← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-10-20

Ono Heart Bus (おおのハートバス)

Based on the official feed source on file

Service mode Bus

72.8 / 100

unchanged since 2026-10-19

Cataloged in Hiroshima, Japan.

Covers 179 daysAccessibility gaps

Source feed: https://ajt-mobusta-gtfs.mcapps.jp/static/17/current_data.zip

The Ono Heart Bus community service in the Ono district of Hatsukaichi, operated by Sasaki Kanko.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 35 minutes ago; last changed 3 days ago.

Measured 4 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: high.

  • All four score categories were measured this run.
  • Realtime was sampled in one bounded window of 9 snapshots.
  • The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

About this feed

Ono Heart Bus (おおのハートバス)’s published feed lists 1 bus route, 152 scheduled trips and 124 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-10-17 through 2027-04-17. It publishes realtime trip updates, vehicle positions and service alerts; when we checked, all of them answered. The published file last changed on 2026-10-16.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.Likely your export tool

A file is missing a column that GTFS requires. Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.

⏱ Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.worth about +12 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

124 of 124 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

Fixing this covers all 124 stops in the feed.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 03

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

152 of 152 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

Fixing this covers all 152 trips in the feed.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Riders and need behind these fixes

  • Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
  • The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.

These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.

Finding handoff

Move one finding to a recheck

Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.

Finding
Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
Recheck
Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

  2. Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

  3. Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. See this feed's finding-clearance log.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 179 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
One or more realtime feeds were reachable; live-arrival coverage is not known.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness56.2 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 9 kinds of issue across 4589 instances (3 error, 4570 warning, 16 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 179 days.

Rider experience52.4 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime quality100.0 / 100

Sampled 9 times outside service hours: 3 of 3 configured feeds healthy; vehicle position plausibility was not measurable.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

This feed has 124 stops.

Skip to route and stop data

The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • おおのハートバス (green)
Routes in Ono Heart Bus (おおのハートバス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
おおのハートバスBusgreen
List every stop
  • 宮島口
  • 更地分れ
  • 更地分れ
  • 宮島口西
  • 宮島口西
  • 大野支所前
  • 県営住宅前
  • 県営住宅前
  • 青葉台
  • 青葉台
  • 福面
  • 福面
  • グリーンハイツ
  • グリーンハイツ
  • 深江
  • 深江
  • 深江保育園
  • 深江保育園
  • 更地
  • 更地
  • 下更地
  • 下更地
  • 前空台入口
  • 前空台入口
  • 別府
  • 土井
  • 棚田
  • 宮島工業高校
  • 宮島工業高校
  • 池田保育園
  • 池田保育園
  • まるくる大野
  • 高畑
  • 高畑
  • 筏津
  • 筏津
  • 西教寺
  • 西教寺
  • 妹背の滝
  • 妹背の滝
  • 前空六丁目
  • 前空六丁目
  • 前空駅
  • 前空一丁目
  • 前空一丁目
  • 物見東
  • 物見東
  • 物見西
  • 物見西
  • 橋本
  • 橋本
  • 滝の下
  • 滝の下
  • 大野中学校
  • 大野中学校
  • 大野西小学校
  • 大野西小学校
  • 大野浦駅北口
  • 大野浦駅北口
  • 船倉
  • 船倉
  • 林が原
  • 林が原
  • 丸石上
  • 丸石上
  • 向原
  • 向原
  • 宮浜温泉
  • 宮浜温泉
  • べにまんさくの湯
  • サンランド入口
  • サンランド入口
  • サンランド東
  • サンランド東
  • サンランド
  • サンランド
  • サンランド西
  • サンランド西
  • 鳴川
  • 玖波駅
  • ふじタウン西
  • ふじタウン西
  • 宮島口東二丁目
  • 宮島口東三丁目
  • 宮島口東一丁目
  • 宮島口上
  • 土井上
  • 大野東小学校
  • 鯛の原
  • 青葉台集会所前
  • 上の浜
  • 上の浜
  • 梅原一丁目
  • 梅原一丁目
  • 沖塩屋
  • 沖塩屋
  • 青海苔
  • 青海苔
  • 丸石
  • 丸石
  • 広電阿品駅
  • ナタリーマリナタウン
  • ふじタウン南
  • ふじタウン南
  • ふじタウン中
  • ふじタウン中
  • ふじタウン北
  • ふじタウン北
  • 中山
  • 西市民センター
  • 大野浦駅南口
  • 大野浦駅南口
  • JR阿品駅
  • 下の浜
  • 下の浜
  • 大手
  • 大手
  • 阿品台山の手
  • 池田橋
  • 池田橋
  • 大野中央
  • 大野中央
  • 永慶寺橋
  • 永慶寺橋

Over time

Overall score across the last 19 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-19.

