← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-10-20

Etajima Bus (江田島バス)

Based on the official feed source on file

Service mode Bus

68.8 / 100

up 3.1 since 2026-10-19 · D → D

Cataloged in Hiroshima, Japan.

Covers 162 daysAccessibility gaps

Source feed: https://gtfs-st.busit.jp/api/etajimabus

Etajima Bus serves Etajima and Kure. Its feed comes from a different bus location vendor than the rest of the association's list, and only trip updates are published as realtime.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 37 minutes ago; last changed 37 minutes ago.

Measured 4 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: high.

  • All four score categories were measured this run.
  • Realtime was sampled in one bounded window of 3 snapshots.
  • The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

About this feed

Etajima Bus (江田島バス)’s published feed lists 34 bus routes, 333 scheduled trips and 173 stops. It publishes realtime trip updates; when we checked, it answered. The published file last changed on 2026-10-20.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.Likely your export tool

A file is missing a column that GTFS requires. Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.

⏱ Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.worth about +12 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

173 of 173 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

Fixing this covers all 173 stops in the feed.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 03

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

333 of 333 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

Fixing this covers all 333 trips in the feed.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Riders and need behind these fixes

  • Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
  • The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.

These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.

Finding handoff

Move one finding to a recheck

Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.

Finding
Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
Recheck
Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

  2. Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

  3. Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 162 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
One or more realtime feeds were reachable; live-arrival coverage is not known.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness53.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 7 kinds of issue across 7852 instances (3 error, 7847 warning, 2 informational).

Freshness85.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 162 days.

Rider experience52.3 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime quality100.0 / 100

Sampled 3 times outside service hours: 1 of 1 configured feed healthy.

Routes and stops

This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.

This feed has 173 stops.

