← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-18

Ota City Bus (太田市営バス)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

75.3 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Catalogued in Gunma, Japan.

Covers 321 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Ota City's municipal bus network in southeastern Gunma; counted as one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

207 of 207 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

97 of 97 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 321 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness77.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 1945 instances (0 error, 1943 warning, 2 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 321 days.

Rider experience52.4 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

Routes in Ota City Bus (太田市営バス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
シティライナーおおた 尾島線Busgray (no shape in feed)
シティライナーおおた 新田線Busgray (no shape in feed)
市営無料バス 西バスBusyellow (no shape in feed)
市営無料バス 東バスBusyellow (no shape in feed)
市営無料バス 韮川・鳥之郷線Busyellow (no shape in feed)
市営無料バス 宝泉・新田線Busyellow (no shape in feed)

This feed has 207 stops.

List every stop
  • 太田駅北口
  • 太田駅北口
  • 市役所東
  • 市役所東
  • 南一番街
  • 南一番街
  • 群馬銀行太田支店前
  • 群馬銀行太田支店前
  • 城山病院前
  • 城山病院前
  • バスターミナルおおた
  • 東矢島町
  • 東矢島町
  • 南矢島町
  • 南矢島町
  • 末広町北
  • 末広町北
  • 堀江病院前
  • 堀江病院前
  • 高林南町
  • 高林南町
  • 県立がんセンター入口
  • 県立がんセンター入口
  • 県立がんセンター
  • 高林西町
  • 高林西町
  • 西町集会所前
  • 西町集会所前
  • 牛沢団地北
  • 牛沢団地北
  • 牛沢十字路
  • 牛沢十字路
  • 富沢団地南
  • 富沢団地南
  • 尾島温泉利根の湯
  • 備前島入口
  • 備前島入口
  • 三菱電機前
  • 三菱電機前
  • 尾島一丁目
  • 尾島一丁目
  • 尾島三丁目
  • 尾島三丁目
  • 尾島上町
  • 尾島上町
  • 粕川住宅入口
  • 粕川住宅入口
  • 尾島庁舎前
  • 出塚新田西
  • 出塚新田西
  • 世良田下町
  • 世良田下町
  • 世良田交差点東
  • 世良田交差点東
  • 世良田上町
  • 世良田上町
  • 今井
  • 今井
  • 尾島歴史公園
  • 太田二丁目
  • 太田二丁目
  • 太田三丁目
  • 太田三丁目
  • 大門入口
  • 大門入口
  • 本島病院前
  • 本島病院前
  • 太田六丁目
  • 太田六丁目
  • 太田記念病院
  • 太田記念病院南
  • 太田合同庁舎前
  • 太田合同庁舎前
  • 藤阿久
  • 藤阿久
  • 新道町
  • 新道町
  • 別所
  • 別所
  • 脇屋入口
  • 脇屋入口
  • 般若
  • 般若
  • 荒木医院前
  • 荒木医院前
  • 反町薬師入口
  • 反町薬師入口
  • 生品神社入口
  • 生品神社入口
  • 新田診療所前
  • 新田診療所前
  • 交番・消防署北
  • 交番・消防署北
  • 金井十字路
  • 金井十字路
  • 本郷
  • 本郷
  • 大根
  • 綿打行政センター
  • 綿打行政センター
  • 綿打行政センター北
  • 綿打行政センター北
  • 新田暁高校
  • 新田暁高校
  • 新田暁高校
  • 藪塚駅
  • 藪塚いこいの湯
  • 藪塚本町行政センター
  • 藪塚本町行政センター
  • 藪塚しゅんらん
  • 藪塚しゅんらん
  • 岩崎歯科東
  • 岩崎歯科東
  • 大原七区公民館
  • 大原七区公民館
  • 宏愛会第一病院
  • 新田大町
  • 新田大町
  • エアリスベース
  • エアリスベース
  • ユーランド新田
  • ジョイフル本田新田店
  • 木崎郵便局
  • 木崎郵便局
  • クスリのアオキ木崎店前
  • クスリのアオキ木崎店前
  • 木崎跨線橋北
  • 木崎跨線橋北
  • 木崎駅南口
  • 木崎駅南口
  • とりせん下田島店
  • 尾島生涯学習センター
  • 尾島生涯学習センター
  • すずかけ団地
  • すずかけ団地
  • 南ヶ丘団地
  • 旧中島家住宅
  • 愛光園前
  • 愛光園前
  • 綿打中学校前
  • 綿打中学校前
  • コスモス早川店北
  • コスモス早川店北
  • いずみ団地南
  • いずみ団地南
  • 新田下田中会館
  • 上田島会館前
  • 上田島会館前
  • 長命寺西
  • 長命寺西
  • 宝泉行政センター
  • 太田宝郵便局北
  • 太田宝郵便局北
  • 川田クリニック北
  • 川田クリニック北
  • 新田遺跡入口
  • 新田遺跡入口
  • ベルク フォルテ太田店
  • 清瀬公園前
  • 清瀬公園前
  • パルタウン集会所
  • パルタウン集会所
  • 三枚橋駅北
  • ウエルシア鳥山店
  • ウエルシア鳥山店
  • 高齢者総合福祉センター
  • 成塚住宅団地
  • 成塚住宅団地
  • かたくりの里
  • カンケンプラザ西
  • カンケンプラザ西
  • 矢場新町
  • 矢場新町
  • 矢場町
  • 矢場町
  • イオンモール太田
  • 安良岡町ゴールドタウン
  • 安良岡町ゴールドタウン
  • 韮川駅西
  • 韮川駅西
  • 台之郷公園
  • 台之郷公園
  • 太田東高校南
  • 太田東高校南
  • 太田工業高校
  • 太田工業高校
  • 休泊行政センター
  • 休泊小学校東
  • 休泊小学校東
  • 竜舞十字路南
  • 竜舞十字路南
  • あいメンタルクリニック前
  • あいメンタルクリニック前
  • 竜舞駅南口
  • 太田年金事務所前
  • 太田年金事務所前
  • ベイシアパワーモールおおた
  • BUSターミナルおおた
  • 大沢建設前
  • 大沢建設前
  • ヤオコー西
  • エアリスベース南
  • エアリスベース南
  • ウエルシア石原店
  • ウエルシア石原店
  • ベイシア丸山店南
  • ベイシア丸山店南

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

8 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning1931 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning207 instances

    207 of 207 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning97 instances

    97 of 97 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning9 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning2 instances

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 321 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 321 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 78 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Ota City Bus (太田市営バス) GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/ota-city-bus/2026-07-18.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-18. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.