Feed status · checked 2026-10-20
Forble (フォーブル)
Based on the official feed source on file
Service mode Bus
down 1.2 since 2026-10-19
Cataloged in Hiroshima, Japan.
Source feed: https://ajt-mobusta-gtfs.mcapps.jp/static/14/current_data.zip
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 38 minutes ago; last changed 7 days ago.
Measured 4 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: high.
- All four score categories were measured this run.
- Realtime was sampled in one bounded window of 9 snapshots.
- The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
About this feed
Forble (フォーブル)’s published feed lists 9 bus routes, 891 scheduled trips and 307 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-10-14 through 2027-04-14. It publishes realtime trip updates, vehicle positions and service alerts; when we checked, all of them answered. The published file last changed on 2026-10-13.
Top things to fix
Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.Likely your export tool
A file is missing a column that GTFS requires. Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.
This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.
⏱ Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.worth about +12 points in its category
Ask your AVL vendor to check that every vehicle assignment reaches TripUpdates. School-day and tripper runs are the ones most often left out.
1 of 1 trips scheduled during the sampling window had no live predictions. Riders on those trips get schedule times labeled as live. Caltrans asks that every trip you run shows up in TripUpdates.
This was measured over a realtime sampling window, so it has no feed-wide share.
⏱ A vendor data-mapping question.worth about +41 points in its category
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
307 of 307 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fixing this covers all 307 stops in the feed.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Riders and need behind these fixes
- Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
- The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.
These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.
Finding handoff
Move one finding to a recheck
Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.
- Finding
- Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 02 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 03 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_rt_trip_coverage
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 176 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Live-arrival data covered 0% of scheduled trips in the sampled window.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 11 kinds of issue across 19581 instances (3 error, 19559 warning, 19 informational).
Service data covers the next 176 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Sampled 9 times: 3 of 3 configured feeds healthy; 0.0% of scheduled trips had live predictions; vehicle position plausibility was not measurable.
Routes and stops
Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.
This feed has 307 stops.
The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.
Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
- 奥畑・椎原線 (green)
- 飯室線・あさひが丘線 (green)
- くすの木台・あさひが丘・北部医療センター線 (green)
- 平和台線 (green)
- 久地線 (green)
- 戸山線 (green)
- サンハイツ線 (green)
- 東亜ハイツ線 (green)
- 若葉台線 (green)
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 奥畑・椎原線 | Bus | green |
| 飯室線・あさひが丘線 | Bus | green |
| くすの木台・あさひが丘・北部医療センター線 | Bus | green |
| 平和台線 | Bus | green |
