Feed status · checked 2026-09-05
Mie Kotsu Chusei (三重交通 中勢営業所)
Based on the official feed source on file
Service mode Bus
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Mie, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.3, validator 8.0.1.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Review the rule documentation for 'duplicate_key' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Duplicate key (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.
⏱ Varies.worth about +24 points in its category
Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.Likely your export tool
A file is missing a column that GTFS requires. Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.
⏱ Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.worth about +12 points in its category
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
930 of 930 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Finding handoff
Move one finding to a recheck
Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.
- Feed evidence
- Duplicate key (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
- Next action
- Review the rule documentation for 'duplicate_key' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Feed evidence
- A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.
- Next action
- Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Feed evidence
- 930 of 930 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
- Next action
- Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Review the rule documentation for 'duplicate_key' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 117 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 15 kinds of issue across 132140 instances (55 error, 130269 warning, 1816 informational).
Service data covers the next 117 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.
This feed has 930 stops.
The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.
Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
- 05 鈴鹿市内線 (green)
- 05 鈴鹿市内線 (green)
- 05 鈴鹿市内線 (green)
- 05 鈴鹿市内線 (green)
- 02 鈴鹿市内線 (green)
- 05 鈴鹿市内線 (green)
- 01 鈴鹿市内(平田)線 (green)
- 01 鈴鹿市内(平田)線 (green)
- 01 鈴鹿市内(平田)線 (green)
- 03 白子サーキット線 (green)
- 03 白子サーキット線 (green)
- 03 白子サーキット線 (green)
- 71 亀山国府線 (green)
- 71 亀山国府線 (green)
- 71 亀山国府線 (green)
- 30 亀山みずほ台線 (green)
- 30 亀山みずほ台線 (green)
- 55 亀山椋本線 (green)
- 55 亀山椋本線 (green)
- 91 亀山関工業団地線 (green)
- 91 亀山関工業団地線 (green)
- 52 椋本線 (green)
- 52 椋本線 (green)
- 52 椋本線 (green)
- 52 椋本線 (green)
- 52 椋本線 (green)
- 52 椋本線 (green)
- 52 椋本線 (green)
- 52 椋本線 (green)
- 52 椋本線 (green)
- 52 椋本線 (green)
- 91 長野線 (green)
- 91 長野線 (green)
- 91 長野線 (green)
- 91 長野線 (green)
- 91 長野線 (green)
- 65 安濃線 (green)
- 65 安濃線 (green)
- 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 (green)
- 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 (green)
- 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 (green)
- 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 (green)
- 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 (green)
- 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 (green)
- 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 (green)
- 15 榊原線 (green)
- 15 榊原線 (green)
- 15 榊原線 (green)
- 15 榊原線 (green)
- 15 榊原線 (green)
- 15 榊原線 (green)
- 15 榊原線 (green)
- 15 榊原線 (green)
- 15 榊原線 (green)
- 15 榊原線 (green)
- 16 榊原線 (green)
- 16 榊原線 (green)
- 16 榊原線 (green)
- 16 榊原線 (green)
- 16 榊原線 (green)
- 15 榊原線 (green)