2026-10-02: 74.22026-10-03: 64.22026-10-04: 64.22026-10-05: 74.22026-10-06: 74.22026-10-07: 74.22026-10-08: 74.22026-10-09: 74.22026-10-10: 74.22026-10-11: 74.22026-10-12: 74.22026-10-13: 74.22026-10-14: 74.22026-10-15: 74.22026-10-16: 72.42026-10-17: 72.82026-10-18: 72.82026-10-19: 72.82026-10-20: 72.8
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-10-0274.2 first check
2026-10-0364.2 down 10.0
2026-10-0464.2 no change
2026-10-0574.2 up 10.0
2026-10-0674.2 no change
2026-10-0774.2 no change
2026-10-0874.2 no change
2026-10-0974.2 no change
2026-10-1074.2 no change
2026-10-1174.2 no change
2026-10-1274.2 no change
2026-10-1374.2 no change
2026-10-1474.2 no change
2026-10-1574.2 no change
2026-10-1672.4 down 1.8
2026-10-1772.8 up 0.4
2026-10-1872.8 no change
2026-10-1972.8 no change
2026-10-2072.8 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change
  • Realtime quality no change

Feed history

Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.

Feed history by published file
CheckedPublished fileService dates throughGrade at the time
2026-10-16 to 2026-10-20 (5 checks)62f4308f29af2027-04-17Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-10-02 to 2026-10-15 (14 checks)e87f17d81a3b2027-01-17Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-09-05 to 2026-10-01 (23 checks)e87f17d81a3b2027-01-17C, 70.4 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade

What changed in this feed

Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-10-19.

Same feed file as 2026-10-19; the published zip did not change.

Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops and export changes in a reader, with no sign-up.

What changed over time

On 2026-10-02 this feed started at grade C. On 2026-10-03 the grade moved from C to D. On 2026-10-05 the grade moved from D to C. As of 2026-10-20 it holds grade C.

A plain-language history of this feed, newest first.

  • 2026-10-05 Grade went D to C, realtime rose 50 points.
  • 2026-10-03 Grade went C to D, realtime fell 50 points.

Everything we checked

12 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Error3 instances

    A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.

    Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

    Fix: Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. (Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.)

    Finding code: missing_required_column · Read the fix guide for missing_required_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning4397 instances

    Some rows in stop_times.txt leave the timepoint column blank.

    That column says whether a time is a real checkpoint or an estimate. Blank leaves apps guessing, and they may show your estimates as promises.

    Fix: Set timepoint=1 on stops that are real time checks and 0 on the rest. If every published time is a scheduled one, mark them all 1. (Usually one export setting.)

    Finding code: missing_timepoint_value · Read the fix guide for missing_timepoint_value · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning161 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning152 instances

    152 of 152 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning124 instances

    124 of 124 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning10 instances

    Some stops sit far from the route line they belong to.

    Trip planners may draw the bus route through the wrong streets or point riders to the wrong corner.

    Fix: Check the flagged stops' coordinates and the route shape in your scheduling software; re-snap whichever is misplaced. (A few minutes per flagged stop.)

    Finding code: stop_too_far_from_shape · Read the fix guide for stop_too_far_from_shape · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    Many of the feed's trips don't run at all in the next 7 days.

    It usually means old service periods are still in the export, making the feed bigger and harder to check.

    Fix: Trim past service periods the next time you export. (One setting in most export tools.)

    Finding code: trip_coverage_not_active_for_next7_days · Read the fix guide for trip_coverage_not_active_for_next7_days · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info11 instances

    The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.

    Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.

    Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)

    Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide for unknown_file · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info3 instances

    Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Finding code: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

Two requirements remain for this feed to earn the conformance mark. 1 validator error to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Not yet
1 validator error to resolve.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 179 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Realtime reliability

The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 200 checks in the 25 days to 2026-10-20, with 23s median lag.

Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment. The window ends at the newest observation, which is not always today: if the monitor stops, this window stops with it.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 179 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 3 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 56 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality 100 / 100
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.

Similar feeds in Hiroshima

Other scorecards in Hiroshima, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.

Show your grade

Put this badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check, shows the date of that check, and links back to this scorecard. When there is no current score it says so instead of showing an old one.

Ono Heart Bus (おおのハートバス): GTFS feed quality grade C, 72.8 of 100, checked 2026-10-20. GTFS Scorecard.

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/ono-heart-bus/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.