| 久地線 | Bus | green |
| 戸山線 | Bus | green |
| サンハイツ線 | Bus | green |
| 東亜ハイツ線 | Bus | green |
| 若葉台線 | Bus | green |
List every stop
- あさひが丘1番
- あさひが丘1番
- あさひが丘2番
- あさひが丘2番
- あさひが丘3番
- あさひが丘3番
- あさひが丘下
- あさひが丘下
- あさひが丘下
- あさひが丘下
- あさひが丘上
- あさひが丘上
- あさひが丘上
- あさひが丘中
- あさひが丘中
- あさひが丘展望台入口
- あさひが丘展望台入口
- あさひが丘東
- あさひが丘東
- くすの木台
- くすの木台
- くすの木台下
- くすの木台下
- くすの木台中
- くすの木台中
- 安県営住宅
- 安県営住宅
- 安佐営業所
- 安佐営業所
- 安佐出張所前
- 安佐出張所前
- 安佐動物公園
- 安佐動物公園
- 一つ町
- 一つ町
- 宇津
- 宇津
- 下向
- 下向
- 下向
- 下向上
- 下向上
- 下大下
- 下大下
- 下萩原
- 下萩原
- 下伴
- 下伴
- 下槙原
- 下槙原
- 角山橋
- 角山橋
- 吉山
- 吉山
- 久地学校
- 久地学校
- 久地魚切
- 久地魚切
- 久地魚切
- 久地魚切
- 久地境原
- 久地境原
- 久地川井
- 久地川井
- 久地農協
- 久地農協
- 久地本郷下
- 久地本郷下
- 魚切橋
- 魚切橋
- 魚切中
- 魚切中
- 教雲寺前
- 教雲寺前
- 郷坂
- 郷坂
- 県営あさひが丘住宅
- 県営あさひが丘住宅
- 戸山学校
- 戸山学校
- 戸山車庫
- 戸山車庫
- 戸山中村
- 戸山中村
- 戸山農協支所前
- 戸山農協支所前
- 戸山槙原
- 戸山槙原
- 戸山郵便局前
- 戸山郵便局前
- 後山下
- 後山下
- 後山上
- 後山上
- 後山上
- 後山農協
- 後山農協
- 幸の神
- 幸の神
- 幸の神
- 幸の神
- 広陵学園入口
- 広陵学園入口
- 荒谷
- 荒谷
- 高浜
- 高浜
- 才の原
- 才の原
- 才の原下
- 才の原下
- 細坂上
- 細坂上
- 桜が峠口
- 桜が峠口
- 三国分れ
- 三国分れ
- 三菱団地入口
- 三菱団地入口
- 三本柿
- 三本柿
- 出雲
- 出雲
- 小浜
- 小浜
- 小野原
- 小野原
- 小野原三国口
- 小野原三国口
- 松宗
- 松宗
- 沼田高校
- 上安駅
- 上安駅
- 上安駅
- 上萩原
- 上萩原
- 上毛木
- 上毛木
- 新畑
- 新畑
- 新畑
- 神原
- 神原
- 壬辰橋
- 壬辰橋
- 清和中学校前
- 清和中学校前
- 西正寺
- 西正寺
- 大下
- 大下
- 大原
- 大原
- 大原駅
- 大原駅
- 大川橋
- 大川橋
- 大谷橋
- 大谷橋
- 中吉山
- 中吉山
- 中田口
- 中田口
- 中萩原
- 中萩原
- 忠央
- 忠央
- 追崎
- 椿原
- 椿原
- 天皇原
- 天皇原
- 藤田橋
- 藤田橋
- 日浦西小学校
- 日浦西小学校
- 八丁橋
- 八丁橋
- 飯室西
- 飯室西
- 飯室毛木
- 飯室毛木
- 尾淵
- 尾淵
- 布
- 布
- 上布
- 上布
- 槙原
- 槙原
- 名原口
- 名原口
- 毛木
- 毛木
- 野稲原
- 野稲原
- 野平口
- 野平口
- 油木
- 油木
- 脇田橋
- 脇田橋
- サンハイツ
- サンハイツ
- サンハイツ下
- サンハイツ下
- サンハイツ県営住宅
- サンハイツ県営住宅
- サンハイツ中
- サンハイツ中
- サンハイツ東
- サンハイツ東
- サンハイツ東上
- サンハイツ東上
- スポーツセンター前
- 安小学校
- 安小学校
- 安小学校西
- 安小学校西
- 安小峠
- 安小峠
- 安中央
- 安中央
- 安田女子大入口
- 安田女子大入口
- 安東亜
- 安東亜
- 奥畑下
- 下小峠
- 下小峠
- 下相田
- 下相田
- 光ヶ丘団地口
- 光ヶ丘団地口
- 高取
- 高取
- 高取
- 高取上
- 高取上
- 三城田上
- 三城田中
- 若葉台
- 若葉台中央公園南
- 若葉台中央公園北
- 若葉台東公園前
- 若葉台東上
- 若葉台入口
- 若葉台北公園前
- 沼田営業所
- and 57 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
Overall score across the last 19 checks — down 1.2 since 2026-10-19.
Show the numbers
| Check | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 69.6 | first check |
| 2026-10-03 | 59.6 | down 10.0 |
| 2026-10-04 | 59.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-05 | 69.6 | up 10.0 |
| 2026-10-06 | 62.6 | down 7.0 |
| 2026-10-07 | 62.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-08 | 62.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-09 | 62.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-10 | 65.0 | up 2.4 |
| 2026-10-11 | 67.3 | up 2.3 |
| 2026-10-12 | 69.6 | up 2.3 |
| 2026-10-13 | 67.9 | down 1.7 |
| 2026-10-14 | 69.6 | up 1.7 |
| 2026-10-15 | 69.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-16 | 61.4 | down 8.2 |
| 2026-10-17 | 69.6 | up 8.2 |
| 2026-10-18 | 69.6 | no change |
| 2026-10-19 | 62.6 | down 7.0 |
| 2026-10-20 | 61.4 | down 1.2 |
What changed since your last check
- Correctness no change
- Freshness no change
- Rider experience no change
- Realtime quality down 6.2
Feed history
Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.
| Checked | Published file | Service dates through | Grade at the time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-13 to 2026-10-20 (8 checks) | 4185cdb81c89 | 2027-04-14 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-12 (11 checks) | 34fab8e894f4 | 2027-01-14 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-09-05 to 2026-10-01 (23 checks) | 34fab8e894f4 | 2027-01-14 | D, 66.2 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
What changed in this feed
Overall score fell 1.2 points since 2026-10-19.