- 11 波瀬線 (green)
- 11 波瀬線 (green)
- 11 波瀬線 (green)
- 11 波瀬線 (green)
- 11 波瀬線 (green)
- 11 波瀬線 (green)
- 11 波瀬線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 21 久居高茶屋線 (green)
- 11 高野団地線 (green)
- 11 高野団地線 (green)
- 53 豊野団地線 (green)
- 53 豊野団地線 (green)
- 53 豊野団地線 (green)
- 51 一身田大里線 (green)
- 51 一身田大里線 (green)
- 51 一身田大里線 (green)
- 51 一身田大里線 (green)
- 51 一身田大里線 (green)
- 34 城山線 (green)
- 34 城山線 (green)
- 34 城山線 (green)
- 34 城山線 (green)
- 34 城山線 (green)
- 34 城山線 (green)
- 93 泉ヶ丘片田団地線 (green)
- 93 泉ヶ丘片田団地線 (green)
- 93 泉ヶ丘片田団地線 (green)
- 93 泉ヶ丘片田団地線 (green)
- 71 津駅西団地循環線 (green)
- 81 津駅西団地循環線 (green)
- 32 香良洲線 (green)
- 32 香良洲線 (green)
- 32 香良洲線 (green)
- 32 香良洲線 (green)
- 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 (green)
- 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 (green)
- 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 (green)
- 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 (green)
- 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 (green)
- 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 (green)
- 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 (green)
- 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 (green)
- 06 神戸白塚線 (green)
- 06 神戸白塚線 (green)
- 06 神戸白塚線 (green)
- 40 津太陽の街線 (green)
- 40 津太陽の街線 (green)
- 40 津太陽の街線 (green)
- 40 津太陽の街線 (green)
- 85 津西ハイタウン線 (green)
- 85 津西ハイタウン線 (green)
- 86 津西ハイタウン線 (green)
- 86 津西ハイタウン線 (green)
- 84 津西ハイタウン線 (green)
- 84 津西ハイタウン線 (green)
- 87 津西ハイタウン線 (green)
- 武86 津西ハイタウン線 (green)
- 武86 津西ハイタウン線 (green)
- 西86 津西ハイタウン線 (green)
- 西86 津西ハイタウン線 (green)
- 22 国立病院線 (green)
- 22 国立病院線 (green)
- 22 国立病院線 (green)
- 22 国立病院線 (green)
- 直通 国立病院線 (green)
- 35 津なぎさまち線 (green)
- 35 津なぎさまち線 (green)
- みえブルーライン 大学病院シャトル (green)
- みえブルーライン 大学病院シャトル (green)
- 31 津三雲線 (green)
- 31 津三雲線 (green)
- 31 津三雲線 (green)
- 31 津三雲線 (green)
- 31 津三雲線 (green)
- 31 津三雲線 (green)
- 31 津三雲線 (green)
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 05 鈴鹿市内線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 05 鈴鹿市内線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 05 鈴鹿市内線 | Bus | green |
| 05 鈴鹿市内線 | Bus | green |
| 02 鈴鹿市内線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 02 鈴鹿市内線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 05 鈴鹿市内線 | Bus | green |
| 05 鈴鹿市内線 | Bus | green |
| 02 鈴鹿市内線 | Bus | green |
| 05 鈴鹿市内線 | Bus | green |
| 01 鈴鹿市内(平田)線 | Bus | green |
| 01 鈴鹿市内(平田)線 | Bus | green |
| 01 鈴鹿市内(平田)線 | Bus | green |
| 01 鈴鹿市内(平田)線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 03 白子サーキット線 | Bus | green |
| 03 白子サーキット線 | Bus | green |
| 03 白子サーキット線 | Bus | green |
| 71 亀山国府線 | Bus | green |
| 71 亀山国府線 | Bus | green |
| 71 亀山国府線 | Bus | green |
| 71 亀山国府線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 71 亀山国府線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 71 亀山国府線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 71 亀山国府線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 71 亀山国府線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 30 亀山みずほ台線 | Bus | green |
| 30 亀山みずほ台線 | Bus | green |
| 55 亀山椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 55 亀山椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 91 亀山関工業団地線 | Bus | green |
| 91 亀山関工業団地線 | Bus | green |
| 直通 稲生高校臨時 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 直通 稲生高校臨時 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green |
| 52 椋本線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 91 長野線 | Bus | green |
