← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-19

Tokushima Bus Nanbu (徳島バス南部)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

72.7 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Catalogued in Tokushima, Japan.

Covers 165 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

A separately incorporated southern subsidiary, distinct from the tracked Tokushima Bus city network.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 2 hours ago; last changed 2 hours ago.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

376 of 376 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

77 of 77 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 165 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness71.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 3919 instances (0 error, 3917 warning, 2 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 165 days.

Rider experience52.5 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 日和佐線 (blue)
  • 88 丹生谷線 (blue)
  • 丹生谷線 (blue)
  • 19 牟岐線 (blue)
  • 20 牟岐線 (blue)
  • 21 牟岐線 (blue)
  • 22 牟岐線 (blue)
  • 23 牟岐線 (blue)
  • 24 牟岐線 (blue)
  • 25 牟岐線 (blue)
  • 26 牟岐線 (blue)
  • 27 牟岐線 (blue)
  • 28 牟岐線 (blue)
Routes in Tokushima Bus Nanbu (徳島バス南部)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
日和佐線Busblue
88 丹生谷線Busblue
丹生谷線Busblue
19 牟岐線Busblue
20 牟岐線Busblue
21 牟岐線Busblue
22 牟岐線Busblue
23 牟岐線Busblue
24 牟岐線Busblue
25 牟岐線Busblue
26 牟岐線Busblue
27 牟岐線Busblue
28 牟岐線Busblue

This feed has 376 stops.

List every stop
  • 出原上
  • 出原上
  • 和無田
  • 和無田
  • 元井
  • 元井
  • 下阿地屋
  • 下阿地屋
  • 牟岐
  • 正観寺前
  • 正観寺前
  • 海部病院
  • 牟岐西
  • 牟岐西
  • 内妻峠
  • 内妻峠
  • 内妻橋
  • 内妻橋
  • 内妻
  • 内妻
  • 古江
  • 古江
  • 尾山花
  • 尾山花
  • 福良
  • 福良
  • 鯖瀬
  • 鯖瀬
  • 大砂
  • 大砂
  • 加島
  • 加島
  • 粟ノ浦
  • 粟ノ浦
  • 浅川天神
  • 浅川天神
  • 浅川駅前
  • 浅川駅前
  • 竹ノ鼻
  • 竹ノ鼻
  • 杉谷
  • 杉谷
  • 海南病院
  • 阿地屋
  • 阿地屋
  • 四方原口
  • 四方原口
  • 海部高校前
  • 海部高校前
  • 海南役場前
  • 海南役場前
  • 海部役場前
  • 海部役場前
  • 海部駅前
  • 海部駅前
  • 小那佐
  • 小那佐
  • 那佐中
  • 那佐中
  • 那佐
  • 那佐
  • 走出
  • 走出
  • 緑風会前
  • 緑風会前
  • 赤松局前
  • 赤松局前
  • 宍喰温泉前
  • 宍喰祇園通
  • 宍喰祇園通
  • 宍喰
  • 宍喰
  • 宍喰駅前
  • 宍喰港
  • 宍喰港
  • 水床トンネル口
  • 水床トンネル口
  • 水床トンネル口
  • 金目
  • 金目
  • 竹ヶ島
  • 甲浦造船所前
  • 甲浦造船所前
  • 甲浦東
  • 甲浦東
  • 寺野
  • 寺野
  • 甲浦
  • 甲浦
  • 甲浦西
  • 甲浦西
  • 甲浦学校前
  • 甲浦学校前
  • 甲浦口
  • 甲浦口
  • 海の駅東洋町
  • 阿南医療センター前
  • 宝田東
  • 宝田東
  • 富岡西高校前
  • 富岡西高校前
  • 寺野中
  • 寺野中
  • 阿南合同庁舎前
  • 阿南合同庁舎前
  • 玉塚
  • 玉塚
  • 阿南駅前通り
  • 阿南駅前通り
  • 阿南市役所前
  • 阿南市役所前
  • フジグラン阿南
  • フジグラン阿南
  • 阿南駅前
  • 中居内
  • 中居内
  • 学原東
  • 学原東
  • 見能林駅前
  • 見能林駅前
  • 阿南高専前
  • 阿南高専前
  • 寺野上
  • 寺野上
  • 青木
  • 青木
  • 長浜(阿南市)
  • 長浜(阿南市)
  • 橘駅前
  • 橘駅前
  • 舳崎
  • 舳崎
  • 舳崎南
  • 舳崎南
  • 橘営業所
  • 橘港口
  • 橘港口
  • 橘中
  • 橘中
  • 橘西
  • 橘西
  • 阿南二中前
  • 阿南二中前
  • 大影
  • 大影
  • 筒崎
  • 筒崎
  • 桑野上
  • 桑野上
  • 内田東
  • 内田東
  • 内田
  • 内田
  • 山口下
  • 山口下
  • 山口中
  • 山口中
  • 山口上
  • 山口上
  • 北谷
  • 北谷
  • 阿瀬比
  • 阿瀬比
  • 東内上
  • 東内上
  • 深瀬下
  • 深瀬下
  • 川口
  • 東内
  • 東内
  • 中山上
  • 中山上
  • 柳沢
  • 柳沢
  • 中山中
  • 中山中
  • 中山薬師前
  • 中山薬師前
  • 中山下
  • 中山下
  • 大下
  • 大下
  • 八幡原
  • 八幡原
  • 和食東
  • 和食東
  • 那賀警察前
  • 那賀警察前
  • 北河内東
  • 北河内東
  • 那賀役場前
  • 那賀役場前
  • 鷲敷中学前
  • 鷲敷中学前
  • 小仁宇
  • 小仁宇
  • 那賀高校前
  • 那賀高校前
  • 仁宇
  • 仁宇
  • 阿井交流センター前
  • 阿井交流センター前
  • 阿井
  • 阿井
  • 百合中
  • 百合中
  • 百合
  • 百合
  • 百合上
  • 百合上
  • 北河内駅前
  • 北河内駅前
  • 朝生
  • 朝生
  • 梁橋
  • 梁橋
  • 水ノ花
  • 水ノ花
  • 延野下
  • 延野下
  • 延野
  • 延野
  • 延野上
  • 延野上
  • 吉野
  • 吉野
  • 吉野中
  • 吉野中
  • 日和佐中学校前
  • 日和佐中学校前
  • 牟岐駅前
  • 調剤薬局前
  • 調剤薬局前
  • 美波町医療保健センター前
  • 美波町医療保健センター前
  • 日和佐本町
  • 日和佐本町
  • 日和佐中
  • 日和佐中
  • 日和佐駅前
  • 大久保東
  • 大久保東
  • 大久保
  • 大久保
  • 紅葉橋
  • 紅葉橋
  • 紅葉川温泉前
  • 紅葉川温泉前
  • and 126 more (see the full list on the map or in the GeoJSON)

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

8 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning3768 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning376 instances

    376 of 376 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning92 instances

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning77 instances

    77 of 77 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning56 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 165 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 165 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 72 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Tokushima Bus Nanbu (徳島バス南部) GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/tokushima-bus-nanbu/2026-07-19.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-19. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.