Same feed file as 2026-10-19; the published zip did not change.
Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops and export changes in a reader, with no sign-up.
What changed over time
On 2026-10-02 this feed started at grade D. On 2026-10-03 the grade moved from D to F. On 2026-10-05 the grade moved from F to D. As of 2026-10-20 it holds grade D.
A plain-language history of this feed, newest first.
- 2026-10-19 Score fell 7 points, realtime fell 35 points.
- 2026-10-17 Score rose 8 points, realtime rose 41 points.
- 2026-10-16 Score fell 8 points, realtime fell 41 points.
- 2026-10-06 Score fell 7 points, realtime fell 35 points.
- 2026-10-05 Grade went F to D, realtime rose 50 points.
- 2026-10-03 Grade went D to F, realtime fell 50 points.
Everything we checked
16 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Error3 instances
A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.
Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.
Fix: Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. (Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.)
Finding code: missing_required_column · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning18644 instances
Some rows in stop_times.txt leave the timepoint column blank.
That column says whether a time is a real checkpoint or an estimate. Blank leaves apps guessing, and they may show your estimates as promises.
Fix: Set timepoint=1 on stops that are real time checks and 0 on the rest. If every published time is a scheduled one, mark them all 1. (Usually one export setting.)
Finding code: missing_timepoint_value · Read the fix guide for missing_timepoint_value · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning894 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning891 instances
891 of 891 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning307 instances
307 of 307 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning68 instances
68 of 891 trips have no headsign, the text that tells riders where the bus is going. A trip counts when it has trip_headsign or a stop_headsign at every stop.
When a route has multiple directions or patterns, the route name alone may not tell riders which service is coming.
Fix: Add the destination, direction, or 'via' label riders actually see to trip_headsign. Do not copy the route name. If the label changes during the trip, use stop_headsign. (Usually one value per route pattern in your scheduling source.)
Finding code: scorecard_missing_headsigns · Read the fix guide for scorecard_missing_headsigns · See GTFS Best Practices (opens GTFS Best Practices on an external site)
- Warning11 instances
Stop has too many matches for shape (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'stop_has_too_many_matches_for_shape' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: stop_has_too_many_matches_for_shape · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning4 instances
The feed contains route shapes no trip uses.
Harmless to riders, but it bloats the feed and suggests stale export data.
Fix: Turn on 'remove unused shapes' (or the like) in your export tool. (One setting.)
Finding code: unused_shape · Read the fix guide for unused_shape · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning3 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning2 instances
Some stops sit far from the route line they belong to.
Trip planners may draw the bus route through the wrong streets or point riders to the wrong corner.
Fix: Check the flagged stops' coordinates and the route shape in your scheduling software; re-snap whichever is misplaced. (A few minutes per flagged stop.)
Finding code: stop_too_far_from_shape · Read the fix guide for stop_too_far_from_shape · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
1 of 1 trips scheduled during the sampling window had no live predictions.
Riders on those trips get schedule times labeled as live. Caltrans asks that every trip you run shows up in TripUpdates.
Fix: Ask your AVL vendor to check that every vehicle assignment reaches TripUpdates. School-day and tripper runs are the ones most often left out. (A vendor data-mapping question.)
Finding code: scorecard_rt_trip_coverage · Read the fix guide for scorecard_rt_trip_coverage · See GTFS-Realtime reference (opens the GTFS-Realtime reference on an external site)
- Info11 instances
The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.
Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.
Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)
Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide for unknown_file · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info6 instances
Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
Two requirements remain for this feed to earn the conformance mark. 1 validator error to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Not yet
- 1 validator error to resolve.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 176 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Realtime reliability
The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 200 checks in the 25 days to 2026-10-20, with 22s median lag.
Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment. The window ends at the newest observation, which is not always today: if the monitor stops, this window stops with it.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 176 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 3 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 48 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 51 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality 59 / 100
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.
Similar feeds in Hiroshima
Other scorecards in Hiroshima, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/forble-bus/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.