Feed status · checked 2026-07-19
Ueda City Orange Bus (上田市街地循環バス・オレンジバス)
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Bus
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Nagano, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 9 hours ago; last changed 9 hours ago.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
324 of 324 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
35 of 35 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 255 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 7 kinds of issue across 1403 instances (0 error, 1398 warning, 5 informational).
Service data covers the next 255 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
1 accessibility depth signal
2 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (上田市街地循環バス 青バス, 上田市街地循環バス 赤バス).
Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.
Skip to route and stop dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 上田市街地循環バス 青バス | Bus | teal (no shape in feed) |
| 上田市街地循環バス 赤バス | Bus | pink (no shape in feed) |
| オレンジバス 城下・塩尻コース | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| オレンジバス 西塩田コース | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| オレンジバス 神川・神科コース | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| オレンジバス 東塩田コース | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| オレンジバス 豊殿・神科コース | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| オレンジバス 浦里・室賀コース | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
This feed has 324 stops.
List every stop
- 上田駅
- 鷹匠町
- 鷹匠町
- 松尾町
- 松尾町
- 海野町
- 海野町
- 横町
- 横町
- 笠原工業前
- 笠原工業前
- イオン上田前
- イオン上田前
- 日の出町・西友前
- 日の出町・西友前
- 文化会館合庁前
- 文化会館合庁前
- 下川原柳
- 下川原柳
- 染谷丘高校前
- 染谷丘高校前
- 山口ショッピングパーク前
- 山口ショッピングパーク前
- 山口
- 山口
- 山口西
- 山口西
- 大星東
- 大星東
- 北小学校前
- 北小学校前
- 新田
- 新田
- 八幡北
- 八幡北
- 信州上田医療センター
- 緑が丘
- 緑が丘
- 緑が丘北
- 緑が丘北
- 緑が丘西
- 緑が丘西
- 新屋
- 新屋
- 花園西
- 花園西
- 北大手
- 北大手
- 木町
- 木町
- 原町
- 原町
- 商工会議所前
- 商工会議所前
- 公園市役所前
- 公園市役所前
- アリオ上田前
- アリオ上田前
- 高齢者福祉センター
- 生協診療所入口
- 生協診療所入口
- 塩尻
- 塩尻
- 西上田駅南口
- 中島入口
- 中島入口
- 下秋和
- 下秋和
- 長野計器前
- 長野計器前
- 秋和保育園前
- 秋和保育園前
- 常磐町
- 常磐町
- 生塚
- 生塚
- 城北自治会館南
- 城北自治会館南
- 城北
- 城北
- 八幡前
- 八幡前
- 下塩尻
- 秋和
- 秋和
- 常盤城
- 常盤城
- 信州上田医療センター前
- 昭和薬局前
- 昭和薬局前
- アリオ上田入口
- アリオ上田入口
- 諏訪形
- 諏訪形
- 小牧
- 小牧
- 県営水道
- 県営水道
- 朝日が丘
- 朝日が丘
- 中之条(城下・塩尻コース)
- 中之条(城下・塩尻コース)
- 千曲高校
- 千曲高校
- 上田駅お城口
- 田中
- 舞田
- 八木沢
- 天神前
- 八木沢西
- 別所温泉
- 別所温泉駅
- 比蘭樹
- 山田
- 金井
- 紺屋村
- 樋ノ口
- 手塚公民館
- 手塚
- 王子
- 新町公民館
- 新町
- 十人
- 塩田自治センター
- 塩田病院
- 塩田町駅
- 塩田農協
- 学海団地
- 保野
- 川西医院
- 保野東
- 保野東
- 上小島
- 小島
- しおだ野ショッピングセンター
- しおだ野ショッピングセンター
- 川辺農協前
- 川辺農協前
- 上田原駅前
- 上田原駅前
- 阪美精密前
- 阪美精密前
- 三ツ角
- 三ツ角
- 三好町2丁目
- 三好町2丁目
- 四中前
- 四中前
- 三好町1丁目
- 三好町1丁目
- アクアプラザ上田
- 常入
- 日の出町
- 小林脳外科
- 小林脳外科
- 東公園前
- 旧SBC放送局前
- 旧SBC放送局前
- 岩門
- 笹井
- 笹井
- 林之郷
- 上青木
- 下青木
- みすず台
- ひかり
- 町吉田
- 下吉田生活センター
- みすず台南
- 大屋駅
- 大屋北
- 大屋北
- TOTOKU前
- TOTOKU前
- 岩下
- 岩下
- 蒼久保
- 蒼久保
- 神川
- 神川
- 信濃国分寺駅前
- 八日堂入口
- 八日堂入口
- 国分
- 国分
- 上堀
- 上堀
- 日本無線前
- 日本無線前
- 大学前駅
- 下之郷
- 生島足島神社
- 生島足島神社
- 中村入口
- 富士山
- 旧水出商店前
- 奈良尾
- 平井寺
- 鈴子
- 鈴子
- 東塩田小学校
- 東塩田小学校
- 石神
- 柳沢
- 柳沢西
- 東前山
- 十人王子神社
- 五加
- 八幡神社
- 下本郷公民館
- 下本郷
- 下神畑
- 下神畑
- 神畑
- 神畑
- 上神畑
- 上神畑
- 月見ヶ丘
- 月見ヶ丘
- 創造館前
- 創造館前
- 報恩寮前
- 報恩寮前
- 上川原柳
- 上川原柳
- 染屋浄水場前
- 染屋浄水場前
- 上田検査場前
- 上田検査場前
- 住吉
- 西野竹
- 神科農協前
- 神科農協前
- 神科小学校前
- 神科小学校前
- 第12分団前
- 五中前
- 第一公園前
- 富士見台
- 新屋西
- 下郷西
- ショッピングパーク前
- 漆戸
- 下郷
- 下郷
- 宮前
- 殿城農協
- まほろばの里交流会館
- 赤坂口
- 伊勢山
- and 74 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
10 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning1374 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning324 instances
324 of 324 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning35 instances
35 of 35 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning22 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 255 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 255 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 76 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/ueda-city-orange-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.