Feed status · checked 2026-08-02
Kagoshima City Community Bus Ai Bus (鹿児島市コミュニティバス「あいばす」)
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Bus
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Kagoshima, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.3, validator 8.0.1.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.Likely your export tool
A file is missing a column that GTFS requires. Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.
⏱ Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.worth about +12 points in its category
Review the rule documentation for 'invalid_row_length' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Invalid row length (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.
⏱ Varies.worth about +12 points in its category
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
2027 of 2027 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Finding handoff
Move one finding to a recheck
Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.
- Feed evidence
- A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.
- Next action
- Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Feed evidence
- Invalid row length (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
- Next action
- Review the rule documentation for 'invalid_row_length' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Feed evidence
- 2027 of 2027 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
- Next action
- Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Review the rule documentation for 'invalid_row_length' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 241 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 13 kinds of issue across 15682 instances (4 error, 15605 warning, 73 informational).
Service data covers the next 241 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
1 accessibility depth signal
This feed models stations or entrances but has no pathways.txt and levels.txt.
Consider: Add pathways.txt connecting entrances, platforms, and elevators, and levels.txt for each floor, so the step-free route is described.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.
This feed has 2027 stops.
The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.
Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| あいばす⑥谷山北部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑥谷山北部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑥谷山北部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑥谷山北部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす②谷山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす②谷山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす①吉野地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす①吉野地域 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす①吉野地域 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす①吉野地域 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす①吉野地域 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす①吉野地域 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす①吉野地域 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす①吉野地域 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす④伊敷東部地域 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす④伊敷東部地域 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす④伊敷東部地域 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす④伊敷東部地域 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑥谷山北部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑥谷山北部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑥谷山北部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑥谷山北部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑥谷山北部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑥谷山北部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑥谷山北部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす②谷山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす②谷山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす②谷山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす②谷山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑦谷山南部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑦谷山南部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑦谷山南部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑦谷山南部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑦谷山南部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑪小原地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑪小原地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑨松元地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑨松元地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑨松元地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑨松元地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑨松元地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑨松元地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑨松元地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑨松元地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑧吉田地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす③喜入地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす③喜入地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす③喜入地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす③喜入地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす③喜入地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす③喜入地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす③喜入地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす③喜入地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす③喜入地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす③喜入地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑩郡山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑩郡山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑩郡山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑩郡山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑩郡山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑩郡山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑩郡山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑩郡山地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| あいばす⑤伊敷西部地域 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
List every stop
- 東俣駐在所
- 東俣駐在所
- 東俣
- デイサービスセンター方面(県道側)
- 東俣駐在所方面
- 白石方面
- デイサービスセンター方面(東俣駐在所側)
- デイサービスセンター
- デイサービスセンター
- 永山口
- デイサービスセンター方面
- 湯屋・山之湯方面
- 湯屋
- 湯屋
- 大下
- 花尾神社前・湯屋方面
- 花尾神社前・丸山方面
- 花尾神社前
- 大下方面
- 宮脇下・向江谷方面
- 宮脇下
- 花尾神社前方面
- 宮脇方面
- 宮脇
- 宮脇下方面
- 隠念仏方面
- 隠念仏
- 宮脇方面
- 大平方面
- 大平上
- 大平上
- 久保山上
- 久保山上
- 久保山
- 久保山上方面
- 花尾校前方面
- 花尾校前
- 花尾校前
- 向江谷
- 向江谷
- 吉野支所前
- 白石
- 南方校前方面
- 東俣方面
- 吉野支所前
- 川田上
- 川田上
- 川田中
- 川田中
- 川田下
- 川田下
- 小原口
- 小原口
- 無線前(支所方面)
- 無線前(支所方面)
- 松十文字
- 吉野支所方面
- 寺山方面
- 薩摩郡山
- 薩摩郡山
- 郡山麓
- 薩摩郡山方面
- 郡山農協前方面
- 郡山農協前
- 郡山麓方面
- 郡山小方面
- 郡山小
- 郡山農協前方面
- 太陽幸園・中福良方面
- 太陽幸園
