← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-09-05

Geiyo Bus (芸陽バス)

Based on the official feed source on file

Service mode Bus

66.7 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Catalogued in Hiroshima, Japan.

Covers 172 daysAccessibility gaps

Geiyo Bus's route network around Higashihiroshima, Takehara, and Kure.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.3, validator 8.0.1.

Measured 4 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: high.

  • All four score categories were measured this run.
  • Realtime was sampled in one bounded window of 9 snapshots.
  • The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.Likely your export tool

A file is missing a column that GTFS requires. Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

⏱ Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.worth about +12 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

1682 of 1682 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 03

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

1593 of 1593 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Finding handoff

Move one finding to a recheck

Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.

Feed evidence
A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.
Next action
Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file.
Recheck
Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 172 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
One or more realtime feeds were reachable; live-arrival coverage is not known.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness47.8 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 10 kinds of issue across 45711 instances (3 error, 45629 warning, 79 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 172 days.

Rider experience39.9 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

1 accessibility depth signal

  • This feed models stations or entrances but has no pathways.txt and levels.txt.

    Consider: Add pathways.txt connecting entrances, platforms, and elevators, and levels.txt for each floor, so the step-free route is described.

Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime quality100.0 / 100

Sampled 9 times outside service hours: 3 of 3 configured feeds healthy; vehicle position plausibility was not measurable.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

This feed has 1682 stops.

