← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-10-20

Awaji City Awa-kami Awa-hime Bus (淡路市あわ神あわ姫バス)

Based on the official feed source on file

Service mode Bus

64.4 / 100

unchanged since 2026-10-19

Cataloged in Hyogo, Japan.

Covers 142 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Source feed: https://api.gtfs-data.jp/v2/organizations/awajicity/feeds/awajinawahimebus/files/feed.zip?rid=current

Awaji City's Awa-kami Awa-hime community bus on Awaji Island.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 4 hours ago; last changed 45 days ago.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

About this feed

Awaji City Awa-kami Awa-hime Bus (淡路市あわ神あわ姫バス)’s published feed lists 6 bus routes, 124 scheduled trips and 221 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-03-12 through 2027-03-11. The published file has not changed since our first check on 2026-09-05.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.Likely your export tool

A file is missing a column that GTFS requires. Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.

⏱ Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.worth about +12 points in its category

Fix 02

Review the rule documentation for 'number_out_of_range' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.

Number out of range (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.

This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.

⏱ Varies.worth about +12 points in its category

Fix 03

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

223 of 223 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

The feed's stops count is not published here, so no share is reported.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Riders and need behind these fixes

  • Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
  • The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.

These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.

Finding handoff

Move one finding to a recheck

Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.

Finding
Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
Recheck
Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Fix 02

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 142 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness53.0 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 8 kinds of issue across 7138 instances (5 error, 7129 warning, 4 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 142 days.

Rider experience51.9 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

2 accessibility depth signals

  • 1 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (あわ神あわ姫バス岩屋洲本線).

    Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.

  • 1 stop name(s) use abbreviations or symbols a screen reader may mispronounce, with no spoken form set ("Awaji Nature Lab & Resort").

    Consider: Add tts_stop_name with the spoken form, e.g. 'Main Street and Second Avenue', for the affected stops.

Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.

This feed has 221 stops.

Skip to route and stop data

The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

Routes in Awaji City Awa-kami Awa-hime Bus (淡路市あわ神あわ姫バス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
あわ神あわ姫バス①時計回りBusteal (no shape in feed)
あわ神あわ姫バス②反時計回りBuspurple (no shape in feed)
あわ神あわ姫バス③東浦北淡線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
あわ神あわ姫バス➉北部観光周遊回りBusgreen (no shape in feed)
あわ神あわ姫バス⑪南部観光周遊回りBusyellow (no shape in feed)
あわ神あわ姫バス岩屋洲本線Buspink (no shape in feed)
List every stop
  • 米山
  • 米山
  • 石田
  • 石田
  • 淡路高校正門前
  • 淡路高校正門前
  • 淡路インターチェンジ高速バス停前
  • 淡路インターチェンジ高速バス停前
  • 淡路ハイウェイオアシスA1駐車場
  • 淡路ハイウェイオアシスA2駐車場
  • 県立淡路島公園
  • グリナリウム淡路島
  • 県立淡路景観園芸学校
  • 淡路カントリーガーデン
  • 釜口小井
  • 釜口小井
  • あわじ花さじき
  • ハーモニーファーム淡路
  • 国営明石海峡公園淡路口前
  • 淡路ワールドパークONOKORO
  • 淡路ワールドパークONOKORO
  • 淡路ワールドパークONOKORO
  • 薫寿堂前
  • 薫寿堂前
  • パルシェ香りの館・香りの湯
  • そばカフェ生田村前
  • 五斗長垣内遺跡前
  • 佐野運動公園
  • 田井交差点前
  • 田井交差点前
  • 佐野小井
  • 佐野小井
  • 津名ふれあいセンター前
  • 津名ふれあいセンター前
  • 関西看護医療大学前
  • 関西看護医療大学前
  • 江井高速バス停前
  • GARB COSTA ORANGE前
  • GARB COSTA ORANGE前
  • Awaji Nature Lab & Resort
  • 津名臨海公園
  • 津名臨海公園
  • 網代
  • 網代
  • 塩尾
  • 塩尾
  • 洲本バスセンター
  • 柏原
  • 柏原
  • 佐野交番前
  • 佐野交番前
  • 佐野
  • 佐野
  • 佐野局前
  • 佐野局前
  • ボールパーク入口
  • ボールパーク入口
  • 土器屋
  • 土器屋
  • 生穂
  • 生穂
  • 津名スポーツセンター前
  • 津名スポーツセンター前
  • 東浦バスターミナル
  • 東浦バスターミナル
  • 大谷
  • 大谷
  • 淡路市役所前
  • 津名中学校前
  • 津名中学校前
  • 津名高校前
  • 津名高校前
  • 中橋公園前
  • 中橋公園前
  • 津名港ターミナル
  • 志筑
  • 志筑
  • しづかホール前
  • しづかホール前
  • 志筑新島
  • 志筑新島
  • 志筑明神
  • 志筑明神
  • 東浦事務所前
  • 東浦事務所前
  • 殿下
  • 殿下
  • 八幡前
  • 八幡前
  • 中田橋
  • 中田橋
  • 中田小学校下
  • 中田小学校下
  • 津名一宮IC
  • 津名一宮IC
  • 広生寺前
  • 広生寺前
  • 竹谷
  • 竹谷
  • 順心淡路病院前
  • 孔官堂前
  • 孔官堂前
  • 井手
  • 井手
  • 久留麻
  • 久留麻
  • 伊弉諾神宮前
  • 伊弉諾神宮前
  • 老の内
  • 老の内
  • 郡家
  • 郡家
  • 一宮事務所前
  • 撫
  • 尾崎
  • 尾崎
  • 尾崎上の浜
  • 尾崎上の浜
  • 枯木
  • 枯木
  • 幸せのパンケーキ前
  • 幸せのパンケーキ前
  • 室津西
  • 室津西
  • 仮屋
  • 仮屋
  • 室津
  • 室津
  • 北淡診療所前
  • 北淡診療所前
  • 北淡インターチェンジ
  • 育波
  • 育波
  • 斗ノ内
  • 斗ノ内
  • 浅野
  • 浅野
  • 水越
  • 水越
  • 淡路高校前
  • 淡路高校前
  • 北淡事務所前
  • 富島中
  • 富島中
  • 南の町
  • 南の町
  • 富島東
  • 富島東
  • 富島交番前
  • 富島交番前
  • 北淡震災記念公園下
  • 北淡震災記念公園下
  • 梨本
  • 梨本
  • 蟇の浦
  • 蟇の浦
  • 大石
  • 中村
  • 轟木
  • 轟木
  • 大川
  • 高松浜
  • 下田
  • 下田
  • 平林
  • 平林
  • 長瀬
  • 江崎
  • 江崎
  • 松帆浦
  • 松帆浦
  • 大谷川
  • 大谷川
  • 道の駅あわじ・淡海荘
  • 道の駅あわじ・淡海荘
  • 長浜
  • 長浜
  • 東長浜
  • 東長浜
  • 岩屋事務所前
  • 岩屋事務所前
  • 津田
  • 津田
  • 茶間川
  • 茶間川
  • 岩屋ポートターミナル
  • 岩屋海水浴場前
  • 岩屋海水浴場前
  • 岩屋中学校前
  • 岩屋中学校前
  • 鵜崎
  • 鵜崎
  • 新世薬局夢舞台前
  • 聖隷淡路病院前
  • 聖隷淡路病院前
  • 淡路夢舞台前
  • 大磯ユーアールエー前
  • 大磯ユーアールエー前
  • 大磯港
  • 大磯港
  • 釜口
  • 釜口
  • 立石川
  • 立石川
  • 浦港
  • 浦港
  • 東浦平成病院前
  • 柿原
  • 柿原
  • 河内
  • 河内
  • 吹き戻しの里前
  • 吹き戻しの里前
  • 本四仁井高速バス停前
  • 本四仁井高速バス停前
  • 仁井本村
  • 赤土
  • 長畠
  • 長畠
  • 野田
  • 野田