| 91 長野線 | Bus | green |
| 91 長野線 | Bus | green |
| 91 長野線 | Bus | green |
| 91 長野線 | Bus | green |
| 65 安濃線 | Bus | green |
| 65 安濃線 | Bus | green |
| 65 安濃線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 65 安濃線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 | Bus | green |
| 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 | Bus | green |
| 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 | Bus | green |
| 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 | Bus | green |
| 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 | Bus | green |
| 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 | Bus | green |
| 95 辰水・殿舟団地線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 16 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 16 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 16 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 16 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 16 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 15 榊原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 16 榊原線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 11 波瀬線 | Bus | green |
| 11 波瀬線 | Bus | green |
| 11 波瀬線 | Bus | green |
| 11 波瀬線 | Bus | green |
| 11 波瀬線 | Bus | green |
| 11 波瀬線 | Bus | green |
| 11 波瀬線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 11 波瀬線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 11 波瀬線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 21 久居高茶屋線 | Bus | green |
| 11 高野団地線 | Bus | green |
| 11 高野団地線 | Bus | green |
| 53 豊野団地線 | Bus | green |
| 53 豊野団地線 | Bus | green |
| 53 豊野団地線 | Bus | green |
| 51 一身田大里線 | Bus | green |
| 51 一身田大里線 | Bus | green |
| 51 一身田大里線 | Bus | green |
| 51 一身田大里線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 51 一身田大里線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 51 一身田大里線 | Bus | green |
| 51 一身田大里線 | Bus | green |
| 34 城山線 | Bus | green |
| 34 城山線 | Bus | green |
| 34 城山線 | Bus | green |
| 34 城山線 | Bus | green |
| 34 城山線 | Bus | green |
| 34 城山線 | Bus | green |
| 93 泉ヶ丘片田団地線 | Bus | green |
| 93 泉ヶ丘片田団地線 | Bus | green |
| 93 泉ヶ丘片田団地線 | Bus | green |
| 93 泉ヶ丘片田団地線 | Bus | green |
| 71 津駅西団地循環線 | Bus | green |
| 81 津駅西団地循環線 | Bus | green |
| 32 香良洲線 | Bus | green |
| 32 香良洲線 | Bus | green |
| 32 香良洲線 | Bus | green |
| 32 香良洲線 | Bus | green |
| 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 | Bus | green |
| 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 | Bus | green |
| 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 | Bus | green |
| 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 | Bus | green |
| 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 | Bus | green |
| 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 | Bus | green |
| 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 | Bus | green |
| 89 看護大学・夢が丘線 | Bus | green |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 06 神戸白塚線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 40 津太陽の街線 | Bus | green |
| 40 津太陽の街線 | Bus | green |
| 40 津太陽の街線 | Bus | green |
| 40 津太陽の街線 | Bus | green |
| 40 津太陽の街線 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 85 津西ハイタウン線 | Bus | green |
| 85 津西ハイタウン線 | Bus | green |
| 86 津西ハイタウン線 | Bus | green |
| 86 津西ハイタウン線 | Bus | green |
| 84 津西ハイタウン線 | Bus | green |
| 84 津西ハイタウン線 | Bus | green |
| 87 津西ハイタウン線 | Bus | green |
| 武86 津西ハイタウン線 | Bus | green |
| 武86 津西ハイタウン線 | Bus | green |