Skip to route and stop data

The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

Routes in Etajima Bus (江田島バス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
中町桟橋・是長・中町桟橋Busgreen (no shape in feed)
小用・市役所・深江Busgreen (no shape in feed)
深江・市役所・小用Busgreen (no shape in feed)
小用・市役所・須野本Busgreen (no shape in feed)
小用・大君・深江Busgreen (no shape in feed)
深江・大君・小用Busgreen (no shape in feed)
須野本・大君・小用Busgreen (no shape in feed)
小用・大原・津久茂Busgreen (no shape in feed)
津久茂・大原・小用Busgreen (no shape in feed)
小用・山田・ゆめタウンBusgreen (no shape in feed)
ゆめタウン・山田・小用Busgreen (no shape in feed)
大柿高校・大君・小用Busgreen (no shape in feed)
ゆめタウン・大君・高田桟橋Busgreen (no shape in feed)
大柿高校・鹿川・中町桟橋Busgreen (no shape in feed)
中町桟橋・鹿川・大柿高校Busgreen (no shape in feed)
三高桟橋・鹿川・大柿高校Busgreen (no shape in feed)
中町桟橋・是長・三高桟橋Busgreen (no shape in feed)
三高桟橋・是長・中町桟橋Busgreen (no shape in feed)
高田桟橋・長瀬海岸・ゆめタウンBusgreen (no shape in feed)
ゆめタウン・長瀬海岸・高田桟橋Busgreen (no shape in feed)
小用・山田・秋月桟橋Busgreen (no shape in feed)
秋月桟橋・山田・小用Busgreen (no shape in feed)
高田桟橋・鹿川・大柿高校Busgreen (no shape in feed)
小用・ゆめタウン・長瀬海岸・高田桟橋Busgreen (no shape in feed)
高田桟橋・長瀬海岸・ゆめタウン・小用Busgreen (no shape in feed)
小用・市役所・大柿高校Busgreen (no shape in feed)
大柿高校・市役所・小用Busgreen (no shape in feed)
小用・大君・大柿高校Busgreen (no shape in feed)
大柿高校・鹿川・三高桟橋Busgreen (no shape in feed)
ゆめタウン・大君・市役所・ゆめタウンBusgreen (no shape in feed)
小用・秋月桟橋・ゆめタウンBusgreen (no shape in feed)
ゆめタウン・秋月桟橋・小用Busgreen (no shape in feed)
小用・術科学校Busgreen (no shape in feed)
術科学校・小用Busgreen (no shape in feed)
List every stop
  • 小用
  • 小用
  • 小用
  • 小用
  • 西の谷
  • 西の谷
  • 柿の木田
  • 世上口
  • 世上口
  • 世上口
  • 第一術科学校前
  • 第一術科学校前
  • 向側
  • 向側
  • 八幡神社前
  • 八幡神社前
  • 江田島小学校前
  • 江田島小学校前
  • 山田
  • 山田
  • 江田島図書館前
  • 江田島図書館前
  • 鷲部中郷
  • 鷲部中郷
  • 鷲部
  • 鷲部
  • 江田島南部墓苑
  • 江田島南部墓苑
  • 沖平
  • 沖平
  • 江南橋
  • 江南橋
  • 江南橋
  • 江南橋
  • 中継ターミナルゆめタウン前
  • 中継ターミナルゆめタウン前
  • 中継ターミナルゆめタウン前
  • 外海
  • 外海
  • 庭草
  • 庭草
  • 楠田
  • 阿浜
  • 柿浦浜
  • 柿浦浜
  • 柿浦桟橋
  • 柿浦桟橋
  • 柿浦峠
  • 柿浦峠
  • 江田島市役所前
  • 江田島市役所前
  • 柿浦
  • 柿浦
  • 常道
  • 常道
  • 坊地
  • 壱畝町
  • 壱畝町
  • 大君
  • 大君
  • 南大君
  • 南大君
  • 河内
  • 能美大原
  • 能美大原
  • 大柿老人福祉センター
  • 大柿老人福祉センター
  • 認定こども園おおがき前
  • 認定こども園おおがき前
  • 大柿高校前
  • 大柿高校前
  • 大柿高校前
  • 大柿高校前
  • 西沖
  • 鴨田
  • 鴨田
  • 深江東
  • 深江
  • 深江港
  • 須野本
  • JA呉大古支店前
  • JA呉大古支店前
  • 峰ヶ迫
  • 峰ヶ迫
  • 澤医院前
  • 余防
  • 鎌木
  • 鎌木
  • 東浜
  • 東浜
  • 中浜
  • 中浜
  • 鹿川小学校前
  • 鹿川小学校前
  • 是長口
  • 是長口
  • 是長口
  • 下郷
  • 下郷
  • 上郷
  • 永田
  • 宮山
  • 迫田口
  • 迫田口
  • 能美中学校前
  • 長石
  • 長石
  • 中町桟橋
  • 中町桟橋
  • 黒張
  • 黒張
  • 長瀬海岸
  • 長瀬海岸
  • 松ヶ鼻
  • 墓地公園前
  • 大盤団地
  • 大盤団地
  • 内海
  • 内海
  • 見浪橋
  • 南区
  • 荒神橋
  • 荒神橋
  • 沖北
  • 高田桟橋前
  • 高田桟橋
  • 小方
  • 小島
  • 三高口
  • 三高桟橋
  • 三高
  • 三高中学校前
  • 三高中学校前
  • 高祖
  • 豊作原住宅前
  • 大間
  • 亀原
  • 亀原
  • 沖美ふれあいセンター前
  • 美能
  • 美能
  • わだて
  • ニューブルービーチ前
  • 砠
  • 鹿田公園前
  • 堂道
  • 林山
  • 是長
  • 松崎
  • 沖美市民センター前
  • 畑
  • 岡
  • 大王
  • 大王神社前
  • 小田
  • 小田
  • 中郷公園
  • 中郷公園
  • 奥小路
  • 世上
  • 世上大橋
  • 宮ノ原2丁目
  • 一つ川橋
  • 石風呂
  • 大原
  • 大原口
  • 青少年交流の家入口
  • 津久茂
  • 秋月
  • 秋月桟橋
  • 飛渡瀬
  • 飛渡瀬
  • 一光ハマ前

Over time

Overall score across the last 19 checks — up 3.1 since 2026-10-19.

