Feed status · checked 2026-07-18
Shichigahama Town Community Bus (七ヶ浜町民バス「ぐるりんこ」)
Based on the feed this agency publishes
Service mode Bus
First scorecard for this agency
Catalogued in Miyagi, Japan.
A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.2, validator 8.0.1.
Checked for changes 1 hours ago; last changed 1 hours ago.
Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the agency's own feed.
How we measured this
Confidence in this measurement: medium.
- Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
- The feed was downloaded from the agency's own URL.
Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.
Top things to fix
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team
156 of 156 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool
81 of 81 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category
How to make and check these changes
Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.
Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. · Read the fix guide
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.
Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.
Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.
Rider view: what this feed publishes
A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.
- Schedule visibility
- The feed's last published service date is in 256 days.
- Published accessibility data
- Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
- Fare information
- Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
- Realtime information
- Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.
Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.
Send your vendor a fix request
You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.
Score by category
The MobilityData validator flagged 5 kinds of issue across 2937 instances (0 error, 2935 warning, 2 informational).
Service data covers the next 256 days.
0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.
0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.
1 accessibility depth signal
2 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (ぐるりんこ 系統６(日中便) 本塩釜駅⇔七ヶ浜国際村, ぐるりんこ 系統７(日中便) 多賀城駅⇔七ヶ浜国際村).
Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.
Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.
Fares are applied to trips.
Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.
Routes and stops
This feed has no route shapes, so the map shows its stops only.
Skip to route and stop dataBasemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.
| Route | Type | Line color |
|---|---|---|
| ぐるりんこ 系統１(朝夕便) 本塩釜駅⇔花渕 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| ぐるりんこ 系統２(朝夕便) 本塩釜駅⇔花渕 | Bus | teal (no shape in feed) |
| ぐるりんこ 系統３(朝夕便) 多賀城駅⇔花渕 | Bus | brown (no shape in feed) |
| ぐるりんこ 系統４(朝夕便) 多賀城駅⇔花渕 | Bus | pink (no shape in feed) |
| ぐるりんこ 系統５(日中便) 本塩釜駅⇔七ヶ浜国際村 | Bus | white (no shape in feed) |
| ぐるりんこ 系統６(日中便) 本塩釜駅⇔七ヶ浜国際村 | Bus | red (no shape in feed) |
| ぐるりんこ 系統７(日中便) 多賀城駅⇔七ヶ浜国際村 | Bus | green (no shape in feed) |
| ぐるりんこ 系統８(日中便) 多賀城駅⇔七ヶ浜国際村 | Bus | yellow (no shape in feed) |
This feed has 156 stops.
List every stop
- 松ヶ浜小学校入口
- 松ヶ浜小学校入口
- 菖蒲田浜入口
- 菖蒲田浜入口
- ＪＡ仙台前
- ＪＡ仙台前
- 菖蒲田海水浴場前
- 菖蒲田海水浴場前
- 笹山
- 笹山
- 笹山
- 高山
- 高山
- 割山
- 割山
- 舘下
- 舘下
- 花渕
- 吉田浜
- 吉田浜
- 湊浜入口
- 湊浜入口
- 君ヶ岡公園
- 君ヶ岡公園
- 大豆沢
- 大豆沢
- 宮前
- 宮前
- 宮前
- 宮前
- 台
- 台
- 金山
- 金山
- 仙台火力前
- 仙台火力前
- 眼鏡橋
- 眼鏡橋
- 西
- 西
- 清水
- 清水
- 清水入口
- 清水入口
- 砂山
- 砂山
- 細田
- 細田
- 亦楽小学校前
- 亦楽小学校前
- 社会福祉協議会前
- 社会福祉協議会前
- 浦田
- 浦田
- 東宮地区防災会館前
- 東宮地区防災会館前
- 東宮浜
- 東宮浜
- 東宮浜公民分館前
- 東宮浜公民分館前
- 吉子
- 吉子
- 要害
- 要害
- 要害児童遊園前
- 要害児童遊園前
- 林崎
- 林崎
- 小畑
- 小畑
- 御林入口
- 御林入口
- 境山
- 境山
- 北遠山
- 北遠山
- 遠山地区避難所前
- 遠山地区避難所前
- 南遠山
- 南遠山
- 向洋中学校入口
- 向洋中学校入口
- 貞山橋
- 貞山橋
- 多賀城高校前
- 多賀城高校前
- 三中前
- 三中前
- 湊浜2丁目
- 湊浜2丁目
- 下馬
- 下馬
- 下馬
- 坂病院入口
- 塩釜市立病院前
- 本町
- 塩釜神社入口
- 海岸通り
- 尾島町
- 尾島町
- 塩釜市役所入口
- 塩釜市役所入口
- 第三小学校前
- 第三小学校前
- 大代橋
- 大代橋
- 湊浜１丁目
- 湊浜１丁目
- 仙塩総合病院前
- 仙塩総合病院前
- 多賀城腎クリニック前
- 多賀城腎クリニック前
- 多賀城駅
- アクアリーナ前
- アクアリーナ前
- 生涯学習センター
- 汐見台中央
- 汐見台中央
- 汐見台南1丁目
- 汐見台南1丁目
- 汐見台南2丁目
- 汐見台南2丁目
- 本塩釜駅
- 赤石病院前
- 赤石病院前
- 松ヶ浜入口
- 松ヶ浜入口
- 後田
- 後田
- 中田
- 中田
- 立花
- 立花
- 休場
- 休場
- 五月田
- 七ヶ浜国際村
- 七ヶ浜国際村
- 汐見台1丁目
- 汐見台1丁目
- 汐見台3丁目
- 汐見台3丁目
- 汐見台6丁目
- 汐見台6丁目
- 吉田浜郵便局前
- 吉田浜郵便局前
- 郷倉前
- 郷倉前
- 小豆浜
- 小豆浜
- 汐見台南2丁目入口
- 汐見台南2丁目入口
- 西沢田
- 西沢田
- 御殿崎
- 御殿崎
Over time