Over time

Overall score across the last 19 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-19.

2026-10-02: 64.42026-10-03: 64.42026-10-04: 64.42026-10-05: 64.42026-10-06: 64.42026-10-07: 64.42026-10-08: 64.42026-10-09: 64.42026-10-10: 64.42026-10-11: 64.42026-10-12: 64.42026-10-13: 64.42026-10-14: 64.42026-10-15: 64.42026-10-16: 64.42026-10-17: 64.42026-10-18: 64.42026-10-19: 64.42026-10-20: 64.4
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-10-0264.4 first check
2026-10-0364.4 no change
2026-10-0464.4 no change
2026-10-0564.4 no change
2026-10-0664.4 no change
2026-10-0764.4 no change
2026-10-0864.4 no change
2026-10-0964.4 no change
2026-10-1064.4 no change
2026-10-1164.4 no change
2026-10-1264.4 no change
2026-10-1364.4 no change
2026-10-1464.4 no change
2026-10-1564.4 no change
2026-10-1664.4 no change
2026-10-1764.4 no change
2026-10-1864.4 no change
2026-10-1964.4 no change
2026-10-2064.4 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change

Feed history

Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.

Feed history by published file
CheckedPublished fileService dates throughGrade at the time
2026-10-02 to 2026-10-20 (19 checks)2a92c9e2ccea2027-03-11Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-09-05 to 2026-10-01 (23 checks)2a92c9e2ccea2027-03-11D, 64.4 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade

Everything we checked

11 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Error3 instances

    A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.

    Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

    Fix: Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. (Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.)

    Finding code: missing_required_column · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Error2 instances

    Number out of range (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'number_out_of_range' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Finding code: number_out_of_range · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning7115 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning223 instances

    223 of 223 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning124 instances

    124 of 124 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning12 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Finding code: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for missing_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info3 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.

    A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.

    Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)

    Finding code: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide for big_gap_in_service · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

Two requirements remain for this feed to earn the conformance mark. 2 validator errors to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Not yet
2 validator errors to resolve.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 142 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 141 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 5 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 53 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.

Similar feeds in Hyogo

Other scorecards in Hyogo, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.

Show your grade

Put this badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check, shows the date of that check, and links back to this scorecard. When there is no current score it says so instead of showing an old one.

Awaji City Awa-kami Awa-hime Bus (淡路市あわ神あわ姫バス): GTFS feed quality grade D, 64.4 of 100, checked 2026-10-20. GTFS Scorecard.

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/awaji-awakami-awahime-bus/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.