2026-10-02: 68.82026-10-03: 68.82026-10-04: 65.52026-10-05: 65.72026-10-06: 65.72026-10-07: 66.12026-10-08: 65.72026-10-09: 68.82026-10-10: 68.82026-10-11: 68.82026-10-12: 65.52026-10-13: 66.12026-10-14: 65.72026-10-15: 66.12026-10-16: 68.82026-10-17: 68.82026-10-18: 66.12026-10-19: 65.72026-10-20: 68.8
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-10-0268.8 first check
2026-10-0368.8 no change
2026-10-0465.5 down 3.3
2026-10-0565.7 up 0.2
2026-10-0665.7 no change
2026-10-0766.1 up 0.4
2026-10-0865.7 down 0.4
2026-10-0968.8 up 3.1
2026-10-1068.8 no change
2026-10-1168.8 no change
2026-10-1265.5 down 3.3
2026-10-1366.1 up 0.6
2026-10-1465.7 down 0.4
2026-10-1566.1 up 0.4
2026-10-1668.8 up 2.7
2026-10-1768.8 no change
2026-10-1866.1 down 2.7
2026-10-1965.7 down 0.4
2026-10-2068.8 up 3.1

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change
  • Realtime quality up 15.4

Feed history

Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.

Feed history by published file
CheckedPublished fileService dates throughGrade at the time
2026-10-203489425d72912027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-19bd32acd052322027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-182cf0c7ba5ea72027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-1780547155d94e2027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-168b74804050222027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-15148259e8dc072027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-1496b766745d592027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-136a1c16a609a32027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-1217c5cbb67f162027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-116d548685f3932027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-10cdc07a53bd5a2027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-09b4300fa980042027-03-31Current rubric: see the trend above

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 periods.

What changed in this feed

Overall score rose 3.1 points since 2026-10-19.

The feed file was re-published since 2026-10-19.

No longer reported since 2026-10-19 (1 finding)

  • 3 of 8 trips scheduled during the sampling window had no live predictions. (scorecard_rt_trip_coverage)

This records the later feed state. It does not establish who made a change or why.

Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops and export changes in a reader, with no sign-up.

What changed over time

On 2026-10-02 this feed started at grade D. On 2026-10-20 the check no longer reported: 3 of 8 trips scheduled during the sampling window had no live predictions. As of 2026-10-20 it holds grade D.

A plain-language history of this feed, newest first.

  • 2026-10-20 Score rose 3 points, realtime rose 15 points.
  • 2026-10-12 Score fell 3 points, realtime fell 16 points.
  • 2026-10-09 Score rose 3 points, realtime rose 15 points.
  • 2026-10-04 Score fell 3 points, realtime fell 16 points.

Everything we checked

11 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Error3 instances

    A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.

    Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

    Fix: Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. (Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.)

    Finding code: missing_required_column · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning7399 instances

    Some rows in stop_times.txt leave the timepoint column blank.

    That column says whether a time is a real checkpoint or an estimate. Blank leaves apps guessing, and they may show your estimates as promises.

    Fix: Set timepoint=1 on stops that are real time checks and 0 on the rest. If every published time is a scheduled one, mark them all 1. (Usually one export setting.)

    Finding code: missing_timepoint_value · Read the fix guide for missing_timepoint_value · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning343 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning333 instances

    333 of 333 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning173 instances

    173 of 173 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning69 instances

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Finding code: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for missing_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning35 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt is missing its start/end dates

    Apps and this scorecard can't warn anyone before the feed goes stale without stated validity dates.

    Fix: Add feed_info.txt with feed_start_date and feed_end_date to your export. (Two fields, set once in export settings.)

    Finding code: scorecard_missing_feed_info_dates · Read the fix guide for scorecard_missing_feed_info_dates · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

Two requirements remain for this feed to earn the conformance mark. 1 validator error to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Not yet
1 validator error to resolve.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 162 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Realtime reliability

The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 200 checks in the 25 days to 2026-10-20, with 0s median lag.

Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment. The window ends at the newest observation, which is not always today: if the monitor stops, this window stops with it.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 162 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 3 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 54 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 85 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality 100 / 100
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.

Similar feeds in Hiroshima

Other scorecards in Hiroshima, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.

Show your grade

Put this badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check, shows the date of that check, and links back to this scorecard. When there is no current score it says so instead of showing an old one.

Etajima Bus (江田島バス): GTFS feed quality grade D, 68.8 of 100, checked 2026-10-20. GTFS Scorecard.

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/etajima-bus/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.