← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-10-17

Tagawa City Community Bus (田川市コミュニティバス)

Based on the feed source on file; publisher ownership is not verified

Service mode Bus

76.5 / 100

unchanged since 2026-10-16

Cataloged in Fukuoka, Japan.

Covers 348 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Source feed: https://api.gtfs-data.jp/v2/organizations/tagawacity/feeds/TagawaCityCommunityBus/files/feed.zip?rid=current

Tagawa City's community bus network; counted as one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 66 minutes ago; last changed 12 days ago.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the feed URL on file (publisher not verified).

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the configured feed URL. Publisher ownership of that URL is not verified.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

About this feed

Tagawa City Community Bus (田川市コミュニティバス)’s published feed lists 7 bus routes, 77 scheduled trips and 199 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-10-05 through 2027-09-30. The published file last changed on 2026-10-04.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

199 of 199 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

Fixing this covers all 199 stops in the feed.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

77 of 77 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

Fixing this covers all 77 trips in the feed.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

Riders and need behind these fixes

  • Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
  • The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.

These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.

Finding handoff

Move one finding to a recheck

Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.

Finding
Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
Recheck
Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Fix 03

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 348 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness75.0 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 10 kinds of issue across 35419 instances (0 error, 35405 warning, 14 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 348 days.

Rider experience59.9 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

1 accessibility depth signal

  • 4 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (1, 2, 5, 7).

    Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.

Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

This feed has 199 stops.

Skip to route and stop data

The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 1 (red)
  • 2 (red)
  • 3 (brown)
  • 4 (yellow)
  • 5 (teal)
  • 6 (white)
  • 7 (green)
Routes in Tagawa City Community Bus (田川市コミュニティバス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
1 まちなか循環線(右回り)Busred
2 まちなか循環線(左回り)Busred
3 坂谷線Busbrown
4 伊加利・鎮西線Busyellow
5 弓削田・川宮線Busteal
6 桜町・川宮線Buswhite
7 金川線Busgreen
List every stop
  • 西田川高校入口
  • 西田川高校入口
  • 文化センター
  • 文化センター
  • 荒牧医院入口
  • 荒牧医院入口
  • 美術館・図書館
  • あきさと園入口
  • あきさと園入口
  • 岩屋公民館
  • 岩屋公民館
  • 内越
  • 新生病院
  • 新生病院
  • 秋里
  • 秋里
  • 村方
  • 村方
  • 位登八幡
  • ほしい西
  • 田川団地
  • 田川団地
  • 桜ヶ丘
  • 桜ヶ丘
  • 日吉町口
  • 日吉町口
  • 元町
  • 地蔵前
  • バイパス川宮北
  • バイパス川宮南
  • 川宮プラチナタウン
  • 西保育所
  • 西保育所
  • 上位登
  • 汐井川
  • 汐井川
  • 桜町
  • 桜町
  • 後藤寺小学校
  • 後藤寺小学校
  • 野上公民館
  • 松ノ木(宮田設備横)
  • 奈良森ヶ坪
  • 新庄橋
  • 新庄橋
  • コスパ伊田
  • 上伊田東
  • 上伊田東
  • 上鎮西
  • 下位登
  • 重藤内科前
  • 重藤内科前
  • 鉄砲町
  • 鉄砲町
  • 東町・福智高校東
  • 東町・福智高校東
  • 夏吉
  • 夏吉
  • 棚木
  • 棚木公園
  • 棚木教育集会所
  • 吉田西
  • みそぎ口
  • 清瀬
  • 三ヶ瀬北
  • 三ヶ瀬北
  • 猪位金郵便局
  • 猪位金郵便局
  • みそぎ1組
  • みそぎ2組
  • 位登産業
  • トライアル田川後藤寺店前
  • トライアル田川後藤寺店前
  • 生目神社
  • 中郷
  • 上弓削田
  • 弓削田
  • 弓削田
  • 西鉄後藤寺
  • 西鉄後藤寺
  • 坂谷
  • 春日橋
  • 春日橋
  • 春日神社前
  • 春日神社前
  • 後藤寺
  • 後藤寺
  • 田川後藤寺駅前
  • 田川後藤寺駅前
  • 社会保険田川病院
  • 大浦上ノ山団地
  • 県住大浦団地
  • サンリット産業
  • 東団地4棟前
  • 後藤寺第2地区3町内集会所
  • 三軒屋フリー乗降区間
  • 藤下医院前
  • 後藤寺西団地
  • 上弓削田公民館
  • 文字山公民館
  • コーポ谷口前
  • 文字山団地
  • 文字山団地
  • 角銅原交差点
  • 弓削田中学校
  • 九電変電所横
  • 井上商店前
  • 猪国集落フリー乗降区間
  • 川宮
  • 西岸寺前
  • 大藪小学校前
  • メルクス前
  • メルクス前
  • 田川科学技術高校
  • 田川科学技術高校
  • 田川市立病院
  • 山賊鍋
  • 平原公民館
  • 平原郵便局
  • 砥石
  • 木城口
  • 城山団地入口
  • 城山団地入口
  • 城山団地
  • 城山団地
  • 月美台
  • 月美台
  • 県営中央団地
  • 中央団地なかしま理容店前
  • 芳ヶ谷団地第一集会所前
  • 鎮西白鳥口
  • 成道寺前
  • 成道寺前
  • 古賀町
  • 古賀町
  • 新橋
  • 新橋
  • 猪膝集落フリー乗降区間
  • 村上外科前
  • 村上外科前
  • 田川伊田駅前
  • 伊田本町口
  • 伊田本町口
  • 南大通り
  • 南大通り
  • 総合庁舎前
  • 総合庁舎前
  • 松原団地
  • 松原団地
  • 田川市役所玄関前
  • 田川市民会館
  • 総合体育館・市民プール
  • 総合体育館・市民プール
  • 青少年文化ホール
  • 青少年文化ホール
  • いいかねパレット前
  • 三井伊田団地
  • 博物館スマイルプラザ
  • 鎮西第一集会所
  • 鎮西第一集会所
  • 鎮西団地
  • 鎮西団地
  • 赤子(丸山組前)
  • 道手
  • 伊加利公民館
  • 伊加利公民館
  • 田中
  • 田中
  • 下伊加利(佐々木商店前)
  • 下伊加利(佐々木商店前)
  • 鎮西中学校前
  • 金国太祖神社前
  • 金国太祖神社前
  • RSHOPなかがみ前
  • 上伊田駅
  • 稲荷町
  • 稲荷町
  • 旬の里かみいた
  • 旬の里かみいた
  • 県立大学旧門前
  • 県立大学旧門前
  • 県大正門前・福智高校西
  • 県大正門前・福智高校西
  • 下伊田
  • 下伊田
  • 猪位金学園前
  • 緑ヶ丘
  • 下吉田教育集会所(吉田公民館)
  • 金川農協
  • 糒東公民館
  • 糒郵便局
  • 糒社宅
  • 糒社宅
  • 白鳥工業団地
  • 白鳥工業団地
  • 東鷹高校
  • 東鷹高校
  • 田川産業前
  • 分院前

