 (green)
  • フジハイツ循環線 (green)
  • 11 フジハイツ・イトーピア線 (green)
  • 明山台循環線(時計回り) (green)
  • 明山台循環線(反時計回り) (green)
  • 17-1 五月が丘・ジアウトレット広島線 (green)
  • 17-3 ジアウトレット広島線 (green)
  • 11-4 広電己斐団地・大迫団地線 (green)
  • 11-1 大迫団地線 (green)
  • 11-6 広電己斐団地線 (green)
  • 11H 広電己斐団地・大迫団地線 (green)
  • 14H 共立ハイツ線 (green)
  • 11 大迫団地線 (green)
  • 11 広電己斐団地線 (green)
  • 17-31 五月が丘・ジアウトレット広島線 (green)
  • 17 五月が丘線 (green)
  • フジハイツ循環線(反時計回り) (green)
  • 14 共立ハイツ線 (green)
  • 11 広電己斐団地・大迫団地線 (green)
  • 11-2 大迫団地線 (green)
  • 11-8 フジハイツ・イトーピア線 (green)
  • 11-54 広電己斐団地・大迫団地線 (green)
  • フジハイツ循環線(時計回り) (green)
  • 11-3 広電己斐団地線 (green)
  • 17-21 五月が丘線 (green)
  • 17 ジアウトレット広島線 (green)
  • 11H 大迫団地線 (green)
  • 17 五月が丘・ジアウトレット広島線 (green)
  • 11-52 大迫団地線 (green)
  • 14-2 共立ハイツ線 (green)
  • 17-2 ジアウトレット広島線 (green)
  • 17H 五月が丘・ジアウトレット広島線 (green)
  • 14-5 共立ハイツ線 (green)
  • イトーピア・フジハイツ線 (green)
  • フジハイツ線 (green)
  • 17H ジアウトレット広島線 (green)
  • 11H 広電己斐団地線 (green)
Routes in Bonbus (ボンバス / エイチ・ディー西広島)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
11-51 大迫団地線Busgreen
フジハイツ循環線Busgreen
11 フジハイツ・イトーピア線Busgreen
明山台循環線(時計回り)Busgreen
明山台循環線(反時計回り)Busgreen
17-1 五月が丘・ジアウトレット広島線Busgreen
17-3 ジアウトレット広島線Busgreen
11-4 広電己斐団地・大迫団地線Busgreen
11-1 大迫団地線Busgreen
11-6 広電己斐団地線Busgreen
11H 広電己斐団地・大迫団地線Busgreen
14H 共立ハイツ線Busgreen
11 大迫団地線Busgreen
11 広電己斐団地線Busgreen
17-31 五月が丘・ジアウトレット広島線Busgreen
17 五月が丘線Busgreen
フジハイツ循環線(反時計回り)Busgreen
14 共立ハイツ線Busgreen
11 広電己斐団地・大迫団地線Busgreen
11-2 大迫団地線Busgreen
11-8 フジハイツ・イトーピア線Busgreen
11-54 広電己斐団地・大迫団地線Busgreen
フジハイツ循環線(時計回り)Busgreen
11-3 広電己斐団地線Busgreen
17-21 五月が丘線Busgreen
17 ジアウトレット広島線Busgreen
11H 大迫団地線Busgreen
17 五月が丘・ジアウトレット広島線Busgreen
11-52 大迫団地線Busgreen
14-2 共立ハイツ線Busgreen
17-2 ジアウトレット広島線Busgreen
17H 五月が丘・ジアウトレット広島線Busgreen
14-5 共立ハイツ線Busgreen
イトーピア・フジハイツ線Busgreen
フジハイツ線Busgreen
17H ジアウトレット広島線Busgreen
11H 広電己斐団地線Busgreen
List every stop
  • 西広島駅
  • 西広島駅
  • 西広島駅
  • 己斐橋
  • 己斐中二丁目
  • 己斐中二丁目
  • みどり幼稚園
  • みどり幼稚園
  • 己斐小学校
  • 己斐小学校
  • 紅葉園
  • 紅葉園
  • 己斐中学校入口
  • 己斐中学校入口
  • 己斐峠入口
  • 己斐峠入口
  • 己斐峠入口
  • 己斐峠入口
  • 己斐上四丁目
  • 己斐上四丁目
  • 己斐上四丁目上
  • 己斐上四丁目上
  • 無線台下
  • 無線台下
  • 緑ヶ丘入口
  • 緑ヶ丘入口
  • やまなみ
  • やまなみ
  • 広電己斐団地
  • 広電己斐団地
  • 国迫団地
  • 国迫団地
  • 国迫団地
  • 国迫団地
  • 大迫団地下
  • 大迫団地下
  • 大迫団地
  • 明山台下
  • 明山台下
  • 明山台中
  • 明山台中
  • 閑静園
  • 閑静園
  • もみじが丘入口
  • もみじが丘入口
  • もみじが丘中央
  • もみじが丘中央
  • もみじが丘南
  • もみじが丘南
  • もみじが丘第二公園
  • もみじが丘第二公園
  • 共立ハイツ上
  • 共立ハイツ上
  • 共立ハイツ
  • 西広島駅北口
  • 西広島駅北口
  • 五月が丘三丁目
  • 五月が丘三丁目
  • 五月が丘二丁目
  • 五月が丘二丁目
  • 五月が丘一丁目
  • 五月が丘一丁目
  • 五月が丘四丁目
  • 五月が丘四丁目
  • 五月が丘四丁目上
  • 五月が丘四丁目上
  • 五月が丘団地
  • 広電己斐団地入口
  • 広電己斐団地入口
  • 広電己斐団地入口
  • 広電己斐団地入口
  • 己斐峠
  • 己斐峠
  • 己斐上三丁目
  • 己斐上三丁目
  • 高須台五丁目
  • 高須台五丁目
  • 高須台四丁目
  • 高須台四丁目
  • 高須台中央
  • 高須台中央
  • 高須小学校
  • 高須小学校
  • 学院東門前
  • 学院東門前
  • 古江
  • 古江
  • 己斐本町二丁目
  • 己斐本町二丁目
  • 己斐
  • 己斐
  • 上天満町
  • 上天満町
  • 十日市
  • 十日市
  • 己斐城山墓苑前
  • 己斐城山墓苑前
  • 日生東団地
  • 日生東団地
  • 紙屋町
  • 紙屋町
  • 紙屋町
  • 都町
  • 都町
  • 福島町
  • 福島町
  • 八丁堀
  • イトーピア入口
  • イトーピア入口
  • 集会所前
  • 集会所前
  • 観音堂入口
  • 観音堂入口
  • フジハイツ消防署前
  • フジハイツ消防署前
  • フジハイツ消防署前
  • フジハイツ消防署前
  • フジハイツ第二公園
  • 己斐東小学校前
  • 己斐東小学校前
  • イトーピアマンション前
  • 西区役所前
  • 西区役所前
  • もみじが丘第一公園
  • もみじが丘第一公園
  • そらの北
  • そらの北
  • ジ アウトレット 広島
  • ジ アウトレット 広島
  • 石内南四丁目
  • 石内南四丁目
  • 免許センター