| 西86 津西ハイタウン線 | Bus | green |
| 西86 津西ハイタウン線 | Bus | green |
| 22 国立病院線 | Bus | green |
| 22 国立病院線 | Bus | green |
| 22 国立病院線 | Bus | green |
| 22 国立病院線 | Bus | green |
| 直通 国立病院線 | Bus | green |
| 35 津なぎさまち線 | Bus | green |
| 35 津なぎさまち線 | Bus | green |
| みえブルーライン 大学病院シャトル | Bus | green |
| みえブルーライン 大学病院シャトル | Bus | green |
| 31 津三雲線 | Bus | green |
| 31 津三雲線 | Bus | green |
| 31 津三雲線 | Bus | green |
| 31 津三雲線 | Bus | green |
| 31 津三雲線 | Bus | green |
| 31 津三雲線 | Bus | green |
| 31 津三雲線 | Bus | green |
List every stop
- 鈴鹿市駅
- 鈴鹿市駅
- 鈴鹿市役所
- 神戸三丁目(鈴鹿)
- 北玉垣
- 安塚口(三交鈴鹿)
- 西玉垣
- 西玉垣
- 玉垣
- 玉垣
- 南玉垣
- 南玉垣
- 鈴鹿警察
- 鈴鹿警察
- 新生(鈴鹿)
- 新生(鈴鹿)
- 白子駅
- 白子駅
- 白子駅
- 国道玉垣
- 国道玉垣
- 桜ケ丘(鈴鹿)
- 桜ケ丘(鈴鹿)
- 江島団地
- 江島団地
- 臨時鴉野(住友電装口)
- 百々川
- 百々川
- 神戸六丁目(鈴鹿)
- 神戸六丁目(鈴鹿)
- 鈴鹿郵便局
- 鈴鹿郵便局
- 西条宮前
- 西条宮前
- シキボウ前
- シキボウ前
- 東三日市
- 東三日市
- 三日市
- 三日市
- 算所(鈴鹿)
- 算所(鈴鹿)
- 平田町駅
- 平田町駅
- 北道伯
- 北道伯
- 東住吉
- 東住吉
- 西住吉
- 奈良
- 奈良
- 本田技研
- 本田技研
- イオンモール鈴鹿正面前
- イオンモール鈴鹿正面前
- イオンモール鈴鹿けやき通り
- イオンモール鈴鹿けやき通り
- イオンモール鈴鹿けやき通り
- イオンモール鈴鹿けやき通り
- 庄野ケ丘
- 庄野ケ丘
- 鈴鹿高校
- 鈴鹿高校
- 庄野橋
- 庄野橋
- 旭化成前
- 旭化成前
- 白子中学校
- 白子中学校
- 東旭が丘三丁目
- 東旭が丘三丁目
- 中旭が丘一丁目
- 中旭が丘一丁目
- 野町
- 野町
- 西山(鈴鹿)
- 西山(鈴鹿)
- 鴉野
- 鴉野
- 東山(鈴鹿)
- 南道伯
- 南道伯
- 稲生寮前
- 立正佼成会
- 立正佼成会
- 青少年の森口
- 青少年の森口
- 鈴鹿サーキット
- 白子郵便局
- 白子郵便局
- 桜島四丁目
- 桜島四丁目
- 亀山駅前
- 亀山局前
- 亀山局前
- 亀山局前
- 鹿島橋
- 鹿島橋
- 和田(鈴鹿)
- 和田(鈴鹿)
- 井田川駅西
- 井田川駅西
- 井田川駅
- 東町(鈴鹿)
- 東町(鈴鹿)
- 本町二丁目(鈴鹿)
- 本町三丁目(鈴鹿)
- 三本松(鈴鹿)
- 亀山ローソク
- 亀山ローソク
- 栄町住宅(鈴鹿)
- 栄町住宅(鈴鹿)
- 和田団地
- 和田団地
- 和田団地東
- 和田団地東
- 川合町口(鈴鹿)
- 川合町口(鈴鹿)
- 鈴国橋
- 西之野
- 北一色
- 本郷(鈴鹿)
- 国府(鈴鹿)
- 国府北口
- 国府新町
- 国府新町
- 平野(鈴鹿)
- 平野石丸
- 平野石丸
- 羽山ラヴズ公園
- 羽山ラヴズ公園
- 羽山東
- 羽山東
- 共進
- 共進
- 羽山西
- 羽山西
- 阿野田
- 阿野田
- 阿野田口
- 公民館前(鈴鹿)
- 鈴鹿大学前
- 鈴鹿大学前
- ゆりの木通り
- 野田池前
- 和賀口
- 和賀口
- 住宅前(鈴鹿)
- 住宅前(鈴鹿)
- 安知本
- 安知本
- 上原
- 岩原
- 布気
- 布気
- 稲生高校
- 葵
- 葵
- みずほ台口
- みずほ台口
- ハヤシユナイテッド文化ホール鈴鹿
- ハヤシユナイテッド文化ホール鈴鹿
- 東台
- 東台
- 北山(亀山)
- 北山(亀山)
- 北町
- 北町
- 栄町(亀山)
- 栄町(亀山)
- みずほ台西
- みずほ台西
- みずほ台東
- みずほ台東
- みどり町
- みどり町
- 鈴鹿中央病院
- 桜島五丁目
- 桜島五丁目
- 石垣池公園
- 石垣池公園
- ザル池
- ザル池
- そよら鈴鹿白子
- そよら鈴鹿白子
- 体育館前
- 体育館前
- 鈴鹿農協本店
- 鈴鹿農協本店
- 安塚園
- 安塚園
- 西町(亀山)
- 西町(亀山)
- 中野村
- 中野村
- 東布気
- 東布気
- 太岡寺
- 太岡寺
- 朝明山
- 朝明山
- 天神
- 天神
- 野田(鈴鹿)
- 野田(鈴鹿)
- 野町東
- 野町東
- MEGAドンキUNY鈴鹿店
- MEGAドンキUNY鈴鹿店
- 桜島公園口
- 桜島公園口
- 工業団地口(亀山
- 工業団地口(亀山
- 汲川原東
- 汲川原西
- 中冨田
- 西冨田東
- 西冨田神社前
- 和泉公民館前
- 和泉西
- 小田坂の下(鈴鹿)
- 国道小田(鈴鹿)
- 国道小田(鈴鹿)
- 回生病院
- 回生病院口
- 回生病院口
- 回生歯科
- シャープ亀山工場
- 白木口
- 白木口
- ダイシン・八千代工業前
- ダイシン・八千代工業前
- エフテック前
- エフテック前
- サンシャインパーク口
- サンシャインパーク口
- ジェイテクト前
- ジェイテクト前
- 工業団地南
- 工業団地南
- 萩野(鈴鹿)
- 椿世口
- 椿世口
- 下新道
- 安塚(鈴鹿車庫)
- 津駅前
- 津駅前
- 津駅前
- 津駅前
- 津駅前
- and 680 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
18 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Error52 instances
Duplicate key (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'duplicate_key' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: duplicate_key · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Error3 instances
A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.
Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.
Fix: Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. (Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.)
Finding code: missing_required_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning58702 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning54717 instances
Some rows in stop_times.txt leave the timepoint column blank.
That column says whether a time is a real checkpoint or an estimate. Blank leaves apps guessing, and they may show your estimates as promises.