- 太陽幸園
- 西俣
- 太陽幸園方面
- 北園・西俣下方面
- 北園
- 西俣方面
- 前田方面
- 前田
- 北園方面
- 開方面
- 開
- 前田方面
- 西俣上方面
- 中別府入口
- 西俣上
- 開方面
- 堂ノ上方面
- 中別府入口
- 堂ノ上
- 堂ノ上
- 大迫
- 堂ノ上方面
- 平原方面
- 平原
- 岳方面
- 大迫・大迫峠方面
- 岳
- 平原・平方面
- 雪元方面
- 雪元
- 岳・雪元下方面
- 大中上方面
- 大中上
- 雪元方面
- 梨木野方面
- 梨木野
- 大中上方面
- 梨木野上方面
- 梨木野上
- 梨木野上
- 仕明下
- 仕明下
- 中別府
- 仕明
- 仕明
- 中別府
- 平
- 岳方面
- 平下方面
- 平下
- 平方面
- 大谷方面
- 大谷
- 平下方面
- 東原岐方面
- 東原岐
- 大谷方面
- 轟ケ滝方面
- 轟ケ滝
- 東原岐方面
- 公民館方面
- 公民館
- 轟ケ滝方面
- 里岳中方面
- 里岳中
- 公民館方面
- 山田岐方面
- 山田岐
- 里岳中方面
- 里岳方面
- 里岳
- 山田岐方面
- 坂元方面
- 中別府中
- 坂元
- 里岳方面
- 有屋田方面
- 中別府中
- 有屋田
- 坂元方面
- 有屋田下方面
- 有屋田下
- 有屋田方面
- 石ヶ丸方面
- 石ヶ丸
- 有屋田下方面
- 宇田方面
- 宇田
- 宇田
- 神之川温泉
- 神之川温泉
- 中川
- 神之川温泉方面
- ニシムタ中川店方面
- ニシムタ中川店
- ニシムタ中川店
- 二反田
- 二反田
- 山口田
- 山口田
- 西俣下
- 山口田方面
- 西俣方面
- 中別府上向入口
- ストリームタウン前
- ストリームタウン前
- 中別府上向入口
- 協和食品前
- 協和食品前
- 油須木
- 油須木
- 油須木中
- 油須木中
- 油須木団地
- 油須木団地
- 油須木上
- 油須木上
- 彼岸田
- 彼岸田
- 中尾
- 中尾
- 茄子田
- 中尾方面
- 新海前方面
- 新海前
- 新海前
- 中別府上向
- 岩戸下
- 岩戸中方面
- 花尾・新海前方面
- 中別府上向
- 岩戸中
- 岩戸中
- 岩戸
- 岩戸
- 上岩戸
- 上岩戸
- 山ノ上
- 山ノ上
- 花尾
- 花尾校前方面
- 岩戸下方面
- 向江谷上
- 向江谷上
- 向江谷中
- 向江谷中
- 丸山
- 丸山
- 丸山口
- 丸山口
- 中別府団地
- 薩摩永山
- 丸山口方面
- 山之湯方面
- 中別府団地
- 山之湯
- 山之湯
- 大英団地
- 大英団地
- 大英公園下
- 大英公園下
- 大英団地南
- 大英団地南
- 中福良
- 中福良
- 郡山保育園
- 郡山保育園
- 坪久田
- 坪久田
- 清和
- 清和
- 常盤
- 清和方面
- 常磐集落センター前方面
- 東菖蒲谷三文字
- 常磐集落センター前
- 常磐集落センター前
- 東菖蒲谷三文字
- 上常盤
- 常磐集落センター前方面
- and 1777 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
18 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Error3 instances
A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.
Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.
Fix: Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. (Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.)
Finding code: missing_required_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Error1 instance
Invalid row length (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'invalid_row_length' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: invalid_row_length · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning7697 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning7236 instances
Missing timepoint value (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'missing_timepoint_value' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: missing_timepoint_value · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning2027 instances
2027 of 2027 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning419 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning175 instances
175 of 175 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning98 instances
Some stops exist in the feed but no trip ever stops at them.
Riders may walk to a stop where no bus is scheduled to arrive.
Fix: Remove retired stops from the export, or add them back to the trips that should serve them. (A review pass in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: stop_without_stop_time · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning76 instances
Two or more routes share the same name.
Riders can't tell the routes apart in apps.
Fix: Give each route a distinct short or long name. (One field per route.)
Finding code: duplicate_route_name · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning75 instances
Some route long names repeat the route's short name inside them.
Apps show both names together, so riders see the number twice, like '5 5 Downtown'.
Fix: Drop the short name from route_long_name and keep the long name descriptive, like 'Downtown via 5th Ave'. (One field per flagged route.)
Finding code: route_long_name_contains_short_name · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning36 instances
36 of 175 trips lack rider-facing destination or direction text.
When a route has multiple directions or patterns, the route name alone may not tell riders which service is coming.
Fix: Add the destination, direction, or 'via' label riders actually see to trip_headsign. Do not copy the route name. If the label changes during the trip, use stop_headsign. (Usually one value per route pattern in your scheduling source.)
Finding code: scorecard_missing_headsigns · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Best Practices (opens GTFS Best Practices on an external site)
- Warning3 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Finding code: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Many of the feed's trips don't run at all in the next 7 days.
It usually means old service periods are still in the export, making the feed bigger and harder to check.
Fix: Trim past service periods the next time you export. (One setting in most export tools.)
Finding code: trip_coverage_not_active_for_next7_days · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
This feed models stations or entrances but has no pathways.txt.
Trip planners can't guide riders through the station, and there is no step-free route information for wheelchair users.
Fix: Add pathways.txt connecting entrances, platforms, and any elevators, with a level for each. (Worth it for multi-level or large stations; flat stops don't need it.)
Finding code: scorecard_station_no_pathways · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Info66 instances
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Finding code: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info6 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.
Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.
Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)
Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. 2 validator errors to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Not yet
- 2 validator errors to resolve.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 241 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Can riders use it?
Checks beyond structural validation: places where the feed is valid but a rider still could not travel.
- 98 of 1174 boardable stops are never served by any trip. Riders see these stops in apps and on the map but can never catch anything there, which erodes trust in the data. Remove stops no route serves, or add the trips that should call at them.
These do not change the grade. They catch trips with no rideable leg and stops no trip serves, the kind of gap a trip planner trips over.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 241 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 4 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 18 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 49 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/kagoshima-city-ai-bus/2026-08-02.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-08-02. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.