GTFS Scorecard
← All agencies

Feed status · checked 2026-10-20

Nagaden Bus, Iizuna depot area (長電バス飯綱営業所管内)

Based on the official feed source on file

Service mode Bus

79.5 / 100

unchanged since 2026-10-19

Cataloged in Nagano, Japan.

Covers 176 daysAccessibility gapsRealtime not yet published

Source feed: https://api.gtfs-data.jp/v2/organizations/nagadenbus/feeds/nagadenbus-iizuna/files/feed.zip?rid=current

The Iizuna depot network of Nagaden Bus, covering the northern Nagano hills.

A data-quality and completeness lens to help an agency improve its GTFS feed. Not an official compliance determination from any transit program. New to this? How to read your scorecard. Interactive view of this scorecard. Rubric v1.4, validator 8.0.1.

Checked for changes 7 hours ago; last changed 44 days ago.

Measured 3 of 4 score categories from the official feed URL on file.

How we measured this

Confidence in this measurement: medium.

  • Realtime quality was not measured this run. It does not count against the grade.
  • The feed was downloaded from the official feed URL on file.

Confidence describes how much the pipeline could measure this run, not the feed itself. It never changes the grade.

About this feed

Nagaden Bus, Iizuna depot area (長電バス飯綱営業所管内)’s published feed lists 4 bus routes, 20 scheduled trips and 69 stops. Its service dates run from 2026-04-15 through 2027-04-14. The published file has not changed since our first check on 2026-09-05.

Top things to fix

Fix 01

Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops.Likely your team

69 of 69 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there. Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

Fixing this covers all 69 stops in the feed.

⏱ A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.worth about +25 points in its category

Fix 02

Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip.Likely your export tool

20 of 20 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible. Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

Fixing this covers all 20 trips in the feed.

⏱ A default or per-trip field in your export.worth about +15 points in its category

Fix 03

Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language.

Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set. These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

This is a validator notice, and the validator decides what each instance covers, so no share of the network can be read from it here.

⏱ A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.worth about +8 points in its category

Riders and need behind these fixes

  • Rider-trip figures come from the United States National Transit Database, which does not cover this feed's country.
  • The served-area need overlays cover the United States and Canada, so none of them applies to this feed.

These describe this feed only. They do not rank agencies, and they do not change the grade or the order of the fixes.

Finding handoff

Move one finding to a recheck

Select one finding. Copy the request, make the change in the feed-producing tool, then compare the next complete run.

Finding
Fix 01 in Top things to fix: its feed evidence and the requested change.
Recheck
Publish the changed feed at the same URL. On the next complete, comparable scorecard run, confirm that this finding is no longer reported.
Copy handoff text
How to make and check these changes

Check the result on the published feed. Read the guide, make the change in your tool, and use the next comparable run to see whether the finding is still reported. Only an action or ticket record can attribute who made the change.

  1. Fix 01 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  2. Fix 02 · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

  3. Fix 03

    Make the change. Make this change in whatever tool produces your feed, then re-export.

    Check the result. The next scorecard run checks this finding again. If a comparable check no longer reports it, the feed's clearance log records that result. This confirms feed state, not who made the change. Self-check a feed before you publish.

Rider view: what this feed publishes

A quick read of rider-facing information in this feed.

Schedule visibility
The feed's last published service date is in 176 days.
Published accessibility data
Accessibility information is stated for 0% of stops and 0% of trips. This measures published data, not whether stops or vehicles are physically usable.
Fare information
Fare information is published using GTFS Fares v1.
Realtime information
Realtime-feed availability and live-arrival coverage are not known from this scorecard.

Important: This does not rate service reliability. Riders should confirm current service alerts, fares, and accessibility accommodations with the transit operator before traveling.

Send your vendor a fix request

You may not control the GTFS export yourself. Copy this and send it to whoever runs your scheduling software export. It names each fix with the validator notice and a guide link.

Score by category

Correctness82.0 / 100

The MobilityData validator flagged 3 kinds of issue across 3047 instances (0 error, 3047 warning, 0 informational).

Freshness100.0 / 100

Service data covers the next 176 days.

Rider experience59.6 / 100

0% of stops state wheelchair accessibility (0% marked accessible, 0% marked not accessible). This measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. Fare data is published.

Accessibility0 / 100

0% of stops state accessibility (0% marked accessible). Reflects what the feed states, not verified physical usability.

1 accessibility depth signal

  • 1 route badge(s) pair a color and text color below the WCAG 4.5:1 contrast bar (iバスコネクト).

    Consider: Adjust route_color or route_text_color so each pair clears 4.5:1. Often switching the text between black and white is enough.

Opportunities to strengthen the data, not deductions from the sub-score above. States what the second accessibility lens can check from the feed, not verified physical usability.

FaresLegacy fares

Fares are applied to trips.

