Feed status · checked 2026-07-19
Miyoshi City Bus (三好市営バス)
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Bus
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Tokushima, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
548 of 548 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
166 of 166 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 255 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 8 kinds of issue across 7114 instances (0 error, 7108 warning, 6 informational).
Service data covers the next 255 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
1 accessibility depth signal
1 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (三好市営バス 吾橋・有瀬線).
Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.
Skip to route and stop dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
- 三好市営バス 佐野池田線 (white)
- 三好市営バス 三野池田線 (white)
- 三好市営バス 下川・大和川周回線 (white)
- 三好市営バス 平野線 (white)
- 三好市営バス 粟山線 (gray)
- 三好市営バス 平線 (gray)
- 三好市営バス 山城線 (pink)
- 三好市営バス 吾橋・有瀬線 (gray)
- 三好市営バス かずら橋・大歩危線 (gray)
- 三好市営バス 高野線 (teal)
- 三好市営バス 名頃線 (yellow)
- 三好市営バス 漆川線 (yellow)
- 三好市営バス 出合線 (green)
- 三好市営バス 井内線 (yellow)
- 三好市営バス 野呂内線 (brown)
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 三好市営バス 佐野池田線 | Bus | white |
| 三好市営バス 三野池田線 | Bus | white |
| 三好市営バス 下川・大和川周回線 | Bus | white |
| 三好市営バス 平野線 | Bus | white |
| 三好市営バス 粟山線 | Bus | gray |
| 三好市営バス 平線 | Bus | gray |
| 三好市営バス 山城線 | Bus | pink |
| 三好市営バス 吾橋・有瀬線 | Bus | gray |
| 三好市営バス かずら橋・大歩危線 | Bus | gray |
| 三好市営バス 高野線 | Bus | teal |
| 三好市営バス 名頃線 | Bus | yellow |
| 三好市営バス 漆川線 | Bus | yellow |
| 三好市営バス 出合線 | Bus | green |
| 三好市営バス 井内線 | Bus | yellow |
| 三好市営バス 野呂内線 | Bus | brown |
This feed has 548 stops.
List every stop
- 国政
- 国政
- 鮎戸
- 鮎戸
- 国政新道
- 国政新道
- 岡ノ鼻
- 岡ノ鼻
- 茂地
- 光末
- 光末
- 下茂地
- 下茂地
- 小川谷
- 小川谷
- 大月橋
- 大月橋
- 大野
- 大野
- 白地郵便局
- 白地郵便局
- 川茂谷
- 川茂谷
- 川茂
- 川茂
- 中ノ瀬
- 中ノ瀬
- 黒川橋
- 黒川橋
- 政友小学校前
- 政友小学校前
- 吉田水道前
- 吉田水道前
- 窪原商店前
- 窪原商店前
- 落合(山城)
- 落合(山城)
- 佐古口
- 佐古口
- 大和小学校前
- 大和小学校前
- 天神トンネル口
- 天神トンネル口
- 長谷
- 長谷
- 大谷橋
- 大谷橋
- 猫坊
- 猫坊
- 若山口
- 若山口
- 祖谷口
- 祖谷口
- 祖谷口橋
- 祖谷口橋
- 下川
- 下川
- 大門
- 大門
- 山城小学校前
- 山城小学校前
- 剣山
- 佐馬地
- 佐馬地
- 二重かずら橋
- 二重かずら橋
- 名頃
- 名頃
- 名頃下
- 名頃下
- 﨔荒
- 﨔荒
- 寒掛
- 寒掛
- 栗本
- 栗本
- 角領
- 角領
- 切谷
- 切谷
- 菅生
- 菅生
- 菅生下
- 菅生下
- 一藤
- 一藤
- 岩角橋
- 岩角橋
- 不動前
- 不動前
- 石船
- 石船
- 虹谷
- 虹谷
- 柿本
- 柿本
- 土井番
- 土井番
- 久保
- 久保
- スタンド前
- スタンド前
- 九鬼
- 九鬼
- 旧落合小学校
- 旧落合小学校
- 天神
- 天神
- 落合橋
- 落合橋
- 鎖谷
- 鎖谷
- 鎖谷下
- 鎖谷下
- 下瀬上
- 下瀬上
- 下瀬
- 下瀬
- 学校前
- 学校前
- 鏡谷
- 鏡谷
- 天皇森
- 天皇森
- 京上
- 京上
- 京上診療所
- 京上診療所
- 馬路
- 馬路
- 京上下
- 京上下
- 若林
- 若林
- 栃の瀬
- 栃の瀬
- 小川
- 小川
- 樫尾
- 大西
- 大西
- 尾尻
- 尾尻
- 和田
- 和田
- 落合(東祖谷)
- 落合(東祖谷)
- 旧和田小学校
- 旧和田小学校
- 境の宮
- 境の宮
- 小島
- 小島
- 今井橋
- 今井橋
- 石脇
- 石脇
- 閑定
- かずら橋
- かずら橋
- 今久保下
- 今久保下
- 今久保上
- 今久保上
- 蔭
- 蔭
- 八幡下
- 八幡下
- 冥地上
- 冥地上
- 峰友
- 峰友
- 冥地下
- 冥地下
- 一宇
- 秘境の湯
- 戸ノ谷
- 戸ノ谷
- 尾井ノ内下
- 尾井ノ内下
- 尾井ノ内上
- 尾井ノ内上
- 峠
- 峠
- 西谷
- 西谷
- お堂前
- お堂前
- 後山
- 後山
- 一里松
- 一里松
- 西岡
- 西岡
- 宮の谷
- 宮の谷
- 中学校前
- 中学校前
- 日浦
- 日浦
- 徳善
- 徳善
- 大歩危駅
- 榎
- 榎
- 土日浦
- 土日浦
- 吾橋
- 吾橋
- 安楽寺
- 雲辺寺口
- 雲辺寺口
- 池田バスターミナル
- 大宮
- 鳴石
- 鳴石
- 谷間
- 谷間
- そぎざ
- そぎざ
- 有瀬
- 有瀬
- とうな
- とうな
- 落窪
- 佐野
- 三好病院玄関前
- 三好病院前
- 三好病院前
- 三好病院前
- 池田駅前
- 池田駅前
- 池田新町
- 池田新町
- よんでん前
- 仙野
- 仙野
- 赤鳥居
- 赤鳥居
- 山城中学校
- 白地上
- 白地上
- 白地城址
- 三縄駅前
- 三縄駅前
- 戸井口
- 戸井口
- 日浦橋
- 日浦橋
- 三縄小学校前
- and 298 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
11 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning6983 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning548 instances
548 of 548 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning166 instances
166 of 166 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning98 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning25 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Some service calendars in the feed have already ended.
Expired calendars are dead weight and can hide real schedule problems from your staff and vendors.
Fix: Remove past service periods the next time you export the feed. (One setting in most export tools.)
Validator rule: expired_calendar · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info3 instances
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 255 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 255 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 68 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/miyoshi-city-tokushima-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.