Skip to route and stop data

The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 頼兼線 (green)
  • 西条-竹原線(西条駅-東広島駅) (green)
  • 2 (green)
  • 豊栄~西条線 (green)
  • 西条エアポートリムジン (green)
  • 安芸津~西条線 (green)
  • 40-2 (green)
  • 40-4 (green)
  • 40-6 (green)
  • 高美が丘線(循環・時計回り) (green)
  • 安芸南線 (green)
  • フェリー線 (green)
  • フェリー線(竹原フェリー-竹原駅) (green)
  • 西条~吉川線(循環) (green)
  • 頼兼線(循環) (green)
  • 高美が丘~西条線 (green)
  • 西条~八本松線 (green)
  • フェリー線(大乗地域交流センター-中通) (green)
  • 白市駅~広島空港線 (green)
  • 安芸南線(海田新開経由) (green)
  • 西条駅~広島大学線(循環) (green)
  • 畑賀線(旧道経由) (green)
  • 高美が丘線(循環・反時計回り) (green)
  • 40-10 (green)
  • 志和循環線(東→西) (green)
  • 1 (green)
  • 40-1 (green)
  • 三原~本郷循環線 (green)
  • 三原~本郷循環線(循環・時計回り) (green)
  • 八本松駅~グリーンタウン線 (green)
  • 西河内線 (green)
  • 志和循環線(西→東) (green)
  • 海田町ふれあいバス 南ルート (green)
  • 三原~幸崎・竹原線 (green)
  • 西条駅~広島大学線 (green)
  • 畑賀線 (green)
  • 三原~本郷線(循環) (green)
  • 小泉循環線 (green)
  • 41-7 (green)
  • 田野浦線 (green)
  • 三原~本郷循環線(循環・反時計回り) (green)
  • 高速:かぐや姫号 (green)
  • 海田町ふれあいバス 北ルート (green)
  • 三原~本郷線 (green)
  • 八本松駅~シャープ・篠線 (green)
  • 河内~甲山線 (green)
  • みどり坂タウンバス (green)
  • 40-8 (green)
  • 7-1 (green)
  • 八本松~吉川線 (green)
  • 八本松駅~シャープ・篠線(循環) (green)
  • 白市線 (green)
  • 7-8 (green)
  • 西条~竹原線 (green)
  • 広島~瀬野・西条線 (green)
  • 磯松線 (green)
  • 西高屋駅~近畿大学線 (green)
  • 高美が丘線 (green)
Routes in Geiyo Bus (芸陽バス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
頼兼線Busgreen
西条-竹原線(西条駅-東広島駅)Busgreen
2 のんバス 青ルート(内回り)Busgreen
豊栄~西条線Busgreen
西条エアポートリムジンBusgreen
安芸津~西条線Busgreen
40-2 三迫線Busgreen
40-4 広島~瀬野・西条線Busgreen
40-6 広島~瀬野・西条線Busgreen
高美が丘線(循環・時計回り)Busgreen
安芸南線Busgreen
フェリー線Busgreen
フェリー線(竹原フェリー-竹原駅)Busgreen
西条~吉川線(循環)Busgreen
頼兼線(循環)Busgreen
高美が丘~西条線Busgreen
西条~八本松線Busgreen
フェリー線(大乗地域交流センター-中通)Busgreen
白市駅~広島空港線Busgreen
安芸南線(海田新開経由)Busgreen
西条駅~広島大学線(循環)Busgreen
畑賀線(旧道経由)Busgreen
高美が丘線(循環・反時計回り)Busgreen
40-10 広島~瀬野・西条線Busgreen
志和循環線(東→西)Busgreen
1 のんバス 赤ルート(外回り)Busgreen
40-1 南幸線Busgreen
三原~本郷循環線Busgreen
三原~本郷循環線(循環・時計回り)Busgreen
八本松駅~グリーンタウン線Busgreen
西河内線Busgreen
志和循環線(西→東)Busgreen
海田町ふれあいバス 南ルートBusgreen
三原~幸崎・竹原線Busgreen
西条駅~広島大学線Busgreen
畑賀線Busgreen
三原~本郷線(循環)Busgreen
小泉循環線Busgreen
41-7 東雲線Busgreen
田野浦線Busgreen
三原~本郷循環線(循環・反時計回り)Busgreen
高速:かぐや姫号Busgreen
海田町ふれあいバス 北ルートBusgreen
三原~本郷線Busgreen
八本松駅~シャープ・篠線Busgreen
河内~甲山線Busgreen
みどり坂タウンバスBusgreen
40-8 広島~瀬野・阿戸線Busgreen
7-1 榎山線Busgreen
八本松~吉川線Busgreen
八本松駅~シャープ・篠線(循環)Busgreen
白市線Busgreen
7-8 阿戸線Busgreen
西条~竹原線Busgreen
広島~瀬野・西条線Busgreen
広島空港-白市(広島空港-白市駅・直行)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
白市-広島空港(白市駅-広島空港・直行)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
磯松線Busgreen
北海田コミュニティ(海田市駅-海田市駅・[北]右回り)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