Realtime qualityNot yet measured

Not scored yet. Nothing here counts against the grade.

Routes and stops

Each route is drawn once, using the longest shape its trips follow; stops are the dots.

This feed has 69 stops.

Skip to route and stop data

The route and stop data is ready below. Load the map only when you want the geographic view. It uses additional data.

Basemap: OpenFreeMap, © OpenStreetMap contributors. Routes and stops: this agency's GTFS feed.

  • 地蔵久保線 (red)
  • 東柏原線 (white)
  • 飯綱温泉線 (green)
Routes in Nagaden Bus, Iizuna depot area (長電バス飯綱営業所管内)'s feed
RouteTypeLine color
iバスコネクトBuspink (no shape in feed)
地蔵久保線Busred
東柏原線Buswhite
飯綱温泉線Busgreen
List every stop
  • いいづなコネクトEAST
  • 飯綱営業所
  • 飯綱町役場
  • 牟礼本町
  • 牟礼ガード下
  • 牟礼桜町
  • 病院前
  • 飯綱病院
  • 仲俣医院
  • 三河屋
  • 牟礼駅
  • 牟礼上町
  • 牟礼小学校南
  • 丸山医院
  • 西黒川
  • 古町
  • 中宿
  • 中宿上
  • 北川入口
  • 野村上
  • 袖之山入口
  • 袖之山西
  • 袖之山
  • 夏川
  • 八蛇口
  • 霊仙寺湖入口
  • 天狗の館
  • 飯綱ゴルフ場
  • 高岡別荘
  • 東ペンション村
  • 西ペンション村
  • 上村
  • 上村南
  • 飯綱温泉
  • 八蛇川
  • 東黒川
  • 良松寺
  • 茶臼山
  • 公会堂
  • 小路
  • 北川
  • 横手
  • 横手公民館
  • 高坂下
  • 高坂
  • 高坂上
  • 坂口
  • 地蔵久保
  • 深沢
  • 北部高校入口
  • 倉井入口
  • 新道
  • 泉屋前
  • 山崎
  • 湯河原
  • 関取場
  • 一ツ屋
  • 馬場
  • 七面社前
  • 上赤塩
  • 上赤塩入口
  • 旧第二小入口
  • 毛見
  • 毛野
  • 柳沢入口
  • 東柏原
  • いいづなコネクトWEST
  • アップルミュージアム
  • サンクゼール

Over time

Overall score across the last 19 checks — unchanged since 2026-10-19.

2026-10-02: 79.52026-10-03: 79.52026-10-04: 79.52026-10-05: 79.52026-10-06: 79.52026-10-07: 79.52026-10-08: 79.52026-10-09: 79.52026-10-10: 79.52026-10-11: 79.52026-10-12: 79.52026-10-13: 79.52026-10-14: 79.52026-10-15: 79.52026-10-16: 79.52026-10-17: 79.52026-10-18: 79.52026-10-19: 79.52026-10-20: 79.5
Show the numbers
CheckScoreChange
2026-10-0279.5 first check
2026-10-0379.5 no change
2026-10-0479.5 no change
2026-10-0579.5 no change
2026-10-0679.5 no change
2026-10-0779.5 no change
2026-10-0879.5 no change
2026-10-0979.5 no change
2026-10-1079.5 no change
2026-10-1179.5 no change
2026-10-1279.5 no change
2026-10-1379.5 no change
2026-10-1479.5 no change
2026-10-1579.5 no change
2026-10-1679.5 no change
2026-10-1779.5 no change
2026-10-1879.5 no change
2026-10-1979.5 no change
2026-10-2079.5 no change

What changed since your last check

  • Correctness no change
  • Freshness no change
  • Rider experience no change

Feed history

Every check on record for this feed, grouped by the published file, newest first. A new file means the published zip changed. Grades from earlier rubric versions are shown with their rubric and are not comparable with today’s grade or the trend above.

CheckedPublished fileService dates throughGrade at the time
2026-10-02 to 2026-10-20 (19 checks)3d09f263025b2027-04-14Current rubric: see the trend above
2026-09-05 to 2026-10-01 (23 checks)3d09f263025b2027-04-14C, 79.5 under rubric 1.3, an earlier scoring contract; not comparable with today’s grade

Everything we checked

5 findings, ordered by severity.

Show every finding
  • Warning3025 instances

    Some internal IDs use characters outside the basic text set.

    These IDs are valid UTF-8 data. This warning is only about support in older apps. It does not mean that names in other languages are wrong.

    Fix: Only change the flagged IDs if an app needs basic ASCII values. Update each place that uses the ID. Keep all names and headsigns in their original language. (A planned ID change, not a quick text cleanup.)

    Finding code: non_ascii_or_non_printable_char · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules

  • Warning69 instances

    69 of 69 stops don't say whether a wheelchair user can board there.

