← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-19

Tokushima City Bus (徳島市営バス)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

75.9 / 100

unchanged since 2026-07-18

Catalogued in Tokushima, Japan.

Covers 255 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

The Tokushima City municipal bus network, run by the city transportation bureau; counted as one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

106 of 106 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

241 of 241 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Populate trip_headsign to match what the bus displays.Likely your export tool

241 of 241 trips have no headsign. Riders at the stop can't tell which direction a bus is going.

⏱ Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.worth about +15 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Populate trip_headsign to match what the bus displays. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 255 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness89.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 3 kinds of issue across 19 instances (0 error, 17 warning, 2 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 255 days.

Rider experience37.5 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 1 万代中央ふ頭線 (yellow)
  • 4 沖洲・南海フェリー線 (yellow)
  • 8 イオンモール徳島線 (yellow)
  • 4 沖洲・南海フェリー線(周回便) (yellow)
  • 32 東部循環線 (yellow)
Routes in Tokushima City Bus (徳島市営バス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
1 万代中央ふ頭線Busyellow
4 沖洲・南海フェリー線Busyellow
8 イオンモール徳島線Busyellow
4 沖洲・南海フェリー線(周回便)Busyellow
32 東部循環線Busyellow

This feed has 106 stops.

List every stop
  • 万代車庫前
  • 助任橋四丁目
  • 市民病院玄関前
  • 中洲町三丁目
  • 中洲町三丁目
  • 南福島町
  • 南福島町
  • 末広一丁目
  • 末広一丁目
  • 南末広町
  • 南末広町
  • 南末広町中・イオンモール前
  • 南末広町中・イオンモール前
  • 徳島中央公園・裁判所北
  • 徳島中央公園・徳島市役所東
  • 助任橋・徳島大学前
  • 中常三島
  • 中常三島
  • 住吉四丁目
  • 住吉四丁目
  • 住吉新橋
  • 住吉新橋
  • 中央市場口
  • 中央市場口
  • 中央市場口
  • 中央市場口
  • 南沖洲三丁目
  • 南沖洲三丁目
  • 南沖洲四丁目
  • 南沖洲四丁目
  • 南沖洲四丁目
  • 南沖洲四丁目
  • マリンターミナル前
  • マリンターミナル前
  • 万代町四丁目
  • 万代町四丁目
  • 万代中央ふ頭前
  • 万代中央ふ頭前
  • 県庁北
  • 県庁北
  • 城東高校前
  • 城東高校前
  • 福島橋
  • 福島橋
  • 慈恵院前
  • 慈恵院前
  • 福島一丁目
  • 福島一丁目
  • 福島明神前
  • 福島明神前
  • 安宅一丁目
  • 安宅一丁目
  • 安宅一丁目
  • 安宅一丁目
  • 大和町二丁目
  • 大和町二丁目
  • イオンモール徳島
  • 中洲町
  • 中洲町
  • 新蔵町
  • 中央郵便局前・徳島市役所北
  • 中央郵便局前・徳島市役所北
  • 徳島中央公園・鷲の門前
  • 徳島大学前
  • 中徳島町二丁目
  • 助任新橋
  • 安宅二丁目
  • 安宅二丁目
  • 城東中学校前
  • 城東中学校前
  • 末広四丁目
  • 末広四丁目
  • 末広四丁目
  • 蛭子前
  • 蛭子前
  • 沖洲小学校前
  • 沖洲小学校前
  • 南沖洲五丁目
  • 南沖洲五丁目
  • マリンピア入口
  • マリンピア入口
  • 工業団地前(東沖洲)
  • 工業団地前(東沖洲)
  • 卸センター前
  • 卸センター前
  • 南海フェリー前
  • 南沖洲五丁目西
  • 南沖洲五丁目西
  • 東部県土整備局前
  • 東部県土整備局前
  • 沖洲大橋
  • 沖洲大橋
  • 末広五丁目
  • 末広住宅前
  • 城東町一丁目
  • 城東町一丁目
  • 西張北
  • 西張北
  • 市民病院前
  • 市民病院前
  • 徳島駅前(降車専用)
  • 徳島駅前
  • 徳島駅前
  • 八百屋町
  • 八百屋町
  • 商業高校前

Over time

Overall score across the last 2 checks — unchanged since 2026-07-18.

2026-07-18: 75.92026-07-19: 75.9
Show the numbers
Overall score by check, with the change from the previous check
CheckScoreChange
2026-07-1875.9 first check
2026-07-1975.9 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change

What changed in this feed

Overall grade and score held steady since 2026-07-18.

Same feed file as 2026-07-18; the published zip did not change.

Subscribe to this feed’s changes (Atom) to hear about grade drops in a reader, with no sign-up.

Everything we checked

7 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning241 instances

    241 of 241 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning241 instances

    241 of 241 trips have no headsign.

    Riders at the stop can't tell which direction a bus is going.

    Fix: Populate trip_headsign to match what the bus displays. (Usually a bulk edit in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_missing_headsigns · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Best Practices (opens GTFS Best Practices on an external site)

  • Warning106 instances

    106 of 106 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning16 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Platform without parent station (flagged by the MobilityData validator).

    See the linked rule for what this affects.

    Fix: Review the rule documentation for 'platform_without_parent_station' at https://gtfs-validator.mobilitydata.org/rules.html and check the flagged rows in your feed. (Varies.)

    Validator rule: platform_without_parent_station · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 255 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 255 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 90 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 38 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Tokushima City Bus (徳島市営バス) GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/tokushima-city-bus/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.