北海田コミュニティ(海田市駅-海田市駅・[北]左回り)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
南海田コミュニティ(海田市駅-海田市駅・[南]右回り)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
南海田コミュニティ(海田市駅-海田市駅・[南]左回り)Busgreen (no shape in feed)
西高屋駅~近畿大学線Busgreen
高美が丘線Busgreen
List every stop
  • 広島バスセンター
  • 江熊
  • 江熊
  • 市立中央図書館前
  • 市立中央図書館前
  • 鏡山公園入口
  • 鏡山公園入口
  • 池ノ上学生宿舎前
  • 池ノ上学生宿舎前
  • 広大中央口
  • 広大北口
  • 広大二神口
  • 二神山
  • 広大西口
  • 大学会館前
  • ががら口
  • 広島バスセンター
  • 広島バスセンター
  • 広島バスセンター
  • 八丁堀
  • 八丁堀
  • 八丁堀
  • 八丁堀
  • 広島駅
  • 広島駅
  • 広島駅
  • 広島駅
  • 荒神町
  • 荒神町
  • 西蟹屋
  • マツダスタジアム前
  • 広島バス大州車庫前
  • 広島バス大州車庫前
  • 大州四丁目
  • 大州四丁目
  • 新大州橋
  • 新大州橋
  • 向洋駅前
  • 向洋駅前
  • 青崎一丁目
  • 青崎一丁目
  • 青崎二丁目
  • 青崎二丁目
  • 東堀越
  • 東堀越
  • 入川
  • 入川
  • 船越町
  • 船越町
  • 海田
  • 海田
  • 海田市駅入口
  • 海田市駅入口
  • 海田大正町
  • 海田大正町
  • 海田大正町
  • 海田大正町
  • 海田大正町
  • 海田大正町
  • 海田大正町
  • 海田大正町
  • 海田小学校前
  • 海田小学校前
  • 海田小学校前
  • 海田小学校前
  • 海田小学校前
  • 海田小学校前
  • 日の浦橋
  • 日の浦橋
  • 日下橋
  • 日下橋
  • 御鷹野橋
  • 御鷹野橋
  • 畝橋
  • 畝橋
  • 国信橋
  • 国信橋
  • 国信橋
  • 国信橋
  • 国信橋
  • 国信橋
  • 井手橋
  • 井手橋
  • 貫道橋
  • 貫道橋
  • 中野東一丁目
  • 才の瀬橋
  • 才の瀬橋
  • 山王橋
  • 山王橋
  • 瀬野川中学校入口
  • 瀬野川中学校入口
  • 権現
  • 権現
  • 平原橋
  • 平原橋
  • 中野東七丁目
  • 中野東七丁目
  • 中野東七丁目
  • 荒野
  • 荒野
  • 宮原橋
  • 宮原橋
  • 瀬野大橋
  • 瀬野大橋
  • 瀬野駅
  • 瀬野駅
  • 瀬野駅
  • 小宇羅地
  • 小宇羅地
  • 瀬野小学校
  • 瀬野小学校
  • 下一貫田
  • 下一貫田
  • 一貫田
  • 一貫田
  • 一貫田
  • 下大山
  • 下大山
  • 中大山
  • 中大山
  • 桜河内
  • 桜河内
  • 上大山
  • 上大山
  • 清山
  • 清山
  • 入野口
  • 入野口
  • 志和南口
  • 志和南口
  • 志和南口
  • 宗吉
  • 宗吉
  • 宗吉
  • 宗吉
  • 宗吉東
  • 宗吉東
  • 八本松駅
  • 八本松駅
  • 八本松駅
  • 八本松駅
  • 上条
  • 上条
  • 下条
  • 下条
  • 下組
  • 下組
  • 八本松病院前
  • 八本松病院前
  • 磯松団地
  • 磯松団地
  • 磯松団地
  • 磯松団地
  • 米満
  • 米満
  • 市田橋
  • 市田橋
  • 友待橋
  • 友待橋
  • 下寺家
  • 下寺家
  • 下寺家
  • 下寺家
  • 西条東
  • 西条東
  • 西条東
  • 芸陽バス前
  • 芸陽バス前
  • 芸陽バス前
  • 西条西本町
  • 栄町
  • 栄町
  • 中央公園前
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅北口
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅
  • 西条駅北口
  • 本通り
  • 本通り
  • 中電前
  • 中電前
  • 市役所前
  • 市役所前
  • 昭和町
  • 昭和町
  • 南区役所前
  • 南区役所前
  • 出汐町
  • 出汐町
  • 大学病院南門
  • 大学病院南門
  • 東雲本町三丁目
  • 東雲本町三丁目
  • 市立工業高校入口
  • 市立工業高校入口
  • 東雲
  • 東雲
  • 仁保二丁目
  • 仁保二丁目
  • 向洋本町
  • 向洋本町
  • 堀越三丁目
  • 堀越三丁目
  • 東部市場前
  • 東部市場前
  • 鴻治新田
  • 鴻治新田
  • 袋町
  • 国泰寺町二丁目
  • 国泰寺町二丁目
  • 曙町
  • 曙町
  • 曙町
  • 曙町
  • 海田中学校入口
  • 海田中学校入口
  • 海田中学校入口
  • 海田中学校入口
  • 海田東小学校前
  • 海田東小学校前
  • 寺迫
  • 寺迫
  • 東三迫橋
  • 東三迫橋
  • 東三迫橋
  • 東三迫橋
  • 三迫
  • 三迫
  • 三迫二丁目
  • 三迫二丁目
  • 三迫二丁目
  • 三迫二丁目
  • 海田郵便局前
  • 海田郵便局前
  • 海田郵便局前
  • 海田郵便局前
  • さいわい保育所前
  • さいわい保育所前
  • 広大東口
  • 海田市駅南口
  • 海田市駅南口
  • 海田市駅南口
  • 海田市駅南口
  • 海田市駅北口
  • 織田幹雄スクエア北
  • 織田幹雄スクエア北
  • and 1432 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

