Feed status · checked 2026-07-19
Meiko Bus (明光バス)
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Bus
unchanged since 2026-07-18
Catalogued in Wakayama, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
420 of 420 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
173 of 173 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 255 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 9 kinds of issue across 8446 instances (0 error, 8436 warning, 10 informational).
Service data covers the next 255 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
1 accessibility depth signal
10 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (102 白浜町内循環線, 105 白浜駅・三段壁線, 6 白浜駅・アドベンチャーワールド線, 2 白浜駅・アドベンチャーワールド線, 1 白浜駅・アドベンチャーワールド線, and more).
Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.
Skip to route and stop dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
- 90 快速熊野古道号 (blue)
- 93 快速熊野古道号 (blue)
- 93 近露本宮線 (blue)
- 94 熊野線 (teal)
- 95 熊野線 (teal)
- 99 近露本宮線 (blue)
- 102 白浜町内循環線 (teal)
- 102 白浜町内循環線 (pink)
- 101 白浜町内循環線 (teal)
- 105 白浜駅・三段壁線 (pink)
- 6 白浜駅・アドベンチャーワールド線 (gray)
- 2 白浜駅・アドベンチャーワールド線 (gray)
- 1 白浜駅・アドベンチャーワールド線 (gray)
- 11 白浜田辺線 (red)
- 12 白浜田辺線 (red)
- 30 白浜田辺線 (blue)
- 31 白浜田辺線 (blue)
- 62 白浜日置線 (orange)
- 63 白浜日置線 (orange)
- 上芳養線 (yellow)
- 長野線 (teal)
- 熊野白浜リゾート空港連絡バス (gray)
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| 90 快速熊野古道号 | Bus | blue |
| 93 快速熊野古道号 | Bus | blue |
| 93 近露本宮線 | Bus | blue |
| 94 熊野線 | Bus | teal |
| 95 熊野線 | Bus | teal |
| 99 近露本宮線 | Bus | blue |
| 102 白浜町内循環線 | Bus | teal |
| 102 白浜町内循環線 | Bus | pink |
| 101 白浜町内循環線 | Bus | teal |
| 105 白浜駅・三段壁線 | Bus | pink |
| 6 白浜駅・アドベンチャーワールド線 | Bus | gray |
| 2 白浜駅・アドベンチャーワールド線 | Bus | gray |
| 1 白浜駅・アドベンチャーワールド線 | Bus | gray |
| 11 白浜田辺線 | Bus | red |
| 12 白浜田辺線 | Bus | red |
| 30 白浜田辺線 | Bus | blue |
| 31 白浜田辺線 | Bus | blue |
| 62 白浜日置線 | Bus | orange |
| 63 白浜日置線 | Bus | orange |
| 上芳養線 | Bus | yellow |
| 長野線 | Bus | teal |
| 熊野白浜リゾート空港連絡バス | Bus | gray |
This feed has 420 stops.
List every stop
- アドベンチャーワールド
- アドベンチャーワールド
- アドベンチャーワールド
- エクシブ白浜
- エクシブ白浜
- 展望台下
- 展望台下
- 空港口
- 空港口
- 白浜警察署前
- 白浜警察署前
- 緑光台
- 緑光台
- 研修道場前
- 研修道場前
- のんびれっじ
- のんびれっじ
- 南千畳
- 南千畳
- 滝内
- 滝内
- 草原の湯
- 草原の湯
- まぶ湯
- まぶ湯
- 走り湯
- 走り湯
- 白良浜
- 白良浜
- 旭ヶ丘
- 旭ヶ丘
- 常喜院下
- 常喜院下
- 測候所前
- 瀬戸の浦
- 瀬戸の浦
- 臨海(円月島)
- 臨海(円月島)
- 江津良
- 江津良
- 紀伊田辺駅
- 紀伊田辺駅
- 紀伊田辺駅
- 阪田山
- 阪田山
- 東白浜
- 東白浜
- 大浦
- 大浦
- 寒サ浦
- 寒サ浦
- 藤島
- 藤島
- 車庫前
- 車庫前
- 桃ノ木峠
- 桃ノ木峠
- 細野
- 細野
- 白浜駅
- 白浜駅
- 白浜駅
- 堅田
- 堅田
- 湊
- 湊
- 湊
- 内の浦
- 内の浦
- 北内之浦
- 北内之浦
- 南和歌山医療センター前
- 新庄病院前
- 神島台
- 神島台
- 真寿苑前
- 真寿苑前
- 跡の浦
- 跡の浦
- 神社前
- 神社前
- 福原産業前
- 福原産業前
- 青葉台
- 青葉台
- つぶり坂
- つぶり坂
- 支所前
- 支所前
- 才野
- 才野
- 富田中学校前
- 富田中学校前
- 富田駅
- 富田駅
- 栄
- 栄
- 富田橋
- 富田橋
- 富田橋
- 富田橋
- 町立体育館前
- 町立体育館前
- 庄川口
- 庄川口
- 内の川学校前
- 内の川学校前
- 内の川
- 内の川
- 鶴ヶ丘
- 鶴ヶ丘
- 郵便橋北詰
- 郵便橋北詰
- 郵便橋
- 郵便橋
- 不動坂
- 不動坂
- 岩崎
- 岩崎
- 生馬橋西詰
- 生馬橋西詰
- 上富田庁舎前
- 上富田庁舎前
- 文里
- 文里
- 文里アパート前
- 文里アパート前
- 神島高校前
- 神島高校前
- 神子浜
- 神子浜
- 工業高校前
- 工業高校前
- 磯間口
- 磯間口
- 東本町
- 東本町
- 新屋敷62
- 下屋敷
- 権現前
- 高瀬
- 高瀬
- 富田
- 富田
- 袋
- 袋
- かせぎ
- かせぎ
- 北見草
- 北見草
- 橋谷
- 橋谷
- 見草
- 見草
- 朝来帰
- 朝来帰
- 椿口
- 椿口
- 椿温泉
- 椿温泉
- 伊勢ヶ谷
- 伊勢ヶ谷