Over time

Overall score across the last 16 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-16.

2026-10-02: 78.72026-10-03: 78.72026-10-04: 76.52026-10-05: 76.52026-10-06: 76.52026-10-07: 76.52026-10-08: 76.52026-10-09: 76.52026-10-10: 76.52026-10-11: 76.52026-10-12: 76.52026-10-13: 76.52026-10-14: 76.52026-10-15: 76.52026-10-16: 76.52026-10-17: 76.5
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-10-0278.7 first check
2026-10-0378.7 no change
2026-10-0476.5 down 2.2
2026-10-0576.5 no change
2026-10-0676.5 no change
2026-10-0776.5 no change
2026-10-0876.5 no change
2026-10-0976.5 no change
2026-10-1076.5 no change
2026-10-1176.5 no change
2026-10-1276.5 no change
2026-10-1376.5 no change
2026-10-1476.5 no change
2026-10-1576.5 no change
2026-10-1676.5 no change
2026-10-1776.5 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change

Feed history

Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.

Feed history by published file
CheckedPublished fileService dates throughGrade at the time
2026-10-04 to 2026-10-17 (14 checks)60963ee470df2027-09-30Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-02 to 2026-10-03 (2 checks)2f433aff3ac22027-09-30Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-07-25 to 2026-10-01 (65 checks)2f433aff3ac22027-09-30C, 78.7 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade
2026-07-18 to 2026-07-24 (4 checks)2f433aff3ac22027-09-30C, 78.7 under rubric 1.2, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade

What changed in this feed

Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-10-16.

Same feed file as 2026-10-16; the published zip did not change.

Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops and export changes in a reader, with no sign-up.

Everything we checked

12 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning35384 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning199 instances

    199 of 199 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning77 instances

    77 of 77 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning19 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    Some service calendars have no days of the week switched on.

    Trips tied to these calendars never run; they are dead data that can mask real schedule problems.

    Fix: Delete the empty calendars or set their service days. (A few minutes in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: service_has_no_active_day_of_the_week · Read the fix guide for service_has_no_active_day_of_the_week · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    Many of the feed's trips don't run at all in the next 7 days.

    It usually means old service periods are still in the export, making the feed bigger and harder to check.

    Fix: Trim past service periods the next time you export. (One setting in most export tools.)

    Finding code: trip_coverage_not_active_for_next7_days · Read the fix guide for trip_coverage_not_active_for_next7_days · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info5 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info3 instances

    The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.

    A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.

    Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)

    Finding code: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide for big_gap_in_service · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info3 instances

    The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.

    Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.

    Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)

    Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide for unknown_file · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    Future calendar (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'future_calendar' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Finding code: future_calendar · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    Future feed (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'future_feed' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Finding code: future_feed · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    Some trip headsigns name a stop along the way, not the final destination.

    The sign should tell riders where the bus ends up, so a midpoint name can send them the wrong way.

    Fix: Set trip_headsign to the trip's last stop or its overall destination. (Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: trip_headsign_matches_intermediate_stop · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

One requirement remains for this feed to earn the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 348 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 348 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 75 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 60 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.

Similar feeds in Fukuoka

Other scorecards in Fukuoka, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.

Show your grade

Put this badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check, shows the date of that check, and links back to this scorecard. When there is no current score it says so instead of showing an old one.

Tagawa City Community Bus (田川市コミュニティバス): GTFS feed quality grade C, 76.5 of 100, checked 2026-10-17. GTFS Scorecard.

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/tagawa-city-community-bus/2026-10-17.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-17. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.