← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-07-18

Suwa City Karin-chan Bus (諏訪市かりんちゃんバス)

Based on the feed this agency publishes

Service mode Bus

75.3 / 100

First scorecard for this agency

Catalogued in Nagano, Japan.

Covers 256 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Suwa City's community bus (かりんちゃんバス) by Lake Suwa in Nagano; counted as one feed record.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 1 hours ago; last changed 1 hours ago.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

169 of 169 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

25 of 25 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 256 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness77.5 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 1235 instances (0 error, 1233 warning, 2 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 256 days.

Rider experience52.3 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.

Skip to route and stop data

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

Routes in Suwa City Karin-chan Bus (諏訪市かりんちゃんバス)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
かりんちゃんバス 東方線(通勤・通学便)Buspink (no shape in feed)
かりんちゃんバス 西方線(通勤・通学便)Busteal (no shape in feed)
かりんちゃんバス 東方線(上諏訪駅・前宮前便)Busyellow (no shape in feed)
かりんちゃんバス 西方線(上諏訪駅・前宮前便)Busteal (no shape in feed)
有賀・上社統合路線(かりんちゃんライナー)Busyellow (no shape in feed)

This feed has 169 stops.

List every stop
  • 湖南団地入口
  • 湖南団地入口
  • 田辺西
  • 田辺西
  • 田辺東
  • 田辺東
  • 諏訪ステーションパーク
  • 沖田町
  • 沖田町
  • 聖ヨゼフ保育園前
  • 聖ヨゼフ保育園前
  • 飯島
  • 飯島
  • 上赤沼
  • 上赤沼
  • 赤沼保育園入口
  • 赤沼保育園入口
  • 下赤沼
  • 下赤沼
  • 鷹野橋下
  • 鷹野橋下
  • 四賀普門寺
  • 四賀普門寺
  • 細久保
  • 細久保
  • 白狐入口
  • 白狐入口
  • 四賀出張所前
  • 四賀出張所前
  • 四賀桑原
  • 四賀桑原
  • 中神戸
  • 中神戸
  • サンリッツロード赤沼
  • 四賀飯島
  • 前宮前
  • すわっこランド
  • 文出
  • 文出
  • 文出西
  • 文出西
  • 小川
  • 小川
  • 小川下
  • 小川下
  • 有賀
  • 有賀
  • SUWAガラスの里
  • SUWAガラスの里
  • クリーンレイク諏訪
  • クリーンレイク諏訪
  • 豊田小学校前
  • 豊田小学校前
  • 上社北参道
  • 下金子
  • 下金子
  • 下金子東
  • 下金子東
  • 福島南
  • 福島南
  • 中金子下
  • 中金子下
  • 中金子中
  • 中金子中
  • 中洲小学校入口
  • 中洲小学校入口
  • 中洲保育園前
  • 中洲保育園前
  • 上金子公民館前
  • 上金子公民館前
  • 上金子入口
  • 上金子入口
  • 清水町野球場前
  • 清水町野球場前
  • 上社
  • 神社前
  • 神社前
  • どんどん橋
  • どんどん橋
  • 南町
  • 南町
  • 諏訪ステーションパーク南
  • 諏訪ステーションパーク南
  • 中洲郵便局前
  • 中洲郵便局前
  • 下金子公民館前
  • 下金子公民館前
  • 福島公民館前
  • 福島公民館前
  • 福島入口
  • 福島入口
  • 福島新町入口
  • 福島新町入口
  • 工業団地西口
  • 工業団地東口
  • 曽根田
  • 曽根田
  • 上諏訪駅諏訪湖口(西口)
  • 温泉街通り
  • 温泉街通り
  • 片倉館前
  • 片倉館前
  • D51前
  • D51前
  • ヨットハーバー前
  • ヨットハーバー前
  • 原田泰治美術館
  • 原田泰治美術館
  • 渋崎入口
  • 渋崎入口
  • 渋崎温泉前
  • 渋崎
  • 足湯前
  • 足湯前
  • 北澤美術館本館
  • 北澤美術館本館
  • 中大和
  • 中大和
  • 浜沢
  • 浜沢
  • 中町
  • 中町
  • 角間橋
  • 角間橋
  • 清水坂下
  • 清水坂下
  • 税務署入口
  • 税務署入口
  • 日赤病院
  • 大和郵便局前
  • 城南
  • 城南
  • 杉菜池
  • 杉菜池
  • 上川
  • 上川
  • 赤羽根車庫
  • 文化センター前
  • 文化センター前
  • 日赤病院入口
  • 日赤病院入口
  • ハローワーク前
  • ハローワーク前
  • 長野日報前
  • 長野日報前
  • 西島崎
  • 西島崎
  • 六斗橋
  • 六斗橋
  • みどり区
  • みどり区
  • 上社旧道口
  • 上社旧道口
  • 唐沢橋
  • 唐沢橋
  • 大熊
  • 大熊
  • 北大熊
  • 北大熊
  • 湖南公民館入口
  • 湖南公民館入口
  • 南真志野
  • 南真志野
  • 北真志野
  • 北真志野
  • 北真志野境
  • 北真志野境
  • 蓼宮橋
  • 蓼宮橋

Over time

This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.

Everything we checked

8 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning1220 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning169 instances

    169 of 169 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning25 instances

    25 of 25 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)

  • Warning11 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.

    Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)

    Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Warning1 instance

    Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.

    Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.

    Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)

    Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info2 instances

    Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.

    Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.

    Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)

    Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

  • Info1 instance

    feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).

    Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.

    Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)

    Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)

Conformance mark Not yet

This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 256 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 256 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 78 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 52 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Show your grade

Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.

Suwa City Karin-chan Bus (諏訪市かりんちゃんバス) GTFS data quality grade: C

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/suwa-karinchan-bus/2026-07-18.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-18. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.