- 市江口
- 市江口
- 笠甫
- 笠甫
- 志原口
- 志原口
- 奥志原
- 奥志原
- 志原
- 志原
- 紀伊新庄駅
- 紀伊新庄駅
- 松原
- 松原
- 日置川町役場前
- 日置川町役場前
- 日置学校前
- 日置学校前
- 日置町
- 日置町
- 日の出
- 日の出
- 大橋
- 大橋
- 古屋
- 古屋
- 大古
- 大古
- 安宅橋
- 安宅橋
- 日置駅
- 名喜里
- 名喜里
- マーメイドタウン入口前
- マーメイドタウン入口前
- 田鶴口
- 田鶴口
- 南紀白浜空港
- 南紀白浜空港
- 海蔵寺町
- 海蔵寺町
- 市民総合センター
- 市民総合センター
- いなり
- 松原(上芳養線)
- クラブ前
- クラブ前
- 芋村
- 芋村
- 寄巻
- 寄巻
- 脇田橋
- 脇田橋
- 会館前
- 会館前
- 技術専門校前
- 技術専門校前
- 田尻
- 田尻
- 西野
- 西野
- 中芳養
- 中芳養
- 平野口
- 平野口
- 小野坂
- 小野坂
- 小野
- 小野
- 下日向
- 下日向
- 鎌谷橋
- 鎌谷橋
- 畑谷
- 畑谷
- 日向
- 日向
- 南紀の台下
- 南紀の台下
- 上芝
- 上芝
- 上日向
- 上日向
- 上芳養診療所
- 上芳養診療所
- 東郷
- 東郷
- 札場
- and 170 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)
Over time
Overall score across the last 2 checks — unchanged since 2026-07-18.
Show the numbers
| Check | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-18 | 68.6 | first check |
| 2026-07-19 | 68.6 | no change |
What changed since your last check
- Correctness no change
- Freshness no change
- Rider experience no change
What changed in this feed
Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-07-18.
Same feed file as 2026-07-18; the published zip did not change.
Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops in a reader, with no sign-up.
Everything we checked
12 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning8130 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning420 instances
420 of 420 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning174 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning173 instances
173 of 173 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning126 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning4 instances
Some service calendars in the feed have already ended.
Expired calendars are dead weight and can hide real schedule problems from your staff and vendors.
Fix: Remove past service periods the next time you export the feed. (One setting in most export tools.)
Validator rule: expired_calendar · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
Two or more routes share the same name.
Riders can't tell the routes apart in apps.
Fix: Give each route a distinct short or long name. (One field per route.)
Validator rule: duplicate_route_name · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info6 instances
Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).
See the linked rule for what this affects.
Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)
Validator rule: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
The feed has a stretch of two weeks or more with no service running.
A long gap can mean dates were left out of the calendar. Apps then show no trips on those days.
Fix: Check whether the gap is real, like a seasonal break; if not, add the missing dates to the calendar. (A review of your calendar dates.)
Validator rule: big_gap_in_service · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 255 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 255 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 62 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/meiko-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.