← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-10-15

Manyosen (万葉線)

Based on the feed source on file; publisher ownership is not verified

Service mode Tram

69.0 / 100

unchanged since 2026-10-14

Cataloged in Toyama, Japan.

Covers 320 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Source feed: https://api.gtfs-data.jp/v2/organizations/manyosen/feeds/manyosen/files/feed.zip?rid=current

The Manyosen light rail line between Takaoka and Imizu in Toyama; counted as one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 6 hours ago; last changed 44 days ago.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the feed URL on file (publisher not verified).

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the configured feed URL. Publisher ownership of that URL is not verified.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

About this feed

Manyosen (万葉線)’s published feed lists 9 tram / light rail routes, 358 scheduled trips and 47 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-09-01 through 2027-08-31. The published file last changed on 2026-09-01.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Review the rule documentation for 'invalid_color' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.

Invalid color (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.

This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.

⏱ Varies.worth about +18 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

47 of 47 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

Fixing this covers all 47 stops in the feed.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 03

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

358 of 358 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the transit vehicle itself can take them.

Fixing this covers all 358 trips in the feed.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Riders and need behind these fixes

  • Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
  • The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.

These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.

Finding handoff

Move one finding to a recheck

Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.

Finding
Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
Recheck
Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Fix 01

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Fix 03 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 320 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness63.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 10859 instances (9 error, 10846 warning, 4 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 320 days.

Rider experience51.9 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

This feed has 47 stops.

Skip to route and stop data

The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 中新湊止 (teal)
  • 中新湊止 (teal)
  • 米島口止 (white)
  • 米島口止 (teal)
  • 越ノ潟行 (teal)
  • 越ノ潟行 (teal)
  • 高岡駅行 (white)
  • 高岡駅行 (white)
  • 高岡駅行 (white)
Routes in Manyosen (万葉線)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
中新湊止 米島口~中新湊Tram / light railteal
中新湊止 高岡駅~中新湊Tram / light railteal
米島口止 越ノ潟~米島口Tram / light railwhite
米島口止 高岡駅~米島口Tram / light railteal
越ノ潟行 高岡~越ノ潟Tram / light railteal
越ノ潟行 米島口~越ノ潟Tram / light railteal
高岡駅行 越ノ潟~高岡駅Tram / light railwhite
高岡駅行 中新湊~高岡駅Tram / light railwhite
高岡駅行 米島口~高岡駅Tram / light railwhite
List every stop
  • 高岡駅
  • ゼオン 荻布
  • ゼオン 荻布
  • 新能町
  • 新能町
  • 米島口
  • 米島口
  • サニーライブグループ 能町口
  • サニーライブグループ 能町口
  • TEKリサイクルセンター高岡 新吉久
  • TEKリサイクルセンター高岡 新吉久
  • 吉久
  • 吉久
  • 中伏木
  • 中伏木
  • 旧牧田組本社 六渡寺
  • 旧牧田組本社 六渡寺
  • 庄川口
  • 庄川口
  • 第一イン新湊クロスベイ前
  • 第一イン新湊クロスベイ前
  • 末広町
  • 末広町
  • 新町口
  • 新町口
  • 中新湊
  • 東新湊
  • 東新湊
  • 海王丸
  • 海王丸
  • 越ノ潟
  • 片原町
  • 片原町
  • 坂下町
  • 坂下町
  • 急患医療センター前
  • 急患医療センター前
  • 広小路
  • 広小路
  • 志貴野中学校前
  • 志貴野中学校前
  • 市民病院前
  • 市民病院前
  • 江尻
  • 江尻
  • 陽だまりの湯 旭ヶ丘
  • 陽だまりの湯 旭ヶ丘

Over time

Overall score across the last 14 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-14.

2026-10-02: 69.02026-10-03: 69.02026-10-04: 69.02026-10-05: 69.02026-10-06: 69.02026-10-07: 69.02026-10-08: 69.02026-10-09: 69.02026-10-10: 69.02026-10-11: 69.02026-10-12: 69.02026-10-13: 69.02026-10-14: 69.02026-10-15: 69.0
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-10-0269.0 first check
2026-10-0369.0 no change
2026-10-0469.0 no change
2026-10-0569.0 no change
2026-10-0669.0 no change
2026-10-0769.0 no change
2026-10-0869.0 no change
2026-10-0969.0 no change
2026-10-1069.0 no change
2026-10-1169.0 no change
2026-10-1269.0 no change
2026-10-1369.0 no change
2026-10-1469.0 no change
2026-10-1569.0 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change

Feed history

Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.

Feed history by published file
CheckedPublished fileService dates throughGrade at the time
2026-10-02 to 2026-10-15 (14 checks)92c1d1a47e2a2027-08-31Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-09-01 to 2026-10-01 (27 checks)92c1d1a47e2a2027-08-31D, 69 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade
2026-07-25 to 2026-08-31 (38 checks)8db9993aa38b2027-06-30D, 69 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade
2026-07-18 to 2026-07-24 (4 checks)8db9993aa38b2027-06-30D, 69 under rubric 1.2, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade

Everything we checked

8 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Error9 instances

    Invalid color (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'invalid_color' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Finding code: invalid_color · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning10835 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning358 instances

    358 of 358 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the transit vehicle itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning47 instances

    47 of 47 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning10 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info4 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide for unknown_column · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

Two requirements remain for this feed to earn the conformance mark. 1 validator error to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Not yet
1 validator error to resolve.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 320 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 319 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 9 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 64 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.

Similar feeds in Toyama

Other scorecards in Toyama, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.

Show your grade

Put this badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check, shows the date of that check, and links back to this scorecard. When there is no current score it says so instead of showing an old one.

Manyosen (万葉線): GTFS feed quality grade D, 69.0 of 100, checked 2026-10-15. GTFS Scorecard.

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/manyosen/2026-10-15.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-15. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.