Fix: Set timepoint=1 on stops that are real time checks and 0 on the rest. If every published time is a scheduled one, mark them all 1. (Usually one export setting.)
Finding code: missing_timepoint_value · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning16226 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Finding code: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1913 instances
1913 of 1913 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning930 instances
930 of 930 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning460 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning156 instances
Two or more routes share the same name.
Riders can't tell the routes apart in apps.
Fix: Give each route a distinct short or long name. (One field per route.)
Finding code: duplicate_route_name · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning6 instances
Some stops sit far from the route line they belong to.
Trip planners may draw the bus route through the wrong streets or point riders to the wrong corner.
Fix: Check the flagged stops' coordinates and the route shape in your scheduling software; re-snap whichever is misplaced. (A few minutes per flagged stop.)
Finding code: stop_too_far_from_shape · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
On some trips the stops fall along the route line in a different order than the schedule lists.
Trip planners can draw the bus doubling back or skipping ahead, which confuses riders reading the map.
Fix: Check the stop order and the shape direction in your scheduling software; the shape is often drawn backwards. (A few minutes per flagged trip.)
Finding code: stops_match_shape_out_of_order · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1777 instances
Unsorted stop times (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'unsorted_stop_times' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: unsorted_stop_times · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info30 instances
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Finding code: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info7 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
Some service dates fall outside the date window set in feed_info.txt.
feed_info.txt should span every day your service runs, so apps know when the data applies.
Fix: Widen feed_start_date and feed_end_date to cover all service dates, or fix the dates that fall outside. (Two fields in feed_info.txt, or one export setting.)
Finding code: service_window_outside_feed_period · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.
Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.
Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)
Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
Two requirements remain for this feed to earn the conformance mark. 2 validator errors to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Not yet
- 2 validator errors to resolve.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 117 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 117 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 55 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 6 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/mie-kotsu-chusei/2026-09-05.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-09-05. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.