Feed status · checked 2026-10-20
Higashimurayama City Community Bus (東村山市コミュニティバス「グリーンバス」)
Based on the official feed source on file
Service mode Bus
unchanged since 2026-10-19
Cataloged in Tokyo, Japan.
Source feed: https://api-public.odpt.org/api/v4/files/odpt/HigashiMurayamaCity/Alllines.zip?date=current
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 3 hours ago; last changed 43 days ago.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
About this feed
Higashimurayama City Community Bus (東村山市コミュニティバス「グリーンバス」)’s published feed lists 8 bus routes, 155 scheduled trips and 101 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-04-01 through 2027-03-31. The published file has not changed since our first check on 2026-09-05.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
101 of 101 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fixing this covers all 101 stops in the feed.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
155 of 155 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fixing this covers all 155 trips in the feed.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.
⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category
Riders and need behind these fixes
- Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
- The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.
These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.
Finding handoff
Move one finding to a recheck
Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.
- Finding
- Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 02 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 03 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 162 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 6 kinds of issue across 3547 instances (0 error, 3545 warning, 2 informational).
Service data covers the next 162 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.
This feed has 101 stops.
The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.
Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 久米川町循環 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 久米川駅南口発～東村山駅西口行 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 多摩北部医療センター発～東村山駅東口行 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 新秋津駅発～東村山駅東口行 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 東村山駅東口発～多摩北部医療センター行 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 東村山駅東口発～新秋津駅行 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 東村山駅西口発～久米川駅南口行 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| 諏訪町循環 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
List every stop
- 都立東村山高校
- 都立東村山高校
- スポーツセンター
- スポーツセンター
- 恩田町四丁目
- 恩多町四丁目
- 鷹の道入口
- 鷹の道入口
- 青葉商店街北
- 青葉商店街北
- 青葉商店街中央
- 青葉商店街中央
- 青葉商店街南
- 青葉商店街南
- 医療センター入口
- 東村山駅東口
- 東村山駅東口
- 多摩北部医療センター
- 東村山駅西口
- ふるさと歴史館
- 社会福祉センター
- 西宿通り中央
- 西宿通り北
- 徳蔵寺
- 諏訪町二丁目
- 白十字病院
- 新山手病院
- 桜並木
- 桜並木
- 西宿公園
- 北山緑道入口
- 公事道北
- 公事道南
- 地域福祉センター
- 地域福祉センター
- 夢ハウス
- 夢ハウス
- 第七中学校前
- 第七中学校前
- 浄水場北
- 浄水場北
- 浄水場西
- 浄水場西
- 消防署東
- 消防署東
- 本町二丁目
- 本町二丁目
- 富士見町四丁目北
- 富士見町四丁目北
- 富士見町四丁目中央
- 富士見町四丁目中央
- グリーンタウン西
- グリーンタウン西
- グリーンタウン南
- グリーンタウン南
- 久米川駅南口
- 久米川駅南口
- 青葉通り
- 青葉通り
- 青葉小学校
- 青葉小学校
- 青葉町住宅
- 青葉町住宅
- 久米川町一丁目
- 久米川町一丁目
- 所沢街道入口
- 所沢街道入口
- 東村山税務署
- 東村山税務署
- 秋津文化センター
- 秋津文化センター
- 秋津小学校
- 秋津小学校
- 中通り中央
- 中通り中央
- 秋津中通り
- 秋津中通り
- 新秋津駅
- 久米川四丁目
- 久米川辻
- 久米川辻
- 第二中学校前
- 野行通り入口
- 南秋津
- 東村山市役所
- 二柳橋南
- 二瀬橋東
- 消防第二分団
- 江戸道
- 野際通り北
- 野際神社
- 野際通り西
- 天王森保育園
- 市役所入口・久米川病院前
- 市役所入口・久米川病院前
- むさしのアイタウン中央
- むさしのアイタウン中央
- 本町三丁目
- 本町三丁目
- 鷹の道中央
- 鷹の道中央
Over time
Overall score across the last 19 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-19.
Show the numbers
| Check | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 75.1 | first check |
| 2026-10-03 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-04 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-05 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-06 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-07 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-08 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-09 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-10 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-11 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-12 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-13 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-14 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-15 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-16 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-17 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-18 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-19 | 75.1 | no change |
| 2026-10-20 | 75.1 | no change |
What changed since your last check
- Correctness no change
- Freshness no change
- Rider experience no change
Feed history
Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.
| Checked | Published file | Service dates through | Grade at the time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 to 2026-10-20 (19 checks) | 5ee420e7c210 | 2027-03-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-09-05 to 2026-10-01 (23 checks) | 5ee420e7c210 | 2027-03-31 | C, 75.1 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade |
What changed in this feed
Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-10-19.
Same feed file as 2026-10-19; the published zip did not change.
Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops and export changes in a reader, with no sign-up.
Everything we checked
9 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning3534 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning155 instances
155 of 155 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning101 instances
101 of 101 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning8 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning2 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Finding code: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for missing_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide for missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
Feed valid beyond total service window (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'feed_valid_beyond_total_service_window' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: feed_valid_beyond_total_service_window · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.
Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.
Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)
Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide for unknown_file · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_feed_contact · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
One requirement remains for this feed to earn the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 162 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 162 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 77 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.
Similar feeds in Tokyo
Other scorecards in Tokyo, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.
Show your grade
Put this badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check, shows the date of that check, and links back to this scorecard. When there is no current score it says so instead of showing an old one.
Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/higashimurayama-city-bus/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.