← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-06-30

Catalina Express

Based on the feed this agency publishes

26.2 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Ahead of 4% of all tracked agencies and 3% of small agencies. Operates in California.

Accessibility gapsNo realtime feed

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.1, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 3 hours ago; last changed 8 days ago.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Add feed_start_date and feed_end_date to feed_info.txt and include calendar end dates in your export.Likely your export tool

Neither feed_info.txt nor the calendars state when service ends. Nobody can tell when this feed will go stale.

⏱ Likely a one-time export setting.worth about +100 points

Fix 02

Review the rule documentation for 'missing_required_file' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.

Missing required file (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.

⏱ Varies.worth about +12 points

Fix 03

Review the rule documentation for 'invalid_input_files_in_subfolder' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.

Invalid input files in subfolder (flagged by the MobilityData validator). See the linked rule for what this affects.

⏱ Varies.worth about +12 points

This feed is published from a code repository, so whoever maintains that repository regenerates the zip — often planning staff or a consultant. The fix happens in the source data, then a fresh export is committed.

Close the loop on each fix. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and let the next run verify it — the scorecard shows the fix; the agency publishes it.

  1. Add feed_start_date and feed_end_date to feed_info.txt and include calendar end dates in your export.

    Make the change. This feed is published from a code repository, so whoever maintains that repository regenerates the zip — often planning staff or a consultant. The fix happens in the source data, then a fresh export is committed.

    Prove it cleared. The next scorecard run re-checks this automatically and, once it is gone, mints a dated receipt. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Review the rule documentation for 'missing_required_file' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.

    Make the change. This feed is published from a code repository, so whoever maintains that repository regenerates the zip — often planning staff or a consultant. The fix happens in the source data, then a fresh export is committed.

    Prove it cleared. The next scorecard run re-checks this automatically and, once it is gone, mints a dated receipt. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Review the rule documentation for 'invalid_input_files_in_subfolder' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed.

    Make the change. This feed is published from a code repository, so whoever maintains that repository regenerates the zip — often planning staff or a consultant. The fix happens in the source data, then a fresh export is committed.

    Prove it cleared. The next scorecard run re-checks this automatically and, once it is gone, mints a dated receipt. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Send your vendor a fix request

This feed is published from a code repository. Forward this to whoever maintains that repository; the fix happens in the source data, then a fresh export is committed. Each fix names the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness60.0 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 4 kinds of issue across 8 instances (7 error, 1 warning, 0 informational).

Freshness0.0 / 100

No service end date could be found in this feed, so there is no way to know when riders will lose trip planning.

Rider experience0.0 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is not published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

NTD certification readiness Not ready

Resolve this before you certify on the D-10. 3 validator errors to resolve. No service end date could be read, so currency is unknown.

Published Ready
Published at a public URL.
Valid Needs attention
3 validator errors to resolve.
Current Not ready
No service end date could be read, so currency is unknown.
agency_id matches your NTD ID Not checked yet
Setting your GTFS agency_id to your five-digit NTD ID is an optional way to line a feed up with its National Transit Database record. FTA links the two on your P-50 form, so it is not a required feed change. We don't have your NTD ID on file, so this is not checked yet.

In plain words: if you report to the federal transit database, you have to publish a working, up-to-date feed and confirm it once a year. This box is a heads-up on whether yours looks ready; it is not the official sign-off.

A readiness signal mapping this feed to the FTA National Transit Database GTFS requirement (Report Year 2023 onward: a public, valid, current feed, certified annually on the D-10). Aligning agency_id with your NTD ID lets the feed line up with your NTD record; the July 2025 final rule links the two on the P-50 form rather than requiring that feed change, and requires shapes.txt in the published GTFS: Full Reporters from Report Year 2025, and Reduced, Rural, and Tribal Reporters from Report Year 2026. Not an official determination; your certification is the official check.

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. 3 validator errors to resolve. No service end date could be read. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Not yet
3 validator errors to resolve.
Current Not yet
No service end date could be read.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Below the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has no service end date, so Maps cannot tell how far ahead it runs. Set a feed_info end date and a calendar that covers at least the next four weeks, then re-export. The feed also carries 7 validator errors, the other thing Maps checks at onboarding; the findings below name each fix.

How this agency maps to the standards

A data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Each category shows this feed's score and the standards it relates to: the FTA National Transit Database GTFS requirement, the MobilityData grading scheme, and the Google Transit gate. Read the full standards crosswalk.

In California, the published guideline is California Transit Data Guidelines. Caltrans' published quality guidelines and compliance checklist; this rubric is anchored to them.

California Minimum GTFS Guidelines checklist (1 of 5 measured items met)

The state's own Data Process Checklist, matched item by item to what this scorecard already measures. An item marked "not measured here" is real ground the checklist covers that this tool does not check; see the official checklist for the full picture.

  • Meets Publish GTFS Schedule at a stable, automatically-fetchable URL

    The published feed URL downloaded at the last check.

  • Not measured here Implement required fields: Fares v2, text-to-speech stop names, shapes.txt, wheelchair_boarding, and Pathways where applicable

    This scorecard measures wheelchair_boarding, shapes.txt coverage, fare data, and station pathways separately, below; it does not check the Fares v2 format specifically or text-to-speech stop names.

  • Not measured here Achieve a passing score in every category of the MobilityData GTFS Grading Scheme v1

    This scorecard automates a proxy for the Grading Scheme's rider-facing fields (see the standards crosswalk) rather than running the scheme itself, which grades by comparison to the real world by hand.

  • Not measured here Publish changes to the base schedule at least one week ahead of every service change

    This scorecard does not track a feed's publish history, so advance notice cannot be checked.

  • Gap Produce no critical errors in the MobilityData GTFS Validator

    3 validator errors to resolve.

  • Not measured here Publish Trip Updates, Vehicle Positions, and Alerts feeds

    This scorecard checks realtime reachability and freshness overall; it does not check for all three feed types individually.

  • Not measured here Update Trip Updates and Vehicle Positions at least every 20 seconds

    This scorecard samples realtime freshness; it does not check this specific 20-second cadence.

  • Not measured here Publish information for at least 99% of vehicles in service

    This scorecard measures the share of scheduled trips represented in TripUpdates, a related but different figure than vehicle coverage.

  • Not measured here Keep 100% of trip_ids consistent between Schedule and Realtime

    This scorecard does not currently check trip_id consistency between the Schedule and Realtime feeds.

  • Not measured here Produce no critical errors in the Center for Urban Transportation Research realtime validator

    This scorecard does not run the CUTR realtime validator.

  • Not measured here Publish accessible feed links on the agency or regional partner website

    This scorecard does not check the agency's own website.

  • Not measured here Register GTFS and GTFS-Realtime feeds with transit.land and the Mobility Database

    This scorecard does not currently check aggregator registration for this section.

  • Gap Designate a technical contact in feed_info.txt's feed_contact_email

    feed_info.txt has no feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url.

  • Gap wheelchair_boarding stated on stops and trips

    States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips.

  • Not measured here shapes.txt with a shape for every trip

    Shape coverage has not been measured for this feed.

  • Gap Fare data published, or the service marked fare-free

    No fare data is published.

Correctness 60 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading: stop locations, route names and colors. Google Transit: a feed must pass validation to stay in Maps.
Freshness 0 / 100
The FTA National Transit Database expectation of a valid, current feed. Google Transit: an expired calendar drops the agency from Maps.
Rider experience 0 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading: stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a live badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates daily and links back to this scorecard.

Catalina Express GTFS data quality grade: F

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/catalina-express/2026-06-30.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-06-30. Use it in a board packet, an NTD narrative, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.