    Riders who use wheelchairs can't plan a trip when accessibility is marked 'unknown'; apps show no information at all.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_boarding to 1 (accessible) or 2 (not accessible) for every stop. A field survey can start with the busiest stops. (A column in stops.txt; your scheduling software likely has it.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_boarding_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference

  • Warning20 instances

    20 of 20 trips don't say whether the vehicle is wheelchair accessible.

    Even with accessible stops, riders need to know the bus itself can take them.

    Fix: Set wheelchair_accessible on every trip. If every vehicle is accessible, this may be one default; otherwise use the value for each trip. (A default or per-trip field in your export.)

    Finding code: scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · Read the fix guide for scorecard_wheelchair_accessible_unknown · See GTFS Schedule reference

  • Warning18 instances

    Some rider-facing names are in ALL CAPS or all lowercase.

    ALL-CAPS stop and headsign names are harder to read in apps and are read awkwardly by screen readers.

    Fix: Use mixed case for stop names and headsigns (e.g. 'Main St & 2nd Ave', not 'MAIN ST & 2ND AVE'). (Often a bulk fix in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: mixed_case_recommended_field · Read the fix guide for mixed_case_recommended_field · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules

  • Warning4 instances

    Some stops exist in the feed but no trip ever stops at them.

    Riders may walk to a stop where no bus is scheduled to arrive.

    Fix: Remove retired stops from the export, or add them back to the trips that should serve them. (A review pass in your scheduling software.)

    Finding code: stop_without_stop_time · Read the fix guide for stop_without_stop_time · See MobilityData GTFS Validator rules

Conformance mark Not yet

One requirement remains for this feed to earn the conformance mark. States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

Valid Met
Passes validation with no errors.
Current Met
Service data covers the next 176 days.
Accessible Not yet
States wheelchair access on 0% of stops and 0% of trips; the mark needs 90% of each.

In plain words: earn this mark when your feed passes validation, has not expired, and says whether nearly every stop and trip is wheelchair accessible.

A pass credential for a feed that is valid, current, and states wheelchair access on nearly every stop and trip. Accessibility here measures what the feed publishes, not whether a stop is physically usable. How the conformance mark works.

Can riders use it?

Checks beyond structural validation: places where the feed is valid but a rider still could not travel.

  • 4 of 69 boardable stops are never served by any trip. Riders see these stops in apps and on the map but can never catch anything there, which erodes trust in the data. Remove stops no route serves, or add the trips that should call at them.

These do not change the grade. They catch trips with no rideable leg and stops no trip serves, the kind of gap a trip planner trips over.

Clears the Google and Apple Maps four-week coverage bar. This feed has 175 days of service ahead, clearing the four-week (28-day) window Maps asks for. No validator errors either, so riders keep seeing this agency in their trip planners; warnings lower the grade here but do not remove a feed from Maps.

How this agency maps to the standards

The scorecard is a data-quality lens, not a compliance determination. Its universal references describe good GTFS and useful rider information. Useful references here are GTFS Schedule Best Practices, GTFS-Realtime Best Practices, MobilityData grading scheme, Google Transit publication guidance. Read the full standards crosswalk.

Correctness 82 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices, checked by the MobilityData validator. MobilityData grading covers stop locations, route names, and colors. Google Transit requires a feed to pass validation for publication.
Freshness 100 / 100
GTFS Schedule best practices call for a dataset that stays current. An expired calendar can remove service from Google Transit and other rider trip planners.
Rider experience 60 / 100
GTFS Best Practices for rider-facing fields. MobilityData grading covers stop names and headsigns.
Realtime quality Not yet published
GTFS-Realtime best practices: a stable URL, high uptime, and frequent updates.

Part of the Japan portfolio: the same scorecards for every feed we track in that group, on one free page.

Similar feeds in Nagano

Other scorecards in Nagano, starting with the same kind of service at a similar size. Listed for comparison, not ranked.

Show your grade

Put this badge on your agency site or feed README. It updates after each completed scoring check, shows the date of that check, and links back to this scorecard. When there is no current score it says so instead of showing an old one.

Nagaden Bus, Iizuna depot area (長電バス飯綱営業所管内): GTFS feed quality grade C, 79.5 of 100, checked 2026-10-20. GTFS Scorecard.

Prefer a shields.io style? Point a dynamic endpoint badge at the published badge.json.

Cite this record

This page updates on every check. The record below does not: it is the dated file this grade came from, published at https://gtfsscorecard.org/data/artifacts/nagaden-bus-iizuna/2026-10-20.json and never overwritten, pinning the grade, category scores, rubric version, validator version, reader archive profile, and the scored feed's sha256 as they stood on 2026-10-20. Use it in a board packet, a regulatory filing, or a research citation instead of linking the live page, whose content will differ on your next visit.

Citing the tool itself rather than one agency's record? Use the repo's CITATION.cff.