15 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Error3 instances

    A file is missing a column that GTFS requires.

    Apps may reject the whole file, so riders could lose the affected routes or stops.

    Fix: Add the required column named in the finding to the flagged file. (Often an export setting; ask your vendor if it recurs.)

    Finding code: missing_required_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning44152 instances

    Some rows in stop_times.txt leave the timepoint column blank.

    That column says whether a time is a real checkpoint or an estimate. Blank leaves apps guessing, and they may show your estimates as promises.

    Fix: Set timepoint=1 on stops that are real time checks and 0 on the rest. If every published time is a scheduled one, mark them all 1. (Usually one export setting.)

    Finding code: missing_timepoint_value · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1682 instances

    1682 of 1682 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning1593 instances

    1593 of 1593 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning1333 instances

    1333 of 1593 trips have no headsign, the text that tells riders where the bus is going.

    When a route has multiple directions or patterns, the route name alone may not tell riders which service is coming.

    Fix: Add the destination, direction, or 'via' label riders actually see to trip_headsign. Do not copy the route name. If the label changes during the trip, use stop_headsign. (Usually one value per route pattern in your scheduling source.)

    Finding code: scorecard_missing_headsigns · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Best Practices (opens GTFS Best Practices on an external site)

  • Warning1327 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning138 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning7 instances

    The feed contains route shapes no trip uses.

    Harmless to riders, but it bloats the feed and suggests stale export data.

    Fix: Turn on 'remove unused shapes' (or the like) in your export tool. (One setting.)

    Finding code: unused_shape · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning4 instances

    Some stops sit far from the route line they belong to.

    Trip planners may draw the bus route through the wrong streets or point riders to the wrong corner.

    Fix: Check the flagged stops' coordinates and the route shape in your scheduling software; re-snap whichever is misplaced. (A few minutes per flagged stop.)

    Finding code: stop_too_far_from_shape · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Finding code: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    This feed models stations or entrances but has no pathways.txt.

    Trip planners can't guide riders through the station, and there is no step-free route information for wheelchair users.

    Fix: Add pathways.txt to link entrances, platforms, and elevators. Give each one a level. (Worth it for multi-level or large stations; flat stops don't need it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_station_no_pathways · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Info66 instances

    Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Finding code: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info11 instances

    The feed includes a file that is not part of the GTFS spec.

    Apps ignore files they don't know, and a stray file can hide a misspelled standard file name.

    Fix: Check the flagged file name for a typo of a standard GTFS file. Remove it if it is a vendor extra. (A quick look at the flagged file.)

    Finding code: unknown_file · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Finding code: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    App makers and state data programs have nobody to email when they spot a problem. Small errors then sit in the feed for months.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Finding code: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

Two requirements remain for this feed to earn the conformance mark. 1 validator error to resolve. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Not yet
1 validator error to resolve.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 172 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Realtime reliability

The realtime feed responded on 100.0% of 7 checks over the last 1 day, with 16s median lag.

Sampled on a schedule between full scores, so this tracks uptime and freshness over time rather than at a single moment.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 172 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. The feed also carries 3 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 48 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 40 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality 100 / 100
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Geiyo Bus (芸陽バス) GTFS data quality grade: D

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/geiyo-bus/2026-09-05.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-09-05. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.