Over time

Overall score across the last 19 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-19.

2026-10-02: 73.82026-10-03: 73.82026-10-04: 73.82026-10-05: 73.82026-10-06: 73.82026-10-07: 73.82026-10-08: 73.82026-10-09: 73.82026-10-10: 73.82026-10-11: 73.82026-10-12: 72.02026-10-13: 73.82026-10-14: 73.82026-10-15: 73.82026-10-16: 73.82026-10-17: 73.82026-10-18: 73.82026-10-19: 73.82026-10-20: 73.8
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-10-0273.8 first check
2026-10-0373.8 no change
2026-10-0473.8 no change
2026-10-0573.8 no change
2026-10-0673.8 no change
2026-10-0773.8 no change
2026-10-0873.8 no change
2026-10-0973.8 no change
2026-10-1073.8 no change
2026-10-1173.8 no change
2026-10-1272.0 down 1.8
2026-10-1373.8 up 1.8
2026-10-1473.8 no change
2026-10-1573.8 no change
2026-10-1673.8 no change
2026-10-1773.8 no change
2026-10-1873.8 no change
2026-10-1973.8 no change
2026-10-2073.8 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change
  • Realtime quality no change

Feed history

Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.

Feed history by published file
CheckedPublished fileService dates throughGrade at the time
2026-10-12 to 2026-10-20 (9 checks)3b571f8c6c862027-04-13Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-02 to 2026-10-11 (10 checks)5dab23c212bd2027-04-01Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-09-30 to 2026-10-01 (2 checks)5dab23c212bd2027-04-01C, 71.1 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade
2026-09-05 to 2026-09-29 (21 checks)3fddca964c102027-01-13C, 71.3 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade

Everything we checked

12 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Error3 instances

    A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.

    Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

    Fix: Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. (Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.)

    Finding code: missing_required_column · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning13917 instances

    Some rows in stop_times.txt leave the timepoint column blank.

    That column says whether a time is a real checkpoint or an estimate. Blank leaves apps guessing, and they may show your estimates as promises.

    Fix: Set timepoint=1 on stops that are real time checks and 0 on the rest. If every published time is a scheduled one, mark them all 1. (Usually one export setting.)

    Finding code: missing_timepoint_value · Read the fix guide for missing_timepoint_value · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning769 instances

    769 of 769 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning767 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning132 instances

    132 of 132 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning68 instances

    68 of 769 trips have no headsign, the text that tells riders where the bus is going. A trip counts when it has trip_headsign or a stop_headsign at every stop.

    When a route has multiple directions or patterns, the route name alone may not tell riders which service is coming.

    Fix: Add the destination, direction, or 'via' label riders actually see to trip_headsign. Do not copy the route name. If the label changes during the trip, use stop_headsign. (Usually one value per route pattern in your scheduling source.)

    Finding code: scorecard_missing_headsigns · Read the fix guide for scorecard_missing_headsigns · See GTFS Best Practices (opens GTFS Best Practices on an external site)

  • Warning37 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info33 instances

    Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Finding code: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info11 instances

    The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.

    Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.

    Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)

    Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide for unknown_file · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

Two requirements remain for this feed to earn the conformance mark. 1 validator error to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Not yet
1 validator error to resolve.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 175 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Realtime reliability

The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 200 checks in the 25 days to 2026-10-20, with 22s median lag.

Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment. The window ends at the newest observation, which is not always today: if the monitor stops, this window stops with it.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 174 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 3 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 60 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 51 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality 100 / 100
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.

Similar feeds in Hiroshima

Other scorecards in Hiroshima, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.

Show your grade

Put this badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check, shows the date of that check, and links back to this scorecard. When there is no current score it says so instead of showing an old one.

Bonbus (ボンバス / エイチ・ディー西広島): GTFS feed quality grade C, 73.8 of 100, checked 2026-10-20. GTFS Scorecard.

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/hd-nishi-hiroshima-bonbus/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.