Feed status · checked 2026-10-20
Société des traversiers du Québec (STQ)
Based on the official feed source on file
Service mode Ferry
unchanged since 2026-10-19
Cataloged in Quebec, Canada.
Source feed: https://gtfs.traversiers.com/api/gtfs.zip
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 3 hours ago; last changed 3 hours ago.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
About this feed
Société des traversiers du Québec (STQ)’s published feed lists 10 ferry routes, 4,956 scheduled trips and 21 stops. Its service dates run from 2021-04-06 through 2099-12-31. The published file last changed on 2026-10-20.
Top things to fix
Add fare_attributes.txt (or Fares v2 files) with your fare structure. If your service is fare-free, ask to have it marked fare-free instead.
The feed contains no fare information. Riders see 'fare unknown' in trip planners and can't budget their trip; visitors are most affected.
This one is about the feed as a whole, so there is no share of it to count.
⏱ A small file for most flat-fare systems.worth about +15 points in its category
Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE').Likely your export tool
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase. ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.
⏱ Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.worth about +8 points in its category
Review the rule documentation for 'service_extends_far_in_the_future' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.
Service extends far in the future (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.
This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.
⏱ Varies.
Riders and need behind these fixes
- Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
- No need reading for this feed was on hand when this was built, so transit need is not known.
These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.
Finding handoff
Move one finding to a recheck
Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.
- Finding
- Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 02 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
- Finding
- Fix 03 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
- Recheck
- Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_fare_data
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed states that service is published through 2099-12-31. This may be intentional or a placeholder; confirm current service with the transit operator.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 100% of terminals and 100% of trips. This measures published data, not whether terminals or vessels are physically usable.
- Fare information
- No fare information is published in the feed.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Ungraded capability read
Ferry data profile
A ferry-specific view of what this GTFS feed publishes. Schedule measurements use ferry routes and trips only; fare and realtime facts are labeled as whole-feed. Unknown values are not treated as no.
- Ferry service
- 10 routes · 4,956 trips
- Terminal structure
- 21 ferry boarding locations; no parent-station hierarchy is published.
- Terminal access
- Not applicable: no ferry boarding location is linked to a parent station, so stop_access is not permitted here.
- Published accessibility
- 100% of ferry boarding locations publish a value; 71.4% of all ferry boarding locations explicitly say allowed (15 of 21). Unstated values remain unknown. 100% of ferry trips publish a value; 91.7% of all ferry trips explicitly say allowed (4,546 of 4,956). Unstated values remain unknown. This reports published values, not verified physical usability.
- Bicycles
- 100% of ferry trips publish a value; 92.2% of all ferry trips explicitly say allowed (4,570 of 4,956). Unstated values remain unknown.
- Cars
- 100% of ferry trips publish a value; 92.2% of all ferry trips explicitly say allowed (4,570 of 4,956). Unstated values remain unknown.
- Fares
- Whole feed: no applied fare data is published. This is not evidence that ferry service is free.
- Realtime
- Whole feed: no GTFS-Realtime endpoints are configured in this scorecard.
Descriptive only. This profile does not change the grade or verify vessels, terminal facilities, vehicle carriage, fares, or accessibility in the real world. Field meanings follow the GTFS Schedule reference.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 4 kinds of issue across 244 instances (0 error, 227 warning, 17 informational).
Service is published through 2099-12-31. It may be intentional, but confirm the end date before treating the feed as maintained.
100% of terminals state wheelchair accessibility (71% marked accessible, 29% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a terminal is physically usable. Fare data is not published.
100% of terminals state accessibility (71% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and terminals
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its terminals only.
This feed has 21 terminals.
The route and terminal data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.
Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and terminals: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| HHC Harrington Harbour–Chevery | Ferry | black (no shape in feed) |
| IV l'île-Verte | Ferry | black (no shape in feed) |
| IE Île d'Entrée–Cap-aux-Meules | Ferry | black (no shape in feed) |
| IAC L'Isle-aux-Coudres–Saint-Joseph-de-la-Rive | Ferry | black (no shape in feed) |
| IAG L'Isle-aux-Grues–Montmagny | Ferry | black (no shape in feed) |
| MBCG Matane–Baie-Comeau–Godbout | Ferry | black (no shape in feed) |
| QL Québec-Lévis | Ferry | black (no shape in feed) |
| RSA Rivière Saint-Augustin | Ferry | black (no shape in feed) |
| STSIL Sorel-Tracy–Saint-Ignace-de-Loyola | Ferry | black (no shape in feed) |
| TBSC Tadoussac–Baie-Sainte-Catherine | Ferry | black (no shape in feed) |
List every terminal
- Sorel-Tracy
- Saint-Ignace-de-Loyola
- Québec
- Lévis
- Matane
- Godbout
- Baie-Comeau
- Tadoussac
- Baie-Sainte-Catherine
- L'Isle-aux-Coudres
- St-Joseph-de-la-Rive
- Saint-Augustin
- Harrington Harbour
- Chevery
- Montmagny
- L'Isle-aux-Grues
- Pakuashipi
- Ile d'Entrée
- Cap-aux-Meules
- départ de l'île
- départ du village
Over time
Overall score across the last 19 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-19.
Show the numbers
| Check | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-02 | 91.0 | first check |
| 2026-10-03 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-04 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-05 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-06 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-07 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-08 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-09 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-10 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-11 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-12 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-13 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-14 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-15 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-16 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-17 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-18 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-19 | 91.0 | no change |
| 2026-10-20 | 91.0 | no change |
What changed since your last check
- Correctness no change
- Freshness no change
- Rider experience no change
Feed history
Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.
| Checked | Published file | Service dates through | Grade at the time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-20 | 0b8342dc6603 | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-19 | 78bf904bc360 | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-18 | e80c664b1078 | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-17 | 635d8dc8e256 | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-16 | 3b17bfa7d3b7 | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-15 | e28b6d622cd1 | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-14 | 5c6c202cd327 | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-13 | 741b5c96f9c0 | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-12 | ff0a2f016d55 | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-11 | fc8ca2e0bead | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-10 | 2b589da165cf | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
| 2026-10-09 | a4ca35e15373 | 2099-12-31 | Current rubric: see the trend above |
Showing the 12 most recent of 42 periods.
What changed in this feed
Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-10-19.
The feed file was re-published since 2026-10-19 (-1 KB).
Changed counts
- down Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase. (231 → 227) (mixed_case_recommended_field)
Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops and export changes in a reader, with no sign-up.
Everything we checked
5 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning227 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
The feed contains no fare information.
Riders see 'fare unknown' in trip planners and can't budget their trip; visitors are most affected.
Fix: Add fare_attributes.txt (or Fares v2 files) with your fare structure. If your service is fare-free, ask to have it marked fare-free instead. (A small file for most flat-fare systems.)
Finding code: scorecard_no_fare_data · Read the fix guide for scorecard_no_fare_data · See GTFS Best Practices (opens GTFS Best Practices on an external site)
- Info12 instances
Service extends far in the future (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'service_extends_far_in_the_future' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: service_extends_far_in_the_future · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info4 instances
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Finding code: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide for big_gap_in_service · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
Feed valid beyond total service window (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'feed_valid_beyond_total_service_window' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Finding code: feed_valid_beyond_total_service_window · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Awarded
This feed earns the conformance mark: valid, current, and stating wheelchair access on nearly every terminal and trip.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- The published window is current, but its service end date is unusually distant; confirm that date is intentional.
- Accessible Met
- States wheelchair access on 100% of terminals and 100% of trips.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every terminal and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every terminal and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a terminal is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed clears the four-week coverage window, but its service end date is unusually distant. Confirm that date is intentional before treating it as evidence of ongoing maintenance. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 90 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 85 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Part of the Canada portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.
Similar feeds in Quebec
Other scorecards in Quebec, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/stq-traversiers/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.