This is the first scorecard for this agency. A trend and a "what changed" summary appear here once it has been checked more than once.
Everything we checked
8 findings, ordered by severity.
Show every finding
- Warning2905 instances
Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.
These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.
Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)
Validator rule: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning156 instances
156 of 156 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.
Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.
Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning81 instances
81 of 81 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.
Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.
Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)
Validator rule: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide · See GTFS Schedule reference (opens the GTFS Schedule reference on an external site)
- Warning24 instances
Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.
ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.
Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)
Validator rule: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning5 instances
Some files leave out fields that GTFS asks for but does not require.
Recommended fields like agency_phone or stop descriptions make the feed more useful to riders and trip planners.
Fix: Review the flagged fields and fill in the ones your riders would use. (A field at a time; not urgent.)
Validator rule: missing_recommended_field · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Warning1 instance
feed_info.txt lists no contact email and no contact URL.
Without a contact, apps like Google Maps can't reach you when they find a problem in the feed.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url to feed_info.txt. (One field, set once in export settings.)
Validator rule: missing_feed_contact_email_and_url · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info2 instances
Some files contain columns that are not part of the GTFS spec.
Harmless to riders, but apps ignore these columns and they can hide typos in real column names.
Fix: Check the flagged column names for misspellings of standard GTFS fields; remove them if they are vendor extras. (A quick look at the flagged files.)
Validator rule: unknown_column · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
- Info1 instance
feed_info.txt has no technical contact (feed_contact_email or feed_contact_url).
Trip-planning apps and regional data coordinators have nobody to email when they spot a problem with your feed, so problems linger.
Fix: Add feed_contact_email to feed_info.txt. (One field.)
Validator rule: scorecard_no_feed_contact · Read the fix guide · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules (opens the validator rules on an external site)
Conformance mark Not yet
This feed is close to the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
- Valid Met
- Passes validation with no errors.
- Current Met
- Service data covers the next 256 days.
- Accessible Not yet
- States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.
In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.
A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.
Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 256 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.
How this agency maps to the standards
The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.
- Correctness 78 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
- Freshness 100 / 100
- GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
- Rider experience 52 / 100
- GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
- Realtime quality Not yet published
- GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.
Show your grade
Put a badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check and links back to this scorecard.
Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.
Cite this record
This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/shichigahama-town-bus/2026-07-18.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-07-18. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.
Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.